TSTP Solution File: GEO216+2 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : GEO216+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 16 20:35:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.39s
% Output   : Proof 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO216+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Aug 31 06:55:49 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.13/0.35  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.13/0.35    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.13/0.35    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.13/0.35    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.13/0.35    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.13/0.35    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.13/0.35    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.13/0.35    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.13/0.35    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.13/0.35    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.13/0.35    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.21/0.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.39  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.39  tff(convergent_lines_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.39     convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(tptp_fun_L_0_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.39     tptp_fun_L_0: $i)).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(unorthogonal_lines_type, type, (
% 0.21/0.39     unorthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o)).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(1,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~![L: $i] : unorthogonal_lines(L, L)) <=> (~![L: $i] : unorthogonal_lines(L, L))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(2,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      ((~![L: $i] : (~(~unorthogonal_lines(L, L)))) <=> (~![L: $i] : unorthogonal_lines(L, L))),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(3,axiom,(~![L: $i] : (~(~unorthogonal_lines(L, L)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','con')).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(4,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![L: $i] : unorthogonal_lines(L, L)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[3, 2])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(5,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![L: $i] : unorthogonal_lines(L, L)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[4, 1])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(6,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![L: $i] : unorthogonal_lines(L, L)),
% 0.21/0.39      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[5, 1])).
% 0.21/0.39  tff(7,plain,
% 0.21/0.39      (~![L: $i] : unorthogonal_lines(L, L)),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 1])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(8,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (~![L: $i] : unorthogonal_lines(L, L)),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 1])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(9,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (~![L: $i] : unorthogonal_lines(L, L)),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 1])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(10,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (~![L: $i] : unorthogonal_lines(L, L)),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 1])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(11,plain,(
% 0.21/0.40      ~unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0)),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[10])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(12,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (^[L: $i, M: $i] : refl((convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) <=> (convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(13,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i] : (convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) <=> ![L: $i, M: $i] : (convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[12])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(14,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (^[L: $i, M: $i] : trans(monotonicity(rewrite(((~convergent_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) <=> (~(convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))), ((~((~convergent_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))) <=> (~(~(convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))))), rewrite((~(~(convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))) <=> (convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))), ((~((~convergent_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))) <=> (convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(15,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i] : (~((~convergent_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))) <=> ![L: $i, M: $i] : (convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[14])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(16,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i] : (~((~convergent_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))) <=> ![L: $i, M: $i] : (~((~convergent_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, M))))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(17,axiom,(![L: $i, M: $i] : (~((~convergent_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, M))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+4.ax','coipo1')).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(18,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i] : (~((~convergent_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, M))))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[17, 16])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(19,plain,(
% 0.21/0.40      ![L: $i, M: $i] : (~((~convergent_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, M))))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[18])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(20,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i] : (convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[19, 15])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(21,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i] : (convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[20, 13])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(22,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (((~![L: $i, M: $i] : (convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) | (convergent_lines(L!0, L!0) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0))) <=> ((~![L: $i, M: $i] : (convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) | convergent_lines(L!0, L!0) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(23,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      ((~![L: $i, M: $i] : (convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) | (convergent_lines(L!0, L!0) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(24,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      ((~![L: $i, M: $i] : (convergent_lines(L, M) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) | convergent_lines(L!0, L!0) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0)),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[23, 22])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(25,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (convergent_lines(L!0, L!0)),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[24, 21, 11])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(26,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (^[L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : refl(((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) <=> ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(27,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) <=> ![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[26])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(28,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (^[L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : trans(monotonicity(trans(monotonicity(rewrite(((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N))) <=> (~(unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))), ((~((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N)))) <=> (~(~(unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))))), rewrite((~(~(unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))) <=> (unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))), ((~((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N)))) <=> (unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M)))), (((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | (~((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N))))) <=> ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | (unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))))), rewrite(((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | (unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) <=> ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))), (((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | (~((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N))))) <=> ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(29,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | (~((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N))))) <=> ![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[28])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(30,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | (~((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N))))) <=> ![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | (~((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N)))))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(31,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (^[L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : rewrite((((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N))) => (~convergent_lines(M, N))) <=> ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | (~((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N))))))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(32,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : (((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N))) => (~convergent_lines(M, N))) <=> ![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | (~((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N)))))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[31])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(33,axiom,(![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : (((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N))) => (~convergent_lines(M, N)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+4.ax','couo1')).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(34,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | (~((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N)))))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[33, 32])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(35,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | (~((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N)))))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[34, 30])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(36,plain,(
% 0.21/0.40      ![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | (~((~unorthogonal_lines(L, M)) & (~unorthogonal_lines(L, N)))))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(skolemize,[status(sab)],[35])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(37,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[36, 29])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(38,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[37, 27])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(39,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (((~![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) | (unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0) | (~convergent_lines(L!0, L!0)))) <=> ((~![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0) | (~convergent_lines(L!0, L!0)))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(40,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (((~convergent_lines(L!0, L!0)) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0)) <=> (unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0) | (~convergent_lines(L!0, L!0)))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(41,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (((~![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) | ((~convergent_lines(L!0, L!0)) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0))) <=> ((~![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) | (unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0) | (~convergent_lines(L!0, L!0))))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(monotonicity,[status(thm)],[40])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(42,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      (((~![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) | ((~convergent_lines(L!0, L!0)) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0))) <=> ((~![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0) | (~convergent_lines(L!0, L!0)))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(transitivity,[status(thm)],[41, 39])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(43,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      ((~![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) | ((~convergent_lines(L!0, L!0)) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(44,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      ((~![L: $i, M: $i, N: $i] : ((~convergent_lines(M, N)) | unorthogonal_lines(L, N) | unorthogonal_lines(L, M))) | unorthogonal_lines(L!0, L!0) | (~convergent_lines(L!0, L!0))),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[43, 42])).
% 0.21/0.40  tff(45,plain,
% 0.21/0.40      ($false),
% 0.21/0.40      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[44, 38, 11, 25])).
% 0.21/0.40  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------