TSTP Solution File: GEO206+3 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : GEO206+3 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 05:10:10 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.94s
% Output   : Solution 0.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11944/GEO206+3.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11944/GEO206+3.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11944/GEO206+3.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 12040
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.016 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(parallel_lines(X1,X2)<=>~(convergent_lines(X1,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', a3)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:~(convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', cp1)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(equal_lines(X1,X2)<=>~(distinct_lines(X1,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax2)).
% fof(9, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(convergent_lines(X1,X2)=>(convergent_lines(X1,X3)|convergent_lines(X2,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax6)).
% fof(15, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_lines(X1,X2)=>convergent_lines(X1,X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', p1)).
% fof(36, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)¶llel_lines(X2,X3))=>equal_lines(X2,parallel_through_point(X3,X1))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', con)).
% fof(37, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)¶llel_lines(X2,X3))=>equal_lines(X2,parallel_through_point(X3,X1)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[36])).
% fof(38, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(parallel_lines(X1,X2)<=>~(convergent_lines(X1,X2))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[1,theory(equality)])).
% fof(39, plain,![X1]:![X2]:~(convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[2,theory(equality)])).
% fof(42, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(equal_lines(X1,X2)<=>~(distinct_lines(X1,X2))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[5,theory(equality)])).
% fof(57, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(parallel_lines(X1,X2))|~(convergent_lines(X1,X2)))&(convergent_lines(X1,X2)|parallel_lines(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[38])).
% fof(58, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(parallel_lines(X3,X4))|~(convergent_lines(X3,X4)))&(convergent_lines(X3,X4)|parallel_lines(X3,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[57])).
% cnf(60,plain,(~convergent_lines(X1,X2)|~parallel_lines(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58])).
% fof(61, plain,![X3]:![X4]:~(convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X4,X3),X4)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[39])).
% cnf(62,plain,(~convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[61])).
% fof(69, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(equal_lines(X1,X2))|~(distinct_lines(X1,X2)))&(distinct_lines(X1,X2)|equal_lines(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[42])).
% fof(70, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(equal_lines(X3,X4))|~(distinct_lines(X3,X4)))&(distinct_lines(X3,X4)|equal_lines(X3,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[69])).
% cnf(71,plain,(equal_lines(X1,X2)|distinct_lines(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[70])).
% fof(80, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(convergent_lines(X1,X2))|(convergent_lines(X1,X3)|convergent_lines(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[9])).
% fof(81, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(convergent_lines(X4,X5))|(convergent_lines(X4,X6)|convergent_lines(X5,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[80])).
% cnf(82,plain,(convergent_lines(X1,X2)|convergent_lines(X3,X2)|~convergent_lines(X3,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[81])).
% fof(97, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(distinct_lines(X1,X2))|convergent_lines(X1,X2)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[15])).
% fof(98, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(distinct_lines(X3,X4))|convergent_lines(X3,X4)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[97])).
% cnf(99,plain,(convergent_lines(X1,X2)|~distinct_lines(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[98])).
% fof(167, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:((incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)¶llel_lines(X2,X3))&~(equal_lines(X2,parallel_through_point(X3,X1)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[37])).
% fof(168, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:?[X6]:((incident_point_and_line(X4,X5)¶llel_lines(X5,X6))&~(equal_lines(X5,parallel_through_point(X6,X4)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[167])).
% fof(169, negated_conjecture,((incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk2_0)¶llel_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0))&~(equal_lines(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[168])).
% cnf(170,negated_conjecture,(~equal_lines(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[169])).
% cnf(171,negated_conjecture,(parallel_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[169])).
% cnf(174,negated_conjecture,(distinct_lines(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[170,71,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(175,negated_conjecture,(~convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[60,171,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(192,negated_conjecture,(convergent_lines(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[99,174,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(195,negated_conjecture,(convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0),X1)|convergent_lines(esk2_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[82,192,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(210,negated_conjecture,(convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[62,195,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(212,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[210,175,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(213,negated_conjecture,($false),212,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 56
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 4
% # ...remaining for further processing: 52
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 33
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 19
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 4
% # Paramodulations                    : 33
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 52
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 5
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 10
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 37
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% # ...number of literals in the above : 33
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 50
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index:    43 leaves,   1.67+/-1.536 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           17 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           38 leaves,   1.39+/-0.844 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.016 s
% # System time            : 0.004 s
% # Total time             : 0.020 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.18 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.18 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11944/GEO206+3.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------