TSTP Solution File: GEO205+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO205+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 54.76s 54.97s
% Output : Refutation 54.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : GEO205+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 16:00:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n013.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Sat Jun 18 16:00:14 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 24799.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 16
% 0.19/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 17
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 94
% 0.19/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.19/0.40 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.19/0.40 distinct function count: 2
% 0.19/0.40 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Changing weight limit from 60 to 33.
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Model 2 [ 1 0 113 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87
% 21.65/21.87 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 395 givens.
% 21.65/21.87
% 35.69/35.87
% 35.69/35.87
% 35.69/35.87 Changing weight limit from 33 to 31.
% 35.69/35.87
% 35.69/35.87 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 400 givens.
% 35.69/35.87
% 38.75/38.98
% 38.75/38.98
% 38.75/38.98 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 38.75/38.98
% 38.75/38.98 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 405 givens.
% 38.75/38.98
% 42.15/42.33
% 42.15/42.33
% 42.15/42.33 Changing weight limit from 30 to 31.
% 42.15/42.33
% 42.15/42.33 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 430 givens.
% 42.15/42.33
% 48.01/48.19
% 48.01/48.19
% 48.01/48.19 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 48.01/48.19
% 48.01/48.19 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 435 givens.
% 48.01/48.19
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 54.57 sec ----> 7070 [binary,7069.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 Length of proof is 27. Level of proof is 14.
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 54.76/54.97 % SZS status Theorem
% 54.76/54.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 54.76/54.97 2 [] {+} -distinct_lines(A,A).
% 54.76/54.97 3 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,A).
% 54.76/54.97 5 [] {+} -distinct_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,C)|distinct_lines(B,C).
% 54.76/54.97 6 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 54.76/54.97 9 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,A)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 54.76/54.97 10 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,B)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 54.76/54.97 11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 54.76/54.97 13 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,C).
% 54.76/54.97 14 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,B).
% 54.76/54.97 15 [] {+} -distinct_lines($c2,$c1).
% 54.76/54.97 16 [] {+} -convergent_lines($c3,$c1)|distinct_points(intersection_point($c3,$c2),intersection_point($c3,$c1)).
% 54.76/54.97 17 [] {-} convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 54.76/54.97 19 [hyper,17,6] {-} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c2,A).
% 54.76/54.97 23 [hyper,19,6] {-} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 54.76/54.97 25 [hyper,19,14] {-} convergent_lines($c3,A)|distinct_lines($c2,A).
% 54.76/54.97 32 [hyper,25,15] {-} convergent_lines($c3,$c1).
% 54.76/54.97 34 [hyper,32,16] {-} distinct_points(intersection_point($c3,$c2),intersection_point($c3,$c1)).
% 54.76/54.97 35 [hyper,32,6] {-} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c1,A).
% 54.76/54.97 37 [hyper,35,6] {-} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 54.76/54.97 38 [hyper,35,3] {-} convergent_lines($c1,$c3).
% 54.76/54.97 42 [hyper,23,6] {-} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines(B,A)|convergent_lines($c2,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 54.76/54.97 45 [hyper,23,3] {-} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c3).
% 54.76/54.97 49 [hyper,38,14] {+} distinct_lines($c1,$c3).
% 54.76/54.97 58 [hyper,45,6] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c3)|convergent_lines($c2,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 54.76/54.97 80 [hyper,34,11,49] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c1)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c3)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c1)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c3).
% 54.76/54.97 107 [hyper,37,3] {-} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c3).
% 54.76/54.97 109 [hyper,37,6] {-} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 54.76/54.97 110 [factor,109.1.3,unit_del,3] {-} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c1).
% 54.76/54.97 112 [hyper,107,6] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c3)|convergent_lines($c1,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 54.76/54.97 131 [hyper,42,6] {-} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c2,B)|convergent_lines(C,B)|convergent_lines(C,D)|convergent_lines(A,D).
% 54.76/54.97 170 [hyper,58,3] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c3)|convergent_lines(A,$c2).
% 54.76/54.97 211 [hyper,112,3] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c3)|convergent_lines(A,$c1).
% 54.76/54.97 561 [hyper,80,9,170,unit_del,1,3] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c1)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c1)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c3).
% 54.76/54.97 5365 [hyper,561,10,110,unit_del,1,3] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c1)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c1),$c3).
% 54.76/54.97 5547 [hyper,5365,9,211,unit_del,1,3] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c1).
% 54.76/54.97 5548 [hyper,5547,13] {-} distinct_lines($c1,A)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),A).
% 54.76/54.97 5856 [hyper,5548,5] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),A)|distinct_lines($c1,B)|distinct_lines(A,B).
% 54.76/54.97 7018 [hyper,5856,15,unit_del,2] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c2).
% 54.76/54.97 7069 [hyper,7018,10,131,unit_del,1,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} convergent_lines($c2,A).
% 54.76/54.97 7070 [binary,7069.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 % SZS output end Refutation
% 54.76/54.97 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 ============ end of search ============
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 true clauses given 38 (8.6%)
% 54.76/54.97 false clauses given 406
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 FALSE TRUE
% 54.76/54.97 8 1 0
% 54.76/54.97 11 1 0
% 54.76/54.97 12 0 14
% 54.76/54.97 13 14 0
% 54.76/54.97 14 2 0
% 54.76/54.97 15 262 9
% 54.76/54.97 16 19 0
% 54.76/54.97 18 43 15
% 54.76/54.97 19 6 0
% 54.76/54.97 21 4 0
% 54.76/54.97 22 10 0
% 54.76/54.97 23 6 0
% 54.76/54.97 24 63 0
% 54.76/54.97 25 86 0
% 54.76/54.97 26 127 0
% 54.76/54.97 27 413 0
% 54.76/54.97 28 356 0
% 54.76/54.97 29 475 0
% 54.76/54.97 30 741 0
% 54.76/54.97 tot: 2629 38 (1.4% true)
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 Model 2 [ 1 -304 113 ] (0.01 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 54.76/54.97
% 54.76/54.97 Process 24799 finished Sat Jun 18 16:01:08 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------