TSTP Solution File: GEO213+2 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO213+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 6.56s 2.21s
% Output   : Proof 18.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO213+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 13:59:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.54/0.60          ____       _                          
% 0.54/0.60    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.54/0.60   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.54/0.60  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.54/0.60  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.54/0.60  
% 0.54/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.54/0.60  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.54/0.60  
% 0.54/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.54/0.61  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.54/0.61  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.54/0.61  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.54/0.61  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.54/0.61  
% 0.54/0.61  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.54/0.61  
% 0.54/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.75/0.68  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.76/0.99  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.04/1.15  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.25/1.17  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.84/1.61  Prover 0: gave up
% 3.84/1.61  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 4.23/1.64  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 4.47/1.73  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.88/1.80  Prover 1: gave up
% 4.88/1.80  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 5.01/1.82  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 5.52/1.96  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.52/1.97  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.56/2.21  Prover 2: proved (415ms)
% 6.56/2.21  
% 6.56/2.21  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 6.56/2.21  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 6.56/2.21  
% 6.56/2.21  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 16.87/4.62  found it (size 848)
% 16.87/4.62  
% 16.87/4.62  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 16.87/4.62  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 17.08/4.62  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3 &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 | v9 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v7, v8) = v10) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v6, v7) = 0) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v6, v8) = 0) | (v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = 0))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 | v9 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v7, v8) = v10) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = v9) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v6, v8) = 0) | (v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_lines(v6, v7) = v11))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 | v9 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v6, v8) = v10) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = v9) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v7, v8) = 0) | (v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_lines(v6, v7) = v11))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 | v9 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v6, v8) = v10) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v6, v7) = 0) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v7, v8) = 0) | (v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = 0))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 | v9 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v6, v8) = v10) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v6, v7) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_points(v5, v6) = 0) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v8) = 0) | (v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_lines(v7, v8) = v11))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 | v9 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v6, v8) = v10) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v8) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v7, v8) = 0) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v6, v7) = 0) | (v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_points(v5, v6) = v11))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 | v9 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v6, v8) = v10) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = v9) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v6, v7) = 0) | (v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v8) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_lines(v7, v8) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_points(v5, v6) = v11))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 | v9 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v6, v7) = v10) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v8) = v9) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v6, v8) = 0) | (v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_lines(v7, v8) = v11) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_points(v5, v6) = v11))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 | v9 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v6, v7) = v10) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v7, v8) = 0) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v6, v8) = 0) | (v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v8) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_points(v5, v6) = v11))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v10 = 0 | v9 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v8) = v10) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_points(v5, v6) = 0) |  ? [v11] : ((v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v6, v8) = 0) | (v11 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v6, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v11 = 0) & distinct_lines(v7, v8) = v11))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v7, v6) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_points(v5, v7) = v8) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = v9) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = v8) |  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & convergent_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & distinct_lines(v6, v7) = v10))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v6, v7) = v8) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v6, v7) = v9) |  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = 0) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & distinct_lines(v6, v7) = v10))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v6, v7) = v9) |  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & distinct_lines(v6, v7) = v10))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v6, v7) = v9) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v7) = v8) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & convergent_lines(v5, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v6, v7) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v5, v7) = v8) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & distinct_lines(v5, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 | v8 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v6, v7) = v9) |  ~ (distinct_points(v5, v7) = v8) |  ? [v10] : ( ~ (v10 = 0) & distinct_points(v5, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v9 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ (distinct_points(v7, v8) = v9) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : (( ~ (v11 = 0) &  ~ (v10 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v7, v6) = v11 & apart_point_and_line(v7, v5) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & convergent_lines(v5, v6) = v10))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v6, v7) = v9) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v5, v7) = v8) |  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & convergent_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | (v10 = 0 & v8 = 0 & convergent_lines(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & convergent_lines(v5, v6) = v10))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v6, v7) = v9) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v7) = v8) |  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & convergent_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | (v10 = 0 & v8 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & convergent_lines(v5, v6) = v10))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v6, v7) = v9) |  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | (v10 = 0 & v8 = 0 & convergent_lines(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & convergent_lines(v5, v6) = v10))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v6, v7) = v9) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v7) = v8) |  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | (v10 = 0 & v8 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = v10) | ( ~ (v10 = 0) & convergent_lines(v5, v6) = v10))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v7, v6) = v8) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = 0) | distinct_points(v5, v7) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = 0) | distinct_lines(v6, v7) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v6, v7) = 0) |  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & convergent_lines(v6, v7) = 0))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v6, v7) = 0) |  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & convergent_lines(v6, v7) = 0))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v6, v7) = v8) | apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v5, v6) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v5, v7) = v8) | apart_point_and_line(v7, v6) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v6) = 0) | convergent_lines(v5, v7) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v6) = 0) | convergent_lines(v6, v7) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v5, v6) = 0) | distinct_lines(v5, v7) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v5, v6) = 0) | distinct_lines(v6, v7) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ (distinct_points(v5, v6) = 0) | distinct_points(v5, v7) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (distinct_points(v5, v6) = 0) | distinct_points(v6, v7) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (intersection_point(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (intersection_point(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (line_connecting(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (line_connecting(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (distinct_points(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = 0) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v7) = 0 & convergent_lines(v5, v7) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & convergent_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & convergent_lines(v5, v6) = v9))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v6) = 0) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v7) = 0 & convergent_lines(v5, v7) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & convergent_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = v9))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = 0) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v6, v7) = 0 & convergent_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & convergent_lines(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & convergent_lines(v5, v6) = v9))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v6) = 0) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v6, v7) = 0 & convergent_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & convergent_lines(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = v9))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v6, v7) = v8) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v7) = 0 & convergent_lines(v5, v7) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & convergent_lines(v5, v6) = v9))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v7) = v8) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v6, v7) = 0 & convergent_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & convergent_lines(v5, v6) = v9))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v7, v8) = 0) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & distinct_points(v7, v6) = 0 & distinct_points(v7, v5) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & distinct_points(v5, v6) = v9))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v6) = 0) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v7) = 0 & convergent_lines(v5, v7) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = v9))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v6) = 0) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] : ((v10 = 0 & v9 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v6, v7) = 0 & convergent_lines(v6, v7) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & v8 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v7) = 0) | ( ~ (v9 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = v9))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v7, v8) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v5, v6) = 0) |  ? [v9] : ((v9 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v6, v8) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v6, v7) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v8) = 0) | (v9 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = 0))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v7 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = v7) | convergent_lines(v5, v6) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v7 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v6) = v7) | unorthogonal_lines(v5, v6) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v7 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v5, v6) = v7) |  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & convergent_lines(v5, v6) = v8)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v6, v5) = v7) |  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v7, v6) = v8)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v6, v5) = v7) |  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = v8)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v6, v5) = v7) |  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v5, v7) = v8)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v6, v5) = v7) |  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & convergent_lines(v7, v6) = v8)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v6) = 0) | distinct_lines(v5, v6) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v5, v5) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v5, v5) = 0) &  ! [v5] :  ~ (distinct_points(v5, v5) = 0) &  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : orthogonal_through_point(v6, v5) = v7 &  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : unorthogonal_lines(v6, v5) = v7 &  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : parallel_through_point(v6, v5) = v7 &  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : intersection_point(v6, v5) = v7 &  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : line_connecting(v6, v5) = v7 &  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : apart_point_and_line(v6, v5) = v7 &  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : convergent_lines(v6, v5) = v7 &  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : distinct_lines(v6, v5) = v7 &  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : distinct_points(v6, v5) = v7)
% 17.21/4.68  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4 yields:
% 17.21/4.68  | (1)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0 & distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = 0 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : unorthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : intersection_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : line_connecting(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : apart_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : convergent_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_points(v1, v0) = v2
% 17.21/4.71  |
% 17.21/4.71  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 17.21/4.71  | (2)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_points(v1, v0) = v2
% 17.21/4.71  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 17.21/4.71  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))
% 17.21/4.71  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 17.21/4.71  | (6)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : apart_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2
% 17.21/4.71  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 17.21/4.71  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 17.21/4.71  | (9)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 17.21/4.71  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 17.21/4.71  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 17.21/4.71  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)))
% 17.21/4.71  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 17.21/4.71  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6)))
% 17.21/4.72  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 17.21/4.72  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)))
% 17.21/4.72  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 17.21/4.72  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 17.21/4.72  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 17.21/4.72  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 17.21/4.72  | (21)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 17.21/4.72  | (22) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0
% 17.21/4.72  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 17.21/4.72  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 17.21/4.72  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)))
% 17.21/4.72  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 17.21/4.72  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 17.21/4.72  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 17.21/4.72  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 17.21/4.72  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 17.21/4.72  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 17.21/4.72  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 17.21/4.72  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 17.21/4.72  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 17.21/4.72  | (35) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.21/4.72  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 17.21/4.72  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0)))
% 17.21/4.72  | (38) distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1
% 17.21/4.72  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 17.21/4.72  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 17.21/4.72  | (41)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : intersection_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 17.61/4.72  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6)))
% 17.61/4.72  | (43)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 17.61/4.72  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 17.61/4.73  | (45)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 17.61/4.73  | (46)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 17.61/4.73  | (47)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = 0 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 17.61/4.73  | (48)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 17.61/4.73  | (49)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 17.61/4.73  | (50)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 17.61/4.73  | (51)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 17.61/4.73  | (52)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 17.61/4.73  | (53)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 17.61/4.73  | (54)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : unorthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 17.61/4.73  | (55)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 17.61/4.73  | (56)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 17.61/4.73  | (57)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)))
% 17.61/4.73  | (58)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : convergent_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 17.61/4.73  | (59)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 17.61/4.73  | (60)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v2, v1) = v3))
% 17.61/4.73  | (61)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 17.61/4.73  | (62)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 17.61/4.73  | (63)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 17.61/4.73  | (64)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 17.61/4.73  | (65)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 17.61/4.73  | (66)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 17.61/4.73  | (67)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 17.61/4.73  | (68)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : line_connecting(v1, v0) = v2
% 17.61/4.73  | (69)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 17.61/4.73  | (70)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v1) = v3))
% 17.61/4.73  | (71)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 17.61/4.73  | (72)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 17.61/4.74  | (73)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 17.61/4.74  | (74)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 17.61/4.74  | (75)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 17.61/4.74  | (76)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6)))
% 17.61/4.74  | (77)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6)))
% 17.61/4.74  | (78)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 17.61/4.74  | (79)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 17.61/4.74  | (80)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  | Instantiating formula (45) with all_0_0_0, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 17.61/4.74  | (81)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  | Instantiating formula (20) with all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 17.61/4.74  | (82) all_0_0_0 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  | Instantiating formula (45) with 0, 0, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.74  | (83)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  | Instantiating formula (79) with 0, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.74  | (84)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  | Instantiating formula (33) with all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.74  | (85)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  | Instantiating formula (17) with all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 17.61/4.74  | (86) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  | Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 17.61/4.74  | (87) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  | Instantiating (85) with all_26_0_32, all_26_1_33 yields:
% 17.61/4.74  | (88) (all_26_0_32 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_26_1_33 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_26_1_33 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33)
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  | Instantiating (84) with all_27_0_34, all_27_1_35 yields:
% 17.61/4.74  | (89) (all_27_0_34 = 0 & all_27_1_35 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_27_1_35 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_27_1_35 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_27_1_35)
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  | Instantiating (83) with all_28_0_36 yields:
% 17.61/4.74  | (90) (all_28_0_36 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_28_0_36 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_28_0_36) | ( ~ (all_28_0_36 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_28_0_36)
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  | Instantiating (81) with all_29_0_37 yields:
% 17.61/4.74  | (91) (all_29_0_37 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37) | ( ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37)
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (82), into two cases.
% 17.61/4.74  |-Branch one:
% 17.61/4.74  | (92) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.61/4.74  |
% 17.61/4.74  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (87), into two cases.
% 17.61/4.74  	|-Branch one:
% 17.61/4.74  	| (93) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 17.61/4.74  	|
% 17.61/4.75  		| Equations (93) can reduce 43 to:
% 17.61/4.75  		| (94) $false
% 17.61/4.75  		|
% 17.61/4.75  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.61/4.75  	|-Branch two:
% 17.61/4.75  	| (43)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 17.61/4.75  	| (96)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = v0)
% 17.61/4.75  	|
% 17.61/4.75  		| Instantiating (96) with all_36_0_38 yields:
% 17.61/4.75  		| (97)  ~ (all_36_0_38 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38
% 17.61/4.75  		|
% 17.61/4.75  		| Applying alpha-rule on (97) yields:
% 17.61/4.75  		| (98)  ~ (all_36_0_38 = 0)
% 17.61/4.75  		| (99) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38
% 17.61/4.75  		|
% 17.61/4.75  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (86), into two cases.
