TSTP Solution File: GEO201+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : GEO201+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:36 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : GEO201+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 19:30:31 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.60  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.56/0.60  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.60  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.56/0.60  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.56/0.60  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.56/0.60  
% 0.56/0.60  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.56/0.60  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.56/0.60  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.61  % File     : GEO201+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.56/0.61  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.56/0.61  % Problem  : Distinct ends means distinct lines
% 0.56/0.61  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 0.56/0.61  % English  : If the lines X and Y are convergent, then the intersection
% 0.56/0.61  %            point of X and Y is equal to the intersection point of X and Y.
% 0.56/0.61  
% 0.56/0.61  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.56/0.61  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.56/0.61  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 0.56/0.61  % Names    : Theorem 5.2 [vPl95]
% 0.56/0.61  
% 0.56/0.61  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.56/0.61  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.13 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.21 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.29 v3.5.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.56/0.61  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.56/0.61  %            Number of atoms       :   37 (   0 equ)
% 0.56/0.61  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.56/0.61  %            Number of connectives :   30 (   8   ~;   9   |;   1   &)
% 0.56/0.61  %                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.56/0.61  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.56/0.61  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.56/0.61  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.56/0.61  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.56/0.61  %            Number of variables   :   35 (  35   !;   0   ?)
% 0.56/0.61  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.56/0.61  
% 0.56/0.61  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.56/0.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.61  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.56/0.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.61  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.56/0.61      ! [X,Y] :
% 0.56/0.61        ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
% 0.56/0.61       => ~ distinct_points(intersection_point(X,Y),intersection_point(Y,X)) ) ).
% 0.56/0.61  
% 0.56/0.61  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.61  % Proof found
% 0.56/0.61  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.56/0.61  %ClaNum:16(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.56/0.61  %VarNum:74(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 0.56/0.61  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.56/0.61  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.56/0.61  %SharedTerms:6
% 0.56/0.61  %goalClause: 1 2
% 0.56/0.61  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.56/0.61  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.56/0.61  [2]P3(f3(a1,a2),f3(a2,a1))
% 0.56/0.61  [3]~P3(x31,x31)
% 0.56/0.61  [4]~P4(x41,x41)
% 0.56/0.61  [5]~P1(x51,x51)
% 0.56/0.61  [12]~P3(x121,x122)+~P2(x122,f4(x121,x122))
% 0.56/0.61  [13]~P3(x131,x132)+~P2(x131,f4(x131,x132))
% 0.56/0.61  [14]~P1(x141,x142)+~P2(f3(x141,x142),x142)
% 0.56/0.61  [15]~P1(x151,x152)+~P2(f3(x151,x152),x151)
% 0.56/0.61  [6]~P3(x63,x61)+P3(x61,x62)+P3(x63,x62)
% 0.56/0.61  [7]~P2(x71,x73)+P3(x71,x72)+P2(x72,x73)
% 0.56/0.61  [8]~P4(x83,x81)+P4(x81,x82)+P4(x83,x82)
% 0.56/0.61  [9]~P1(x93,x91)+P4(x91,x92)+P1(x93,x92)
% 0.56/0.61  [10]~P2(x103,x101)+P4(x101,x102)+P2(x103,x102)
% 0.56/0.61  [11]~P1(x113,x111)+P1(x111,x112)+P1(x113,x112)
% 0.56/0.61  [16]P2(x164,x163)+~P3(x164,x161)+~P4(x163,x162)+P2(x161,x162)+P2(x161,x163)+P2(x164,x162)
% 0.56/0.61  %EqnAxiom
% 0.56/0.61  
% 0.56/0.61  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(17,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (P1(a2,a1)),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,11])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(18,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (~P1(x181,x181)),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(19,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (P4(a2,a1)),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,18,11,9])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(27,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (~P2(f3(a1,a2),a1)),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4,5,18,2,11,9,8,6,15])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(29,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (~P2(f3(a1,a2),a2)),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4,5,18,2,11,9,8,6,15,14])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(35,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     (P2(f3(a2,a1),a2)+P2(f3(a2,a1),a1)),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,27,29,19,16])).
% 0.56/0.61  cnf(41,plain,
% 0.56/0.61     ($false),
% 0.56/0.61     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,15,35,14]),
% 0.56/0.61     ['proof']).
% 0.56/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/0.61  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------