TSTP Solution File: GEO220+2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : GEO220+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 11:14:50 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.38s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   60 (  32   ~;   7   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (  25   !;   9   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f95,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f94,f49]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(sK1,sK2)
    & ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK0,sK2)
    & ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f24,f47]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
        & ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X2)
        & ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X1) )
   => ( convergent_lines(sK1,sK2)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK0,sK2)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK0,sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X2)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X2)
      & ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X2)
          & ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X1) )
       => ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X5,X6,X7] :
        ( ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X5,X7)
          & ~ unorthogonal_lines(X5,X6) )
       => ~ convergent_lines(X6,X7) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f16,conjecture,
    ! [X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X5,X7)
        & ~ unorthogonal_lines(X5,X6) )
     => ~ convergent_lines(X6,X7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    unorthogonal_lines(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolution,[],[f90,f50]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK0,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f90,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( unorthogonal_lines(X0,sK2)
      | unorthogonal_lines(X0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f66,f51]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    convergent_lines(sK1,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2)
      | unorthogonal_lines(X0,X2)
      | unorthogonal_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2)
      | unorthogonal_lines(X0,X2)
      | unorthogonal_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2)
      | unorthogonal_lines(X0,X2)
      | unorthogonal_lines(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X2)
        & ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X1) )
     => ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X5,X7)
        & ~ unorthogonal_lines(X5,X6) )
     => ~ convergent_lines(X6,X7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',couo1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO220+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Apr 30 05:41:18 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  % (10083)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.37  % (10087)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [1,1]
% 0.14/0.37  % (10084)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [2,1]
% 0.14/0.37  % (10085)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10086)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10088)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10089)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [3,1]
% 0.14/0.37  % (10090)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.37  Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.14/0.37  % (10087)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10087)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10087)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10087)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  % (10087)Memory used [KB]: 836
% 0.14/0.37  % (10087)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.37  % (10087)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.14/0.37  % (10087)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  % (10087)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [1,1]
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [3]
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [1]
% 0.14/0.37  % (10089)First to succeed.
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [2]
% 0.14/0.37  TRYING [2,1]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [3,1]
% 0.14/0.38  TRYING [3]
% 0.14/0.38  % (10084)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.38  Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.14/0.38  % (10085)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10085)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (10085)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.14/0.38  % (10085)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % (10085)Memory used [KB]: 835
% 0.14/0.38  % (10085)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.38  % (10085)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.14/0.38  % (10085)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (10085)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (10086)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.14/0.38  % (10089)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.14/0.38  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.38  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.38  % (10089)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (10089)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.14/0.38  % (10089)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.14/0.38  
% 0.14/0.38  % (10089)Memory used [KB]: 787
% 0.14/0.38  % (10089)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.38  % (10089)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.14/0.38  % (10089)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (10089)------------------------------
% 0.14/0.38  % (10083)Success in time 0.019 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------