% 17.61/4.75  		|-Branch one:
% 17.61/4.75  		| (93) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 17.61/4.75  		|
% 17.61/4.75  			| Equations (93) can reduce 43 to:
% 17.61/4.75  			| (94) $false
% 17.61/4.75  			|
% 17.61/4.75  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.61/4.75  		|-Branch two:
% 17.61/4.75  		| (43)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 17.61/4.75  		| (103)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 17.61/4.75  		|
% 17.61/4.75  			| Instantiating (103) with all_41_0_39 yields:
% 17.61/4.75  			| (104)  ~ (all_41_0_39 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_41_0_39
% 17.61/4.75  			|
% 17.61/4.75  			| Applying alpha-rule on (104) yields:
% 17.61/4.75  			| (105)  ~ (all_41_0_39 = 0)
% 17.61/4.75  			| (106) distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_41_0_39
% 17.61/4.75  			|
% 17.61/4.75  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (88), into two cases.
% 17.61/4.75  			|-Branch one:
% 17.61/4.75  			| (107) (all_26_0_32 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_26_1_33 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 17.61/4.75  			|
% 17.61/4.75  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (107), into two cases.
% 17.61/4.75  				|-Branch one:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (108) all_26_0_32 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  					| Applying alpha-rule on (108) yields:
% 17.61/4.75  					| (109) all_26_0_32 = 0
% 17.61/4.75  					| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.61/4.75  					| (111) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.61/4.75  					| (112) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.61/4.75  					|
% 17.61/4.75  					| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, 0, all_36_0_38 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  					| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 17.61/4.75  					|
% 17.61/4.75  					| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 17.61/4.75  					| (94) $false
% 17.61/4.75  					|
% 17.61/4.75  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.61/4.75  				|-Branch two:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (115) all_26_1_33 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  					| Applying alpha-rule on (115) yields:
% 17.61/4.75  					| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.61/4.75  					| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.61/4.75  					| (92) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.61/4.75  					|
% 17.61/4.75  					| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.61/4.75  					| (94) $false
% 17.61/4.75  					|
% 17.61/4.75  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.61/4.75  			|-Branch two:
% 17.61/4.75  			| (120)  ~ (all_26_1_33 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33
% 17.61/4.75  			|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Applying alpha-rule on (120) yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (121)  ~ (all_26_1_33 = 0)
% 17.61/4.75  				| (122) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Instantiating formula (40) with 0, 0, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (123)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Instantiating formula (69) with 0, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (124)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Instantiating formula (55) with all_0_0_0, 0, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (125)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0) | (v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Instantiating formula (78) with all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (126)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Instantiating formula (40) with all_36_0_38, 0, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (127)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Instantiating formula (7) with all_36_0_38, all_36_0_38, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (128) all_36_0_38 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Instantiating formula (40) with all_36_0_38, all_36_0_38, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (129)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Instantiating formula (3) with all_36_0_38, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (130)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Instantiating formula (19) with all_36_0_38, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (131) all_36_0_38 = 0 | unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Instantiating formula (7) with all_26_1_33, all_26_1_33, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (132) all_26_1_33 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Instantiating formula (40) with all_26_1_33, all_26_1_33, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (133)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.61/4.75  				|
% 17.61/4.75  				| Instantiating formula (55) with 0, all_26_1_33, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.61/4.75  				| (134)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				| Instantiating formula (73) with all_26_1_33, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (135)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				| Instantiating formula (4) with all_41_0_39, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_41_0_39, yields:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (136) all_41_0_39 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				| Instantiating (135) with all_53_0_40, all_53_1_41 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (137) (all_53_0_40 = 0 & all_53_1_41 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_53_1_41 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0) | ( ~ (all_53_1_41 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_53_1_41)
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				| Instantiating (134) with all_54_0_42 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (138) (all_54_0_42 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0) | (all_54_0_42 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_54_0_42 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_54_0_42) | ( ~ (all_54_0_42 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_54_0_42)
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				| Instantiating (133) with all_55_0_43 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (139) (all_55_0_43 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_55_0_43 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_55_0_43) | ( ~ (all_55_0_43 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_55_0_43)
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				| Instantiating (130) with all_56_0_44 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (140) (all_56_0_44 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_56_0_44 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_56_0_44 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44) | ( ~ (all_56_0_44 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44)
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				| Instantiating (127) with all_57_0_45 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (141) (all_57_0_45 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_57_0_45 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45) | ( ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45)
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				| Instantiating (129) with all_58_0_46 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (142) (all_58_0_46 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_58_0_46 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_58_0_46) | ( ~ (all_58_0_46 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_58_0_46)
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				| Instantiating (126) with all_59_0_47, all_59_1_48 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (143) (all_59_0_47 = 0 & all_59_1_48 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_59_1_48 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0) | ( ~ (all_59_1_48 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_59_1_48)
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				| Instantiating (125) with all_60_0_49 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (144) (all_60_0_49 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0) | (all_60_0_49 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_60_0_49 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_49) | ( ~ (all_60_0_49 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_49)
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				| Instantiating (124) with all_61_0_50, all_61_1_51 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (145) (all_61_0_50 = 0 & all_61_1_51 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_61_1_51 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_61_1_51 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_61_1_51)
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				| Instantiating (123) with all_62_0_52 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (146) (all_62_0_52 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_62_0_52 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_52) | ( ~ (all_62_0_52 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_52)
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (131), into two cases.
% 17.61/4.76  				|-Branch one:
% 17.61/4.76  				| (111) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.61/4.76  				|
% 17.61/4.76  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (132), into two cases.
% 17.61/4.76  					|-Branch one:
% 17.61/4.76  					| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.61/4.76  					|
% 17.61/4.76  						| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 17.61/4.76  						| (94) $false
% 17.61/4.76  						|
% 17.61/4.76  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.61/4.76  					|-Branch two:
% 17.61/4.76  					| (121)  ~ (all_26_1_33 = 0)
% 17.61/4.76  					| (151)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 17.61/4.76  					|
% 17.61/4.76  						| Instantiating (151) with all_71_0_53 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  						| (152)  ~ (all_71_0_53 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_71_0_53
% 17.61/4.76  						|
% 17.61/4.76  						| Applying alpha-rule on (152) yields:
% 17.61/4.76  						| (153)  ~ (all_71_0_53 = 0)
% 17.61/4.76  						| (154) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_71_0_53
% 17.61/4.76  						|
% 17.61/4.76  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (128), into two cases.
% 17.61/4.76  						|-Branch one:
% 17.61/4.76  						| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 17.61/4.76  						|
% 17.61/4.76  							| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 17.61/4.76  							| (94) $false
% 17.61/4.76  							|
% 17.61/4.76  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.61/4.76  						|-Branch two:
% 17.61/4.76  						| (98)  ~ (all_36_0_38 = 0)
% 17.61/4.76  						| (151)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 17.61/4.76  						|
% 17.61/4.76  							| Instantiating (151) with all_76_0_54 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  							| (159)  ~ (all_76_0_54 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_76_0_54
% 17.61/4.76  							|
% 17.61/4.76  							| Applying alpha-rule on (159) yields:
% 17.61/4.76  							| (160)  ~ (all_76_0_54 = 0)
% 17.61/4.76  							| (161) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_76_0_54
% 17.61/4.76  							|
% 17.61/4.76  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (136), into two cases.
% 17.61/4.76  							|-Branch one:
% 17.61/4.76  							| (162) all_41_0_39 = 0
% 17.61/4.76  							|
% 17.61/4.76  								| Equations (162) can reduce 105 to:
% 17.61/4.76  								| (94) $false
% 17.61/4.76  								|
% 17.61/4.76  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.61/4.76  							|-Branch two:
% 17.61/4.76  							| (105)  ~ (all_41_0_39 = 0)
% 17.61/4.76  							| (151)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 17.61/4.76  							|
% 17.61/4.76  								| Instantiating (151) with all_81_0_55 yields:
% 17.61/4.76  								| (166)  ~ (all_81_0_55 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_81_0_55
% 17.61/4.76  								|
% 17.61/4.76  								| Applying alpha-rule on (166) yields:
% 17.61/4.76  								| (167)  ~ (all_81_0_55 = 0)
% 17.61/4.76  								| (168) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_81_0_55
% 17.61/4.76  								|
% 17.61/4.76  								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_76_0_54, all_81_0_55 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_81_0_55, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_76_0_54, yields:
% 17.61/4.76  								| (169) all_81_0_55 = all_76_0_54
% 17.61/4.76  								|
% 17.61/4.76  								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_71_0_53, all_81_0_55 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_81_0_55, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_71_0_53, yields:
% 17.61/4.76  								| (170) all_81_0_55 = all_71_0_53
% 17.61/4.76  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Combining equations (169,170) yields a new equation:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (171) all_76_0_54 = all_71_0_53
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Simplifying 171 yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (172) all_76_0_54 = all_71_0_53
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Equations (172) can reduce 160 to:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (153)  ~ (all_71_0_53 = 0)
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| From (172) and (161) follows:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (154) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_71_0_53
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating formula (45) with 0, all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (175)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating formula (45) with 0, 0, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (176)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating formula (79) with 0, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (177)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating formula (55) with 0, 0, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (178)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating formula (55) with 0, all_36_0_38, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (179)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating formula (79) with 0, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (180)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating formula (73) with all_36_0_38, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (181)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating formula (73) with all_26_1_33, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (182)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating formula (40) with all_71_0_53, all_71_0_53, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_71_0_53, yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (183)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_71_0_53 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating formula (73) with all_71_0_53, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_71_0_53, yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (184)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_71_0_53 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating formula (73) with all_71_0_53, all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_71_0_53, yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (185)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_71_0_53 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating formula (19) with all_71_0_53, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_71_0_53, yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (186) all_71_0_53 = 0 | unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating (185) with all_92_0_56, all_92_1_57 yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (187) (all_92_0_56 = 0 & all_92_1_57 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_92_1_57 = 0 & all_71_0_53 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (all_92_1_57 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_92_1_57)
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating (184) with all_93_0_58, all_93_1_59 yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (188) (all_93_0_58 = 0 & all_93_1_59 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_93_1_59 = 0 & all_71_0_53 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (all_93_1_59 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_93_1_59)
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating (183) with all_94_0_60 yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (189) (all_94_0_60 = 0 & all_71_0_53 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (all_94_0_60 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_94_0_60) | ( ~ (all_94_0_60 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_94_0_60)
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating (182) with all_95_0_61, all_95_1_62 yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (190) (all_95_0_61 = 0 & all_95_1_62 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_95_1_62 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_95_1_62 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_95_1_62)
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating (181) with all_96_0_63, all_96_1_64 yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (191) (all_96_0_63 = 0 & all_96_1_64 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_96_1_64 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0) | ( ~ (all_96_1_64 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_96_1_64)
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating (178) with all_97_0_65 yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (192) (all_97_0_65 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_97_0_65 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_97_0_65 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_97_0_65) | ( ~ (all_97_0_65 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_97_0_65)
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating (177) with all_98_0_66, all_98_1_67 yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (193) (all_98_0_66 = 0 & all_98_1_67 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_98_1_67 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_98_1_67 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_98_1_67)
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating (176) with all_99_0_68 yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (194) (all_99_0_68 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_99_0_68 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_99_0_68) | ( ~ (all_99_0_68 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_99_0_68)
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating (180) with all_100_0_69, all_100_1_70 yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (195) (all_100_0_69 = 0 & all_100_1_70 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_100_1_70 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_100_1_70 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_100_1_70)
% 17.61/4.77  								|
% 17.61/4.77  								| Instantiating (179) with all_101_0_71 yields:
% 17.61/4.77  								| (196) (all_101_0_71 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0) | (all_101_0_71 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_101_0_71 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_101_0_71) | ( ~ (all_101_0_71 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_101_0_71)
% 17.61/4.78  								|
% 17.61/4.78  								| Instantiating (175) with all_102_0_72 yields:
% 17.61/4.78  								| (197) (all_102_0_72 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_102_0_72 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_102_0_72 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_102_0_72) | ( ~ (all_102_0_72 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_102_0_72)
% 17.61/4.78  								|
% 17.61/4.78  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (89), into two cases.
