TSTP Solution File: GEO219+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : GEO219+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:22:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 8.69s 1.88s
% Output : Proof 12.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : GEO219+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 22:58:18 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.61 ________ _____
% 0.19/0.61 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.61 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.19/0.61 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.19/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.61 (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.61 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.61
% 0.19/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.63 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.62/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.62/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.62/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.62/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.62/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.62/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.62/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.68/1.04 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.68/1.04 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.84/1.08 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.84/1.08 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.84/1.08 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.84/1.08 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.84/1.08 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.50/1.30 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.50/1.30 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 4.50/1.31 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.89/1.33 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.89/1.33 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.35/1.54 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.55/1.56 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 6.55/1.56 Prover 3: gave up
% 6.55/1.57 Prover 6: gave up
% 6.55/1.58 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 6.55/1.59 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 6.55/1.61 Prover 1: gave up
% 6.55/1.61 Prover 9: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1423531889
% 6.55/1.62 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 6.55/1.62 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 7.10/1.65 Prover 9: Preprocessing ...
% 7.10/1.67 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.44/1.69 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.44/1.69 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.44/1.70 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.44/1.73 Prover 7: gave up
% 7.44/1.73 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 7.99/1.75 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 8.20/1.81 Prover 9: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.20/1.82 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.20/1.82 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.20/1.85 Prover 10: gave up
% 8.20/1.85 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 8.69/1.87 Prover 0: proved (1239ms)
% 8.69/1.88
% 8.69/1.88 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.69/1.88
% 8.69/1.88 Prover 9: stopped
% 8.69/1.88 Prover 5: stopped
% 8.69/1.89 Prover 2: stopped
% 8.69/1.89 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 8.69/1.89 Prover 16: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 8.69/1.89 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 8.69/1.89 Prover 19: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 8.69/1.90 Prover 8: gave up
% 8.69/1.90 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 9.15/1.91 Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 9.15/1.93 Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 9.15/1.94 Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.15/1.96 Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.15/1.97 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.71/1.98 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.71/1.99 Prover 16: gave up
% 9.71/2.00 Prover 13: gave up
% 9.71/2.01 Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.71/2.02 Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.71/2.06 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.74/2.13 Prover 19: gave up
% 11.68/2.34 Prover 11: Found proof (size 69)
% 11.68/2.34 Prover 11: proved (494ms)
% 11.68/2.34 Prover 4: stopped
% 11.68/2.35
% 11.68/2.35 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.68/2.35
% 11.68/2.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 11.68/2.36 Assumptions after simplification:
% 11.68/2.36 ---------------------------------
% 11.68/2.36
% 11.68/2.36 (ax6)
% 12.20/2.38 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: int] : ! [v4: int] : (v4 =
% 12.20/2.38 0 | v3 = 0 | ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) | ~ (convergent_lines(v0,
% 12.20/2.38 v2) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v5: int] : ( ~ (v5 =
% 12.20/2.38 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : !
% 12.20/2.38 [v2: $i] : ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | ~
% 12.20/2.38 (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 12.20/2.39 convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : !
% 12.20/2.39 [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) | ~
% 12.20/2.39 (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 12.20/2.39 convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 12.20/2.39
% 12.20/2.39 (coipo1)
% 12.20/2.39 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | ~
% 12.20/2.39 (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 12.20/2.39 convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: int] :
% 12.20/2.39 (v2 = 0 | ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 12.20/2.39 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 12.20/2.39
% 12.20/2.39 (con)
% 12.29/2.39 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: int] : ? [v4: int] : ( ~
% 12.29/2.39 (v4 = 0) & ~ (v3 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 &
% 12.29/2.39 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4 & $i(v2) &
% 12.29/2.39 $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 12.29/2.39
% 12.29/2.39 (cotno1)
% 12.29/2.41 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: any] : ! [v4: any] : ( ~
% 12.29/2.41 (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) | ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |
% 12.29/2.41 ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7:
% 12.29/2.41 int] : ? [v8: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) |
% 12.29/2.41 (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.41 unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v8) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1,
% 12.29/2.41 v2) = v7))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: any] :
% 12.29/2.41 ! [v4: any] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) | ~
% 12.29/2.41 (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ?
