TSTP Solution File: GEO211+2 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : GEO211+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10 % Problem : GEO211+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.10 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.09/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 22:36:02 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.46 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.51 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.51 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.13/0.51 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.51 % Transform :cnf
% 0.13/0.51 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.13/0.51 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.51
% 0.13/0.51 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.13/0.51 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.13/0.51 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.51 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.51 % File : GEO211+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.51 % Domain : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.13/0.51 % Problem : A line is not orthogonal to itself
% 0.13/0.51 % Version : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.13/0.51 % English : A Line is not orthogonal to itself.
% 0.13/0.51
% 0.13/0.51 % Refs : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.13/0.51 % : [Li97] Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 0.13/0.51 % : [Li98] Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 0.13/0.51 % : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.13/0.51 % Source : [ILTP]
% 0.13/0.51 % Names :
% 0.13/0.51
% 0.13/0.51 % Status : Theorem
% 0.13/0.51 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.08 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.13/0.51 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% 0.13/0.51 % Number of atoms : 56 ( 0 equ)
% 0.13/0.51 % Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% 0.13/0.51 % Number of connectives : 42 ( 7 ~; 16 |; 5 &)
% 0.13/0.51 % ( 0 <=>; 14 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.13/0.51 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% 0.13/0.51 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.13/0.51 % Number of predicates : 5 ( 5 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.13/0.51 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.13/0.51 % Number of variables : 51 ( 51 !; 0 ?)
% 0.13/0.51 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.13/0.51
% 0.13/0.51 % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.13/0.51 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.51 include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 0.13/0.51 include('Axioms/GEO006+2.ax').
% 0.13/0.51 include('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax').
% 0.13/0.51 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.51 fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.13/0.51 ! [L] : unorthogonal_lines(L,L) ).
% 0.13/0.51
% 0.13/0.51 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.51 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.51 % Proof found
% 0.13/0.51 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.51 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.51 %ClaNum:26(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.13/0.51 %VarNum:138(SingletonVarNum:62)
% 0.13/0.51 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.13/0.51 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.13/0.51 %SharedTerms:2
% 0.13/0.51 %goalClause: 1
% 0.13/0.51 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.13/0.51 [1]~P1(a1,a1)
% 0.13/0.51 [2]~P2(x21,x21)
% 0.13/0.51 [3]~P3(x31,x31)
% 0.13/0.51 [4]~P4(x41,x41)
% 0.13/0.51 [5]~P5(x51,f2(x52,x51))
% 0.13/0.51 [6]~P5(x61,f3(x62,x61))
% 0.13/0.51 [7]~P4(f2(x71,x72),x71)
% 0.13/0.51 [8]~P1(f3(x81,x82),x81)
% 0.13/0.51 [9]P1(x91,x92)+P4(x91,x92)
% 0.13/0.51 [10]~P4(x101,x102)+P3(x101,x102)
% 0.13/0.51 [11]~P2(x113,x111)+P2(x111,x112)+P2(x113,x112)
% 0.13/0.51 [12]~P5(x121,x123)+P2(x121,x122)+P5(x122,x123)
% 0.13/0.51 [13]~P3(x133,x131)+P3(x131,x132)+P3(x133,x132)
% 0.13/0.51 [14]~P5(x143,x141)+P3(x141,x142)+P5(x143,x142)
% 0.13/0.51 [15]~P4(x153,x151)+P4(x151,x152)+P4(x153,x152)
% 0.13/0.51 [22]~P4(x222,x223)+~P5(x221,x223)+P2(x221,f4(x222,x223))
% 0.13/0.52 [23]~P4(x232,x233)+~P5(x231,x232)+P2(x231,f4(x232,x233))
% 0.13/0.52 [24]P2(x241,x242)+~P2(x243,x242)+~P5(x241,f5(x243,x242))
% 0.13/0.52 [25]P2(x251,x252)+~P2(x252,x253)+~P5(x251,f5(x252,x253))
% 0.13/0.52 [16]P5(x163,x161)+~P3(x161,x162)+P4(x161,x162)+P5(x163,x162)
% 0.13/0.52 [18]~P4(x181,x183)+~P1(x181,x183)+P4(x181,x182)+P1(x183,x182)
% 0.13/0.52 [19]~P4(x193,x191)+~P1(x193,x191)+P4(x191,x192)+P1(x193,x192)
% 0.13/0.52 [20]~P4(x201,x203)+~P1(x201,x203)+P1(x201,x202)+P1(x203,x202)
% 0.13/0.52 [21]P1(x213,x214)+~P3(x213,x212)+P5(x211,x212)+P5(x211,x213)+P1(x212,x214)
% 0.13/0.52 [26]P5(x264,x263)+~P2(x264,x261)+~P3(x263,x262)+P5(x261,x262)+P5(x261,x263)+P5(x264,x262)
% 0.13/0.52 %EqnAxiom
% 0.13/0.52
% 0.13/0.52 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.52 cnf(27,plain,
% 0.13/0.52 ($false),
% 0.13/0.52 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,9]),
% 0.13/0.52 ['proof']).
% 0.13/0.52 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.13/0.52 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------