% 17.61/4.78  								|-Branch one:
% 17.61/4.78  								| (198) (all_27_0_34 = 0 & all_27_1_35 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_27_1_35 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 17.61/4.78  								|
% 17.61/4.78  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 17.61/4.78  									|-Branch one:
% 17.61/4.78  									| (199) all_27_0_34 = 0 & all_27_1_35 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.61/4.78  									|
% 17.61/4.78  										| Applying alpha-rule on (199) yields:
% 17.61/4.78  										| (200) all_27_0_34 = 0
% 17.61/4.78  										| (201) all_27_1_35 = 0
% 17.61/4.78  										| (202) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.61/4.78  										| (203) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.61/4.78  										|
% 17.61/4.78  										| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.78  										| (204) $false
% 17.61/4.78  										|
% 17.61/4.78  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.61/4.78  									|-Branch two:
% 17.61/4.78  									| (205) all_27_1_35 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.61/4.78  									|
% 17.61/4.78  										| Applying alpha-rule on (205) yields:
% 17.61/4.78  										| (201) all_27_1_35 = 0
% 17.61/4.78  										| (207) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.61/4.78  										|
% 17.61/4.78  										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, 0, all_26_1_33 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.61/4.78  										| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.61/4.78  										|
% 17.61/4.78  										| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 17.61/4.78  										| (94) $false
% 17.61/4.78  										|
% 17.61/4.78  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.61/4.78  								|-Branch two:
% 17.61/4.78  								| (210)  ~ (all_27_1_35 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_27_1_35
% 17.87/4.78  								|
% 17.87/4.78  									| Applying alpha-rule on (210) yields:
% 17.87/4.78  									| (211)  ~ (all_27_1_35 = 0)
% 17.87/4.78  									| (212) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_27_1_35
% 17.87/4.78  									|
% 17.87/4.78  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (186), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.78  									|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.78  									| (213) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.78  									|
% 17.87/4.78  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (90), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.78  										|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.78  										| (214) (all_28_0_36 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_28_0_36 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_28_0_36)
% 17.87/4.78  										|
% 17.87/4.78  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (214), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.78  											|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.78  											| (215) all_28_0_36 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.78  											|
% 17.87/4.78  												| Applying alpha-rule on (215) yields:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (216) all_28_0_36 = 0
% 17.87/4.78  												| (207) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_27_1_35, all_26_1_33 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_27_1_35, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (218) all_27_1_35 = all_26_1_33
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, 0, all_27_1_35 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_27_1_35, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (201) all_27_1_35 = 0
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  												| Combining equations (201,218) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  												| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.78  											|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.78  											| (222)  ~ (all_28_0_36 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.78  											|
% 17.87/4.78  												| Applying alpha-rule on (222) yields:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (223)  ~ (all_28_0_36 = 0)
% 17.87/4.78  												| (224) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  												| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, 0, all_28_0_36 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_28_0_36, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (216) all_28_0_36 = 0
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  												| Equations (216) can reduce 223 to:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.78  										|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.78  										| (227)  ~ (all_28_0_36 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.78  										|
% 17.87/4.78  											| Applying alpha-rule on (227) yields:
% 17.87/4.78  											| (223)  ~ (all_28_0_36 = 0)
% 17.87/4.78  											| (229) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.78  											|
% 17.87/4.78  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (189), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.78  											|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.78  											| (230) (all_94_0_60 = 0 & all_71_0_53 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (all_94_0_60 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_94_0_60)
% 17.87/4.78  											|
% 17.87/4.78  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.78  												|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (231) all_94_0_60 = 0 & all_71_0_53 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  													| Applying alpha-rule on (231) yields:
% 17.87/4.78  													| (232) all_94_0_60 = 0
% 17.87/4.78  													| (233) all_71_0_53 = 0
% 17.87/4.78  													| (213) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.78  													|
% 17.87/4.78  													| Equations (233) can reduce 153 to:
% 17.87/4.78  													| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.78  													|
% 17.87/4.78  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.78  												|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (236)  ~ (all_94_0_60 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_94_0_60
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  													| Applying alpha-rule on (236) yields:
% 17.87/4.78  													| (237)  ~ (all_94_0_60 = 0)
% 17.87/4.78  													| (238) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_94_0_60
% 17.87/4.78  													|
% 17.87/4.78  													| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, 0, all_94_0_60 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_94_0_60, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.78  													| (232) all_94_0_60 = 0
% 17.87/4.78  													|
% 17.87/4.78  													| Equations (232) can reduce 237 to:
% 17.87/4.78  													| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.78  													|
% 17.87/4.78  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.78  											|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.78  											| (241)  ~ (all_94_0_60 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_94_0_60
% 17.87/4.78  											|
% 17.87/4.78  												| Applying alpha-rule on (241) yields:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (237)  ~ (all_94_0_60 = 0)
% 17.87/4.78  												| (243) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_94_0_60
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (139), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.78  												|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (244) (all_55_0_43 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_55_0_43 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_55_0_43)
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (244), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.78  													|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.78  													| (245) all_55_0_43 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.78  													|
% 17.87/4.78  														| Applying alpha-rule on (245) yields:
% 17.87/4.78  														| (246) all_55_0_43 = 0
% 17.87/4.78  														| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.87/4.78  														| (35) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.78  														|
% 17.87/4.78  														| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 17.87/4.78  														| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.78  														|
% 17.87/4.78  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.78  													|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.78  													| (250)  ~ (all_55_0_43 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_55_0_43
% 17.87/4.78  													|
% 17.87/4.78  														| Applying alpha-rule on (250) yields:
% 17.87/4.78  														| (251)  ~ (all_55_0_43 = 0)
% 17.87/4.78  														| (252) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_55_0_43
% 17.87/4.78  														|
% 17.87/4.78  														| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, 0, all_55_0_43 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_55_0_43, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.78  														| (246) all_55_0_43 = 0
% 17.87/4.78  														|
% 17.87/4.78  														| Equations (246) can reduce 251 to:
% 17.87/4.78  														| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.78  														|
% 17.87/4.78  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.78  												|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.78  												| (255)  ~ (all_55_0_43 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_55_0_43
% 17.87/4.78  												|
% 17.87/4.78  													| Applying alpha-rule on (255) yields:
% 17.87/4.78  													| (251)  ~ (all_55_0_43 = 0)
% 17.87/4.78  													| (257) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_55_0_43
% 17.87/4.78  													|
% 17.87/4.78  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (138), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.78  													|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.78  													| (258) (all_54_0_42 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0) | (all_54_0_42 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_54_0_42 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_54_0_42)
% 17.87/4.78  													|
% 17.87/4.79  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (258), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.79  														|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.79  														| (259) (all_54_0_42 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0) | (all_54_0_42 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 17.87/4.79  														|
% 17.87/4.79  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (259), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.79  															|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.79  															| (260) all_54_0_42 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  															|
% 17.87/4.79  																| Applying alpha-rule on (260) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (261) all_54_0_42 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.79  															|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.79  															| (264) all_54_0_42 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.79  															|
% 17.87/4.79  																| Applying alpha-rule on (264) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (261) all_54_0_42 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																| (207) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_27_1_35, all_26_1_33 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_27_1_35, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (218) all_27_1_35 = all_26_1_33
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, 0, all_27_1_35 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_27_1_35, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (201) all_27_1_35 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																| Combining equations (201,218) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.79  														|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.79  														| (271)  ~ (all_54_0_42 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_54_0_42
% 17.87/4.79  														|
% 17.87/4.79  															| Applying alpha-rule on (271) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  															| (272)  ~ (all_54_0_42 = 0)
% 17.87/4.79  															| (273) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_54_0_42
% 17.87/4.79  															|
% 17.87/4.79  															| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, 0, all_54_0_42 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_54_0_42, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  															| (261) all_54_0_42 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  															|
% 17.87/4.79  															| Equations (261) can reduce 272 to:
% 17.87/4.79  															| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.79  															|
% 17.87/4.79  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.79  													|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.79  													| (276)  ~ (all_54_0_42 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_54_0_42
% 17.87/4.79  													|
% 17.87/4.79  														| Applying alpha-rule on (276) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  														| (272)  ~ (all_54_0_42 = 0)
% 17.87/4.79  														| (278) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_54_0_42
% 17.87/4.79  														|
% 17.87/4.79  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (196), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.79  														|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.79  														| (279) (all_101_0_71 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0) | (all_101_0_71 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_101_0_71 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_101_0_71)
% 17.87/4.79  														|
% 17.87/4.79  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (279), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.79  															|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.79  															| (280) (all_101_0_71 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0) | (all_101_0_71 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 17.87/4.79  															|
% 17.87/4.79  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (280), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.79  																|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (281) all_101_0_71 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (281) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (282) all_101_0_71 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.79  																|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (285) all_101_0_71 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (285) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (282) all_101_0_71 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (112) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, 0, all_36_0_38 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.79  															|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.79  															| (290)  ~ (all_101_0_71 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_101_0_71
% 17.87/4.79  															|
% 17.87/4.79  																| Applying alpha-rule on (290) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (291)  ~ (all_101_0_71 = 0)
% 17.87/4.79  																| (292) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_101_0_71
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, 0, all_101_0_71 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_101_0_71, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (282) all_101_0_71 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																| Equations (282) can reduce 291 to:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.79  														|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.79  														| (295)  ~ (all_101_0_71 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_101_0_71
% 17.87/4.79  														|
% 17.87/4.79  															| Applying alpha-rule on (295) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  															| (291)  ~ (all_101_0_71 = 0)
% 17.87/4.79  															| (297) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_101_0_71
% 17.87/4.79  															|
% 17.87/4.79  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (142), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.79  															|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.79  															| (298) (all_58_0_46 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_58_0_46 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_58_0_46)
% 17.87/4.79  															|
% 17.87/4.79  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (298), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.79  																|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (299) all_58_0_46 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (299) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (300) all_58_0_46 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (111) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.79  																|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (304)  ~ (all_58_0_46 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_58_0_46
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (304) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (305)  ~ (all_58_0_46 = 0)
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (306) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_58_0_46
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, 0, all_58_0_46 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_58_0_46, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (300) all_58_0_46 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Equations (300) can reduce 305 to:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.79  															|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.79  															| (309)  ~ (all_58_0_46 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_58_0_46
% 17.87/4.79  															|
% 17.87/4.79  																| Applying alpha-rule on (309) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (305)  ~ (all_58_0_46 = 0)
% 17.87/4.79  																| (311) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_58_0_46
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.79  																|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (312) (all_99_0_68 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_99_0_68 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_99_0_68)
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (312), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.79  																	|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (313) all_99_0_68 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (313) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																		| (314) all_99_0_68 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																		| (112) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																		|
% 17.87/4.79  																		| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, 0, all_36_0_38 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																		| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																		|
% 17.87/4.79  																		| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 17.87/4.79  																		| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.79  																		|
% 17.87/4.79  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.79  																	|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (318)  ~ (all_99_0_68 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_99_0_68
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (318) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																		| (319)  ~ (all_99_0_68 = 0)
% 17.87/4.79  																		| (320) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_99_0_68
% 17.87/4.79  																		|
% 17.87/4.79  																		| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, 0, all_99_0_68 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_99_0_68, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																		| (314) all_99_0_68 = 0
% 17.87/4.79  																		|
% 17.87/4.79  																		| Equations (314) can reduce 319 to:
% 17.87/4.79  																		| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.79  																		|
% 17.87/4.79  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.79  																|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.79  																| (323)  ~ (all_99_0_68 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_99_0_68
% 17.87/4.79  																|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (323) yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (319)  ~ (all_99_0_68 = 0)
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (325) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_99_0_68
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_27_1_35, all_26_1_33 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_27_1_35, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (218) all_27_1_35 = all_26_1_33
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_101_0_71, all_71_0_53 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_101_0_71, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_71_0_53, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (327) all_101_0_71 = all_71_0_53
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_94_0_60, all_99_0_68 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_99_0_68, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_94_0_60, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (328) all_99_0_68 = all_94_0_60
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_58_0_46, all_71_0_53 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_71_0_53, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_58_0_46, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (329) all_71_0_53 = all_58_0_46
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_58_0_46, all_94_0_60 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_94_0_60, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_58_0_46, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (330) all_94_0_60 = all_58_0_46
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_55_0_43, all_94_0_60 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_94_0_60, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_55_0_43, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (331) all_94_0_60 = all_55_0_43
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_54_0_42, all_99_0_68 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_99_0_68, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_54_0_42, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (332) all_99_0_68 = all_54_0_42
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_28_0_36, all_101_0_71 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_101_0_71, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_28_0_36, yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (333) all_101_0_71 = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Combining equations (327,333) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (334) all_71_0_53 = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Simplifying 334 yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (335) all_71_0_53 = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Combining equations (328,332) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (336) all_94_0_60 = all_54_0_42
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Simplifying 336 yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (337) all_94_0_60 = all_54_0_42
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Combining equations (337,331) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (338) all_55_0_43 = all_54_0_42
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Combining equations (330,331) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (339) all_58_0_46 = all_55_0_43
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Simplifying 339 yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (340) all_58_0_46 = all_55_0_43
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Combining equations (329,335) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (341) all_58_0_46 = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Simplifying 341 yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (342) all_58_0_46 = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Combining equations (340,342) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (343) all_55_0_43 = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Simplifying 343 yields:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (344) all_55_0_43 = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Combining equations (344,338) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (345) all_54_0_42 = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Equations (345) can reduce 272 to:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (223)  ~ (all_28_0_36 = 0)
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| Equations (218) can reduce 211 to:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (121)  ~ (all_26_1_33 = 0)
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.79  																	| From (218) and (212) follows:
% 17.87/4.79  																	| (122) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33
% 17.87/4.79  																	|
% 17.87/4.80  																	| From (345) and (278) follows:
% 17.87/4.80  																	| (229) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_28_0_36
% 17.87/4.80  																	|
% 17.87/4.80  																	| Instantiating formula (79) with 0, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																	| (350)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.87/4.80  																	|
% 17.87/4.80  																	| Instantiating (350) with all_146_0_73, all_146_1_74 yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																	| (351) (all_146_0_73 = 0 & all_146_1_74 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_146_1_74 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (all_146_1_74 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_146_1_74)
% 17.87/4.80  																	|
% 17.87/4.80  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (91), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.80  																	|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.80  																	| (352) (all_29_0_37 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37)
% 17.87/4.80  																	|
% 17.87/4.80  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (352), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.80  																		|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.80  																		| (353) all_29_0_37 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																		|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Applying alpha-rule on (353) yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (354) all_29_0_37 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (92) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.80  																		|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.80  																		| (358)  ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37
% 17.87/4.80  																		|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Applying alpha-rule on (358) yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (359)  ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0)
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (360) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Instantiating formula (20) with all_29_0_37, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37, yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (361) all_29_0_37 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (361), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.80  																			|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (203) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																				| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																				| (204) $false
% 17.87/4.80  																				|
% 17.87/4.80  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.80  																			|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (364)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (354) all_29_0_37 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																				| Equations (354) can reduce 359 to:
% 17.87/4.80  																				| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.80  																				|
% 17.87/4.80  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.80  																	|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.80  																	| (367)  ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37
% 17.87/4.80  																	|
% 17.87/4.80  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (367) yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																		| (359)  ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0)
% 17.87/4.80  																		| (369) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37
% 17.87/4.80  																		|
% 17.87/4.80  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.80  																		|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.80  																		| (370) (all_53_0_40 = 0 & all_53_1_41 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_53_1_41 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0)
% 17.87/4.80  																		|
