TSTP Solution File: GEO200+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : GEO200+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:22:12 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 6.88s 1.60s
% Output   : Proof 10.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GEO200+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 18:58:11 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.62  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.62  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.62  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.62  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.62  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.62  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.62  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.62                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.62  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.62/0.64  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.62/0.66  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.62/0.66  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.62/0.66  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.62/0.66  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.62/0.66  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.62/0.66  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.62/0.66  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 2.51/1.01  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.51/1.02  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.51/1.05  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.51/1.06  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.51/1.06  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.51/1.06  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.51/1.06  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.94/1.27  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 3.94/1.27  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 3.94/1.28  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.94/1.28  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.94/1.31  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.46/1.41  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.46/1.42  Prover 3: gave up
% 5.46/1.42  Prover 6: gave up
% 5.46/1.42  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 5.46/1.42  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 5.46/1.43  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 5.46/1.45  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 5.92/1.47  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 5.92/1.49  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.92/1.50  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.92/1.53  Prover 1: gave up
% 5.92/1.54  Prover 9: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1423531889
% 5.92/1.55  Prover 9: Preprocessing ...
% 6.63/1.56  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.63/1.57  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.88/1.60  Prover 5: proved (944ms)
% 6.88/1.60  
% 6.88/1.60  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.88/1.60  
% 6.88/1.60  Prover 0: stopped
% 6.88/1.60  Prover 2: stopped
% 6.88/1.60  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 6.88/1.60  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 6.88/1.60  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 6.88/1.62  Prover 7: gave up
% 6.88/1.62  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 6.88/1.62  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 7.16/1.63  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 7.16/1.63  Prover 8: gave up
% 7.22/1.65  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 7.22/1.65  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 7.22/1.65  Prover 19: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 7.22/1.67  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.22/1.67  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.22/1.68  Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 7.22/1.69  Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.22/1.69  Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.22/1.69  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.22/1.70  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.75/1.72  Prover 9: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.75/1.72  Prover 9: stopped
% 8.18/1.77  Prover 10: gave up
% 8.18/1.78  Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.18/1.79  Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.18/1.81  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.18/1.83  Prover 13: gave up
% 8.18/1.84  Prover 16: gave up
% 8.18/1.86  Prover 19: gave up
% 9.96/2.04  Prover 4: Found proof (size 86)
% 9.96/2.04  Prover 4: proved (1383ms)
% 9.96/2.04  Prover 11: stopped
% 9.96/2.04  
% 9.96/2.04  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.96/2.04  
% 9.96/2.06  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 10.10/2.07  Assumptions after simplification:
% 10.10/2.07  ---------------------------------
% 10.10/2.07  
% 10.10/2.07    (apart1)
% 10.10/2.09     ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 10.10/2.09  
% 10.10/2.09    (apart4)
% 10.10/2.10     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 =
% 10.10/2.10      0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2)
% 10.10/2.10        = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: int] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) &
% 10.10/2.10        distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 10.10/2.10     ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~
% 10.10/2.10      (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 10.10/2.10      distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 10.10/2.10    [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~
% 10.10/2.10      (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 10.10/2.10      distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 10.10/2.10  
% 10.10/2.10    (ci1)
% 10.10/2.10     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |
% 10.10/2.10       ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] :
% 10.10/2.10      (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4
% 10.10/2.10            = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 10.10/2.10      (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ?
% 10.10/2.10      [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 &
% 10.10/2.10        apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3 & $i(v2)))
% 10.10/2.10  
% 10.10/2.10    (ci2)
% 10.10/2.10     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |
% 10.10/2.10       ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] :
% 10.10/2.10      (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4
% 10.10/2.10            = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 10.10/2.10      (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ?
% 10.10/2.10      [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 &
% 10.10/2.10        apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3 & $i(v2)))
% 10.10/2.10  
% 10.10/2.10    (con)
% 10.10/2.11     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] : (line_connecting(v1,
% 10.10/2.11        v0) = v3 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0 &
% 10.10/2.11      distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 10.10/2.11  
% 10.10/2.11    (cu1)
% 10.10/2.12     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] :  ! [v5:
% 10.10/2.12      int] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] : 
% 10.10/2.12      ? [v8: any] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0,
% 10.10/2.12          v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 =
% 10.10/2.12          0))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4:
% 10.10/2.12      int] :  ! [v5: int] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) =
% 10.10/2.12        v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3)
% 10.10/2.12        = 0) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v6: any] :  ?
