TSTP Solution File: GEO209+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : GEO209+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.43s 2.15s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 11 unt; 7 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_23,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X3,X1)
| ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u94wczp/input.p',i_0_23) ).
cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(esk3_0,esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u94wczp/input.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u94wczp/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u94wczp/input.p',i_0_16) ).
cnf(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ convergent_lines(esk4_0,esk2_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u94wczp/input.p',i_0_15) ).
cnf(i_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u94wczp/input.p',i_0_18) ).
cnf(i_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk4_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-9u94wczp/input.p',i_0_17) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X3,X1)
| ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
i_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(esk3_0,esk4_0),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk4_0)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,esk4_0)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk2_0),
i_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( convergent_lines(esk3_0,X1)
| convergent_lines(esk4_0,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
~ convergent_lines(esk4_0,esk2_0),
i_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0),
i_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,esk4_0)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,esk3_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk4_0),
i_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : GEO209+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:22:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.20/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.20/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 4.43/2.15 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 4.43/2.15 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 4.43/2.15 # Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 4.43/2.15
% 4.43/2.15 # Proof found!
% 4.43/2.15 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.43/2.15 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.43/2.15 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 4.43/2.15 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 4.43/2.15 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 4.43/2.15 # Proof object conjectures : 13
% 4.43/2.15 # Proof object clause conjectures : 8
% 4.43/2.15 # Proof object formula conjectures : 5
% 4.43/2.15 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 4.43/2.15 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 4.43/2.15 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 4.43/2.15 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 4.43/2.15 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.43/2.15 # Parsed axioms : 23
% 4.43/2.15 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Initial clauses : 23
% 4.43/2.15 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Initial clauses in saturation : 23
% 4.43/2.15 # Processed clauses : 61
% 4.43/2.15 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # ...subsumed : 9
% 4.43/2.15 # ...remaining for further processing : 52
% 4.43/2.15 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 4.43/2.15 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Generated clauses : 184
% 4.43/2.15 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 157
% 4.43/2.15 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 4.43/2.15 # Paramodulations : 168
% 4.43/2.15 # Factorizations : 16
% 4.43/2.15 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Current number of processed clauses : 47
% 4.43/2.15 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 4.43/2.15 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Negative unit clauses : 9
% 4.43/2.15 # Non-unit-clauses : 35
% 4.43/2.15 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 91
% 4.43/2.15 # ...number of literals in the above : 421
% 4.43/2.15 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 4.43/2.15 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 199
% 4.43/2.15 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 114
% 4.43/2.15 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16
% 4.43/2.15 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 4.43/2.15 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Condensation successes : 0
% 4.43/2.15 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2442
% 4.43/2.15
% 4.43/2.15 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.43/2.15 # User time : 0.011 s
% 4.43/2.15 # System time : 0.002 s
% 4.43/2.15 # Total time : 0.013 s
% 4.43/2.15 # ...preprocessing : 0.010 s
% 4.43/2.15 # ...main loop : 0.003 s
% 4.43/2.15 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.43/2.15
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------