% 17.87/4.80  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (370), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.80  																			|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (371) all_53_0_40 = 0 & all_53_1_41 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																				| Applying alpha-rule on (371) yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																				| (372) all_53_0_40 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																				| (373) all_53_1_41 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																				| (202) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																				| (203) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																				|
% 17.87/4.80  																				| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																				| (204) $false
% 17.87/4.80  																				|
% 17.87/4.80  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.80  																			|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (377) all_53_1_41 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																				| Applying alpha-rule on (377) yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																				| (373) all_53_1_41 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																				| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																				|
% 17.87/4.80  																				| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 17.87/4.80  																				| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.80  																				|
% 17.87/4.80  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.80  																		|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.80  																		| (381)  ~ (all_53_1_41 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_53_1_41
% 17.87/4.80  																		|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Applying alpha-rule on (381) yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (382)  ~ (all_53_1_41 = 0)
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (383) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_53_1_41
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_53_1_41, all_26_1_33 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_53_1_41, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (384) all_53_1_41 = all_26_1_33
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Equations (384) can reduce 382 to:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (121)  ~ (all_26_1_33 = 0)
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| From (384) and (383) follows:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (122) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Instantiating formula (74) with all_29_0_37, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37, yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (387) all_29_0_37 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Instantiating formula (7) with all_26_1_33, all_29_0_37, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (388) all_29_0_37 = 0 | all_26_1_33 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Instantiating formula (40) with all_26_1_33, all_29_0_37, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (389)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Instantiating formula (40) with all_29_0_37, all_29_0_37, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37, yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (390)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Instantiating formula (55) with 0, all_29_0_37, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37, yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (391)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Instantiating formula (19) with all_29_0_37, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37, yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (392) all_29_0_37 = 0 | unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Instantiating (391) with all_163_0_82 yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (393) (all_163_0_82 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_163_0_82 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_163_0_82 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_163_0_82) | ( ~ (all_163_0_82 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_163_0_82)
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Instantiating (390) with all_164_0_83 yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (394) (all_164_0_83 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_164_0_83 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_164_0_83) | ( ~ (all_164_0_83 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_164_0_83)
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			| Instantiating (389) with all_165_0_84 yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (395) (all_165_0_84 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_165_0_84 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_165_0_84 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_165_0_84) | ( ~ (all_165_0_84 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_165_0_84)
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (140), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.80  																			|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.80  																			| (396) (all_56_0_44 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_56_0_44 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_56_0_44 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44)
% 17.87/4.80  																			|
% 17.87/4.80  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (396), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.80  																				|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.80  																				| (397) (all_56_0_44 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_56_0_44 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 17.87/4.80  																				|
% 17.87/4.80  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (397), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.80  																					|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.80  																					| (398) all_56_0_44 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																					|
% 17.87/4.80  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (398) yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																						| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																						| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																						| (111) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																						|
% 17.87/4.80  																						| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 17.87/4.80  																						| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.80  																						|
% 17.87/4.80  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.80  																					|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.80  																					| (403) all_56_0_44 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																					|
% 17.87/4.80  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (403) yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																						| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																						| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																						| (92) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																						|
% 17.87/4.80  																						| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.87/4.80  																						| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.80  																						|
% 17.87/4.80  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.80  																				|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.80  																				| (408)  ~ (all_56_0_44 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44
% 17.87/4.80  																				|
% 17.87/4.80  																					| Applying alpha-rule on (408) yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																					| (409)  ~ (all_56_0_44 = 0)
% 17.87/4.80  																					| (410) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44
% 17.87/4.80  																					|
% 17.87/4.80  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (388), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.80  																					|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.80  																					| (354) all_29_0_37 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																					|
% 17.87/4.80  																						| Equations (354) can reduce 359 to:
% 17.87/4.80  																						| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.80  																						|
% 17.87/4.80  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.80  																					|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.80  																					| (359)  ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0)
% 17.87/4.80  																					| (414) all_26_1_33 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 17.87/4.80  																					|
% 17.87/4.80  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (414), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.80  																						|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.80  																						| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																						|
% 17.87/4.80  																							| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 17.87/4.80  																							| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.80  																							|
% 17.87/4.80  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.80  																						|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.80  																						| (121)  ~ (all_26_1_33 = 0)
% 17.87/4.80  																						| (418)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 17.87/4.80  																						|
% 17.87/4.80  																							| Instantiating (418) with all_204_0_106 yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																							| (419)  ~ (all_204_0_106 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_204_0_106
% 17.87/4.80  																							|
% 17.87/4.80  																							| Applying alpha-rule on (419) yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																							| (420)  ~ (all_204_0_106 = 0)
% 17.87/4.80  																							| (421) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_204_0_106
% 17.87/4.80  																							|
% 17.87/4.80  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (143), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.80  																							|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.80  																							| (422) (all_59_0_47 = 0 & all_59_1_48 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_59_1_48 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 17.87/4.80  																							|
% 17.87/4.80  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (422), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.80  																								|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.80  																								| (423) all_59_0_47 = 0 & all_59_1_48 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																								|
% 17.87/4.80  																									| Applying alpha-rule on (423) yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																									| (424) all_59_0_47 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																									| (425) all_59_1_48 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																									| (426) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																									| (427) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																									|
% 17.87/4.80  																									| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																									| (204) $false
% 17.87/4.80  																									|
% 17.87/4.80  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.80  																								|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.80  																								| (429) all_59_1_48 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																								|
% 17.87/4.80  																									| Applying alpha-rule on (429) yields:
% 17.87/4.80  																									| (425) all_59_1_48 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																									| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.80  																									|
% 17.87/4.80  																									| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.87/4.80  																									| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.80  																									|
% 17.87/4.80  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.80  																							|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.80  																							| (433)  ~ (all_59_1_48 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_59_1_48
% 17.87/4.81  																							|
% 17.87/4.81  																								| Applying alpha-rule on (433) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																								| (434)  ~ (all_59_1_48 = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																								| (435) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_59_1_48
% 17.87/4.81  																								|
% 17.87/4.81  																								| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_59_1_48, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_59_1_48, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																								| (436) all_59_1_48 = all_0_0_0
% 17.87/4.81  																								|
% 17.87/4.81  																								| Equations (436) can reduce 434 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																								| (21)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																								|
% 17.87/4.81  																								| From (436) and (435) follows:
% 17.87/4.81  																								| (22) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0
% 17.87/4.81  																								|
% 17.87/4.81  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (141), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																								|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																								| (439) (all_57_0_45 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_57_0_45 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45)
% 17.87/4.81  																								|
% 17.87/4.81  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (439), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																									|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (440) (all_57_0_45 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_57_0_45 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (440), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																										|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (441) all_57_0_45 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																											| Applying alpha-rule on (441) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																											| (442) all_57_0_45 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																											| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																											| (111) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																											|
% 17.87/4.81  																											| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																											| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.81  																											|
% 17.87/4.81  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.81  																										|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (446) all_57_0_45 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																											| Applying alpha-rule on (446) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																											| (442) all_57_0_45 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																											| (448) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																											|
% 17.87/4.81  																											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																											| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																											|
% 17.87/4.81  																											| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																											| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.81  																											|
% 17.87/4.81  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.81  																									|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (451)  ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																										| Applying alpha-rule on (451) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (452)  ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (453) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																										| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_57_0_45, all_56_0_44 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (454) all_57_0_45 = all_56_0_44
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																										| Equations (454) can reduce 452 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (409)  ~ (all_56_0_44 = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																										| From (454) and (453) follows:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (410) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																										| Instantiating formula (19) with all_204_0_106, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_204_0_106, yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (457) all_204_0_106 = 0 | unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (457), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																										|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (458) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_56_0_44 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																											| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																											|
% 17.87/4.81  																											| Equations (399) can reduce 409 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																											| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.81  																											|
% 17.87/4.81  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.81  																										|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (461)  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (462) all_204_0_106 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																											| Equations (462) can reduce 420 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																											| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.81  																											|
% 17.87/4.81  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.81  																								|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.81  																								| (464)  ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45
% 17.87/4.81  																								|
% 17.87/4.81  																									| Applying alpha-rule on (464) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (452)  ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (466) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_57_0_45, all_204_0_106 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_204_0_106, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45, yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (467) all_204_0_106 = all_57_0_45
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																									| Equations (467) can reduce 420 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (452)  ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																									| From (467) and (421) follows:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (466) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																									| Instantiating formula (19) with all_57_0_45, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45, yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (470) all_57_0_45 = 0 | unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (470), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																									|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (458) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																										| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_56_0_44 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																										| Equations (399) can reduce 409 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.81  																									|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (461)  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (442) all_57_0_45 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																										| Equations (442) can reduce 452 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.81  																			|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.81  																			| (477)  ~ (all_56_0_44 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44
% 17.87/4.81  																			|
% 17.87/4.81  																				| Applying alpha-rule on (477) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																				| (409)  ~ (all_56_0_44 = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																				| (479) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44
% 17.87/4.81  																				|
% 17.87/4.81  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (392), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																				|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																				| (202) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																				|
% 17.87/4.81  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																					|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																					| (481) (all_93_0_58 = 0 & all_93_1_59 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_93_1_59 = 0 & all_71_0_53 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																					|
% 17.87/4.81  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (481), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																						|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																						| (482) all_93_0_58 = 0 & all_93_1_59 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																						|
% 17.87/4.81  																							| Applying alpha-rule on (482) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (483) all_93_0_58 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (484) all_93_1_59 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (458) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (486) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																							|
% 17.87/4.81  																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_56_0_44 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																							|
% 17.87/4.81  																							| Equations (399) can reduce 409 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.81  																							|
% 17.87/4.81  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.81  																						|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.81  																						| (489) all_93_1_59 = 0 & all_71_0_53 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																						|
% 17.87/4.81  																							| Applying alpha-rule on (489) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (484) all_93_1_59 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (233) all_71_0_53 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (213) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																							|
% 17.87/4.81  																							| Combining equations (335,233) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (493) all_28_0_36 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																							|
% 17.87/4.81  																							| Simplifying 493 yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (216) all_28_0_36 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																							|
% 17.87/4.81  																							| Equations (216) can reduce 223 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.81  																							|
% 17.87/4.81  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.81  																					|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.81  																					| (496)  ~ (all_93_1_59 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_93_1_59
% 17.87/4.81  																					|
% 17.87/4.81  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (496) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																						| (497)  ~ (all_93_1_59 = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																						| (498) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_93_1_59
% 17.87/4.81  																						|
% 17.87/4.81  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (387), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																						|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																						| (499) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																						|
% 17.87/4.81  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (394), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																							|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (500) (all_164_0_83 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_164_0_83 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_164_0_83)
% 17.87/4.81  																							|
% 17.87/4.81  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (500), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																								|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																								| (501) all_164_0_83 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																								|
% 17.87/4.81  																									| Applying alpha-rule on (501) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (502) all_164_0_83 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (354) all_29_0_37 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (202) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																									| Equations (354) can reduce 359 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.81  																								|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.81  																								| (506)  ~ (all_164_0_83 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_164_0_83
% 17.87/4.81  																								|
% 17.87/4.81  																									| Applying alpha-rule on (506) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (507)  ~ (all_164_0_83 = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (508) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_164_0_83
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																									| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, 0, all_164_0_83 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_164_0_83, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (502) all_164_0_83 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																									| Equations (502) can reduce 507 to:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.81  																							|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.81  																							| (511)  ~ (all_164_0_83 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_164_0_83
% 17.87/4.81  																							|
% 17.87/4.81  																								| Applying alpha-rule on (511) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																								| (507)  ~ (all_164_0_83 = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																								| (513) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_164_0_83
% 17.87/4.81  																								|
% 17.87/4.81  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (351), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																								|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																								| (514) (all_146_0_73 = 0 & all_146_1_74 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_146_1_74 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 17.87/4.81  																								|
% 17.87/4.81  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (514), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.81  																									|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.81  																									| (515) all_146_0_73 = 0 & all_146_1_74 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																									|
% 17.87/4.81  																										| Applying alpha-rule on (515) yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (516) all_146_0_73 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (517) all_146_1_74 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (458) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (486) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.81  																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_56_0_44 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.81  																										| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 17.87/4.81  																										|
% 17.87/4.82  																										| Equations (399) can reduce 409 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																										| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.82  																										|
% 17.87/4.82  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.82  																									|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.82  																									| (522) all_146_1_74 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																									|
% 17.87/4.82  																										| Applying alpha-rule on (522) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																										| (517) all_146_1_74 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																										| (524) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																										|
% 17.87/4.82  																										| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																										| (204) $false
% 17.87/4.82  																										|
% 17.87/4.82  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.82  																								|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.82  																								| (526)  ~ (all_146_1_74 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_146_1_74
% 17.87/4.82  																								|