% 10.10/2.12      [v7: any] :  ? [v8: any] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 &
% 10.10/2.12        apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6
% 10.10/2.12            = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : 
% 10.10/2.12    ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] :  ! [v5: int] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4)
% 10.10/2.12      |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7:
% 10.10/2.12        any] :  ? [v8: any] :  ? [v9: any] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 &
% 10.10/2.12        apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 &
% 10.10/2.12        distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 =
% 10.10/2.12          0))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4:
% 10.10/2.12      int] :  ! [v5: int] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) =
% 10.10/2.12        v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] :  ? [v8: any] :  ? [v9:
% 10.10/2.12        any] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) =
% 10.10/2.12        v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7
% 10.10/2.12            = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : 
% 10.10/2.12    ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] :  ! [v5: int] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4)
% 10.10/2.12      |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      $i(v0) |  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] :  ? [v8: any] :
% 10.10/2.12      (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 &
% 10.10/2.12        distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0:
% 10.10/2.12      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] :  ! [v5: int]
% 10.10/2.12    : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] : 
% 10.10/2.12      ? [v8: any] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1,
% 10.10/2.12          v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 =
% 10.10/2.12          0))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 10.10/2.12      (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v3)
% 10.10/2.12      |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6:
% 10.10/2.12        any] :  ? [v7: any] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 &
% 10.10/2.12        apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 &
% 10.10/2.12        apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 10.10/2.12  
% 10.10/2.12    (function-axioms)
% 10.10/2.12     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 10.10/2.12    ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 10.10/2.12    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 10.10/2.12      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 10.10/2.12      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 10.10/2.12    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 10.10/2.12      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3,
% 10.10/2.12          v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : 
% 10.10/2.12    ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 10.10/2.12      (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 10.10/2.12  
% 10.10/2.12  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 10.10/2.12  --------------------------------------------
% 10.10/2.12  apart2, apart3, apart5, ax6, ceq1, ceq2, ceq3, ci3, ci4
% 10.10/2.12  
% 10.10/2.12  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 10.10/2.12  ---------------------------------
% 10.10/2.12  
% 10.10/2.12  Begin of proof
% 10.10/2.12  | 
% 10.10/2.12  | ALPHA: (apart4) implies:
% 10.10/2.12  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 |  ~
% 10.10/2.12  |          (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | 
% 10.10/2.12  |          ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 10.10/2.12  | 
% 10.10/2.12  | ALPHA: (ci1) implies:
% 10.10/2.13  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 10.10/2.13  |          $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 10.10/2.13  |            line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3 &
% 10.10/2.13  |            $i(v2)))
% 10.40/2.13  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1)
% 10.40/2.13  |            = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] :
% 10.40/2.13  |          (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3 & (
% 10.40/2.13  |              ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 10.40/2.13  | 
% 10.40/2.13  | ALPHA: (ci2) implies:
% 10.40/2.13  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 10.40/2.13  |          $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 10.40/2.13  |            line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3 &
% 10.40/2.13  |            $i(v2)))
% 10.40/2.13  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1)
% 10.40/2.13  |            = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] :
% 10.40/2.13  |          (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3 & (
% 10.40/2.13  |              ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 10.40/2.13  | 
