TSTP Solution File: GEO208+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO208+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.00s 1.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   6 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (   9   ~;   8   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   14 (   7   >;   7   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (;  11   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > parallel_through_point > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(parallel_through_point,type,
    parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_185,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,Z] :
        ( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X,Y)
          & ~ apart_point_and_line(X,Z)
          & ~ convergent_lines(Y,Z) )
       => ~ distinct_lines(Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_170,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( distinct_lines(Y,Z)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X,Y)
        | apart_point_and_line(X,Z)
        | convergent_lines(Y,Z) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cup1) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_185]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_185]) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    distinct_lines('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_185]) ).

tff(c_241,plain,
    ! [Y_82,Z_83,X_84] :
      ( convergent_lines(Y_82,Z_83)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_84,Z_83)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_84,Y_82)
      | ~ distinct_lines(Y_82,Z_83) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_170]) ).

tff(c_263,plain,
    ! [X_84] :
      ( convergent_lines('#skF_2','#skF_3')
      | apart_point_and_line(X_84,'#skF_3')
      | apart_point_and_line(X_84,'#skF_2') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_241]) ).

tff(c_277,plain,
    ! [X_85] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X_85,'#skF_3')
      | apart_point_and_line(X_85,'#skF_2') ),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_263]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_185]) ).

tff(c_292,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_277,c_42]) ).

tff(c_300,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_292]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GEO208+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:55:01 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.00/1.97  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.00/1.98  
% 4.00/1.98  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.00/2.00  
% 4.00/2.00  Inference rules
% 4.00/2.00  ----------------------
% 4.00/2.00  #Ref     : 0
% 4.00/2.00  #Sup     : 39
% 4.00/2.00  #Fact    : 10
% 4.00/2.00  #Define  : 0
% 4.00/2.00  #Split   : 0
% 4.00/2.00  #Chain   : 0
% 4.00/2.00  #Close   : 0
% 4.00/2.00  
% 4.00/2.00  Ordering : KBO
% 4.00/2.00  
% 4.00/2.00  Simplification rules
% 4.00/2.00  ----------------------
% 4.00/2.00  #Subsume      : 7
% 4.00/2.00  #Demod        : 11
% 4.00/2.00  #Tautology    : 11
% 4.00/2.00  #SimpNegUnit  : 2
% 4.00/2.00  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.00/2.00  
% 4.00/2.00  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.00/2.00  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.00/2.00  
% 4.00/2.00  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.00/2.00  ----------------------
% 4.00/2.01  Preprocessing        : 0.59
% 4.00/2.01  Parsing              : 0.36
% 4.00/2.01  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 4.00/2.01  Main loop            : 0.35
% 4.00/2.01  Inferencing          : 0.15
% 4.00/2.01  Reduction            : 0.08
% 4.00/2.01  Demodulation         : 0.05
% 4.00/2.01  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 4.00/2.01  Subsumption          : 0.09
% 4.00/2.01  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 4.00/2.01  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.00/2.01  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.00/2.01  Total                : 0.99
% 4.00/2.01  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.00/2.01  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.00/2.01  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.00/2.01  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------