% 17.87/4.82  																									| Applying alpha-rule on (526) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																									| (527)  ~ (all_146_1_74 = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																									| (528) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_146_1_74
% 17.87/4.82  																									|
% 17.87/4.82  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (144), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.82  																									|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.82  																									| (529) (all_60_0_49 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0) | (all_60_0_49 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_60_0_49 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_49)
% 17.87/4.82  																									|
% 17.87/4.82  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (529), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.82  																										|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.82  																										| (530) (all_60_0_49 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0) | (all_60_0_49 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																										|
% 17.87/4.82  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (530), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.82  																											|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (531) all_60_0_49 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Applying alpha-rule on (531) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (532) all_60_0_49 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.82  																											|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (535) all_60_0_49 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Applying alpha-rule on (535) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (532) all_60_0_49 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (448) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.82  																										|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.82  																										| (540)  ~ (all_60_0_49 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_49
% 17.87/4.82  																										|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Applying alpha-rule on (540) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (541)  ~ (all_60_0_49 = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (542) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_49
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, 0, all_60_0_49 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_49, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (532) all_60_0_49 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Equations (532) can reduce 541 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.82  																									|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.82  																									| (545)  ~ (all_60_0_49 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_49
% 17.87/4.82  																									|
% 17.87/4.82  																										| Applying alpha-rule on (545) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																										| (541)  ~ (all_60_0_49 = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																										| (547) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_49
% 17.87/4.82  																										|
% 17.87/4.82  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (146), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.82  																										|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.82  																										| (548) (all_62_0_52 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_62_0_52 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_52)
% 17.87/4.82  																										|
% 17.87/4.82  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.82  																											|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (549) all_62_0_52 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Applying alpha-rule on (549) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (550) all_62_0_52 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (448) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.82  																											|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (554)  ~ (all_62_0_52 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_52
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Applying alpha-rule on (554) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (555)  ~ (all_62_0_52 = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (556) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_52
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, 0, all_62_0_52 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_52, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (550) all_62_0_52 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Equations (550) can reduce 555 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.82  																										|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.82  																										| (559)  ~ (all_62_0_52 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_52
% 17.87/4.82  																										|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Applying alpha-rule on (559) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (555)  ~ (all_62_0_52 = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (561) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_52
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_62_0_52, all_29_0_37 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_52, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_29_0_37, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (562) all_62_0_52 = all_29_0_37
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_62_0_52, all_164_0_83 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_164_0_83, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_62_0_52, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (563) all_164_0_83 = all_62_0_52
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_60_0_49, all_164_0_83 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_164_0_83, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = all_60_0_49, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (564) all_164_0_83 = all_60_0_49
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_146_1_74, all_26_1_33 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_146_1_74, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (565) all_146_1_74 = all_26_1_33
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_93_1_59, all_146_1_74 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_146_1_74, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_93_1_59, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (566) all_146_1_74 = all_93_1_59
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Combining equations (563,564) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (567) all_62_0_52 = all_60_0_49
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Simplifying 567 yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (568) all_62_0_52 = all_60_0_49
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Combining equations (565,566) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (569) all_93_1_59 = all_26_1_33
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Combining equations (568,562) yields a new equation:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (570) all_60_0_49 = all_29_0_37
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Simplifying 570 yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (571) all_60_0_49 = all_29_0_37
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Equations (569) can reduce 497 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (121)  ~ (all_26_1_33 = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| Equations (571) can reduce 541 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (359)  ~ (all_29_0_37 = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											| From (569) and (498) follows:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (122) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (143), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.82  																											|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (422) (all_59_0_47 = 0 & all_59_1_48 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_59_1_48 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (422), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.82  																												|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (423) all_59_0_47 = 0 & all_59_1_48 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																													| Applying alpha-rule on (423) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																													| (424) all_59_0_47 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																													| (425) all_59_1_48 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																													| (426) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																													| (427) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																													|
% 17.87/4.82  																													| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																													| (204) $false
% 17.87/4.82  																													|
% 17.87/4.82  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.82  																												|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (429) all_59_1_48 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																													| Applying alpha-rule on (429) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																													| (425) all_59_1_48 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																													| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																													|
% 17.87/4.82  																													| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																													| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.82  																													|
% 17.87/4.82  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.82  																											|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.82  																											| (433)  ~ (all_59_1_48 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_59_1_48
% 17.87/4.82  																											|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Applying alpha-rule on (433) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (434)  ~ (all_59_1_48 = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (435) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_59_1_48
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_59_1_48, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_59_1_48, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (436) all_59_1_48 = all_0_0_0
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| Equations (436) can reduce 434 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (21)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												| From (436) and (435) follows:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (22) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (141), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.82  																												|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.82  																												| (439) (all_57_0_45 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_57_0_45 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45)
% 17.87/4.82  																												|
% 17.87/4.82  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (439), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.82  																													|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.82  																													| (440) (all_57_0_45 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_57_0_45 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																													|
% 17.87/4.82  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (440), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.82  																														|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.82  																														| (441) all_57_0_45 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																														|
% 17.87/4.82  																															| Applying alpha-rule on (441) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																															| (442) all_57_0_45 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																															| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																															| (111) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																															|
% 17.87/4.82  																															| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																															| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.82  																															|
% 17.87/4.82  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.82  																														|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.82  																														| (446) all_57_0_45 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																														|
% 17.87/4.82  																															| Applying alpha-rule on (446) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																															| (442) all_57_0_45 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																															| (448) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																															|
% 17.87/4.82  																															| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																															| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																															|
% 17.87/4.82  																															| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																															| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.82  																															|
% 17.87/4.82  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.82  																													|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.82  																													| (451)  ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45
% 17.87/4.82  																													|
% 17.87/4.82  																														| Applying alpha-rule on (451) yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																														| (452)  ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0)
% 17.87/4.82  																														| (453) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45
% 17.87/4.82  																														|
% 17.87/4.82  																														| Instantiating formula (20) with all_57_0_45, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																														| (607) all_57_0_45 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																														|
% 17.87/4.82  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (607), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.82  																														|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.82  																														| (486) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																														|
% 17.87/4.82  																															| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_56_0_44 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.82  																															| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 17.87/4.82  																															|
% 17.87/4.82  																															| Equations (399) can reduce 409 to:
% 17.87/4.82  																															| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.82  																															|
% 17.87/4.82  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.82  																														|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (611)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (442) all_57_0_45 = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																															| Equations (442) can reduce 452 to:
% 17.87/4.83  																															| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.83  																															|
% 17.87/4.83  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.83  																												|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.83  																												| (464)  ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45
% 17.87/4.83  																												|
% 17.87/4.83  																													| Applying alpha-rule on (464) yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																													| (452)  ~ (all_57_0_45 = 0)
% 17.87/4.83  																													| (466) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45
% 17.87/4.83  																													|
% 17.87/4.83  																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_57_0_45, all_56_0_44 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_57_0_45, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																													| (454) all_57_0_45 = all_56_0_44
% 17.87/4.83  																													|
% 17.87/4.83  																													| Equations (454) can reduce 452 to:
% 17.87/4.83  																													| (409)  ~ (all_56_0_44 = 0)
% 17.87/4.83  																													|
% 17.87/4.83  																													| From (454) and (466) follows:
% 17.87/4.83  																													| (479) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44
% 17.87/4.83  																													|
% 17.87/4.83  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (145), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.83  																													|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.83  																													| (620) (all_61_0_50 = 0 & all_61_1_51 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_61_1_51 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 17.87/4.83  																													|
% 17.87/4.83  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (620), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.83  																														|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (621) all_61_0_50 = 0 & all_61_1_51 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																															| Applying alpha-rule on (621) yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																															| (622) all_61_0_50 = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																															| (623) all_61_1_51 = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																															| (426) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																															| (427) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																															|
% 17.87/4.83  																															| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																															| (204) $false
% 17.87/4.83  																															|
% 17.87/4.83  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.83  																														|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (627) all_61_1_51 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																															| Applying alpha-rule on (627) yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																															| (623) all_61_1_51 = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																															| (448) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																															|
% 17.87/4.83  																															| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																															| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																															|
% 17.87/4.83  																															| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.87/4.83  																															| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.83  																															|
% 17.87/4.83  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.83  																													|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.83  																													| (632)  ~ (all_61_1_51 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_61_1_51
% 17.87/4.83  																													|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Applying alpha-rule on (632) yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (633)  ~ (all_61_1_51 = 0)
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (634) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_61_1_51
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, all_61_1_51, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_61_1_51, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (635) all_61_1_51 = all_0_0_0
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Equations (635) can reduce 633 to:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (21)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| From (635) and (634) follows:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (22) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (45) with 0, 0, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (638)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (3) with all_26_1_33, 0, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (639)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (69) with 0, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (640)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (55) with 0, 0, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (641)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (55) with 0, 0, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (642)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (30) with 0, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (643)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (32) with all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (644)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (32) with 0, all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (645)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (40) with all_28_0_36, all_56_0_44, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = all_28_0_36, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (646)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_28_0_36 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (24) with all_56_0_44, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (647) all_56_0_44 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (30) with all_56_0_44, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (648)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ((v1 = 0 & v0 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = v0))
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (55) with 0, all_56_0_44, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (649)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = v0))
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating formula (19) with all_56_0_44, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (650) all_56_0_44 = 0 | unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating (648) with all_237_0_224, all_237_1_225 yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (651) (all_237_0_224 = 0 & all_237_1_225 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_237_1_225 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (all_237_1_225 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_237_1_225)
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating (646) with all_239_0_228 yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (652) (all_239_0_228 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_239_0_228 = 0 & all_28_0_36 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (all_239_0_228 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_239_0_228) | ( ~ (all_239_0_228 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_239_0_228)
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating (645) with all_240_0_229, all_240_1_230 yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (653) (all_240_0_229 = 0 & all_240_1_230 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_240_1_230 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_240_1_230 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_240_1_230)
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating (649) with all_241_0_231 yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (654) (all_241_0_231 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_241_0_231 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (all_241_0_231 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_241_0_231) | ( ~ (all_241_0_231 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_241_0_231)
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating (643) with all_242_0_232, all_242_1_233 yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (655) (all_242_0_232 = 0 & all_242_1_233 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_242_1_233 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_242_1_233 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_242_1_233)
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating (642) with all_244_0_235 yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (656) (all_244_0_235 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_244_0_235 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_244_0_235 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_244_0_235) | ( ~ (all_244_0_235 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_244_0_235)
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating (641) with all_250_0_241 yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (657) (all_250_0_241 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_250_0_241 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241) | ( ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241)
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating (640) with all_251_0_242, all_251_1_243 yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (658) (all_251_0_242 = 0 & all_251_1_243 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_251_1_243 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_251_1_243 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_251_1_243)
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating (644) with all_254_0_247, all_254_1_248 yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (659) (all_254_0_247 = 0 & all_254_1_248 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_254_1_248 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_254_1_248 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_254_1_248)
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating (639) with all_256_0_251 yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (660) (all_256_0_251 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_256_0_251 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_256_0_251 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_256_0_251) | ( ~ (all_256_0_251 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_256_0_251)
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														| Instantiating (638) with all_258_0_254 yields:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (661) (all_258_0_254 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_258_0_254 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_258_0_254 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_258_0_254) | ( ~ (all_258_0_254 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_258_0_254)
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (650), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.83  																														|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.83  																														| (458) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.83  																														|
% 17.87/4.83  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.83  																															|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.83  																															| (663) (all_102_0_72 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_102_0_72 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_102_0_72 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_102_0_72)
% 17.87/4.83  																															|
% 17.87/4.83  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (663), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.83  																																|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																| (664) (all_102_0_72 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_102_0_72 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																|
% 17.87/4.84  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (664), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| (665) all_102_0_72 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (665) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (666) all_102_0_72 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (92) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| (670) all_102_0_72 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (670) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (666) all_102_0_72 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (112) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, 0, all_36_0_38 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																																|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																																| (675)  ~ (all_102_0_72 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_102_0_72
% 17.87/4.84  																																|
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (675) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| (676)  ~ (all_102_0_72 = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| (677) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_102_0_72
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_102_0_72 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_102_0_72, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| (666) all_102_0_72 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| Equations (666) can reduce 676 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																															|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																															| (680)  ~ (all_102_0_72 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_102_0_72