% 10.40/2.13  | ALPHA: (cu1) implies:
% 10.40/2.13  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 10.40/2.13  |          (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~
% 10.40/2.13  |          $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5:
% 10.40/2.13  |            any] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: any] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3)
% 10.40/2.13  |            = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0,
% 10.40/2.13  |              v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 |
% 10.40/2.13  |              v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 10.40/2.13  | 
% 10.40/2.13  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 10.40/2.13  |   (7)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 10.40/2.13  |         ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 10.40/2.13  |          (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 10.40/2.13  |   (8)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 10.40/2.13  |         ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 10.40/2.13  |          (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 10.40/2.13  |   (9)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 10.40/2.13  |          (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 10.40/2.13  | 
% 10.40/2.13  | DELTA: instantiating (con) with fresh symbols all_17_0, all_17_1, all_17_2,
% 10.40/2.13  |        all_17_3 gives:
% 10.40/2.13  |   (10)  line_connecting(all_17_2, all_17_3) = all_17_0 &
% 10.40/2.13  |         line_connecting(all_17_3, all_17_2) = all_17_1 &
% 10.40/2.13  |         distinct_lines(all_17_1, all_17_0) = 0 & distinct_points(all_17_3,
% 10.40/2.13  |           all_17_2) = 0 & $i(all_17_0) & $i(all_17_1) & $i(all_17_2) &
% 10.40/2.13  |         $i(all_17_3)
% 10.40/2.13  | 
% 10.40/2.13  | ALPHA: (10) implies:
% 10.40/2.13  |   (11)  $i(all_17_3)
% 10.40/2.14  |   (12)  $i(all_17_2)
% 10.40/2.14  |   (13)  $i(all_17_1)
% 10.40/2.14  |   (14)  $i(all_17_0)
% 10.40/2.14  |   (15)  distinct_points(all_17_3, all_17_2) = 0
% 10.40/2.14  |   (16)  distinct_lines(all_17_1, all_17_0) = 0
% 10.40/2.14  |   (17)  line_connecting(all_17_3, all_17_2) = all_17_1
% 10.40/2.14  |   (18)  line_connecting(all_17_2, all_17_3) = all_17_0
% 10.40/2.14  | 
% 10.40/2.14  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_17_3, all_17_2, simplifying with (11),
% 10.40/2.14  |              (12), (15) gives:
% 10.40/2.14  |   (19)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_17_3,
% 10.40/2.14  |             all_17_2) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, v0) = v1 & $i(v0))
% 10.40/2.14  | 
% 10.40/2.14  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_17_3, all_17_2, simplifying with (11),
% 10.40/2.14  |              (12), (15) gives:
% 10.40/2.14  |   (20)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & line_connecting(all_17_3,
% 10.40/2.14  |             all_17_2) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, v0) = v1 & $i(v0))
% 10.40/2.14  | 
% 10.40/2.14  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_17_3, all_17_2, all_17_1, all_17_0,
% 10.40/2.14  |              simplifying with (11), (12), (13), (14), (15), (16) gives:
% 10.40/2.14  |   (21)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: any] :
% 10.40/2.14  |         (apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_0) = v3 &
% 10.40/2.14  |           apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_1) = v2 &
% 10.40/2.14  |           apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_17_0) = v1 &
% 10.40/2.14  |           apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_17_1) = v0 & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 |
% 10.40/2.14  |             v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 10.40/2.14  | 
% 10.40/2.14  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_17_3, all_17_2, all_17_1, simplifying
% 10.40/2.14  |              with (11), (12), (17) gives:
% 10.40/2.14  |   (22)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (apart_point_and_line(all_17_2,
% 10.40/2.14  |             all_17_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_17_3, all_17_2) = v0 & ( ~
% 10.40/2.14  |             (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 10.40/2.14  | 
% 10.40/2.14  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_17_3, all_17_2, all_17_1, simplifying
% 10.40/2.14  |              with (11), (12), (17) gives:
% 10.40/2.14  |   (23)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (apart_point_and_line(all_17_3,
% 10.40/2.14  |             all_17_1) = v1 & distinct_points(all_17_3, all_17_2) = v0 & ( ~
% 10.40/2.14  |             (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 10.40/2.14  | 
% 10.40/2.14  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_17_2, all_17_3, all_17_0, simplifying
% 10.40/2.14  |              with (11), (12), (18) gives:
% 10.40/2.14  |   (24)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (apart_point_and_line(all_17_3,
