TSTP Solution File: GEO219+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO219+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:44 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.77s 1.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  10 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  23   ~;  19   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   14 (   7   >;   7   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (;  26   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ unorthogonal_lines > distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(unorthogonal_lines,type,
    unorthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_203,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [L,M,N] :
        ( ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,M)
          & ~ convergent_lines(L,N) )
       => ~ unorthogonal_lines(M,N) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_162,axiom,
    ! [L,M] :
      ~ ( ~ convergent_lines(L,M)
        & ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,M) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+4.ax',coipo1) ).

tff(f_77,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
     => ( convergent_lines(X,Z)
        | convergent_lines(Y,Z) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ax6) ).

tff(f_181,axiom,
    ! [L,M,N] :
      ( ( ( ~ convergent_lines(L,M)
          | ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,M) )
        & ( ~ convergent_lines(L,N)
          | ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,N) ) )
     => ( ~ convergent_lines(M,N)
        | ~ unorthogonal_lines(M,N) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+4.ax',cotno1) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_203]) ).

tff(c_50,plain,
    ! [L_45,M_46] :
      ( unorthogonal_lines(L_45,M_46)
      | convergent_lines(L_45,M_46) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_162]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_203]) ).

tff(c_54,plain,
    convergent_lines('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_46]) ).

tff(c_59,plain,
    ! [Y_55,Z_56,X_57] :
      ( convergent_lines(Y_55,Z_56)
      | convergent_lines(X_57,Z_56)
      | ~ convergent_lines(X_57,Y_55) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_77]) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    ! [Z_56] :
      ( convergent_lines('#skF_2',Z_56)
      | convergent_lines('#skF_1',Z_56) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_59]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    unorthogonal_lines('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_203]) ).

tff(c_194,plain,
    ! [L_82,M_83,N_84] :
      ( convergent_lines(L_82,M_83)
      | convergent_lines(L_82,N_84)
      | ~ unorthogonal_lines(M_83,N_84)
      | ~ convergent_lines(M_83,N_84) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_181]) ).

tff(c_206,plain,
    ! [L_82] :
      ( convergent_lines(L_82,'#skF_2')
      | convergent_lines(L_82,'#skF_3')
      | ~ convergent_lines('#skF_2','#skF_3') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_194]) ).

tff(c_207,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_206]) ).

tff(c_214,plain,
    convergent_lines('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_207]) ).

tff(c_219,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_214]) ).

tff(c_221,plain,
    convergent_lines('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_206]) ).

tff(c_404,plain,
    ! [L_98,M_99,N_100] :
      ( unorthogonal_lines(L_98,M_99)
      | convergent_lines(L_98,N_100)
      | ~ unorthogonal_lines(M_99,N_100)
      | ~ convergent_lines(M_99,N_100) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_181]) ).

tff(c_418,plain,
    ! [L_98] :
      ( unorthogonal_lines(L_98,'#skF_2')
      | convergent_lines(L_98,'#skF_3')
      | ~ convergent_lines('#skF_2','#skF_3') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_404]) ).

tff(c_431,plain,
    ! [L_101] :
      ( unorthogonal_lines(L_101,'#skF_2')
      | convergent_lines(L_101,'#skF_3') ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_221,c_418]) ).

tff(c_440,plain,
    convergent_lines('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_431,c_46]) ).

tff(c_447,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_440]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GEO219+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:37:38 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.77/1.90  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.77/1.91  
% 3.77/1.91  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.97/1.93  
% 3.97/1.93  Inference rules
% 3.97/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.97/1.93  #Ref     : 0
% 3.97/1.93  #Sup     : 90
% 3.97/1.93  #Fact    : 4
% 3.97/1.93  #Define  : 0
% 3.97/1.93  #Split   : 2
% 3.97/1.93  #Chain   : 0
% 3.97/1.93  #Close   : 0
% 3.97/1.93  
% 3.97/1.93  Ordering : KBO
% 3.97/1.93  
% 3.97/1.93  Simplification rules
% 3.97/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.97/1.93  #Subsume      : 12
% 3.97/1.93  #Demod        : 12
% 3.97/1.93  #Tautology    : 13
% 3.97/1.93  #SimpNegUnit  : 2
% 3.97/1.93  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.97/1.93  
% 3.97/1.93  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.97/1.93  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.97/1.93  
% 3.97/1.93  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.97/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.97/1.94  Preprocessing        : 0.49
% 3.97/1.94  Parsing              : 0.27
% 3.97/1.94  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.97/1.94  Main loop            : 0.41
% 3.97/1.94  Inferencing          : 0.17
% 3.97/1.94  Reduction            : 0.10
% 3.97/1.94  Demodulation         : 0.06
% 3.97/1.94  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.97/1.94  Subsumption          : 0.11
% 3.97/1.94  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.97/1.94  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.97/1.94  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.97/1.94  Total                : 0.95
% 3.97/1.94  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.97/1.94  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.97/1.94  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.97/1.94  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------