% 17.87/4.84  																															|
% 17.87/4.84  																																| Applying alpha-rule on (680) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																| (676)  ~ (all_102_0_72 = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																| (682) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_102_0_72
% 17.87/4.84  																																|
% 17.87/4.84  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (192), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																| (683) (all_97_0_65 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_97_0_65 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0) | ( ~ (all_97_0_65 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_97_0_65)
% 17.87/4.84  																																|
% 17.87/4.84  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (683), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| (684) (all_97_0_65 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_97_0_65 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (684), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (685) all_97_0_65 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (685) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (686) all_97_0_65 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (448) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (690) all_97_0_65 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (690) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (686) all_97_0_65 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (112) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, 0, all_36_0_38 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| (695)  ~ (all_97_0_65 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_97_0_65
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (695) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (696)  ~ (all_97_0_65 = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (697) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_97_0_65
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_97_0_65 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_97_0_65, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (686) all_97_0_65 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| Equations (686) can reduce 696 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																																|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																																| (700)  ~ (all_97_0_65 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_97_0_65
% 17.87/4.84  																																|
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (700) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| (696)  ~ (all_97_0_65 = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| (702) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_97_0_65
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|
% 17.87/4.84  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (393), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| (703) (all_163_0_82 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_163_0_82 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_163_0_82 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_163_0_82)
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (703), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (704) (all_163_0_82 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_163_0_82 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (704), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (705) all_163_0_82 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (705) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (706) all_163_0_82 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (354) all_29_0_37 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (202) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| Equations (354) can reduce 359 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (710) all_163_0_82 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (710) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (706) all_163_0_82 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (207) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, 0, all_26_1_33 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (715)  ~ (all_163_0_82 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_163_0_82
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (715) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (716)  ~ (all_163_0_82 = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (717) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_163_0_82
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_163_0_82 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_163_0_82, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (706) all_163_0_82 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| Equations (706) can reduce 716 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																																	| (720)  ~ (all_163_0_82 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_163_0_82
% 17.87/4.84  																																	|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (720) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (716)  ~ (all_163_0_82 = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (722) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_163_0_82
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (395), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (723) (all_165_0_84 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_165_0_84 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_165_0_84 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_165_0_84)
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (723), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (724) (all_165_0_84 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_165_0_84 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (724), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (725) all_165_0_84 = 0 & all_29_0_37 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (725) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| (726) all_165_0_84 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| (354) all_29_0_37 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| (202) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																					|
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| Equations (354) can reduce 359 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																					|
% 17.87/4.84  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (730) all_165_0_84 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (730) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| (726) all_165_0_84 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| (35) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																					|
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																					|
% 17.87/4.84  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (735)  ~ (all_165_0_84 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_165_0_84
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (735) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (736)  ~ (all_165_0_84 = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (737) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_165_0_84
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_165_0_84 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_165_0_84, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (726) all_165_0_84 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| Equations (726) can reduce 736 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																																		| (740)  ~ (all_165_0_84 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_165_0_84
% 17.87/4.84  																																		|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (740) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (736)  ~ (all_165_0_84 = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (742) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_165_0_84
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (660), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																			| (743) (all_256_0_251 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_256_0_251 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_256_0_251 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_256_0_251)
% 17.87/4.84  																																			|
% 17.87/4.84  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (743), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																				| (744) (all_256_0_251 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_256_0_251 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 17.87/4.84  																																				|
% 17.87/4.84  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (744), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.84  																																					|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| (745) all_256_0_251 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																					|
% 17.87/4.84  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (745) yields:
% 17.87/4.84  																																						| (746) all_256_0_251 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																						| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																						| (35) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																						|
% 17.87/4.84  																																						| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 17.87/4.84  																																						| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.84  																																						|
% 17.87/4.84  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.84  																																					|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.84  																																					| (750) all_256_0_251 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.84  																																					|
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (750) yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| (746) all_256_0_251 = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| (203) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| (204) $false
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.85  																																				|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.85  																																				| (754)  ~ (all_256_0_251 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_256_0_251
% 17.87/4.85  																																				|
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (754) yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| (755)  ~ (all_256_0_251 = 0)
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| (756) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_256_0_251
% 17.87/4.85  																																					|
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_256_0_251 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_256_0_251, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| (746) all_256_0_251 = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																					|
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| Equations (746) can reduce 755 to:
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.85  																																					|
% 17.87/4.85  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.85  																																			|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.85  																																			| (759)  ~ (all_256_0_251 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_256_0_251
% 17.87/4.85  																																			|
% 17.87/4.85  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (759) yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																				| (755)  ~ (all_256_0_251 = 0)
% 17.87/4.85  																																				| (761) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_256_0_251
% 17.87/4.85  																																				|
% 17.87/4.85  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (661), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.85  																																				|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.85  																																				| (762) (all_258_0_254 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_258_0_254 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_258_0_254 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_258_0_254)
% 17.87/4.85  																																				|
% 17.87/4.85  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (762), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.85  																																					|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| (763) (all_258_0_254 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_258_0_254 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 17.87/4.85  																																					|
% 17.87/4.85  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (763), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| (764) all_258_0_254 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (764) yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| (765) all_258_0_254 = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| (203) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																							|
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| (204) $false
% 17.87/4.85  																																							|
% 17.87/4.85  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| (768) all_258_0_254 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (768) yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| (765) all_258_0_254 = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| (207) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																							|
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, 0, all_26_1_33 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																							|
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.85  																																							|
% 17.87/4.85  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.85  																																					|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| (773)  ~ (all_258_0_254 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_258_0_254
% 17.87/4.85  																																					|
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (773) yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| (774)  ~ (all_258_0_254 = 0)
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| (775) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_258_0_254
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_258_0_254 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_258_0_254, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| (765) all_258_0_254 = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| Equations (765) can reduce 774 to:
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| (94) $false
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 17.87/4.85  																																				|-Branch two:
% 17.87/4.85  																																				| (778)  ~ (all_258_0_254 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_258_0_254
% 17.87/4.85  																																				|
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (778) yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| (774)  ~ (all_258_0_254 = 0)
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| (780) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_258_0_254
% 17.87/4.85  																																					|
% 17.87/4.85  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (647), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.85  																																					|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.85  																																					| (781) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																					|
% 17.87/4.85  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (652), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.85  																																						| (782) (all_239_0_228 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_239_0_228 = 0 & all_28_0_36 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (all_239_0_228 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_239_0_228)
% 17.87/4.85  																																						|
% 17.87/4.85  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (782), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.85  																																							|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.85  																																							| (783) (all_239_0_228 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_239_0_228 = 0 & all_28_0_36 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 17.87/4.85  																																							|
% 17.87/4.85  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (783), into two cases.
% 17.87/4.85  																																								|-Branch one:
% 17.87/4.85  																																								| (784) all_239_0_228 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																								|
% 17.87/4.85  																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (784) yields:
% 17.87/4.85  																																									| (785) all_239_0_228 = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																									| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 17.87/4.85  																																									| (458) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																									|
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| Equations (399) can reduce 409 to:
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| (94) $false
% 18.21/4.85  																																									|
% 18.21/4.85  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.85  																																								|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.85  																																								| (789) all_239_0_228 = 0 & all_28_0_36 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																								|
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (789) yields:
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| (785) all_239_0_228 = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| (216) all_28_0_36 = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| (213) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																									|
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| Equations (216) can reduce 223 to:
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| (94) $false
% 18.21/4.85  																																									|
% 18.21/4.85  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.85  																																							|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.85  																																							| (794)  ~ (all_239_0_228 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_239_0_228
% 18.21/4.85  																																							|
% 18.21/4.85  																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (794) yields:
% 18.21/4.85  																																								| (795)  ~ (all_239_0_228 = 0)
% 18.21/4.85  																																								| (796) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_239_0_228
% 18.21/4.85  																																								|
% 18.21/4.85  																																								| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_239_0_228 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_239_0_228, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 18.21/4.85  																																								| (785) all_239_0_228 = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																								|
% 18.21/4.85  																																								| Equations (785) can reduce 795 to:
% 18.21/4.85  																																								| (94) $false
% 18.21/4.85  																																								|
% 18.21/4.85  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.85  																																						|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.85  																																						| (799)  ~ (all_239_0_228 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_239_0_228
% 18.21/4.85  																																						|
% 18.21/4.85  																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (799) yields:
% 18.21/4.85  																																							| (795)  ~ (all_239_0_228 = 0)
% 18.21/4.85  																																							| (801) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_239_0_228
% 18.21/4.85  																																							|
% 18.21/4.85  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (654), into two cases.
% 18.21/4.85  																																							|-Branch one:
% 18.21/4.85  																																							| (802) (all_241_0_231 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_241_0_231 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0) | ( ~ (all_241_0_231 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_241_0_231)
% 18.21/4.85  																																							|
% 18.21/4.85  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (802), into two cases.
% 18.21/4.85  																																								|-Branch one:
% 18.21/4.85  																																								| (803) (all_241_0_231 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_241_0_231 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 18.21/4.85  																																								|
% 18.21/4.85  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (803), into two cases.
% 18.21/4.85  																																									|-Branch one:
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| (804) all_241_0_231 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																									|
% 18.21/4.85  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (804) yields:
% 18.21/4.85  																																										| (805) all_241_0_231 = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																										| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																										| (458) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																										|
% 18.21/4.85  																																										| Equations (399) can reduce 409 to:
% 18.21/4.85  																																										| (94) $false
% 18.21/4.85  																																										|
% 18.21/4.85  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.85  																																									|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| (809) all_241_0_231 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																									|
% 18.21/4.85  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (809) yields:
% 18.21/4.85  																																										| (805) all_241_0_231 = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																										| (524) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.21/4.85  																																										|
% 18.21/4.85  																																										| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 18.21/4.85  																																										| (204) $false
% 18.21/4.85  																																										|
% 18.21/4.85  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.85  																																								|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.85  																																								| (813)  ~ (all_241_0_231 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_241_0_231
% 18.21/4.85  																																								|
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (813) yields:
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| (814)  ~ (all_241_0_231 = 0)
% 18.21/4.85  																																									| (815) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_241_0_231
% 18.21/4.86  																																									|
% 18.21/4.86  																																									| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, 0, all_241_0_231 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_241_0_231, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																									| (805) all_241_0_231 = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																									|
% 18.21/4.86  																																									| Equations (805) can reduce 814 to:
% 18.21/4.86  																																									| (94) $false
% 18.21/4.86  																																									|
% 18.21/4.86  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.86  																																							|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.86  																																							| (818)  ~ (all_241_0_231 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_241_0_231
% 18.21/4.86  																																							|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (818) yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (814)  ~ (all_241_0_231 = 0)
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (820) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_241_0_231
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_256_0_251, all_56_0_44 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_256_0_251, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_56_0_44, yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (821) all_256_0_251 = all_56_0_44
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_241_0_231, all_258_0_254 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_258_0_254, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_241_0_231, yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (822) all_258_0_254 = all_241_0_231
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_239_0_228, all_256_0_251 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_256_0_251, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_239_0_228, yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (823) all_256_0_251 = all_239_0_228
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_165_0_84, all_241_0_231 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_241_0_231, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_165_0_84, yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (824) all_241_0_231 = all_165_0_84
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_165_0_84, all_239_0_228 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_239_0_228, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_165_0_84, yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (825) all_239_0_228 = all_165_0_84
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_163_0_82, all_256_0_251 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_256_0_251, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_163_0_82, yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (826) all_256_0_251 = all_163_0_82
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_102_0_72, all_239_0_228 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_239_0_228, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_102_0_72, yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (827) all_239_0_228 = all_102_0_72
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_97_0_65, all_258_0_254 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_258_0_254, convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = all_97_0_65, yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (828) all_258_0_254 = all_97_0_65
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Combining equations (822,828) yields a new equation:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (829) all_241_0_231 = all_97_0_65
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Simplifying 829 yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (830) all_241_0_231 = all_97_0_65
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Combining equations (821,826) yields a new equation:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (831) all_163_0_82 = all_56_0_44
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Combining equations (823,826) yields a new equation:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (832) all_239_0_228 = all_163_0_82
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Simplifying 832 yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (833) all_239_0_228 = all_163_0_82
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Combining equations (824,830) yields a new equation:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (834) all_165_0_84 = all_97_0_65
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Simplifying 834 yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (835) all_165_0_84 = all_97_0_65
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Combining equations (833,827) yields a new equation:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (836) all_163_0_82 = all_102_0_72
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Simplifying 836 yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (837) all_163_0_82 = all_102_0_72
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Combining equations (825,827) yields a new equation:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (838) all_165_0_84 = all_102_0_72
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Simplifying 838 yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (839) all_165_0_84 = all_102_0_72
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Combining equations (839,835) yields a new equation:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (840) all_102_0_72 = all_97_0_65
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Simplifying 840 yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (841) all_102_0_72 = all_97_0_65
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Combining equations (837,831) yields a new equation:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (842) all_102_0_72 = all_56_0_44
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Simplifying 842 yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (843) all_102_0_72 = all_56_0_44
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Combining equations (843,841) yields a new equation:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (844) all_97_0_65 = all_56_0_44
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| Equations (844) can reduce 696 to:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (409)  ~ (all_56_0_44 = 0)
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (187), into two cases.