% 10.40/2.14  |             all_17_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_17_2, all_17_3) = v0 & ( ~
% 10.40/2.14  |             (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 10.40/2.14  | 
% 10.40/2.14  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_17_2, all_17_3, all_17_0, simplifying
% 10.40/2.14  |              with (11), (12), (18) gives:
% 10.40/2.14  |   (25)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (apart_point_and_line(all_17_2,
% 10.40/2.14  |             all_17_0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_17_2, all_17_3) = v0 & ( ~
% 10.40/2.14  |             (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 10.40/2.14  | 
% 10.40/2.14  | DELTA: instantiating (25) with fresh symbols all_24_0, all_24_1 gives:
% 10.40/2.14  |   (26)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_0) = all_24_0 &
% 10.40/2.14  |         distinct_points(all_17_2, all_17_3) = all_24_1 & ( ~ (all_24_0 = 0) | 
% 10.40/2.14  |           ~ (all_24_1 = 0))
% 10.40/2.14  | 
% 10.40/2.14  | ALPHA: (26) implies:
% 10.40/2.14  |   (27)  distinct_points(all_17_2, all_17_3) = all_24_1
% 10.40/2.15  |   (28)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_0) = all_24_0
% 10.40/2.15  |   (29)   ~ (all_24_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_24_1 = 0)
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | DELTA: instantiating (22) with fresh symbols all_26_0, all_26_1 gives:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (30)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_1) = all_26_0 &
% 10.40/2.15  |         distinct_points(all_17_3, all_17_2) = all_26_1 & ( ~ (all_26_0 = 0) | 
% 10.40/2.15  |           ~ (all_26_1 = 0))
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | ALPHA: (30) implies:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (31)  distinct_points(all_17_3, all_17_2) = all_26_1
% 10.40/2.15  |   (32)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_1) = all_26_0
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | DELTA: instantiating (24) with fresh symbols all_28_0, all_28_1 gives:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (33)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_17_0) = all_28_0 &
% 10.40/2.15  |         distinct_points(all_17_2, all_17_3) = all_28_1 & ( ~ (all_28_0 = 0) | 
% 10.40/2.15  |           ~ (all_28_1 = 0))
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | ALPHA: (33) implies:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (34)  distinct_points(all_17_2, all_17_3) = all_28_1
% 10.40/2.15  |   (35)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_17_0) = all_28_0
% 10.40/2.15  |   (36)   ~ (all_28_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_28_1 = 0)
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | DELTA: instantiating (23) with fresh symbols all_30_0, all_30_1 gives:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (37)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_17_1) = all_30_0 &
% 10.40/2.15  |         distinct_points(all_17_3, all_17_2) = all_30_1 & ( ~ (all_30_0 = 0) | 
% 10.40/2.15  |           ~ (all_30_1 = 0))
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | ALPHA: (37) implies:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (38)  distinct_points(all_17_3, all_17_2) = all_30_1
% 10.40/2.15  |   (39)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_17_1) = all_30_0
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | DELTA: instantiating (20) with fresh symbols all_32_0, all_32_1 gives:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (40)   ~ (all_32_0 = 0) & line_connecting(all_17_3, all_17_2) = all_32_1 &
% 10.40/2.15  |         apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_32_1) = all_32_0 & $i(all_32_1)
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | ALPHA: (40) implies:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (41)   ~ (all_32_0 = 0)
% 10.40/2.15  |   (42)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_32_1) = all_32_0
% 10.40/2.15  |   (43)  line_connecting(all_17_3, all_17_2) = all_32_1
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | DELTA: instantiating (19) with fresh symbols all_34_0, all_34_1 gives:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (44)   ~ (all_34_0 = 0) & line_connecting(all_17_3, all_17_2) = all_34_1 &
% 10.40/2.15  |         apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_34_1) = all_34_0 & $i(all_34_1)
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | ALPHA: (44) implies:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (45)   ~ (all_34_0 = 0)
% 10.40/2.15  |   (46)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_34_1) = all_34_0
% 10.40/2.15  |   (47)  line_connecting(all_17_3, all_17_2) = all_34_1
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | DELTA: instantiating (21) with fresh symbols all_36_0, all_36_1, all_36_2,
% 10.40/2.15  |        all_36_3 gives:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (48)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_0) = all_36_0 &
% 10.40/2.15  |         apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_1) = all_36_1 &