% 12.29/2.41 [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ? [v8: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v4 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.41 convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.41 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1,
% 12.29/2.41 v2) = v8) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v7))) & ! [v0:
% 12.29/2.41 $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: any] : ! [v4: any] : ( ~
% 12.29/2.41 (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) | ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) | ~
% 12.29/2.41 $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int]
% 12.29/2.41 : ? [v8: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 =
% 12.29/2.41 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.41 unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v8) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1,
% 12.29/2.41 v2) = v7))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: any] :
% 12.29/2.41 ! [v4: any] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) | ~ (convergent_lines(v0,
% 12.29/2.41 v1) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v5: int] : ? [v6:
% 12.29/2.41 int] : ? [v7: int] : ? [v8: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v4 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.41 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.41 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1,
% 12.29/2.41 v2) = v8) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v7))) & ! [v0:
% 12.29/2.41 $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: any] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1,
% 12.29/2.41 v2) = 0) | ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1)
% 12.29/2.41 | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v4: int] : ? [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] :
% 12.29/2.41 ((v6 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.41 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v7
% 12.29/2.41 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v7))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] :
% 12.29/2.41 ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: any] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ~
% 12.29/2.41 (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ?
% 12.29/2.41 [v4: int] : ? [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v5 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.41 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0
% 12.29/2.41 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.41 convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v7))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2:
% 12.29/2.41 $i] : ! [v3: any] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ~
% 12.29/2.41 (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ?
% 12.29/2.41 [v4: int] : ? [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v3 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.41 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.41 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v7
% 12.29/2.41 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v7))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] :
% 12.29/2.41 ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: any] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ~
% 12.29/2.41 (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ?
% 12.29/2.41 [v4: int] : ? [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v5 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.41 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0
% 12.29/2.41 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.41 convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v7))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2:
% 12.29/2.41 $i] : ! [v3: any] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) | ~
% 12.29/2.41 (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v4:
% 12.29/2.41 int] : ? [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v3 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.41 convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.41 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v7
% 12.29/2.42 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v7))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i]
% 12.29/2.42 : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: any] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) | ~
% 12.29/2.42 (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v4:
% 12.29/2.42 int] : ? [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v5 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.42 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0
% 12.29/2.42 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.42 unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v7))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2:
% 12.29/2.42 $i] : ! [v3: any] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ~
% 12.29/2.42 (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ?
% 12.29/2.42 [v4: int] : ? [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v3 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.42 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.42 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v7
% 12.29/2.42 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v7))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i]
% 12.29/2.42 : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: any] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ~
% 12.29/2.42 (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ?
% 12.29/2.42 [v4: int] : ? [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v5 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.42 unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0
% 12.29/2.42 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.42 unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v7)))
% 12.29/2.42
% 12.29/2.42 (function-axioms)
% 12.29/2.42 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : !
% 12.29/2.42 [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 12.29/2.42 (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i]
% 12.29/2.42 : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 12.29/2.42 (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i]
% 12.29/2.42 : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 12.29/2.42 (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 12.29/2.42 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 12.29/2.42 (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) =
