TSTP Solution File: GEO200+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : GEO200+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 05:07:52 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.90s
% Output   : Solution 0.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23374/GEO200+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23374/GEO200+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23374/GEO200+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 23470
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.011 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:~(distinct_points(X1,X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', apart1)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:~(distinct_lines(X1,X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', apart2)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>(distinct_points(X1,X3)|distinct_points(X2,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', apart4)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(distinct_lines(X1,X2)=>(distinct_lines(X1,X3)|distinct_lines(X2,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', apart5)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ci1)).
% fof(6, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ci2)).
% fof(7, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X4]:![X5]:((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_lines(X4,X5))=>(((apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X5))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X4))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X5))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', cu1)).
% fof(15, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X2,X1)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', con)).
% fof(16, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X2,X1))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[15])).
% fof(17, plain,![X1]:~(distinct_points(X1,X1)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[1,theory(equality)])).
% fof(18, plain,![X1]:~(distinct_lines(X1,X1)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[2,theory(equality)])).
% fof(19, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[5,theory(equality)])).
% fof(20, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[6,theory(equality)])).
% fof(24, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X2,X1))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[16,theory(equality)])).
% fof(25, plain,![X2]:~(distinct_points(X2,X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[17])).
% cnf(26,plain,(~distinct_points(X1,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[25])).
% fof(27, plain,![X2]:~(distinct_lines(X2,X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[18])).
% cnf(28,plain,(~distinct_lines(X1,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27])).
% fof(29, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|(distinct_points(X1,X3)|distinct_points(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(30, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(distinct_points(X4,X5))|(distinct_points(X4,X6)|distinct_points(X5,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[29])).
% cnf(31,plain,(distinct_points(X1,X2)|distinct_points(X3,X2)|~distinct_points(X3,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[30])).
% fof(32, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(distinct_lines(X1,X2))|(distinct_lines(X1,X3)|distinct_lines(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4])).
% fof(33, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(distinct_lines(X4,X5))|(distinct_lines(X4,X6)|distinct_lines(X5,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[32])).
% cnf(34,plain,(distinct_lines(X1,X2)|distinct_lines(X3,X2)|~distinct_lines(X3,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[33])).
% fof(35, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|~(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[19])).
% fof(36, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(distinct_points(X3,X4))|~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X3,X4)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[35])).
% cnf(37,plain,(~apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2))|~distinct_points(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[36])).
% fof(38, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|~(apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[20])).
% fof(39, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(distinct_points(X3,X4))|~(apart_point_and_line(X4,line_connecting(X3,X4)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[38])).
% cnf(40,plain,(~apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X1))|~distinct_points(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[39])).
% fof(41, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X4]:![X5]:((~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|~(distinct_lines(X4,X5)))|(((apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X5))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X4))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X5))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[7])).
% fof(42, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:((~(distinct_points(X6,X7))|~(distinct_lines(X8,X9)))|(((apart_point_and_line(X6,X8)|apart_point_and_line(X6,X9))|apart_point_and_line(X7,X8))|apart_point_and_line(X7,X9))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[41])).
% cnf(43,plain,(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)|~distinct_lines(X3,X2)|~distinct_points(X4,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[42])).
% fof(64, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X2,X1))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[24])).
% fof(65, negated_conjecture,?[X3]:?[X4]:(distinct_points(X3,X4)&distinct_lines(line_connecting(X3,X4),line_connecting(X4,X3))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[64])).
% fof(66, negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)&distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[65])).
% cnf(67,negated_conjecture,(distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[66])).
% cnf(68,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[66])).
% cnf(69,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,X1)|distinct_points(esk2_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[31,68,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(70,negated_conjecture,(distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1)|distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0),X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[34,67,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(72,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[26,69,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(75,negated_conjecture,(distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0),line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[28,70,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(79,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|~distinct_points(X1,X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[43,75,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(80,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[79,72,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(85,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|~distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[37,80,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(86,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[85,68,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(87,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[86,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(439,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|~distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[40,87,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(440,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[439,72,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(441,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[440,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(444,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|~distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[40,441,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(445,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[444,68,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(446,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[445,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(449,negated_conjecture,(~distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[37,446,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(451,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[449,72,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(452,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[451,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(453,negated_conjecture,($false),452,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 112
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 48
% # ...remaining for further processing: 64
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 4
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 1
% # Generated clauses                  : 304
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 249
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 4
% # Paramodulations                    : 232
% # Factorizations                     : 72
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 43
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 5
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 3
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 35
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 154
% # ...number of literals in the above : 876
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 601
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 394
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 1
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index:    30 leaves,   2.00+/-1.653 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           17 leaves,   1.59+/-1.191 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           27 leaves,   1.70+/-1.242 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.023 s
% # System time            : 0.003 s
% # Total time             : 0.026 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.19 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.11 CPU 0.19 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23374/GEO200+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------