% 10.40/2.15  |         apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_17_0) = all_36_2 &
% 10.40/2.15  |         apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_17_1) = all_36_3 & (all_36_0 = 0 |
% 10.40/2.15  |           all_36_1 = 0 | all_36_2 = 0 | all_36_3 = 0)
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | ALPHA: (48) implies:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (49)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_17_1) = all_36_3
% 10.40/2.15  |   (50)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_17_0) = all_36_2
% 10.40/2.15  |   (51)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_1) = all_36_1
% 10.40/2.15  |   (52)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_0) = all_36_0
% 10.40/2.15  |   (53)  all_36_0 = 0 | all_36_1 = 0 | all_36_2 = 0 | all_36_3 = 0
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with 0, all_30_1, all_17_2, all_17_3,
% 10.40/2.15  |              simplifying with (15), (38) gives:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (54)  all_30_1 = 0
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_26_1, all_30_1, all_17_2, all_17_3,
% 10.40/2.15  |              simplifying with (31), (38) gives:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (55)  all_30_1 = all_26_1
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_24_1, all_28_1, all_17_3, all_17_2,
% 10.40/2.15  |              simplifying with (27), (34) gives:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (56)  all_28_1 = all_24_1
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_30_0, all_36_3, all_17_1, all_17_3,
% 10.40/2.15  |              simplifying with (39), (49) gives:
% 10.40/2.15  |   (57)  all_36_3 = all_30_0
% 10.40/2.15  | 
% 10.40/2.15  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_28_0, all_36_2, all_17_0, all_17_3,
% 10.40/2.15  |              simplifying with (35), (50) gives:
% 10.40/2.16  |   (58)  all_36_2 = all_28_0
% 10.40/2.16  | 
% 10.40/2.16  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_26_0, all_36_1, all_17_1, all_17_2,
% 10.40/2.16  |              simplifying with (32), (51) gives:
% 10.40/2.16  |   (59)  all_36_1 = all_26_0
% 10.40/2.16  | 
% 10.40/2.16  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_24_0, all_36_0, all_17_0, all_17_2,
% 10.40/2.16  |              simplifying with (28), (52) gives:
% 10.40/2.16  |   (60)  all_36_0 = all_24_0
% 10.40/2.16  | 
% 10.40/2.16  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_17_1, all_34_1, all_17_2, all_17_3,
% 10.40/2.16  |              simplifying with (17), (47) gives:
% 10.40/2.16  |   (61)  all_34_1 = all_17_1
% 10.40/2.16  | 
% 10.40/2.16  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_32_1, all_34_1, all_17_2, all_17_3,
% 10.40/2.16  |              simplifying with (43), (47) gives:
% 10.40/2.16  |   (62)  all_34_1 = all_32_1
% 10.40/2.16  | 
% 10.40/2.16  | COMBINE_EQS: (61), (62) imply:
% 10.40/2.16  |   (63)  all_32_1 = all_17_1
% 10.40/2.16  | 
% 10.40/2.16  | SIMP: (63) implies:
% 10.55/2.16  |   (64)  all_32_1 = all_17_1
% 10.55/2.16  | 
% 10.55/2.16  | COMBINE_EQS: (54), (55) imply:
% 10.55/2.16  |   (65)  all_26_1 = 0
% 10.55/2.16  | 
% 10.55/2.16  | REDUCE: (46), (61) imply:
% 10.55/2.16  |   (66)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_1) = all_34_0
% 10.55/2.16  | 
% 10.55/2.16  | REDUCE: (42), (64) imply:
% 10.55/2.16  |   (67)  apart_point_and_line(all_17_3, all_17_1) = all_32_0
% 10.55/2.16  | 
% 10.55/2.16  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_30_0, all_32_0, all_17_1, all_17_3,
% 10.55/2.16  |              simplifying with (39), (67) gives:
% 10.55/2.16  |   (68)  all_32_0 = all_30_0
% 10.55/2.16  | 
% 10.55/2.16  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_26_0, all_34_0, all_17_1, all_17_2,
% 10.55/2.16  |              simplifying with (32), (66) gives:
% 10.55/2.16  |   (69)  all_34_0 = all_26_0
% 10.55/2.16  | 
% 10.55/2.16  | REDUCE: (45), (69) imply:
% 10.55/2.16  |   (70)   ~ (all_26_0 = 0)
% 10.55/2.16  | 
% 10.55/2.16  | REDUCE: (41), (68) imply:
% 10.55/2.16  |   (71)   ~ (all_30_0 = 0)
% 10.55/2.16  | 
% 10.55/2.16  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_17_3, all_17_2, all_17_3, all_24_1,
% 10.55/2.16  |              simplifying with (11), (12), (15), (27) gives:
% 10.55/2.16  |   (72)  all_24_1 = 0 | distinct_points(all_17_3, all_17_3) = 0
% 10.55/2.16  | 
% 10.55/2.16  | BETA: splitting (29) gives:
% 10.55/2.16  | 
% 10.55/2.16  | Case 1:
% 10.55/2.16  | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | |   (73)   ~ (all_24_0 = 0)
% 10.55/2.16  | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | BETA: splitting (53) gives:
% 10.55/2.16  | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | Case 1:
% 10.55/2.16  | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | |   (74)  all_36_0 = 0
% 10.55/2.16  | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | COMBINE_EQS: (60), (74) imply:
% 10.55/2.16  | | |   (75)  all_24_0 = 0
% 10.55/2.16  | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | REDUCE: (73), (75) imply:
% 10.55/2.16  | | |   (76)  $false
% 10.55/2.16  | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | CLOSE: (76) is inconsistent.
