TSTP Solution File: GEO210+1 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : GEO210+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:54:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.72s 1.92s
% Output : Refutation 1.72s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 3 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 0 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(21,axiom,
~ unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(A,B),A),
file('GEO210+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(22,axiom,
~ apart_point_and_line(A,orthogonal_through_point(B,A)),
file('GEO210+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(23,axiom,
( ~ distinct_lines(A,B)
| apart_point_and_line(C,A)
| apart_point_and_line(C,B)
| unorthogonal_lines(A,D)
| unorthogonal_lines(B,D) ),
file('GEO210+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(24,axiom,
~ apart_point_and_line(dollar_c3,dollar_c2),
file('GEO210+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(25,axiom,
~ unorthogonal_lines(dollar_c2,dollar_c1),
file('GEO210+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(27,axiom,
distinct_lines(dollar_c2,orthogonal_through_point(dollar_c1,dollar_c3)),
file('GEO210+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(32,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(A,dollar_c2)
| apart_point_and_line(A,orthogonal_through_point(dollar_c1,dollar_c3))
| unorthogonal_lines(dollar_c2,B)
| unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(dollar_c1,dollar_c3),B) ),
inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[27,23]),
[iquote('hyper,27,23')] ).
cnf(55,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(A,dollar_c2)
| apart_point_and_line(A,orthogonal_through_point(dollar_c1,dollar_c3)) ),
inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[32,25]),21]),
[iquote('hyper,32,25,unit_del,21')] ).
cnf(102,plain,
apart_point_and_line(dollar_c3,orthogonal_through_point(dollar_c1,dollar_c3)),
inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[55,24]),
[iquote('hyper,55,24')] ).
cnf(103,plain,
$false,
inference(binary,[status(thm)],[102,22]),
[iquote('binary,102.1,22.1')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : GEO210+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 07:25:06 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.72/1.92 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.72/1.92 The process was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 1.72/1.92 Wed Jul 27 07:25:07 2022
% 1.72/1.92 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 28500.
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.72/1.92 set(auto).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.72/1.92 clear(print_given).
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 formula_list(usable).
% 1.72/1.92 all X (-distinct_points(X,X)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X (-distinct_lines(X,X)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X (-convergent_lines(X,X)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y Z (distinct_points(X,Y)->distinct_points(X,Z)|distinct_points(Y,Z)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y Z (distinct_lines(X,Y)->distinct_lines(X,Z)|distinct_lines(Y,Z)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y Z (convergent_lines(X,Y)->convergent_lines(X,Z)|convergent_lines(Y,Z)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y (distinct_points(X,Y)-> -apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y))).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y (distinct_points(X,Y)-> -apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y))).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y (convergent_lines(X,Y)-> -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),X)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y (convergent_lines(X,Y)-> -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Y)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y U V (distinct_points(X,Y)&distinct_lines(U,V)->apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(X,V)|apart_point_and_line(Y,U)|apart_point_and_line(Y,V)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y Z (apart_point_and_line(X,Y)->distinct_points(X,Z)|apart_point_and_line(Z,Y)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y Z (apart_point_and_line(X,Y)->distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y Z (convergent_lines(X,Y)->distinct_lines(Y,Z)|convergent_lines(X,Z)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y (-convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(Y,X),Y)).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y (-apart_point_and_line(X,parallel_through_point(Y,X))).
% 1.72/1.92 all X Y Z (distinct_lines(Y,Z)->apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)|convergent_lines(Y,Z)).
% 1.72/1.92 all L M (convergent_lines(L,M)|unorthogonal_lines(L,M)).
% 1.72/1.92 all L M N (convergent_lines(L,M)&unorthogonal_lines(L,M)->convergent_lines(L,N)&unorthogonal_lines(L,N)|convergent_lines(M,N)&unorthogonal_lines(M,N)).
% 1.72/1.92 all A L (-unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(L,A),L)).
% 1.72/1.92 all A L (-apart_point_and_line(A,orthogonal_through_point(L,A))).
% 1.72/1.92 all A L M N (distinct_lines(L,M)->apart_point_and_line(A,L)|apart_point_and_line(A,M)|unorthogonal_lines(L,N)|unorthogonal_lines(M,N)).
% 1.72/1.92 -(all A L M (-apart_point_and_line(A,L)& -unorthogonal_lines(L,M)-> -distinct_lines(L,orthogonal_through_point(M,A)))).
% 1.72/1.92 end_of_list.
