TSTP Solution File: GEO216+3 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GEO216+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.40s 2.11s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   6 unt;   2 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ orthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57z0wtxp/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    orthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57z0wtxp/input.p',i_0_26) ).

cnf(i_0_24,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57z0wtxp/input.p',i_0_24) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-57z0wtxp/input.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ orthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    orthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    i_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GEO216+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 20:47:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.20/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.20/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 4.40/2.11  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 4.40/2.11  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 4.40/2.11  # Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 4.40/2.11  
% 4.40/2.11  # Proof found!
% 4.40/2.11  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.40/2.11  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.40/2.11  # Proof object total steps             : 10
% 4.40/2.11  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 4.40/2.11  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 4.40/2.11  # Proof object conjectures             : 3
% 4.40/2.11  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 4.40/2.11  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 1
% 4.40/2.11  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 4.40/2.11  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 4.40/2.11  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 4.40/2.11  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 1
% 4.40/2.11  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.40/2.11  # Parsed axioms                        : 47
% 4.40/2.11  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Initial clauses                      : 47
% 4.40/2.11  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 47
% 4.40/2.11  # Processed clauses                    : 49
% 4.40/2.11  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # ...subsumed                          : 5
% 4.40/2.11  # ...remaining for further processing  : 44
% 4.40/2.11  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Generated clauses                    : 42
% 4.40/2.11  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 30
% 4.40/2.11  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 4.40/2.11  # Paramodulations                      : 14
% 4.40/2.11  # Factorizations                       : 28
% 4.40/2.11  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Current number of processed clauses  : 44
% 4.40/2.11  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 4.40/2.11  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.40/2.11  #    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 4.40/2.11  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 35
% 4.40/2.11  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 28
% 4.40/2.11  # ...number of literals in the above   : 83
% 4.40/2.11  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 245
% 4.40/2.11  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 125
% 4.40/2.11  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 8
% 4.40/2.11  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 4.40/2.11  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 4.40/2.11  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1283
% 4.40/2.11  
% 4.40/2.11  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.40/2.11  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 4.40/2.11  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 4.40/2.11  # Total time               : 0.013 s
% 4.40/2.11  # ...preprocessing         : 0.012 s
% 4.40/2.11  # ...main loop             : 0.001 s
% 4.40/2.11  # Maximum resident set size: 7140 pages
% 4.40/2.11  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------