TSTP Solution File: GEO210+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : GEO210+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:42 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : GEO210+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 22:15:08 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.58  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.63  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.20/0.63  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.63  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.63  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  % File     : GEO210+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.20/0.63  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.20/0.63  % Problem  : Uniqueness of orthogonality
% 0.20/0.63  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 0.20/0.63  % English  : If the point A is incident with line L, and the line L is
% 0.20/0.63  %            orthogonal to M, then L is equal to the orthogonal to M
% 0.20/0.63  %            through A.
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.20/0.63  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.20/0.63  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 0.20/0.63  % Names    : Theorem 8.1 [vPl95]
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.20/0.63  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.21 v5.0.0, 0.10 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.14 v3.5.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.20/0.63  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   7 unt;   0 def)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of atoms       :   59 (   0 equ)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of connectives :   50 (  14   ~;  16   |;   5   &)
% 0.20/0.63  %                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.63  %            Number of variables   :   56 (  56   !;   0   ?)
% 0.20/0.63  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.20/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.20/0.63  include('Axioms/GEO006+2.ax').
% 0.20/0.63  include('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax').
% 0.20/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.63      ! [A,L,M] :
% 0.20/0.63        ( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(A,L)
% 0.20/0.63          & ~ unorthogonal_lines(L,M) )
% 0.20/0.63       => ~ distinct_lines(L,orthogonal_through_point(M,A)) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.64  %ClaNum:28(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.64  %VarNum:132(SingletonVarNum:59)
% 0.20/0.64  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.20/0.64  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.64  %SharedTerms:7
% 0.20/0.64  %goalClause: 1 2 3
% 0.20/0.64  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.20/0.64  [2]~P2(a2,a1)
% 0.20/0.64  [3]~P4(a1,a3)
% 0.20/0.64  [1]P1(a1,f4(a3,a2))
% 0.20/0.64  [4]~P5(x41,x41)
% 0.20/0.64  [5]~P1(x51,x51)
% 0.20/0.64  [6]~P3(x61,x61)
% 0.20/0.64  [7]~P2(x71,f7(x72,x71))
% 0.20/0.64  [8]~P2(x81,f4(x82,x81))
% 0.20/0.64  [9]~P3(f7(x91,x92),x91)
% 0.20/0.64  [10]~P4(f4(x101,x102),x101)
% 0.20/0.64  [11]P4(x111,x112)+P3(x111,x112)
% 0.20/0.64  [24]~P5(x241,x242)+~P2(x242,f5(x241,x242))
% 0.20/0.64  [25]~P5(x251,x252)+~P2(x251,f5(x251,x252))
% 0.20/0.64  [26]~P3(x261,x262)+~P2(f6(x261,x262),x262)
% 0.20/0.64  [27]~P3(x271,x272)+~P2(f6(x271,x272),x271)
% 0.20/0.64  [12]~P5(x123,x121)+P5(x121,x122)+P5(x123,x122)
% 0.20/0.64  [13]~P2(x131,x133)+P5(x131,x132)+P2(x132,x133)
% 0.20/0.64  [14]~P1(x143,x141)+P1(x141,x142)+P1(x143,x142)
% 0.20/0.64  [15]~P3(x153,x151)+P1(x151,x152)+P3(x153,x152)
% 0.20/0.64  [16]~P2(x163,x161)+P1(x161,x162)+P2(x163,x162)
% 0.20/0.64  [17]~P3(x173,x171)+P3(x171,x172)+P3(x173,x172)
% 0.20/0.64  [18]P2(x183,x181)+~P1(x181,x182)+P3(x181,x182)+P2(x183,x182)
% 0.20/0.64  [20]~P3(x201,x203)+~P4(x201,x203)+P3(x201,x202)+P4(x203,x202)
% 0.20/0.64  [21]~P3(x213,x211)+~P4(x213,x211)+P3(x211,x212)+P4(x213,x212)
% 0.20/0.64  [22]~P3(x221,x223)+~P4(x221,x223)+P4(x221,x222)+P4(x223,x222)
% 0.20/0.64  [23]P4(x233,x234)+~P1(x233,x232)+P2(x231,x232)+P2(x231,x233)+P4(x232,x234)
% 0.20/0.64  [28]P2(x284,x283)+~P5(x284,x281)+~P1(x283,x282)+P2(x281,x282)+P2(x281,x283)+P2(x284,x282)
% 0.20/0.64  %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.64  
% 0.20/0.64  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.20/0.64     ($false),
% 0.20/0.64     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,1,8,2,10,23]),
% 0.20/0.64     ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.64  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.64  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------