TSTP Solution File: GEO216+2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : GEO216+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 11:14:48 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.11s 0.35s
% Output : Refutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 15 ~; 2 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f74,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f73,f54]) ).
fof(f54,plain,
! [X0] : ~ convergent_lines(X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0] : ~ convergent_lines(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',apart3) ).
fof(f73,plain,
convergent_lines(sK1,sK1),
inference(resolution,[],[f57,f52]) ).
fof(f52,plain,
~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).
fof(f49,plain,
~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK1),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1])],[f23,f48]) ).
fof(f48,plain,
( ? [X0] : ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X0)
=> ~ unorthogonal_lines(sK1,sK1) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
? [X0] : ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X0),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f18,plain,
~ ! [X0] : unorthogonal_lines(X0,X0),
inference(rectify,[],[f17]) ).
fof(f17,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X5] : unorthogonal_lines(X5,X5),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f16]) ).
fof(f16,conjecture,
! [X5] : unorthogonal_lines(X5,X5),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(f57,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( unorthogonal_lines(X0,X1)
| convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( unorthogonal_lines(X0,X1)
| convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).
fof(f19,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
~ ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X0,X1)
& ~ convergent_lines(X0,X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
~ ( ~ unorthogonal_lines(X5,X6)
& ~ convergent_lines(X5,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',coipo1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : GEO216+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 05:39:58 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.33 % (25521)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.11/0.35 % (25523)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.11/0.35 TRYING [1,1]
% 0.11/0.35 % (25525)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.11/0.35 % (25528)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.11/0.35 % (25524)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.11/0.35 % (25522)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.11/0.35 % (25526)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.11/0.35 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.11/0.35 % (25523)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (25523)------------------------------
% 0.11/0.35 % (25523)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.11/0.35 % (25523)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 % (25523)Memory used [KB]: 835
% 0.11/0.35 % (25523)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.35 % (25523)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.11/0.35 % (25523)------------------------------
% 0.11/0.35 % (25523)------------------------------
% 0.11/0.35 % (25527)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.11/0.35 % (25526)First to succeed.
% 0.11/0.35 TRYING [1]
% 0.11/0.35 TRYING [1]
% 0.11/0.35 TRYING [1,1]
% 0.11/0.35 % (25528)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.11/0.35 Cannot enumerate next child to try in an incomplete setup
% 0.11/0.35 % (25525)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (25525)------------------------------
% 0.11/0.35 % (25525)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.11/0.35 % (25525)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 % (25525)Memory used [KB]: 835
% 0.11/0.35 % (25525)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.35 % (25525)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.11/0.35 % (25525)------------------------------
% 0.11/0.35 % (25525)------------------------------
% 0.11/0.35 % (25522)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.11/0.35 % (25526)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.11/0.35 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.11/0.35 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.35 % (25526)------------------------------
% 0.11/0.35 % (25526)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.11/0.35 % (25526)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 % (25526)Memory used [KB]: 771
% 0.11/0.35 % (25526)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.35 % (25526)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.11/0.35 % (25526)------------------------------
% 0.11/0.35 % (25526)------------------------------
% 0.11/0.35 % (25521)Success in time 0.017 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------