TSTP Solution File: GEO208+3 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : GEO208+3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 05:10:46 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 1.10s
% Output : Solution 1.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4770/GEO208+3.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4770/GEO208+3.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4770/GEO208+3.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 4866
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(parallel_lines(X1,X2)<=>~(convergent_lines(X1,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', a3)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(equal_lines(X1,X2)<=>~(distinct_lines(X1,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax2)).
% fof(11, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_lines(X1,X2)=>convergent_lines(X1,X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', p1)).
% fof(36, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(((incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)&incident_point_and_line(X1,X3))¶llel_lines(X2,X3))=>equal_lines(X2,X3)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', con)).
% fof(37, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(((incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)&incident_point_and_line(X1,X3))¶llel_lines(X2,X3))=>equal_lines(X2,X3))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[36])).
% fof(38, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(parallel_lines(X1,X2)<=>~(convergent_lines(X1,X2))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[1,theory(equality)])).
% fof(40, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(equal_lines(X1,X2)<=>~(distinct_lines(X1,X2))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[3,theory(equality)])).
% fof(57, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(parallel_lines(X1,X2))|~(convergent_lines(X1,X2)))&(convergent_lines(X1,X2)|parallel_lines(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[38])).
% fof(58, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(parallel_lines(X3,X4))|~(convergent_lines(X3,X4)))&(convergent_lines(X3,X4)|parallel_lines(X3,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[57])).
% cnf(60,plain,(~convergent_lines(X1,X2)|~parallel_lines(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58])).
% fof(65, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(equal_lines(X1,X2))|~(distinct_lines(X1,X2)))&(distinct_lines(X1,X2)|equal_lines(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[40])).
% fof(66, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(equal_lines(X3,X4))|~(distinct_lines(X3,X4)))&(distinct_lines(X3,X4)|equal_lines(X3,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[65])).
% cnf(67,plain,(equal_lines(X1,X2)|distinct_lines(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[66])).
% fof(87, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(distinct_lines(X1,X2))|convergent_lines(X1,X2)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11])).
% fof(88, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(distinct_lines(X3,X4))|convergent_lines(X3,X4)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[87])).
% cnf(89,plain,(convergent_lines(X1,X2)|~distinct_lines(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[88])).
% fof(167, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:(((incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)&incident_point_and_line(X1,X3))¶llel_lines(X2,X3))&~(equal_lines(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[37])).
% fof(168, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:?[X6]:(((incident_point_and_line(X4,X5)&incident_point_and_line(X4,X6))¶llel_lines(X5,X6))&~(equal_lines(X5,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[167])).
% fof(169, negated_conjecture,(((incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk2_0)&incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0))¶llel_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0))&~(equal_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[168])).
% cnf(170,negated_conjecture,(~equal_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[169])).
% cnf(171,negated_conjecture,(parallel_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[169])).
% cnf(175,negated_conjecture,(distinct_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[170,67,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(176,negated_conjecture,(~convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[60,171,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(194,negated_conjecture,(convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[89,175,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(200,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[176,194,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(201,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[200,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(202,negated_conjecture,($false),201,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 53
% # ...of these trivial : 0
% # ...subsumed : 4
% # ...remaining for further processing: 49
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 0
% # Generated clauses : 22
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 11
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% # Paramodulations : 22
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 48
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 5
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 8
% # Non-unit-clauses : 35
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8
% # ...number of literals in the above : 15
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 50
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index: 36 leaves, 1.81+/-1.647 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 15 leaves, 1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 33 leaves, 1.45+/-0.891 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.015 s
% # System time : 0.003 s
% # Total time : 0.018 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.22 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.12 CPU 0.22 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4770/GEO208+3.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------