TSTP Solution File: GEO221+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : GEO221+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 05:15:37 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.90s
% Output   : Solution 0.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13323/GEO221+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13323/GEO221+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13323/GEO221+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 13419
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.014 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(4, axiom,![X4]:![X5]:~(apart_point_and_line(X4,orthogonal_through_point(X5,X4))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ooc2)).
% fof(7, axiom,![X4]:![X5]:![X8]:![X9]:(distinct_lines(X5,X8)=>(((apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X8))|unorthogonal_lines(X5,X9))|unorthogonal_lines(X8,X9))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ouo1)).
% fof(9, axiom,![X4]:![X5]:~(unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(X5,X4),X5)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ooc1)).
% fof(23, conjecture,![X4]:![X10]:![X5]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X10,orthogonal_through_point(X5,X4)))=>~(distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(X5,X4),orthogonal_through_point(X5,X10)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', con)).
% fof(24, negated_conjecture,~(![X4]:![X10]:![X5]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X10,orthogonal_through_point(X5,X4)))=>~(distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(X5,X4),orthogonal_through_point(X5,X10))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[23])).
% fof(26, plain,![X4]:![X5]:~(apart_point_and_line(X4,orthogonal_through_point(X5,X4))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[4,theory(equality)])).
% fof(27, plain,![X4]:![X5]:~(unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(X5,X4),X5)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[9,theory(equality)])).
% fof(36, negated_conjecture,~(![X4]:![X10]:![X5]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X10,orthogonal_through_point(X5,X4)))=>~(distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(X5,X4),orthogonal_through_point(X5,X10))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[24,theory(equality)])).
% fof(45, plain,![X6]:![X7]:~(apart_point_and_line(X6,orthogonal_through_point(X7,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[26])).
% cnf(46,plain,(~apart_point_and_line(X1,orthogonal_through_point(X2,X1))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[45])).
% fof(53, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X8]:![X9]:(~(distinct_lines(X5,X8))|(((apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X8))|unorthogonal_lines(X5,X9))|unorthogonal_lines(X8,X9))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[7])).
% fof(54, plain,![X10]:![X11]:![X12]:![X13]:(~(distinct_lines(X11,X12))|(((apart_point_and_line(X10,X11)|apart_point_and_line(X10,X12))|unorthogonal_lines(X11,X13))|unorthogonal_lines(X12,X13))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[53])).
% cnf(55,plain,(unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2)|unorthogonal_lines(X3,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X1)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)|~distinct_lines(X3,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[54])).
% fof(59, plain,![X6]:![X7]:~(unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(X7,X6),X7)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[27])).
% cnf(60,plain,(~unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[59])).
% fof(99, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X10]:?[X5]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X10,orthogonal_through_point(X5,X4)))&distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(X5,X4),orthogonal_through_point(X5,X10))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[36])).
% fof(100, negated_conjecture,?[X11]:?[X12]:?[X13]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X12,orthogonal_through_point(X13,X11)))&distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(X13,X11),orthogonal_through_point(X13,X12))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[99])).
% fof(101, negated_conjecture,(~(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0)))&distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0),orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[100])).
% cnf(102,negated_conjecture,(distinct_lines(orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0),orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[101])).
% cnf(103,negated_conjecture,(~apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[101])).
% cnf(111,negated_conjecture,(unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0),X1)|unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0),X1)|apart_point_and_line(X2,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(X2,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[55,102,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(229,negated_conjecture,(unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0),esk3_0)|apart_point_and_line(X1,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(X1,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[60,111,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(230,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(X1,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(X1,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk2_0))),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[229,60,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(240,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,orthogonal_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[46,230,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(241,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[240,103,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(242,negated_conjecture,($false),241,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 56
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 10
% # ...remaining for further processing: 46
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 2
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 121
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 103
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 1
% # Paramodulations                    : 115
% # Factorizations                     : 6
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 44
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 5
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 8
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 31
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 61
% # ...number of literals in the above : 243
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 88
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 71
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 1
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index:    35 leaves,   2.17+/-2.131 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           13 leaves,   1.69+/-0.821 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           32 leaves,   1.81+/-1.333 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.016 s
% # System time            : 0.004 s
% # Total time             : 0.020 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.10 CPU 0.18 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.10 CPU 0.18 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13323/GEO221+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------