TSTP Solution File: GEO217+2 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : GEO217+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:54:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.92s 2.12s
% Output   : Refutation 1.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   7 unt;   4 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   17 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    ~ convergent_lines(A,A),
    file('GEO217+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ convergent_lines(A,B)
    | convergent_lines(A,C)
    | convergent_lines(B,C) ),
    file('GEO217+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ~ convergent_lines(dollar_c3,dollar_c2),
    file('GEO217+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    ~ convergent_lines(dollar_c3,dollar_c1),
    file('GEO217+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    convergent_lines(dollar_c2,dollar_c1),
    file('GEO217+2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(26,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(dollar_c2,A)
    | convergent_lines(dollar_c1,A) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[23,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,23,6')] ).

cnf(34,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(dollar_c1,A)
    | convergent_lines(dollar_c2,B)
    | convergent_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[26,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,26,6')] ).

cnf(62,plain,
    convergent_lines(dollar_c1,dollar_c3),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[34,20]),3]),
    [iquote('hyper,34,20,unit_del,3')] ).

cnf(93,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(dollar_c1,A)
    | convergent_lines(dollar_c3,A) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[62,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,62,6')] ).

cnf(138,plain,
    convergent_lines(dollar_c3,dollar_c1),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[93,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,93,3')] ).

cnf(139,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[138,21]),
    [iquote('binary,138.1,21.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GEO217+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 07:32:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.92/2.10  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.92/2.10  The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 1.92/2.10  Wed Jul 27 07:32:54 2022
% 1.92/2.10  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 27064.
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.92/2.10  set(auto).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.92/2.10  clear(print_given).
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  formula_list(usable).
% 1.92/2.10  all X (-distinct_points(X,X)).
% 1.92/2.10  all X (-distinct_lines(X,X)).
% 1.92/2.10  all X (-convergent_lines(X,X)).
% 1.92/2.10  all X Y Z (distinct_points(X,Y)->distinct_points(X,Z)|distinct_points(Y,Z)).
% 1.92/2.10  all X Y Z (distinct_lines(X,Y)->distinct_lines(X,Z)|distinct_lines(Y,Z)).
% 1.92/2.10  all X Y Z (convergent_lines(X,Y)->convergent_lines(X,Z)|convergent_lines(Y,Z)).
% 1.92/2.10  all X Y Z (distinct_points(X,Y)-> (apart_point_and_line(Z,line_connecting(X,Y))->distinct_points(Z,X)&distinct_points(Z,Y))).
% 1.92/2.10  all X Y Z (convergent_lines(X,Y)-> (apart_point_and_line(Z,X)|apart_point_and_line(Z,Y)->distinct_points(Z,intersection_point(X,Y)))).
% 1.92/2.10  all X Y U V (distinct_points(X,Y)&distinct_lines(U,V)->apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(X,V)|apart_point_and_line(Y,U)|apart_point_and_line(Y,V)).
% 1.92/2.10  all X Y Z (apart_point_and_line(X,Y)->distinct_points(X,Z)|apart_point_and_line(Z,Y)).
% 1.92/2.10  all X Y Z (apart_point_and_line(X,Y)->distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)).
% 1.92/2.10  all X Y (convergent_lines(X,Y)->distinct_lines(X,Y)).
% 1.92/2.10  all L M (-(-convergent_lines(L,M)& -unorthogonal_lines(L,M))).
% 1.92/2.10  all L M N ((-convergent_lines(L,M)| -unorthogonal_lines(L,M))& (-convergent_lines(L,N)| -unorthogonal_lines(L,N))-> -convergent_lines(M,N)| -unorthogonal_lines(M,N)).
% 1.92/2.10  all L M N (-unorthogonal_lines(L,M)& -unorthogonal_lines(L,N)-> -convergent_lines(M,N)).
% 1.92/2.10  -(all L M N (-convergent_lines(L,M)& -convergent_lines(L,N)-> -convergent_lines(M,N))).
% 1.92/2.10  end_of_list.
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  list(usable).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -distinct_points(X,X).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -distinct_lines(X,X).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -convergent_lines(X,X).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -distinct_points(X,Y)|distinct_points(X,Z)|distinct_points(Y,Z).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -distinct_lines(X,Y)|distinct_lines(X,Z)|distinct_lines(Y,Z).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -convergent_lines(X,Y)|convergent_lines(X,Z)|convergent_lines(Y,Z).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -distinct_points(X,Y)| -apart_point_and_line(Z,line_connecting(X,Y))|distinct_points(Z,X).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -distinct_points(X,Y)| -apart_point_and_line(Z,line_connecting(X,Y))|distinct_points(Z,Y).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -convergent_lines(X,Y)| -apart_point_and_line(Z,X)|distinct_points(Z,intersection_point(X,Y)).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -convergent_lines(X,Y)| -apart_point_and_line(Z,Y)|distinct_points(Z,intersection_point(X,Y)).