TSTP Solution File: GEO213+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GEO213+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.22s 2.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (  13 unt;  10 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   45 (   0 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s8cb9gyh/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s8cb9gyh/input.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | convergent_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s8cb9gyh/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ distinct_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s8cb9gyh/input.p',i_0_15) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s8cb9gyh/input.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_23,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X1,X3)
    | ~ unorthogonal_lines(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s8cb9gyh/input.p',i_0_23) ).

cnf(i_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    unorthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s8cb9gyh/input.p',i_0_16) ).

cnf(i_0_3,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-s8cb9gyh/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ unorthogonal_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | convergent_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ distinct_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    i_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(esk2_0,X1)
    | convergent_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | unorthogonal_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X1,X3)
    | ~ unorthogonal_lines(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    unorthogonal_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    i_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ~ convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(esk2_0,X1)
    | convergent_lines(esk3_0,X2)
    | convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( convergent_lines(esk1_0,X1)
    | unorthogonal_lines(esk2_0,X1)
    | ~ convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ~ convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_46]),c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(esk2_0,X1)
    | convergent_lines(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]),c_0_45]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GEO213+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 14:02:30 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.47  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.22/0.48  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.22/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.22/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.22/2.58  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 8.22/2.58  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.22/2.58  # Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 8.22/2.58  
% 8.22/2.58  # Proof found!
% 8.22/2.58  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.22/2.58  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.22/2.58  # Proof object total steps             : 25
% 8.22/2.58  # Proof object clause steps            : 17
% 8.22/2.58  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 8.22/2.58  # Proof object conjectures             : 12
% 8.22/2.58  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 9
% 8.22/2.58  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 8.22/2.58  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 8.22/2.58  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 8.22/2.58  # Proof object generating inferences   : 9
% 8.22/2.58  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 8.22/2.58  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.22/2.58  # Parsed axioms                        : 28
% 8.22/2.58  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Initial clauses                      : 28
% 8.22/2.58  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 28
% 8.22/2.58  # Processed clauses                    : 51
% 8.22/2.58  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 8.22/2.58  # ...remaining for further processing  : 47
% 8.22/2.58  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Generated clauses                    : 72
% 8.22/2.58  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 58
% 8.22/2.58  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 8.22/2.58  # Paramodulations                      : 70
% 8.22/2.58  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 8.22/2.58  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Current number of processed clauses  : 47
% 8.22/2.58  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 8.22/2.58  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.22/2.58  #    Negative unit clauses             : 11
% 8.22/2.58  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 30
% 8.22/2.58  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 33
% 8.22/2.58  # ...number of literals in the above   : 128
% 8.22/2.58  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 87
% 8.22/2.58  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 64
% 8.22/2.58  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 8.22/2.58  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 49
% 8.22/2.58  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.22/2.58  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1326
% 8.22/2.58  
% 8.22/2.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.22/2.58  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 8.22/2.58  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 8.22/2.58  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 8.22/2.58  # ...preprocessing         : 0.010 s
% 8.22/2.58  # ...main loop             : 0.001 s
% 8.22/2.58  # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 8.22/2.58  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------