TSTP Solution File: GEO204+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : GEO204+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:04:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   98 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   89 (  27   ~;  47   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   0 sgn  28   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
        & ~ distinct_points(X2,X3) )
     => ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
        & ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X1,X3)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',con) ).

fof(apart4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
        | distinct_points(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',apart4) ).

fof(apart1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',apart1) ).

fof(cu1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
        & distinct_lines(X4,X5) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
        | apart_point_and_line(X1,X5)
        | apart_point_and_line(X2,X4)
        | apart_point_and_line(X2,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',cu1) ).

fof(con1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
       => ( distinct_points(X3,X1)
          & distinct_points(X3,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',con1) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
          & ~ distinct_points(X2,X3) )
       => ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
          & ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X1,X3)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X4,X5)
      | distinct_points(X4,X6)
      | distinct_points(X5,X6) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[apart4])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & ~ distinct_points(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & ( ~ distinct_points(esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk1_0,esk3_0)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | distinct_points(X3,X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X2] : ~ distinct_points(X2,X2),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk1_0,X1)
    | distinct_points(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk2_0,X1)
    | distinct_points(esk1_0,X2)
    | distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(X1,esk1_0)
    | distinct_points(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ distinct_points(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(X1,esk1_0)
    | distinct_points(esk2_0,X2)
    | distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(X1,esk3_0)
    | distinct_points(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X6,X7)
      | ~ distinct_lines(X8,X9)
      | apart_point_and_line(X6,X8)
      | apart_point_and_line(X6,X9)
      | apart_point_and_line(X7,X8)
      | apart_point_and_line(X7,X9) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cu1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | ~ distinct_points(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)
    | ~ distinct_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk1_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk1_0,X1)
    | distinct_points(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X6,X4)
        | ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))
        | ~ distinct_points(X4,X5) )
      & ( distinct_points(X6,X5)
        | ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))
        | ~ distinct_points(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[con1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X3,X1)
    | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X3,X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk3_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_20])]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_20])]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_31]),c_0_9])]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_32]),c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk3_0,X1)
    | distinct_points(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_34]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11  % Problem  : GEO204+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.02/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 05:33:47 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.21/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.21/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.21/1.40  
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.21/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 36
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 25
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 23
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 20
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 16
% 0.21/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 14
% 0.21/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.21/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 0.21/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
% 0.21/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 12
% 0.21/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 0.21/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 110
% 0.21/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 59
% 0.21/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 51
% 0.21/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.21/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.21/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 389
% 0.21/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 323
% 0.21/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 25
% 0.21/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 253
% 0.21/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 136
% 0.21/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 45
% 0.21/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.21/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.21/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 35
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 214
% 0.21/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1063
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 6
% 0.21/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 983
% 0.21/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 659
% 0.21/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 86
% 0.21/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.21/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.21/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.21/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5413
% 0.21/1.40  
% 0.21/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/1.40  # User time                : 0.024 s
% 0.21/1.40  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.21/1.40  # Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.21/1.40  # Maximum resident set size: 3080 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------