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -distinct_points(X,Y)| -distinct_lines(U,V)|apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(X,V)|apart_point_and_line(Y,U)|apart_point_and_line(Y,V).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|distinct_points(X,Z)|apart_point_and_line(Z,Y).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -convergent_lines(X,Y)|distinct_lines(X,Y).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] convergent_lines(L,M)|unorthogonal_lines(L,M).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] convergent_lines(L,M)|convergent_lines(L,N)| -convergent_lines(M,N)| -unorthogonal_lines(M,N).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] convergent_lines(L,M)|unorthogonal_lines(L,N)| -convergent_lines(M,N)| -unorthogonal_lines(M,N).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] unorthogonal_lines(L,M)|convergent_lines(L,N)| -convergent_lines(M,N)| -unorthogonal_lines(M,N).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] unorthogonal_lines(L,M)|unorthogonal_lines(L,N)| -convergent_lines(M,N)| -unorthogonal_lines(M,N).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] unorthogonal_lines(L,M)|unorthogonal_lines(L,N)| -convergent_lines(M,N).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] -convergent_lines($c3,$c1).
% 1.92/2.10  0 [] convergent_lines($c2,$c1).
% 1.92/2.10  end_of_list.
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.92/2.10  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.92/2.10  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.92/2.10     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  ------------> process usable:
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 1 [] -distinct_points(A,A).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] -distinct_lines(A,A).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [] -convergent_lines(A,A).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 4 [] -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 5 [] -distinct_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,C)|distinct_lines(B,C).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 6 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 7 [] -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,line_connecting(A,B))|distinct_points(C,A).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 8 [] -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,line_connecting(A,B))|distinct_points(C,B).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 9 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,A)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 10 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,B)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=18): 11 [] -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 12 [] -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(C,B).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 13 [] -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,C).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 14 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,B).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 15 [] convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)| -convergent_lines(B,C)| -unorthogonal_lines(B,C).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 16 [] convergent_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,C)| -convergent_lines(B,C)| -unorthogonal_lines(B,C).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 17 [] unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)| -convergent_lines(B,C)| -unorthogonal_lines(B,C).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 18 [] unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,C)| -convergent_lines(B,C)| -unorthogonal_lines(B,C).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 19 [] unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,C)| -convergent_lines(B,C).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 20 [] -convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 21 [] -convergent_lines($c3,$c1).
% 1.92/2.12  19 back subsumes 18.
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  ------------> process sos:
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 22 [] convergent_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,B).
% 1.92/2.12  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 23 [] convergent_lines($c2,$c1).
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.02 sec ----> 139 [binary,138.1,21.1] $F.
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 5.
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.92/2.12  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.92/2.12  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.92/2.12  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  ============ end of search ============
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.92/2.12  clauses given                 25
% 1.92/2.12  clauses generated            692
% 1.92/2.12  clauses kept                 138
% 1.92/2.12  clauses forward subsumed     577
% 1.92/2.12  clauses back subsumed         14
% 1.92/2.12  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.92/2.12  user CPU time          0.02          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.92/2.12  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.92/2.12  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.92/2.12  
% 1.92/2.12  Process 27064 finished Wed Jul 27 07:32:56 2022
% 1.92/2.12  Otter interrupted
% 1.92/2.12  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------