TSTP Solution File: GEO208+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : GEO208+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 12:54:49 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.88s 2.08s
% Output   : Refutation 1.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   6 unt;   2 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(17,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(A,B)
    | apart_point_and_line(C,A)
    | apart_point_and_line(C,B)
    | convergent_lines(A,B) ),
    file('GEO208+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(dollar_c3,dollar_c2),
    file('GEO208+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(19,axiom,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(dollar_c3,dollar_c1),
    file('GEO208+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ~ convergent_lines(dollar_c2,dollar_c1),
    file('GEO208+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    distinct_lines(dollar_c2,dollar_c1),
    file('GEO208+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(A,dollar_c2)
    | apart_point_and_line(A,dollar_c1) ),
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[21,17]),20]),
    [iquote('hyper,21,17,unit_del,20')] ).

cnf(24,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(dollar_c3,dollar_c1),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[22,18]),
    [iquote('hyper,22,18')] ).

cnf(25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[24,19]),
    [iquote('binary,24.1,19.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : GEO208+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 07:27:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.88/2.08  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.88/2.08  The process was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 1.88/2.08  Wed Jul 27 07:27:00 2022
% 1.88/2.08  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 4039.
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.88/2.08  set(auto).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.88/2.08  clear(print_given).
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  formula_list(usable).
% 1.88/2.08  all X (-distinct_points(X,X)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X (-distinct_lines(X,X)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X (-convergent_lines(X,X)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y Z (distinct_points(X,Y)->distinct_points(X,Z)|distinct_points(Y,Z)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y Z (distinct_lines(X,Y)->distinct_lines(X,Z)|distinct_lines(Y,Z)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y Z (convergent_lines(X,Y)->convergent_lines(X,Z)|convergent_lines(Y,Z)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y (distinct_points(X,Y)-> -apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y))).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y (distinct_points(X,Y)-> -apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y))).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y (convergent_lines(X,Y)-> -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),X)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y (convergent_lines(X,Y)-> -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Y)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y U V (distinct_points(X,Y)&distinct_lines(U,V)->apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(X,V)|apart_point_and_line(Y,U)|apart_point_and_line(Y,V)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y Z (apart_point_and_line(X,Y)->distinct_points(X,Z)|apart_point_and_line(Z,Y)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y Z (apart_point_and_line(X,Y)->distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y Z (convergent_lines(X,Y)->distinct_lines(Y,Z)|convergent_lines(X,Z)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y (-convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(Y,X),Y)).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y (-apart_point_and_line(X,parallel_through_point(Y,X))).
% 1.88/2.08  all X Y Z (distinct_lines(Y,Z)->apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)|convergent_lines(Y,Z)).
% 1.88/2.08  -(all X Y Z (-apart_point_and_line(X,Y)& -apart_point_and_line(X,Z)& -convergent_lines(Y,Z)-> -distinct_lines(Y,Z))).
% 1.88/2.08  end_of_list.
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  list(usable).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -distinct_points(X,X).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -distinct_lines(X,X).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -convergent_lines(X,X).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -distinct_points(X,Y)|distinct_points(X,Z)|distinct_points(Y,Z).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -distinct_lines(X,Y)|distinct_lines(X,Z)|distinct_lines(Y,Z).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -convergent_lines(X,Y)|convergent_lines(X,Z)|convergent_lines(Y,Z).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -distinct_points(X,Y)| -apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -distinct_points(X,Y)| -apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -convergent_lines(X,Y)| -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),X).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -convergent_lines(X,Y)| -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Y).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -distinct_points(X,Y)| -distinct_lines(U,V)|apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(X,V)|apart_point_and_line(Y,U)|apart_point_and_line(Y,V).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|distinct_points(X,Z)|apart_point_and_line(Z,Y).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -convergent_lines(X,Y)|distinct_lines(Y,Z)|convergent_lines(X,Z).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(Y,X),Y).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -apart_point_and_line(X,parallel_through_point(Y,X)).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)|convergent_lines(Y,Z).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -apart_point_and_line($c3,$c2).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -apart_point_and_line($c3,$c1).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] -convergent_lines($c2,$c1).
% 1.88/2.08  0 [] distinct_lines($c2,$c1).
% 1.88/2.08  end_of_list.
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.88/2.08  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.88/2.08  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.88/2.08     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  ------------> process usable:
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 1 [] -distinct_points(A,A).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] -distinct_lines(A,A).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [] -convergent_lines(A,A).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 4 [] -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 5 [] -distinct_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,C)|distinct_lines(B,C).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 6 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 7 [] -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(A,line_connecting(A,B)).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 8 [] -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(B,line_connecting(A,B)).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 9 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(A,B),A).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 10 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(A,B),B).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=18): 11 [] -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 12 [] -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(C,B).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 13 [] -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,C).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 14 [] -convergent_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|convergent_lines(A,C).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 15 [] -convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(A,B),A).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 16 [] -apart_point_and_line(A,parallel_through_point(B,A)).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 17 [] -distinct_lines(A,B)|apart_point_and_line(C,A)|apart_point_and_line(C,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 18 [] -apart_point_and_line($c3,$c2).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 19 [] -apart_point_and_line($c3,$c1).
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 20 [] -convergent_lines($c2,$c1).
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  ------------> process sos:
% 1.88/2.08  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 21 [] distinct_lines($c2,$c1).
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.00 sec ----> 25 [binary,24.1,19.1] $F.
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.88/2.08  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.88/2.08  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.88/2.08  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  ============ end of search ============
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.88/2.08  clauses given                  2
% 1.88/2.08  clauses generated             13
% 1.88/2.08  clauses kept                  24
% 1.88/2.08  clauses forward subsumed      10
% 1.88/2.08  clauses back subsumed          0
% 1.88/2.08  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.88/2.08  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.88/2.08  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.88/2.08  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.88/2.08  
% 1.88/2.08  Process 4039 finished Wed Jul 27 07:27:02 2022
% 1.91/2.08  Otter interrupted
% 1.91/2.08  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------