TSTP Solution File: GEO218+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO218+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.68s 0.86s
% Output   : Refutation 0.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO218+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:28:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36  Sat Jun 18 18:28:18 2022
% 0.20/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 25578.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.20/0.36  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.20/0.36  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36  19 back subsumes 18.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 20
% 0.20/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 22
% 0.20/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 0.20/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.20/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.20/0.40     distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.20/0.40     distinct function count: 2
% 0.20/0.40     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.68/0.86  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.68/0.86  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Model 3 [ 1 0 159 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Model 4 [ 1 0 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Model 5 [ 2 0 147 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Model 6 [ 2 1 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.48 sec ----> 77 [binary,76.1,20.1] {-} $F.
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 6.
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.68/0.86  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.68/0.86  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  3 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,A).
% 0.68/0.86  6 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 0.68/0.86  16 [] {+} convergent_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,C)| -convergent_lines(B,C)| -unorthogonal_lines(B,C).
% 0.68/0.86  20 [] {+} -convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 0.68/0.86  21 [] {+} -unorthogonal_lines($c3,$c1).
% 0.68/0.86  22 [] {+} convergent_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,B).
% 0.68/0.86  23 [] {+} unorthogonal_lines($c2,$c1).
% 0.68/0.86  24 [hyper,22,21] {+} convergent_lines($c3,$c1).
% 0.68/0.86  27 [hyper,24,6] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c1,A).
% 0.68/0.86  30 [hyper,27,20] {+} convergent_lines($c1,$c2).
% 0.68/0.86  43 [hyper,30,6] {+} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines($c2,A).
% 0.68/0.86  65 [hyper,43,16,23,unit_del,3] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c2)|unorthogonal_lines(A,$c1).
% 0.68/0.86  76 [hyper,65,21] {-} convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 0.68/0.86  77 [binary,76.1,20.1] {-} $F.
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.68/0.86  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  ============ end of search ============
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  true clauses given          11      (61.1%)
% 0.68/0.86  false clauses given          7
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.68/0.86     6  0         4
% 0.68/0.86     9  0         16
% 0.68/0.86    12  0         5
% 0.68/0.86  tot:  0         25      (100.0% true)
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Model 6 [ 2 -7 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.68/0.86  
% 0.68/0.86  Process 25578 finished Sat Jun 18 18:28:19 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------