TSTP Solution File: GEO206+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : GEO206+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 05:09:56 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.90s
% Output   : Solution 0.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13339/GEO206+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13339/GEO206+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13339/GEO206+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 13435
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.012 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(convergent_lines(X1,X2)=>(convergent_lines(X1,X3)|convergent_lines(X2,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ax6)).
% fof(7, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:~(convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', cp1)).
% fof(8, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:~(apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', cp2)).
% fof(9, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(distinct_lines(X2,X3)=>((apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3))|convergent_lines(X2,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', cup1)).
% fof(18, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((~(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2))&~(convergent_lines(X2,X3)))=>~(distinct_lines(X2,parallel_through_point(X3,X1)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', con)).
% fof(19, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((~(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2))&~(convergent_lines(X2,X3)))=>~(distinct_lines(X2,parallel_through_point(X3,X1))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[18])).
% fof(22, plain,![X1]:![X2]:~(convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[7,theory(equality)])).
% fof(23, plain,![X1]:![X2]:~(apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[8,theory(equality)])).
% fof(29, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((~(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2))&~(convergent_lines(X2,X3)))=>~(distinct_lines(X2,parallel_through_point(X3,X1))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[19,theory(equality)])).
% fof(37, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(convergent_lines(X1,X2))|(convergent_lines(X1,X3)|convergent_lines(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4])).
% fof(38, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(convergent_lines(X4,X5))|(convergent_lines(X4,X6)|convergent_lines(X5,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[37])).
% cnf(39,plain,(convergent_lines(X1,X2)|convergent_lines(X3,X2)|~convergent_lines(X3,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[38])).
% fof(46, plain,![X3]:![X4]:~(convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X4,X3),X4)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[22])).
% cnf(47,plain,(~convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[46])).
% fof(48, plain,![X3]:![X4]:~(apart_point_and_line(X3,parallel_through_point(X4,X3))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[23])).
% cnf(49,plain,(~apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[48])).
% fof(50, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(distinct_lines(X2,X3))|((apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3))|convergent_lines(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[9])).
% fof(51, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(distinct_lines(X5,X6))|((apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X6))|convergent_lines(X5,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[50])).
% cnf(52,plain,(convergent_lines(X1,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X3,X1)|~distinct_lines(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[51])).
% fof(76, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:((~(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2))&~(convergent_lines(X2,X3)))&distinct_lines(X2,parallel_through_point(X3,X1))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[29])).
% fof(77, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:?[X6]:((~(apart_point_and_line(X4,X5))&~(convergent_lines(X5,X6)))&distinct_lines(X5,parallel_through_point(X6,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[76])).
% fof(78, negated_conjecture,((~(apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk2_0))&~(convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)))&distinct_lines(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[77])).
% cnf(79,negated_conjecture,(distinct_lines(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[78])).
% cnf(80,negated_conjecture,(~convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[78])).
% cnf(81,negated_conjecture,(~apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[78])).
% cnf(83,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(X1,esk2_0)|convergent_lines(esk2_0,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[52,79,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(89,negated_conjecture,(convergent_lines(esk2_0,X1)|convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0),X1)|apart_point_and_line(X2,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(X2,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[39,83,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(231,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(X1,esk2_0)|convergent_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[47,89,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(236,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(esk3_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(X1,esk2_0)),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[231,80,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(280,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[49,236,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(281,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[280,81,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(282,negated_conjecture,($false),281,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 75
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 8
% # ...remaining for further processing: 67
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 4
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 1
% # Generated clauses                  : 170
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 150
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 156
% # Factorizations                     : 14
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 42
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 2
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 8
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 32
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 88
% # ...number of literals in the above : 346
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 98
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 63
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 1
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index:    46 leaves,   1.50+/-1.229 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           20 leaves,   1.20+/-0.400 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           41 leaves,   1.34+/-0.784 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.018 s
% # System time            : 0.002 s
% # Total time             : 0.020 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.18 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.18 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13339/GEO206+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------