TSTP Solution File: GEO204+2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO204+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 106.21s 106.39s
% Output : Refutation 106.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GEO204+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 05:46:09 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Sat Jun 18 05:46:09 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11038.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.57 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.57 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.57 number of clauses in intial UL: 16
% 0.21/0.57 number of clauses initially in problem: 17
% 0.21/0.57 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 94
% 0.21/0.57 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.21/0.57 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.57 absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.21/0.57 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.21/0.57 distinct function count: 2
% 0.21/0.57 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.21/0.57
% 0.21/0.57 =========== start of search ===========
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Changing weight limit from 60 to 42.
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 35.35/35.53
% 35.35/35.53 Resetting weight limit to 42 after 110 givens.
% 35.35/35.53
% 39.80/39.98
% 39.80/39.98
% 39.80/39.98 Changing weight limit from 42 to 36.
% 39.80/39.98
% 39.80/39.98 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 115 givens.
% 39.80/39.98
% 77.50/77.72
% 77.50/77.72
% 77.50/77.72 Changing weight limit from 36 to 34.
% 77.50/77.72
% 77.50/77.72 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 150 givens.
% 77.50/77.72
% 90.14/90.36
% 90.14/90.36
% 90.14/90.36 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 90.14/90.36
% 90.14/90.36 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 155 givens.
% 90.14/90.36
% 105.78/105.96
% 105.78/105.96
% 105.78/105.96 Changing weight limit from 33 to 34.
% 105.78/105.96
% 105.78/105.96 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 170 givens.
% 105.78/105.96
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 105.97 sec ----> 6011 [binary,6010.1,15.1] {+} $F.
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 Length of proof is 22. Level of proof is 11.
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 106.21/106.39 % SZS status Theorem
% 106.21/106.39 % SZS output start Refutation
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 106.21/106.39 4 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 106.21/106.39 7 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,line_connecting(A,B))|distinct_points(C,A).
% 106.21/106.39 8 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,line_connecting(A,B))|distinct_points(C,B).
% 106.21/106.39 11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 106.21/106.39 15 [] {+} -distinct_points($c2,$c1).
% 106.21/106.39 16 [] {+} -distinct_points($c3,$c1)|distinct_lines(line_connecting($c3,$c2),line_connecting($c3,$c1)).
% 106.21/106.39 17 [] {-} distinct_points($c3,$c2).
% 106.21/106.39 18 [hyper,17,4] {-} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points($c2,A).
% 106.21/106.39 19 [hyper,18,16,unit_del,15] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c3,$c2),line_connecting($c3,$c1)).
% 106.21/106.39 20 [hyper,18,4] {-} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points($c3,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 106.21/106.39 22 [hyper,18,15] {-} distinct_points($c3,$c1).
% 106.21/106.39 24 [hyper,22,4] {-} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points($c1,A).
% 106.21/106.39 25 [hyper,24,4] {-} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points($c3,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 106.21/106.39 30 [hyper,19,11,22] {+} apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c3,$c2))|apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c3,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c2))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c1)).
% 106.21/106.39 39 [hyper,20,1] {-} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points(A,$c3).
% 106.21/106.39 44 [hyper,39,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points($c2,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 106.21/106.39 57 [hyper,25,1] {-} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points(A,$c3).
% 106.21/106.39 61 [hyper,57,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points($c1,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 106.21/106.39 67 [hyper,44,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points($c2,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 106.21/106.39 68 [hyper,44,1] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,$c2).
% 106.21/106.39 80 [hyper,61,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points($c1,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 106.21/106.39 148 [hyper,30,7,68,unit_del,1,1] {+} apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c3,$c1))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c2))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c1)).
% 106.21/106.39 282 [hyper,67,15] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(B,$c1).
% 106.21/106.39 354 [hyper,80,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points($c1,B)|distinct_points(C,B)|distinct_points(A,D)|distinct_points(C,D).
% 106.21/106.39 5030 [hyper,148,7,282,unit_del,1,1,1] {+} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c2))|apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c1)).
% 106.21/106.39 5764 [hyper,5030,8,282,unit_del,1,1,1] {+} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c2)).
% 106.21/106.39 5963 [hyper,5764,8,354,unit_del,1,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} distinct_points($c1,$c2).
% 106.21/106.39 5986 [hyper,5963,4] {-} distinct_points($c1,A)|distinct_points($c2,A).
% 106.21/106.39 6010 [hyper,5986,1] {-} distinct_points($c2,$c1).
% 106.21/106.39 6011 [binary,6010.1,15.1] {+} $F.
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 % SZS output end Refutation
% 106.21/106.39 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 ============ end of search ============
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 true clauses given 35 (20.3%)
% 106.21/106.39 false clauses given 137
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 FALSE TRUE
% 106.21/106.39 8 0 2
% 106.21/106.39 15 0 4
% 106.21/106.39 16 2 0
% 106.21/106.39 18 104 0
% 106.21/106.39 19 18 0
% 106.21/106.39 21 0 6
% 106.21/106.39 22 0 8
% 106.21/106.39 24 0 37
% 106.21/106.39 25 0 55
% 106.21/106.39 26 0 5
% 106.21/106.39 27 0 158
% 106.21/106.39 28 0 170
% 106.21/106.39 29 0 52
% 106.21/106.39 30 0 478
% 106.21/106.39 31 0 492
% 106.21/106.39 32 0 127
% 106.21/106.39 33 0 827
% 106.21/106.39 tot: 124 2421 (95.1% true)
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 106.21/106.39
% 106.21/106.39 Process 11038 finished Sat Jun 18 05:47:55 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------