% 12.29/2.42 v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2:
% 12.29/2.42 $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 12.29/2.42 (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 12.29/2.42 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 12.29/2.42 (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0:
% 12.29/2.42 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i]
% 12.29/2.42 : (v1 = v0 | ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) =
% 12.29/2.42 v0))
% 12.29/2.42
% 12.29/2.42 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 12.29/2.42 --------------------------------------------
% 12.29/2.42 apart1, apart2, apart3, apart4, apart5, ceq1, ceq2, ceq3, ci1, ci2, ci3, ci4,
% 12.29/2.42 couo1, cu1
% 12.29/2.42
% 12.29/2.42 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 12.29/2.42 ---------------------------------
% 12.29/2.42
% 12.29/2.42 Begin of proof
% 12.29/2.42 |
% 12.29/2.42 | ALPHA: (ax6) implies:
% 12.29/2.43 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~
% 12.29/2.43 | (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) | ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |
% 12.29/2.43 | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 12.29/2.43 |
% 12.29/2.43 | ALPHA: (coipo1) implies:
% 12.29/2.43 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 | ~
% 12.29/2.43 | (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 12.29/2.43 | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 12.29/2.43 |
% 12.29/2.43 | ALPHA: (cotno1) implies:
% 12.29/2.43 | (3) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: any] : ( ~
% 12.29/2.43 | (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3)
% 12.29/2.43 | | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v4: int] : ? [v5: int] :
% 12.29/2.43 | ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v3 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.43 | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.43 | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |
% 12.29/2.43 | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v7)))
% 12.29/2.43 | (4) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: any] : ( ~
% 12.29/2.43 | (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) =
% 12.29/2.43 | v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v4: int] : ? [v5:
% 12.29/2.43 | int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v5 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.43 | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) |
% 12.29/2.43 | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.43 | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v7)))
% 12.29/2.44 | (5) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: any] : ! [v4: any] :
% 12.29/2.44 | ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) | ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) =
% 12.29/2.44 | v4) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v5: int] : ? [v6:
% 12.29/2.44 | int] : ? [v7: int] : ? [v8: int] : ((v6 = 0 & v4 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.44 | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.44 | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v8 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.44 | unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v8) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.44 | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v7)))
% 12.29/2.44 |
% 12.29/2.44 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 12.29/2.44 | (6) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 12.29/2.44 | ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 12.29/2.44 | (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 12.29/2.44 | (7) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 12.29/2.44 | ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 12.29/2.44 | (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 12.29/2.44 |
% 12.29/2.44 | DELTA: instantiating (con) with fresh symbols all_20_0, all_20_1, all_20_2,
% 12.29/2.44 | all_20_3, all_20_4 gives:
% 12.29/2.44 | (8) ~ (all_20_0 = 0) & ~ (all_20_1 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_3,
% 12.29/2.44 | all_20_2) = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = all_20_1 &
% 12.29/2.44 | convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_2) = all_20_0 & $i(all_20_2) &
% 12.29/2.44 | $i(all_20_3) & $i(all_20_4)
% 12.29/2.44 |
% 12.29/2.44 | ALPHA: (8) implies:
% 12.29/2.44 | (9) ~ (all_20_1 = 0)
% 12.29/2.44 | (10) ~ (all_20_0 = 0)
% 12.29/2.44 | (11) $i(all_20_4)
% 12.29/2.44 | (12) $i(all_20_3)
% 12.29/2.44 | (13) $i(all_20_2)
% 12.29/2.44 | (14) convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_2) = all_20_0
% 12.29/2.44 | (15) unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = all_20_1
% 12.29/2.44 | (16) unorthogonal_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = 0
% 12.29/2.44 |
% 12.29/2.44 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_20_4, all_20_3, all_20_2, all_20_1,
% 12.29/2.44 | all_20_0, simplifying with (11), (12), (13), (14), (15) gives:
% 12.29/2.44 | (17) ? [v0: int] : ? [v1: int] : ? [v2: int] : ? [v3: int] : ((v1 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.44 | all_20_0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4, all_20_2) = 0) | (v0 =
% 12.29/2.44 | 0 & all_20_1 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = 0) | ( ~
% 12.29/2.44 | (v3 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = v3) | ( ~ (v2
% 12.29/2.44 | = 0) & convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = v2))
% 12.29/2.44 |
% 12.29/2.44 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_20_4, all_20_3, all_20_1, simplifying
% 12.29/2.44 | with (11), (12), (15) gives:
% 12.29/2.44 | (18) all_20_1 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = 0
% 12.29/2.44 |
% 12.29/2.44 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_20_4, all_20_3, all_20_2, all_20_1,
% 12.29/2.44 | simplifying with (11), (12), (13), (15), (16) gives:
% 12.29/2.45 | (19) ? [v0: int] : ? [v1: int] : ? [v2: int] : ? [v3: int] : ((v2 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.45 | v1 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4, all_20_2) = 0 &
% 12.29/2.45 | convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_20_1 = 0
% 12.29/2.45 | & convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.45 | convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = v3))