% 10.55/2.16  | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | Case 2:
% 10.55/2.16  | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | |   (77)  all_36_1 = 0 | all_36_2 = 0 | all_36_3 = 0
% 10.55/2.16  | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | BETA: splitting (36) gives:
% 10.55/2.16  | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | Case 1:
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | |   (78)   ~ (all_28_0 = 0)
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | BETA: splitting (77) gives:
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | Case 1:
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | |   (79)  all_36_1 = 0
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (59), (79) imply:
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | |   (80)  all_26_0 = 0
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | REDUCE: (70), (80) imply:
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | |   (81)  $false
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | CLOSE: (81) is inconsistent.
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | Case 2:
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | |   (82)  all_36_2 = 0 | all_36_3 = 0
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | BETA: splitting (82) gives:
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | Case 1:
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | |   (83)  all_36_2 = 0
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.16  | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (58), (83) imply:
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | |   (84)  all_28_0 = 0
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | SIMP: (84) implies:
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | |   (85)  all_28_0 = 0
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | REDUCE: (78), (85) imply:
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | |   (86)  $false
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | CLOSE: (86) is inconsistent.
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | Case 2:
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | |   (87)  all_36_3 = 0
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (57), (87) imply:
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | |   (88)  all_30_0 = 0
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | REDUCE: (71), (88) imply:
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | |   (89)  $false
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | CLOSE: (89) is inconsistent.
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | End of split
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | End of split
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | Case 2:
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | |   (90)   ~ (all_28_1 = 0)
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | REDUCE: (56), (90) imply:
% 10.55/2.17  | | | |   (91)   ~ (all_24_1 = 0)
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | REF_CLOSE: (11), (72), (91), (apart1) are inconsistent by sub-proof #1.
% 10.55/2.17  | | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | | End of split
% 10.55/2.17  | | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | End of split
% 10.55/2.17  | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | Case 2:
% 10.55/2.17  | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | |   (92)   ~ (all_24_1 = 0)
% 10.55/2.17  | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | REF_CLOSE: (11), (72), (92), (apart1) are inconsistent by sub-proof #1.
% 10.55/2.17  | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | End of split
% 10.55/2.17  | 
% 10.55/2.17  End of proof
% 10.55/2.17  
% 10.55/2.17  Sub-proof #1 shows that the following formulas are inconsistent:
% 10.55/2.17  ----------------------------------------------------------------
% 10.55/2.17    (1)  all_24_1 = 0 | distinct_points(all_17_3, all_17_3) = 0
% 10.55/2.17    (2)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 10.55/2.17    (3)  $i(all_17_3)
% 10.55/2.17    (4)   ~ (all_24_1 = 0)
% 10.55/2.17  
% 10.55/2.17  Begin of proof
% 10.55/2.17  | 
% 10.55/2.17  | BETA: splitting (1) gives:
% 10.55/2.17  | 
% 10.55/2.17  | Case 1:
% 10.55/2.17  | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | |   (5)  distinct_points(all_17_3, all_17_3) = 0
% 10.55/2.17  | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_17_3, simplifying with (3), (5)
% 10.55/2.17  | |              gives:
% 10.55/2.17  | |   (6)  $false
% 10.55/2.17  | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | CLOSE: (6) is inconsistent.
% 10.55/2.17  | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | Case 2:
% 10.55/2.17  | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | |   (7)  all_24_1 = 0
% 10.55/2.17  | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | REDUCE: (4), (7) imply:
% 10.55/2.17  | |   (8)  $false
% 10.55/2.17  | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | | CLOSE: (8) is inconsistent.
% 10.55/2.17  | | 
% 10.55/2.17  | End of split
% 10.55/2.17  | 
% 10.55/2.17  End of proof
% 10.55/2.17  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 10.55/2.17  
% 10.55/2.17  1547ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------