TSTP Solution File: GEO200+3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO200+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:38:37 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 7.11s 2.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   25
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   57 (  18 unt;  18 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   79 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   60 (  20   ~;  33   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  16   >;  14   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   13 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (;  42   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ unorthogonal_lines > parallel_lines > orthogonal_lines > incident_point_and_line > equal_points > equal_lines > distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > point > line > parallel_through_point > orthogonal_through_point > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(equal_lines,type,
    equal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(equal_points,type,
    equal_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(incident_point_and_line,type,
    incident_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(parallel_through_point,type,
    parallel_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(orthogonal_through_point,type,
    orthogonal_through_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(point,type,
    point: $i > $o ).

tff(line,type,
    line: $i > $o ).

tff(parallel_lines,type,
    parallel_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(unorthogonal_lines,type,
    unorthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(orthogonal_lines,type,
    orthogonal_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_432,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y] :
        ( distinct_points(X,Y)
       => equal_lines(line_connecting(X,Y),line_connecting(Y,X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_66,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_points(X,Z)
        | distinct_points(Y,Z) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart4) ).

tff(f_54,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ distinct_points(X,X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart1) ).

tff(f_410,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( equal_lines(X,Y)
    <=> ~ distinct_lines(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',ax2) ).

tff(f_112,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,U,V] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
        & distinct_lines(U,V) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(X,V)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,U)
        | apart_point_and_line(Y,V) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).

tff(f_84,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

tff(c_96,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_432]) ).

tff(c_338,plain,
    ! [Y_186,Z_187,X_188] :
      ( distinct_points(Y_186,Z_187)
      | distinct_points(X_188,Z_187)
      | ~ distinct_points(X_188,Y_186) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_342,plain,
    ! [Z_189] :
      ( distinct_points('#skF_2',Z_189)
      | distinct_points('#skF_1',Z_189) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_338]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [Y_5,Z_6,X_4] :
      ( distinct_points(Y_5,Z_6)
      | distinct_points(X_4,Z_6)
      | ~ distinct_points(X_4,Y_5) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_370,plain,
    ! [Z_190,Z_191] :
      ( distinct_points(Z_190,Z_191)
      | distinct_points('#skF_2',Z_191)
      | distinct_points('#skF_1',Z_190) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_342,c_8]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1] : ~ distinct_points(X_1,X_1),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_54]) ).

tff(c_392,plain,
    ! [Z_192] :
      ( distinct_points(Z_192,'#skF_2')
      | distinct_points('#skF_1',Z_192) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_370,c_2]) ).

tff(c_496,plain,
    ! [Z_197,Z_198] :
      ( distinct_points(Z_197,Z_198)
      | distinct_points('#skF_1',Z_198)
      | distinct_points(Z_197,'#skF_2') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_392,c_8]) ).

tff(c_521,plain,
    ! [Z_199] :
      ( distinct_points(Z_199,'#skF_1')
      | distinct_points(Z_199,'#skF_2') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_496,c_2]) ).

tff(c_529,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_2','#skF_1'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_521,c_2]) ).

tff(c_106,plain,
    ! [X_97,Y_98] :
      ( equal_lines(X_97,Y_98)
      | distinct_lines(X_97,Y_98) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_410]) ).

tff(c_94,plain,
    ~ equal_lines(line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'),line_connecting('#skF_2','#skF_1')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_432]) ).

tff(c_110,plain,
    distinct_lines(line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'),line_connecting('#skF_2','#skF_1')),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_94]) ).

tff(c_2969,plain,
    ! [Y_454,V_455,U_456,X_457] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_454,V_455)
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_454,U_456)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_457,V_455)
      | apart_point_and_line(X_457,U_456)
      | ~ distinct_lines(U_456,V_455)
      | ~ distinct_points(X_457,Y_454) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_112]) ).

tff(c_3139,plain,
    ! [Y_466,X_467] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Y_466,line_connecting('#skF_2','#skF_1'))
      | apart_point_and_line(Y_466,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | apart_point_and_line(X_467,line_connecting('#skF_2','#skF_1'))
      | apart_point_and_line(X_467,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_467,Y_466) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_2969]) ).

tff(c_3244,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_2','#skF_1'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_2','#skF_1'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_96,c_3139]) ).

tff(c_3730,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_3244]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [X_13,Y_14] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X_13,line_connecting(X_13,Y_14))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_13,Y_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_84]) ).

tff(c_3737,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3730,c_14]) ).

tff(c_3743,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_96,c_3737]) ).

tff(c_3744,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_2','#skF_1'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_2','#skF_1')) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_3244]) ).

tff(c_4082,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_2','#skF_1')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_3744]) ).

tff(c_4089,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_2','#skF_1'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4082,c_14]) ).

tff(c_4095,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_529,c_4089]) ).

tff(c_4096,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
    | apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_2','#skF_1')) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_3744]) ).

tff(c_4098,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_1',line_connecting('#skF_2','#skF_1')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_4096]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [Y_16,X_15] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(Y_16,line_connecting(X_15,Y_16))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_15,Y_16) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_4105,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_2','#skF_1'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4098,c_16]) ).

tff(c_4111,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_529,c_4105]) ).

tff(c_4112,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_2',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_4096]) ).

tff(c_4120,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4112,c_16]) ).

tff(c_4126,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_96,c_4120]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : GEO200+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.14/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:18:33 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 7.11/2.75  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.11/2.75  
% 7.11/2.75  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.11/2.78  
% 7.11/2.78  Inference rules
% 7.11/2.78  ----------------------
% 7.11/2.78  #Ref     : 0
% 7.11/2.78  #Sup     : 886
% 7.11/2.78  #Fact    : 72
% 7.11/2.78  #Define  : 0
% 7.11/2.78  #Split   : 4
% 7.11/2.78  #Chain   : 0
% 7.11/2.78  #Close   : 0
% 7.11/2.78  
% 7.11/2.78  Ordering : KBO
% 7.11/2.78  
% 7.39/2.78  Simplification rules
% 7.39/2.78  ----------------------
% 7.39/2.78  #Subsume      : 145
% 7.39/2.78  #Demod        : 113
% 7.39/2.78  #Tautology    : 122
% 7.39/2.78  #SimpNegUnit  : 14
% 7.39/2.78  #BackRed      : 0
% 7.39/2.78  
% 7.39/2.78  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 7.39/2.78  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 7.39/2.78  
% 7.39/2.78  Timing (in seconds)
% 7.39/2.78  ----------------------
% 7.39/2.78  Preprocessing        : 0.59
% 7.39/2.78  Parsing              : 0.33
% 7.39/2.78  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 7.39/2.78  Main loop            : 1.06
% 7.39/2.78  Inferencing          : 0.39
% 7.39/2.78  Reduction            : 0.28
% 7.39/2.78  Demodulation         : 0.17
% 7.39/2.78  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 7.39/2.78  Subsumption          : 0.27
% 7.39/2.78  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 7.39/2.79  MUC search           : 0.00
% 7.39/2.79  Cooper               : 0.00
% 7.39/2.79  Total                : 1.70
% 7.39/2.79  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 7.39/2.79  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 7.39/2.79  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 7.39/2.79  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------