% 12.29/2.45 |
% 12.29/2.45 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_20_4, all_20_3, all_20_2, all_20_0,
% 12.29/2.45 | simplifying with (11), (12), (13), (14), (16) gives:
% 12.29/2.45 | (20) ? [v0: int] : ? [v1: int] : ? [v2: int] : ? [v3: int] : ((v2 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.45 | all_20_0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4, all_20_2) = 0) | (v1 =
% 12.29/2.45 | 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = 0 &
% 12.29/2.45 | convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.45 | convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = v3))
% 12.29/2.45 |
% 12.29/2.45 | DELTA: instantiating (20) with fresh symbols all_29_0, all_29_1, all_29_2,
% 12.29/2.45 | all_29_3 gives:
% 12.29/2.45 | (21) (all_29_1 = 0 & all_20_0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4, all_20_2)
% 12.29/2.45 | = 0) | (all_29_2 = 0 & all_29_3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4,
% 12.29/2.45 | all_20_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = 0) | ( ~
% 12.29/2.45 | (all_29_0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = all_29_0)
% 12.29/2.45 |
% 12.29/2.45 | DELTA: instantiating (19) with fresh symbols all_30_0, all_30_1, all_30_2,
% 12.29/2.45 | all_30_3 gives:
% 12.29/2.45 | (22) (all_30_1 = 0 & all_30_2 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4, all_20_2)
% 12.29/2.45 | = 0 & convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_2) = 0) | (all_30_3 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.45 | all_20_1 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = 0) | ( ~
% 12.29/2.45 | (all_30_0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = all_30_0)
% 12.29/2.45 |
% 12.29/2.45 | DELTA: instantiating (17) with fresh symbols all_31_0, all_31_1, all_31_2,
% 12.29/2.45 | all_31_3 gives:
% 12.29/2.45 | (23) (all_31_2 = 0 & all_20_0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4, all_20_2)
% 12.29/2.45 | = 0) | (all_31_3 = 0 & all_20_1 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_20_4,
% 12.29/2.45 | all_20_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_31_0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_3,
% 12.29/2.45 | all_20_2) = all_31_0) | ( ~ (all_31_1 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.45 | convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = all_31_1)
% 12.29/2.45 |
% 12.29/2.45 | BETA: splitting (18) gives:
% 12.29/2.45 |
% 12.29/2.45 | Case 1:
% 12.29/2.45 | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | (24) convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = 0
% 12.29/2.45 | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | BETA: splitting (21) gives:
% 12.29/2.45 | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | Case 1:
% 12.29/2.45 | | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | | (25) all_29_1 = 0 & all_20_0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4,
% 12.29/2.45 | | | all_20_2) = 0
% 12.29/2.45 | | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | | ALPHA: (25) implies:
% 12.29/2.45 | | | (26) all_20_0 = 0
% 12.29/2.45 | | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | | REDUCE: (10), (26) imply:
% 12.29/2.45 | | | (27) $false
% 12.29/2.45 | | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | | CLOSE: (27) is inconsistent.
% 12.29/2.45 | | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | Case 2:
% 12.29/2.45 | | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | | (28) (all_29_2 = 0 & all_29_3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4,
% 12.29/2.45 | | | all_20_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = 0) | (
% 12.29/2.45 | | | ~ (all_29_0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) =
% 12.29/2.45 | | | all_29_0)
% 12.29/2.45 | | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | | BETA: splitting (28) gives:
% 12.29/2.45 | | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | | Case 1:
% 12.29/2.45 | | | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | | | (29) all_29_2 = 0 & all_29_3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4,
% 12.29/2.45 | | | | all_20_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = 0
% 12.29/2.45 | | | |
% 12.29/2.45 | | | | ALPHA: (29) implies:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | (30) unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = 0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_20_1, 0, all_20_3, all_20_4,
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | simplifying with (15), (30) gives:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | (31) all_20_1 = 0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | REDUCE: (9), (31) imply:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | (32) $false
% 12.29/2.46 | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | CLOSE: (32) is inconsistent.
% 12.29/2.46 | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | Case 2:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | (33) ~ (all_29_0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) =
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | all_29_0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | ALPHA: (33) implies:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | (34) ~ (all_29_0 = 0)
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | (35) convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = all_29_0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | BETA: splitting (23) gives:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | Case 1:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | (36) (all_31_2 = 0 & all_20_0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4,
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | all_20_2) = 0) | (all_31_3 = 0 & all_20_1 = 0 &
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_3) = 0)
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | BETA: splitting (36) gives:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | Case 1:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (37) all_31_2 = 0 & all_20_0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4,
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | all_20_2) = 0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | ALPHA: (37) implies:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (38) all_20_0 = 0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | REDUCE: (10), (38) imply:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (39) $false
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | CLOSE: (39) is inconsistent.
