TSTP Solution File: GEO208+3 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO208+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.90s 1.10s
% Output   : Refutation 0.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GEO208+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 22:37:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37  Fri Jun 17 22:37:52 2022
% 0.13/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 22480.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 15 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -distinct_lines(A,B)|apart_point_and_line(C,A)|apart_point_and_line(C,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -unorthogonal_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 0.13/0.37  28 back subsumes 27.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [] {-} convergent_lines(A,B)|unorthogonal_lines(A,B).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.41  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.41  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.41  number of clauses in intial UL: 37
% 0.20/0.41  number of clauses initially in problem: 46
% 0.20/0.41  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 80
% 0.20/0.41  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 94
% 0.20/0.41  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.41  absolute distinct symbol count: 19
% 0.20/0.41     distinct predicate count: 12
% 0.20/0.41     distinct function count: 4
% 0.20/0.41     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.90/1.10  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.90/1.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Model 3 [ 3 1 304 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Model 4 [ 3 0 267 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Model 6 [ 3 1 370 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Model 7 [ 5 0 1362 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Model 8 [ 4 1 437 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Model 9 [ 4 0 151 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Model 10 [ 5 1 651 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Model 11 [ 5 0 474 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Model 12 [ 1 0 153 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.71 sec ----> 103 [hyper,94,35,47] {-} $F.
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.90/1.10  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.90/1.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  15 [] {+} -distinct_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 0.90/1.10  35 [] {+} -parallel_lines(A,B)| -convergent_lines(A,B).
% 0.90/1.10  38 [] {+} -equal_lines($c2,$c1).
% 0.90/1.10  41 [] {+} equal_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,B).
% 0.90/1.10  47 [] {+} parallel_lines($c2,$c1).
% 0.90/1.10  72 [hyper,41,38] {+} distinct_lines($c2,$c1).
% 0.90/1.10  94 [hyper,72,15] {+} convergent_lines($c2,$c1).
% 0.90/1.10  103 [hyper,94,35,47] {-} $F.
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.90/1.10  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  ============ end of search ============
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  true clauses given           1      (8.3%)
% 0.90/1.10  false clauses given         11
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.90/1.10     5  0         1
% 0.90/1.10     6  7         11
% 0.90/1.10     8  3         10
% 0.90/1.10    11  4         8
% 0.90/1.10    12  0         1
% 0.90/1.10    14  0         4
% 0.90/1.10  tot:  14        35      (71.4% true)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Model 12 [ 1 0 153 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.90/1.10  
% 0.90/1.10  Process 22480 finished Fri Jun 17 22:37:53 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------