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|-Branch one:
% 18.21/4.86  																																								| (846) (all_92_0_56 = 0 & all_92_1_57 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_92_1_57 = 0 & all_71_0_53 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 18.21/4.86  																																								|
% 18.21/4.86  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (846), into two cases.
% 18.21/4.86  																																									|-Branch one:
% 18.21/4.86  																																									| (847) all_92_0_56 = 0 & all_92_1_57 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																									|
% 18.21/4.86  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (847) yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																										| (848) all_92_0_56 = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																										| (849) all_92_1_57 = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																										| (850) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																										| (781) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																										|
% 18.21/4.86  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (659), into two cases.
% 18.21/4.86  																																										|-Branch one:
% 18.21/4.86  																																										| (852) (all_254_0_247 = 0 & all_254_1_248 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_254_1_248 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 18.21/4.86  																																										|
% 18.21/4.86  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (852), into two cases.
% 18.21/4.86  																																											|-Branch one:
% 18.21/4.86  																																											| (853) all_254_0_247 = 0 & all_254_1_248 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																											|
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (853) yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| (854) all_254_0_247 = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| (855) all_254_1_248 = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| (426) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| (427) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																												|
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| (204) $false
% 18.21/4.86  																																												|
% 18.21/4.86  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.86  																																											|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.86  																																											| (859) all_254_1_248 = 0 & all_0_0_0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																											|
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (859) yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| (855) all_254_1_248 = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| (92) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.21/4.86  																																												|
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 18.21/4.86  																																												| (94) $false
% 18.21/4.86  																																												|
% 18.21/4.86  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.86  																																										|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.86  																																										| (864)  ~ (all_254_1_248 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_254_1_248
% 18.21/4.86  																																										|
% 18.21/4.86  																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (864) yields:
% 18.21/4.86  																																											| (865)  ~ (all_254_1_248 = 0)
% 18.21/4.86  																																											| (866) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_254_1_248
% 18.21/4.86  																																											|
% 18.21/4.86  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (657), into two cases.
% 18.21/4.86  																																											|-Branch one:
% 18.21/4.86  																																											| (867) (all_250_0_241 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_250_0_241 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241)
% 18.21/4.86  																																											|
% 18.21/4.86  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (867), into two cases.
% 18.21/4.86  																																												|-Branch one:
% 18.21/4.87  																																												| (868) (all_250_0_241 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_250_0_241 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 18.21/4.87  																																												|
% 18.21/4.87  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (868), into two cases.
% 18.21/4.87  																																													|-Branch one:
% 18.21/4.87  																																													| (869) all_250_0_241 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																													|
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (869) yields:
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| (870) all_250_0_241 = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| (871) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																														|
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, 0, all_254_1_248 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_254_1_248, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| (855) all_254_1_248 = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																														|
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| Equations (855) can reduce 865 to:
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| (94) $false
% 18.21/4.87  																																														|
% 18.21/4.87  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.87  																																													|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.87  																																													| (874) all_250_0_241 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																													|
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (874) yields:
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| (870) all_250_0_241 = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| (207) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																														|
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, 0, all_26_1_33 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																														|
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 18.21/4.87  																																														| (94) $false
% 18.21/4.87  																																														|
% 18.21/4.87  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.87  																																												|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.87  																																												| (879)  ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241
% 18.21/4.87  																																												|
% 18.21/4.87  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (879) yields:
% 18.21/4.87  																																													| (880)  ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0)
% 18.21/4.87  																																													| (881) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241
% 18.21/4.87  																																													|
% 18.21/4.87  																																													| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, 0, all_250_0_241 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 18.21/4.87  																																													| (870) all_250_0_241 = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																													|
% 18.21/4.87  																																													| Equations (870) can reduce 880 to:
% 18.21/4.87  																																													| (94) $false
% 18.21/4.87  																																													|
% 18.21/4.87  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.87  																																											|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.87  																																											| (884)  ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241
% 18.21/4.87  																																											|
% 18.21/4.87  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (884) yields:
% 18.21/4.87  																																												| (880)  ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0)
% 18.21/4.87  																																												| (886) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241
% 18.21/4.87  																																												|
% 18.21/4.87  																																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_250_0_241, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241, convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 18.21/4.87  																																												| (870) all_250_0_241 = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																												|
% 18.21/4.87  																																												| Equations (870) can reduce 880 to:
% 18.21/4.87  																																												| (94) $false
% 18.21/4.87  																																												|
% 18.21/4.87  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.87  																																									|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.87  																																									| (889) all_92_1_57 = 0 & all_71_0_53 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																									|
% 18.21/4.87  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (889) yields:
% 18.21/4.87  																																										| (849) all_92_1_57 = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																										| (233) all_71_0_53 = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																										| (213) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																										|
% 18.21/4.87  																																										| Combining equations (335,233) yields a new equation:
% 18.21/4.87  																																										| (493) all_28_0_36 = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																										|
% 18.21/4.87  																																										| Simplifying 493 yields:
% 18.21/4.87  																																										| (216) all_28_0_36 = 0
% 18.21/4.87  																																										|
% 18.21/4.87  																																										| Equations (216) can reduce 223 to:
% 18.21/4.87  																																										| (94) $false
% 18.21/4.87  																																										|
% 18.21/4.87  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.21/4.87  																																								|-Branch two:
% 18.21/4.87  																																								| (896)  ~ (all_92_1_57 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_92_1_57
% 18.21/4.87  																																								|
% 18.21/4.87  																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (896) yields:
% 18.21/4.87  																																									| (897)  ~ (all_92_1_57 = 0)
% 18.21/4.87  																																									| (898) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_92_1_57
% 18.21/4.87  																																									|
% 18.21/4.87  																																									| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, all_92_1_57, all_36_0_38 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_92_1_57, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 18.29/4.87  																																									| (899) all_92_1_57 = all_36_0_38
% 18.29/4.87  																																									|
% 18.29/4.87  																																									| From (899) and (898) follows:
% 18.29/4.87  																																									| (99) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38
% 18.29/4.87  																																									|
% 18.29/4.87  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (190), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.87  																																									|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.87  																																									| (901) (all_95_0_61 = 0 & all_95_1_62 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_95_1_62 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 18.29/4.87  																																									|
% 18.29/4.87  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (901), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.87  																																										|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.87  																																										| (902) all_95_0_61 = 0 & all_95_1_62 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																										|
% 18.29/4.87  																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (902) yields:
% 18.29/4.87  																																											| (903) all_95_0_61 = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																											| (904) all_95_1_62 = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																											| (871) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																											| (499) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																											|
% 18.29/4.87  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (653), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.87  																																											|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.87  																																											| (907) (all_240_0_229 = 0 & all_240_1_230 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_240_1_230 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 18.29/4.87  																																											|
% 18.29/4.87  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (907), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.87  																																												|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.87  																																												| (908) all_240_0_229 = 0 & all_240_1_230 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																												|
% 18.29/4.87  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (908) yields:
% 18.29/4.87  																																													| (909) all_240_0_229 = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																													| (910) all_240_1_230 = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																													| (871) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																													|
% 18.29/4.87  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (656), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.87  																																													|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.87  																																													| (912) (all_244_0_235 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_244_0_235 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_244_0_235 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_244_0_235)
% 18.29/4.87  																																													|
% 18.29/4.87  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (912), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.87  																																														|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.87  																																														| (913) (all_244_0_235 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_244_0_235 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 18.29/4.87  																																														|
% 18.29/4.87  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (913), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.87  																																															|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.87  																																															| (914) all_244_0_235 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																															|
% 18.29/4.87  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (914) yields:
% 18.29/4.87  																																																| (915) all_244_0_235 = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																																| (871) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																																|
% 18.29/4.87  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (651), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.87  																																																|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.87  																																																| (917) (all_237_0_224 = 0 & all_237_1_225 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_237_1_225 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 18.29/4.87  																																																|
% 18.29/4.87  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (917), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.87  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.87  																																																	| (918) all_237_0_224 = 0 & all_237_1_225 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																																	|
% 18.29/4.87  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (918) yields:
% 18.29/4.87  																																																		| (919) all_237_0_224 = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																																		| (920) all_237_1_225 = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																																		| (850) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																																		| (781) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.29/4.87  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.87  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (658), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.87  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.87  																																																		| (923) (all_251_0_242 = 0 & all_251_1_243 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_251_1_243 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 18.29/4.87  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (923), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			| (924) all_251_0_242 = 0 & all_251_1_243 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (924) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (925) all_251_0_242 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (926) all_251_1_243 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (202) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (203) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (204) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			| (930) all_251_1_243 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (930) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (926) all_251_1_243 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (871) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (655), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (933) (all_242_0_232 = 0 & all_242_1_233 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_242_1_233 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (933), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| (934) all_242_0_232 = 0 & all_242_1_233 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (934) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (935) all_242_0_232 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (936) all_242_1_233 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (426) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (427) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (204) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| (940) all_242_1_233 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (940) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (936) all_242_1_233 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (448) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (945)  ~ (all_242_1_233 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_242_1_233
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (945) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| (946)  ~ (all_242_1_233 = 0)
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| (947) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_242_1_233
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, 0, all_242_1_233 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_242_1_233, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| (936) all_242_1_233 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| Equations (936) can reduce 946 to:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																		| (950)  ~ (all_251_1_243 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_251_1_243
% 18.29/4.88  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (950) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			| (951)  ~ (all_251_1_243 = 0)
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			| (952) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_251_1_243
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (657), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			| (867) (all_250_0_241 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_250_0_241 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241)
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (867), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (868) (all_250_0_241 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_250_0_241 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (868), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| (869) all_250_0_241 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (869) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (870) all_250_0_241 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (871) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, 0, all_251_1_243 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_251_1_243, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (926) all_251_1_243 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| Equations (926) can reduce 951 to:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| (874) all_250_0_241 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (874) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (870) all_250_0_241 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (207) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, 0, all_26_1_33 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (879)  ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (879) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| (880)  ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0)
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| (881) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, 0, all_250_0_241 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| (870) all_250_0_241 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| Equations (870) can reduce 880 to:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			| (884)  ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241
% 18.29/4.88  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (884) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (880)  ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0)
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (886) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_250_0_241, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241, convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (870) all_250_0_241 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| Equations (870) can reduce 880 to:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	| (975) all_237_1_225 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (975) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																		| (920) all_237_1_225 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																		| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																		| (458) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																		| Equations (399) can reduce 409 to:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																		| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																																|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																| (980)  ~ (all_237_1_225 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_237_1_225
% 18.29/4.88  																																																|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (980) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	| (981)  ~ (all_237_1_225 = 0)
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	| (982) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_237_1_225
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, 0, all_237_1_225 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_237_1_225, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	| (920) all_237_1_225 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	| Equations (920) can reduce 981 to:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																															|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																															| (985) all_244_0_235 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																															|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (985) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																| (915) all_244_0_235 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																| (203) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																																|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																																| (204) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																																|
% 18.29/4.88  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																														|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																														| (989)  ~ (all_244_0_235 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_244_0_235
% 18.29/4.88  																																														|
% 18.29/4.88  																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (989) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																															| (990)  ~ (all_244_0_235 = 0)
% 18.29/4.88  																																															| (991) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_244_0_235
% 18.29/4.88  																																															|
% 18.29/4.88  																																															| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, 0, all_244_0_235 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_244_0_235, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																															| (915) all_244_0_235 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																															|
% 18.29/4.88  																																															| Equations (915) can reduce 990 to:
% 18.29/4.88  																																															| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																															|
% 18.29/4.88  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																													|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																													| (994)  ~ (all_244_0_235 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_244_0_235
% 18.29/4.88  																																													|
% 18.29/4.88  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (994) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																														| (990)  ~ (all_244_0_235 = 0)
% 18.29/4.88  																																														| (996) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_244_0_235
% 18.29/4.88  																																														|
% 18.29/4.88  																																														| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_244_0_235, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_244_0_235, convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																														| (915) all_244_0_235 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																														|
% 18.29/4.88  																																														| Equations (915) can reduce 990 to:
% 18.29/4.88  																																														| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																														|
% 18.29/4.88  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																												|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																												| (999) all_240_1_230 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																												|
% 18.29/4.88  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (999) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																													| (910) all_240_1_230 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																													| (203) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																													|
% 18.29/4.88  																																													| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																													| (204) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																													|
% 18.29/4.88  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.88  																																											|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.88  																																											| (1003)  ~ (all_240_1_230 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_240_1_230