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | Case 2:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (40) all_31_3 = 0 & all_20_1 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_20_4,
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | all_20_3) = 0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | ALPHA: (40) implies:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (41) all_20_1 = 0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | REDUCE: (9), (41) imply:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (42) $false
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | CLOSE: (42) is inconsistent.
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | End of split
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | Case 2:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | (43) ( ~ (all_31_0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) =
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | all_31_0) | ( ~ (all_31_1 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_20_3,
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | all_20_2) = all_31_1)
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | BETA: splitting (43) gives:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | Case 1:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (44) ~ (all_31_0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) =
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | all_31_0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | ALPHA: (44) implies:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (45) ~ (all_31_0 = 0)
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (46) unorthogonal_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = all_31_0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with 0, all_31_0, all_20_2, all_20_3,
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | simplifying with (16), (46) gives:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (47) all_31_0 = 0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | REDUCE: (45), (47) imply:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (48) $false
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | CLOSE: (48) is inconsistent.
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | Case 2:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (49) ~ (all_31_1 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) =
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | all_31_1
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | ALPHA: (49) implies:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | (50) convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = all_31_1
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | BETA: splitting (22) gives:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | Case 1:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | | (51) all_30_1 = 0 & all_30_2 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_20_4,
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | | all_20_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_2) = 0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | | ALPHA: (51) implies:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | | (52) convergent_lines(all_20_4, all_20_2) = 0
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_20_0, 0, all_20_2,
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | | all_20_4, simplifying with (14), (52) gives:
% 12.29/2.46 | | | | | | | (53) all_20_0 = 0
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | REDUCE: (10), (53) imply:
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | (54) $false
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | CLOSE: (54) is inconsistent.
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | Case 2:
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | (55) (all_30_3 = 0 & all_20_1 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_20_4,
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | all_20_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_30_0 = 0) &
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = all_30_0)
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (55) gives:
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | | (56) all_30_3 = 0 & all_20_1 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_20_4,
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | | all_20_3) = 0
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (56) implies:
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | | (57) all_20_1 = 0
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (9), (57) imply:
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | | (58) $false
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (58) is inconsistent.
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | | (59) ~ (all_30_0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2)
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | | = all_30_0
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | |
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (59) implies:
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | | (60) convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = all_30_0
% 12.29/2.47 | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_20_4, all_20_3,
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | all_20_2, all_20_0, simplifying with (11), (12),
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | (13), (14), (24) gives:
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | (61) all_20_0 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = 0
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (61) gives:
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | (62) convergent_lines(all_20_3, all_20_2) = 0
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_29_0, all_30_0,
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | all_20_2, all_20_3, simplifying with (35), (60)
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | gives:
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | (63) all_30_0 = all_29_0
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_30_0, all_31_1,
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | all_20_2, all_20_3, simplifying with (50), (60)
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | gives:
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | (64) all_31_1 = all_30_0
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with 0, all_31_1, all_20_2,
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | all_20_3, simplifying with (50), (62) gives:
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | (65) all_31_1 = 0
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (64), (65) imply:
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | (66) all_30_0 = 0
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (66) implies:
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | (67) all_30_0 = 0
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (63), (67) imply:
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | (68) all_29_0 = 0
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (34), (68) imply:
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | (69) $false
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (69) is inconsistent.
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | (70) all_20_0 = 0
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (10), (70) imply:
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | (71) $false
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (71) is inconsistent.
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | | End of split
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | | End of split
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | | End of split
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | | End of split
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | | End of split
% 12.50/2.47 | | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | | End of split
% 12.50/2.47 | | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | End of split
% 12.50/2.47 | |
% 12.50/2.47 | Case 2:
% 12.50/2.47 | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | (72) all_20_1 = 0
% 12.50/2.47 | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | REDUCE: (9), (72) imply:
% 12.50/2.47 | | (73) $false
% 12.50/2.47 | |
% 12.50/2.47 | | CLOSE: (73) is inconsistent.
% 12.50/2.47 | |
% 12.50/2.47 | End of split
% 12.50/2.47 |
% 12.50/2.47 End of proof
% 12.50/2.47 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 12.50/2.47
% 12.50/2.47 1863ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------