TSTP Solution File: GEO206+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO206+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.02s 2.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   25
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (   9 unt;  19 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  11   ~;   8   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  16   >;  14   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (;  27   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ unorthogonal_lines > parallel_lines > orthogonal_lines > incident_point_and_line > equal_points > equal_lines > distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > point > line > parallel_through_point > orthogonal_through_point > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(equal_lines,type,
    equal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(equal_points,type,
    equal_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(incident_point_and_line,type,
    incident_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(parallel_through_point,type,
    parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(orthogonal_through_point,type,
    orthogonal_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(point,type,
    point: $i > $o ).

tff(line,type,
    line: $i > $o ).

tff(parallel_lines,type,
    parallel_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(unorthogonal_lines,type,
    unorthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(orthogonal_lines,type,
    orthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_436,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,Z] :
        ( ( incident_point_and_line(X,Y)
          & parallel_lines(Y,Z) )
       => equal_lines(Y,parallel_through_point(Z,X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_417,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( parallel_lines(X,Y)
    <=> ~ convergent_lines(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a3) ).

tff(f_412,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( equal_lines(X,Y)
    <=> ~ distinct_lines(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',ax2) ).

tff(f_74,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( distinct_lines(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_lines(X,Z)
        | distinct_lines(Y,Z) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart5) ).

tff(f_161,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_lines(X,Y)
     => convergent_lines(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+1.ax',p1) ).

tff(f_189,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(Y,X),Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp1) ).

tff(c_96,plain,
    parallel_lines('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_436]) ).

tff(c_115,plain,
    ! [X_101,Y_102] :
      ( ~ convergent_lines(X_101,Y_102)
      | ~ parallel_lines(X_101,Y_102) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_417]) ).

tff(c_123,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_115]) ).

tff(c_131,plain,
    ! [X_107,Y_108] :
      ( equal_lines(X_107,Y_108)
      | distinct_lines(X_107,Y_108) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_412]) ).

tff(c_94,plain,
    ~ equal_lines('#skF_2',parallel_through_point('#skF_3','#skF_1')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_436]) ).

tff(c_135,plain,
    distinct_lines('#skF_2',parallel_through_point('#skF_3','#skF_1')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_131,c_94]) ).

tff(c_237,plain,
    ! [Y_160,Z_161,X_162] :
      ( distinct_lines(Y_160,Z_161)
      | distinct_lines(X_162,Z_161)
      | ~ distinct_lines(X_162,Y_160) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).

tff(c_241,plain,
    ! [Z_163] :
      ( distinct_lines(parallel_through_point('#skF_3','#skF_1'),Z_163)
      | distinct_lines('#skF_2',Z_163) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_135,c_237]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ! [X_34,Y_35] :
      ( convergent_lines(X_34,Y_35)
      | ~ distinct_lines(X_34,Y_35) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_161]) ).

tff(c_255,plain,
    ! [Z_164] :
      ( convergent_lines(parallel_through_point('#skF_3','#skF_1'),Z_164)
      | distinct_lines('#skF_2',Z_164) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_241,c_30]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ! [Y_37,X_36] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(Y_37,X_36),Y_37),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_189]) ).

tff(c_267,plain,
    distinct_lines('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_255,c_32]) ).

tff(c_326,plain,
    convergent_lines('#skF_2','#skF_3'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_267,c_30]) ).

tff(c_331,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_123,c_326]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GEO206+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:58:54 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.02/2.02  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.02/2.02  
% 4.02/2.02  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.02/2.05  
% 4.02/2.05  Inference rules
% 4.02/2.05  ----------------------
% 4.02/2.05  #Ref     : 0
% 4.02/2.05  #Sup     : 40
% 4.02/2.05  #Fact    : 2
% 4.02/2.05  #Define  : 0
% 4.02/2.05  #Split   : 0
% 4.02/2.05  #Chain   : 0
% 4.02/2.05  #Close   : 0
% 4.02/2.05  
% 4.02/2.05  Ordering : KBO
% 4.02/2.05  
% 4.02/2.05  Simplification rules
% 4.02/2.05  ----------------------
% 4.02/2.05  #Subsume      : 4
% 4.02/2.05  #Demod        : 7
% 4.02/2.05  #Tautology    : 12
% 4.02/2.05  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 4.02/2.05  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.02/2.05  
% 4.02/2.05  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.02/2.05  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.02/2.05  
% 4.02/2.05  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.02/2.05  ----------------------
% 4.02/2.06  Preprocessing        : 0.56
% 4.02/2.06  Parsing              : 0.32
% 4.02/2.06  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 4.02/2.06  Main loop            : 0.36
% 4.02/2.06  Inferencing          : 0.15
% 4.02/2.06  Reduction            : 0.09
% 4.02/2.06  Demodulation         : 0.06
% 4.02/2.06  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 4.02/2.06  Subsumption          : 0.08
% 4.02/2.06  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 4.02/2.06  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.02/2.06  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.02/2.06  Total                : 0.97
% 4.02/2.06  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.02/2.06  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.02/2.06  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.02/2.06  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------