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 list(usable).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -distinct_points(X,X).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -distinct_lines(X,X).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -convergent_lines(X,X).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -distinct_points(X,Y)|distinct_points(X,Z)|distinct_points(Y,Z).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -distinct_lines(X,Y)|distinct_lines(X,Z)|distinct_lines(Y,Z).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -convergent_lines(X,Y)|convergent_lines(X,Z)|convergent_lines(Y,Z).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -distinct_points(X,Y)| -apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -distinct_points(X,Y)| -apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -convergent_lines(X,Y)| -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),X).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -convergent_lines(X,Y)| -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Y).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -distinct_points(X,Y)| -distinct_lines(U,V)|apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(X,V)|apart_point_and_line(Y,U)|apart_point_and_line(Y,V).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|distinct_points(X,Z)|apart_point_and_line(Z,Y).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -convergent_lines(X,Y)|distinct_lines(Y,Z)|convergent_lines(X,Z).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(Y,X),Y).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -apart_point_and_line(X,parallel_through_point(Y,X)).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)|convergent_lines(Y,Z).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] convergent_lines(L,M)|unorthogonal_lines(L,M).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -convergent_lines(L,M)| -unorthogonal_lines(L,M)|convergent_lines(L,N)|convergent_lines(M,N).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -convergent_lines(L,M)| -unorthogonal_lines(L,M)|convergent_lines(L,N)|unorthogonal_lines(M,N).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -convergent_lines(L,M)| -unorthogonal_lines(L,M)|unorthogonal_lines(L,N)|convergent_lines(M,N).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -convergent_lines(L,M)| -unorthogonal_lines(L,M)|unorthogonal_lines(L,N)|unorthogonal_lines(M,N).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(L,A),L).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -apart_point_and_line(A,orthogonal_through_point(L,A)).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -distinct_lines(L,M)|apart_point_and_line(A,L)|apart_point_and_line(A,M)|unorthogonal_lines(L,N)|unorthogonal_lines(M,N).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -apart_point_and_line($c3,$c2).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] -unorthogonal_lines($c2,$c1).
% 1.72/1.92 0 [] distinct_lines($c2,orthogonal_through_point($c1,$c3)).
% 1.72/1.92 end_of_list.
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 1.72/1.92 be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.72/1.92 satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: set(factor).
% 1.72/1.92 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 ------------> process usable:
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 1 [] -distinct_points(A,A).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] -distinct_lines(A,A).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [] -convergent_lines(A,A).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 4 [] -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 5 [] -distinct_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,C)|distinct_lines(B,C).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 6 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 7 [] -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(A,line_connecting(A,B)).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 8 [] -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(B,line_connecting(A,B)).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 9 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(A,B),A).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 10 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(A,B),B).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=18): 11 [] -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 12 [] -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(C,B).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 13 [] -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,C).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 14 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|convergent_lines(A,C).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 15 [] -convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(A,B),A).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 16 [] -apart_point_and_line(A,parallel_through_point(B,A)).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 17 [] -distinct_lines(A,B)|apart_point_and_line(C,A)|apart_point_and_line(C,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 1.72/1.92 Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)| -unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 18 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)| -unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|unorthogonal_lines(B,C).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 19 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)| -unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 20 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)| -unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,C)|unorthogonal_lines(B,C).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 21 [] -unorthogonal_lines(orthogonal_through_point(A,B),A).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 22 [] -apart_point_and_line(A,orthogonal_through_point(B,A)).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=15): 23 [] -distinct_lines(A,B)|apart_point_and_line(C,A)|apart_point_and_line(C,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,D)|unorthogonal_lines(B,D).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 24 [] -apart_point_and_line($c3,$c2).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 25 [] -unorthogonal_lines($c2,$c1).
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 ------------> process sos:
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 26 [] convergent_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,B).
% 1.72/1.92 ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 27 [] distinct_lines($c2,orthogonal_through_point($c1,$c3)).
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.00 sec ----> 103 [binary,102.1,22.1] $F.
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 3.
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.72/1.92 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.72/1.92 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.72/1.92 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 ============ end of search ============
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.72/1.92 clauses given 17
% 1.72/1.92 clauses generated 244
% 1.72/1.92 clauses kept 102
% 1.72/1.92 clauses forward subsumed 170
% 1.72/1.92 clauses back subsumed 3
% 1.72/1.92 Kbytes malloced 976
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.72/1.92 user CPU time 0.00 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.72/1.92 system CPU time 0.00 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.72/1.92 wall-clock time 1 (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.72/1.92
% 1.72/1.92 Process 28500 finished Wed Jul 27 07:25:08 2022
% 1.72/1.92 Otter interrupted
% 1.72/1.92 PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------