TSTP Solution File: GEO219+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO219+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.85s 2.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 9 unt; 8 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 32 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_19,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| unorthogonal_lines(X1,X3)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ unorthogonal_lines(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cq99h1tj/input.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
unorthogonal_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cq99h1tj/input.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(i_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ unorthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cq99h1tj/input.p',i_0_17) ).
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cq99h1tj/input.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cq99h1tj/input.p',i_0_16) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-cq99h1tj/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| unorthogonal_lines(X1,X3)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ unorthogonal_lines(X3,X2) ),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
unorthogonal_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ unorthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
i_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(X1,esk3_0)
| unorthogonal_lines(X1,esk2_0)
| ~ convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
i_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( convergent_lines(esk1_0,X1)
| convergent_lines(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_31]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO219+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 04:06:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.85/2.33 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 6.85/2.33 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 6.85/2.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 6.85/2.33
% 6.85/2.33 # Proof found!
% 6.85/2.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.85/2.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.85/2.33 # Proof object total steps : 17
% 6.85/2.33 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 6.85/2.33 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 6.85/2.33 # Proof object conjectures : 10
% 6.85/2.33 # Proof object clause conjectures : 7
% 6.85/2.33 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 6.85/2.33 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 6.85/2.33 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 6.85/2.33 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 6.85/2.33 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 6.85/2.33 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.85/2.33 # Parsed axioms : 23
% 6.85/2.33 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Initial clauses : 23
% 6.85/2.33 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Initial clauses in saturation : 23
% 6.85/2.33 # Processed clauses : 33
% 6.85/2.33 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # ...subsumed : 3
% 6.85/2.33 # ...remaining for further processing : 30
% 6.85/2.33 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Generated clauses : 32
% 6.85/2.33 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 27
% 6.85/2.33 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 6.85/2.33 # Paramodulations : 32
% 6.85/2.33 # Factorizations : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Current number of processed clauses : 30
% 6.85/2.33 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 6.85/2.33 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 6.85/2.33 # Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 6.85/2.33 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 6.85/2.33 # ...number of literals in the above : 55
% 6.85/2.33 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 30
% 6.85/2.33 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 6.85/2.33 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 6.85/2.33 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 6.85/2.33 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Condensation successes : 0
% 6.85/2.33 # Termbank termtop insertions : 841
% 6.85/2.33
% 6.85/2.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.85/2.33 # User time : 0.013 s
% 6.85/2.33 # System time : 0.004 s
% 6.85/2.33 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 6.85/2.33 # ...preprocessing : 0.016 s
% 6.85/2.33 # ...main loop : 0.002 s
% 6.85/2.33 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 6.85/2.33
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------