TSTP Solution File: GEO216+3 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : GEO216+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:47:11 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  10 unt;  17 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (  14   ~;   6   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  16   >;  14   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn;  15   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    unorthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    orthogonal_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    point: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    line: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    equal_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    equal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    parallel_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    incident_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    orthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

fof(a5,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( orthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
    <=> ~ unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a5) ).

fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X6] : ~ orthogonal_lines(X6,X6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(apart3,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart3) ).

fof(occu1,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( convergent_lines(X6,X7)
      | unorthogonal_lines(X6,X7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+3.ax',occu1) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( orthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
    <=> ~ unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a5]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X6] : ~ orthogonal_lines(X6,X6),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X90,X91] :
      ( ( ~ orthogonal_lines(X90,X91)
        | ~ unorthogonal_lines(X90,X91) )
      & ( unorthogonal_lines(X90,X91)
        | orthogonal_lines(X90,X91) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    orthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart3]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ orthogonal_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    orthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X53,X54] :
      ( convergent_lines(X53,X54)
      | unorthogonal_lines(X53,X54) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[occu1]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X13] : ~ convergent_lines(X13,X13),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : GEO216+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 20:00:02 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.56  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.58  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.58  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.58  % Total time : 0.008000 s
% 0.19/0.59  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.59  % Total time : 0.012000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------