% 18.29/4.88  																																											|
% 18.29/4.88  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (1003) yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																												| (1004)  ~ (all_240_1_230 = 0)
% 18.29/4.88  																																												| (1005) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_240_1_230
% 18.29/4.88  																																												|
% 18.29/4.88  																																												| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, 0, all_240_1_230 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_240_1_230, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.88  																																												| (910) all_240_1_230 = 0
% 18.29/4.88  																																												|
% 18.29/4.88  																																												| Equations (910) can reduce 1004 to:
% 18.29/4.88  																																												| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.88  																																												|
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.89  																																										|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.89  																																										| (1008) all_95_1_62 = 0 & all_26_1_33 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																										|
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (1008) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (904) all_95_1_62 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (35) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.89  																																									|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.89  																																									| (1013)  ~ (all_95_1_62 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_95_1_62
% 18.29/4.89  																																									|
% 18.29/4.89  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (1013) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																										| (1014)  ~ (all_95_1_62 = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																										| (1015) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_95_1_62
% 18.29/4.89  																																										|
% 18.29/4.89  																																										| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, all_95_1_62, all_36_0_38 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_95_1_62, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																										| (1016) all_95_1_62 = all_36_0_38
% 18.29/4.89  																																										|
% 18.29/4.89  																																										| Equations (1016) can reduce 1014 to:
% 18.29/4.89  																																										| (98)  ~ (all_36_0_38 = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																										|
% 18.29/4.89  																																										| From (1016) and (1015) follows:
% 18.29/4.89  																																										| (99) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38
% 18.29/4.89  																																										|
% 18.29/4.89  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																										|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																										| (1019) (all_96_0_63 = 0 & all_96_1_64 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_96_1_64 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																										|
% 18.29/4.89  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1019), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (1020) all_96_0_63 = 0 & all_96_1_64 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (1020) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (1021) all_96_0_63 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (1022) all_96_1_64 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (426) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (427) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (204) $false
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (1026) all_96_1_64 = 0 & all_36_0_38 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (1026) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (1022) all_96_1_64 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.89  																																										|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.89  																																										| (1030)  ~ (all_96_1_64 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_96_1_64
% 18.29/4.89  																																										|
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (1030) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (1031)  ~ (all_96_1_64 = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (1032) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_96_1_64
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, all_96_1_64, all_36_0_38 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_96_1_64, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (1033) all_96_1_64 = all_36_0_38
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| Equations (1033) can reduce 1031 to:
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (98)  ~ (all_36_0_38 = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| From (1033) and (1032) follows:
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (99) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|
% 18.29/4.89  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (193), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (1036) (all_98_0_66 = 0 & all_98_1_67 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_98_1_67 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|
% 18.29/4.89  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1036), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (1037) all_98_0_66 = 0 & all_98_1_67 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1037) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| (1038) all_98_0_66 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| (1039) all_98_1_67 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| (426) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| (427) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																													|
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| (204) $false
% 18.29/4.89  																																													|
% 18.29/4.89  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (1043) all_98_1_67 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1043) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| (1039) all_98_1_67 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| (112) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																													|
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, 0, all_36_0_38 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																													|
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.89  																																													|
% 18.29/4.89  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.89  																																											| (1048)  ~ (all_98_1_67 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_98_1_67
% 18.29/4.89  																																											|
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (1048) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (1049)  ~ (all_98_1_67 = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (1050) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_98_1_67
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, all_98_1_67, all_36_0_38 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_98_1_67, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (1051) all_98_1_67 = all_36_0_38
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| From (1051) and (1050) follows:
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (99) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|
% 18.29/4.89  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (195), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																												| (1053) (all_100_0_69 = 0 & all_100_1_70 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_100_1_70 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																												|
% 18.29/4.89  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1053), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																													|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																													| (1054) all_100_0_69 = 0 & all_100_1_70 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																													|
% 18.29/4.89  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (1054) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																														| (1055) all_100_0_69 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																														| (1056) all_100_1_70 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																														| (871) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																														| (499) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																														|
% 18.29/4.89  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (651), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																														|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																														| (917) (all_237_0_224 = 0 & all_237_1_225 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0) | (all_237_1_225 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																														|
% 18.29/4.89  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (917), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																															|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																															| (918) all_237_0_224 = 0 & all_237_1_225 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																															|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (918) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																| (919) all_237_0_224 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																| (920) all_237_1_225 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																| (850) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																| (781) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (658), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																																|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																| (923) (all_251_0_242 = 0 & all_251_1_243 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_251_1_243 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																																|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (923), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																	| (924) all_251_0_242 = 0 & all_251_1_243 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																	|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (924) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		| (925) all_251_0_242 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		| (926) all_251_1_243 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		| (202) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		| (203) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		| (204) $false
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.89  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																	| (930) all_251_1_243 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																	|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (930) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		| (926) all_251_1_243 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		| (871) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (653), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		| (907) (all_240_0_229 = 0 & all_240_1_230 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_240_1_230 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (907), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			| (908) all_240_0_229 = 0 & all_240_1_230 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (908) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				| (909) all_240_0_229 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				| (910) all_240_1_230 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				| (871) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (655), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				| (933) (all_242_0_232 = 0 & all_242_1_233 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0) | (all_242_1_233 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (933), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					| (934) all_242_0_232 = 0 & all_242_1_233 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (934) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| (935) all_242_0_232 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| (936) all_242_1_233 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| (426) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| (427) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| (204) $false
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					| (940) all_242_1_233 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (940) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| (936) all_242_1_233 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| (448) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = all_0_0_0, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				| (945)  ~ (all_242_1_233 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_242_1_233
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (945) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					| (946)  ~ (all_242_1_233 = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					| (947) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_242_1_233
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, 0, all_242_1_233 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_242_1_233, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					| (936) all_242_1_233 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					| Equations (936) can reduce 946 to:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			| (999) all_240_1_230 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (999) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				| (910) all_240_1_230 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				| (203) convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				| (204) $false
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		| (1003)  ~ (all_240_1_230 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_240_1_230
% 18.29/4.89  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (1003) yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			| (1004)  ~ (all_240_1_230 = 0)
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			| (1005) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_240_1_230
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, 0, all_240_1_230 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_240_1_230, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			| (910) all_240_1_230 = 0
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			| Equations (910) can reduce 1004 to:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.89  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.89  																																																|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.89  																																																| (950)  ~ (all_251_1_243 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_251_1_243
% 18.29/4.90  																																																|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (950) yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																	| (951)  ~ (all_251_1_243 = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  																																																	| (952) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_251_1_243
% 18.29/4.90  																																																	|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (657), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.90  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																	| (867) (all_250_0_241 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_250_0_241 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0) | ( ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241)
% 18.29/4.90  																																																	|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (867), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		| (868) (all_250_0_241 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0) | (all_250_0_241 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (868), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			| (869) all_250_0_241 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (869) yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| (870) all_250_0_241 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| (871) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, 0, all_251_1_243 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_251_1_243, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| (926) all_251_1_243 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| Equations (926) can reduce 951 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			| (874) all_250_0_241 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (874) yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| (870) all_250_0_241 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| (207) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, 0, all_26_1_33 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		| (879)  ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (879) yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			| (880)  ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			| (881) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, 0, all_250_0_241 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			| (870) all_250_0_241 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			| Equations (870) can reduce 880 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																	| (884)  ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241
% 18.29/4.90  																																																	|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (884) yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		| (880)  ~ (all_250_0_241 = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		| (886) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_250_0_241, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = all_250_0_241, convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		| (870) all_250_0_241 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		| Equations (870) can reduce 880 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  																																															|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  																																															| (975) all_237_1_225 = 0 & all_56_0_44 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																															|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (975) yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																| (920) all_237_1_225 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																| (458) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																																|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																| Equations (399) can reduce 409 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																																																| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																																																|
% 18.29/4.90  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  																																														|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  																																														| (980)  ~ (all_237_1_225 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_237_1_225
% 18.29/4.90  																																														|
% 18.29/4.90  																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (980) yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																															| (981)  ~ (all_237_1_225 = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  																																															| (982) unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_237_1_225
% 18.29/4.90  																																															|
% 18.29/4.90  																																															| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, 0, all_237_1_225 and discharging atoms unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = all_237_1_225, unorthogonal_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																															| (920) all_237_1_225 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																															|
% 18.29/4.90  																																															| Equations (920) can reduce 981 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																																															| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																																															|
% 18.29/4.90  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  																																													|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| (1141) all_100_1_70 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																													|
% 18.29/4.90  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (1141) yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																														| (1056) all_100_1_70 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																														| (207) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																														|
% 18.29/4.90  																																														| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, 0, all_26_1_33 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = all_26_1_33, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																														| (110) all_26_1_33 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																														|
% 18.29/4.90  																																														| Equations (110) can reduce 121 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																																														| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																																														|
% 18.29/4.90  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  																																												|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  																																												| (1146)  ~ (all_100_1_70 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_100_1_70
% 18.29/4.90  																																												|
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1146) yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| (1147)  ~ (all_100_1_70 = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| (1148) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_100_1_70
% 18.29/4.90  																																													|
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2, all_100_1_70, all_36_0_38 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_100_1_70, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| (1149) all_100_1_70 = all_36_0_38
% 18.29/4.90  																																													|
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| Equations (1149) can reduce 1147 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| (98)  ~ (all_36_0_38 = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  																																													|
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| From (1149) and (1148) follows:
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| (99) convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38
% 18.29/4.90  																																													|
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| Instantiating formula (24) with all_36_0_38, all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0, convergent_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = all_36_0_38, yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| (1152) all_36_0_38 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																													|
% 18.29/4.90  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1152), into two cases.
% 18.29/4.90  																																													|-Branch one:
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| (427) convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																													|
% 18.29/4.90  																																														| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 18.29/4.90  																																														| (204) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																																														|
% 18.29/4.90  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  																																													|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| (1155)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  																																													| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																													|
% 18.29/4.90  																																														| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																																														| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																																														|
% 18.29/4.90  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  																																					|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  																																					| (1158)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  																																					| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																																					|
% 18.29/4.90  																																						| Equations (399) can reduce 409 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																																						| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																																						|
% 18.29/4.90  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  																														|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  																														| (461)  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  																														| (399) all_56_0_44 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																														|
% 18.29/4.90  																															| Equations (399) can reduce 409 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																															| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																															|
% 18.29/4.90  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  																						|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  																						| (1164)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  																						| (354) all_29_0_37 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																						|
% 18.29/4.90  																							| Equations (354) can reduce 359 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																							| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																							|
% 18.29/4.90  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  																				|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  																				| (1167)  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_3_3) = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  																				| (354) all_29_0_37 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  																				|
% 18.29/4.90  																					| Equations (354) can reduce 359 to:
% 18.29/4.90  																					| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  																					|
% 18.29/4.90  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  									|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  									| (1170)  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4) = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  									| (233) all_71_0_53 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  									|
% 18.29/4.90  										| Equations (233) can reduce 153 to:
% 18.29/4.90  										| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  										|
% 18.29/4.90  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  				|-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  				| (1173)  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(all_0_4_4, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  				| (113) all_36_0_38 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  				|
% 18.29/4.90  					| Equations (113) can reduce 98 to:
% 18.29/4.90  					| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  					|
% 18.29/4.90  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  |-Branch two:
% 18.29/4.90  | (1176)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_0_3_3, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 18.29/4.90  | (117) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 18.29/4.90  |
% 18.29/4.90  	| Equations (117) can reduce 21 to:
% 18.29/4.90  	| (94) $false
% 18.29/4.90  	|
% 18.29/4.90  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 18.29/4.90  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 18.29/4.90  
% 18.29/4.90  4281ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------