TSTP Solution File: GEO216+3 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : GEO216+3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 08:58:11 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 24 ~; 8 |; 4 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 0 sgn 22 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(8,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
~ ( ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2)
& ~ unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/tmp/tmpbS93pi/sel_GEO216+3.p_1',coipo1) ).
fof(9,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( orthogonal_lines(X5,X6)
<=> ~ unorthogonal_lines(X5,X6) ),
file('/tmp/tmpbS93pi/sel_GEO216+3.p_1',a5) ).
fof(13,axiom,
! [X5] : ~ convergent_lines(X5,X5),
file('/tmp/tmpbS93pi/sel_GEO216+3.p_1',apart3) ).
fof(16,conjecture,
! [X1] : ~ orthogonal_lines(X1,X1),
file('/tmp/tmpbS93pi/sel_GEO216+3.p_1',con) ).
fof(17,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] : ~ orthogonal_lines(X1,X1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[16]) ).
fof(19,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
~ ( ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2)
& ~ unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[8,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(20,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( orthogonal_lines(X5,X6)
<=> ~ unorthogonal_lines(X5,X6) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[9,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(23,plain,
! [X5] : ~ convergent_lines(X5,X5),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[13,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(24,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] : ~ orthogonal_lines(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[17,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(54,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
fof(55,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( convergent_lines(X3,X4)
| unorthogonal_lines(X3,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[54]) ).
cnf(56,plain,
( unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[55]) ).
fof(57,plain,
! [X5,X6] :
( ( ~ orthogonal_lines(X5,X6)
| ~ unorthogonal_lines(X5,X6) )
& ( unorthogonal_lines(X5,X6)
| orthogonal_lines(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
fof(58,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ( ~ orthogonal_lines(X7,X8)
| ~ unorthogonal_lines(X7,X8) )
& ( unorthogonal_lines(X7,X8)
| orthogonal_lines(X7,X8) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[57]) ).
cnf(60,plain,
( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ orthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58]) ).
fof(69,plain,
! [X6] : ~ convergent_lines(X6,X6),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
cnf(70,plain,
~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[69]) ).
fof(76,negated_conjecture,
? [X1] : orthogonal_lines(X1,X1),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
fof(77,negated_conjecture,
? [X2] : orthogonal_lines(X2,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[76]) ).
fof(78,negated_conjecture,
orthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[77]) ).
cnf(79,negated_conjecture,
orthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[78]) ).
cnf(80,negated_conjecture,
~ unorthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[60,79,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(92,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[80,56,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(93,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[92,70,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(94,negated_conjecture,
$false,
93,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO216+3.p
% --creating new selector for [GEO006+4.ax, GEO006+3.ax, GEO006+0.ax, GEO006+1.ax, GEO006+2.ax, GEO006+6.ax, GEO006+5.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpbS93pi/sel_GEO216+3.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem GEO216+3.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO216+3.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO216+3.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------