TSTP Solution File: GEO199+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO199+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:04:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 1.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 67 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 56 ( 21 ~; 18 |; 11 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 59 ( 7 sgn 38 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X3,X2)
& convergent_lines(X1,X3)
& incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X3) )
=> incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(X2,X1),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',con) ).
fof(a4,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
<=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).
fof(ceq2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).
fof(p1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
=> convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+1.ax',p1) ).
fof(cp2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp2) ).
fof(ax6,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( convergent_lines(X1,X3)
| convergent_lines(X2,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ax6) ).
fof(cp1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp1) ).
fof(apart3,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart3) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X3,X2)
& convergent_lines(X1,X3)
& incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X3) )
=> incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(X2,X1),X3) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk2_0)
& convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
& ~ incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk2_0,esk1_0),esk3_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X3,X4)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X4) )
& ( apart_point_and_line(X3,X4)
| incident_point_and_line(X3,X4) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a4])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)
| distinct_lines(X5,X6)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X6) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk2_0,esk1_0),esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X3,X4)
| convergent_lines(X3,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk2_0,esk1_0),esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X3,X4] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,parallel_through_point(X4,X3)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cp2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk2_0,esk1_0),X1)
| distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ convergent_lines(X4,X5)
| convergent_lines(X4,X6)
| convergent_lines(X5,X6) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax6])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk2_0,esk1_0),X1)
| convergent_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X3,X4] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X4,X3),X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cp1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk3_0,parallel_through_point(X1,intersection_point(esk2_0,esk1_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X2] : ~ convergent_lines(X2,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart3])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X2),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,intersection_point(esk2_0,esk1_0)),X2)
| convergent_lines(esk3_0,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk3_0,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : GEO199+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 18:00:53 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/1.40 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.21/1.40 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.21/1.40 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.21/1.40
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof found!
% 0.21/1.40 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/1.40 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object total steps : 32
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object conjectures : 11
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object clause conjectures : 8
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object generating inferences : 7
% 0.21/1.40 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.21/1.40 # Parsed axioms : 36
% 0.21/1.40 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4
% 0.21/1.40 # Initial clauses : 43
% 0.21/1.40 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Initial clauses in saturation : 43
% 0.21/1.40 # Processed clauses : 669
% 0.21/1.40 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.21/1.40 # ...subsumed : 261
% 0.21/1.40 # ...remaining for further processing : 407
% 0.21/1.40 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Backward-subsumed : 39
% 0.21/1.40 # Backward-rewritten : 54
% 0.21/1.40 # Generated clauses : 7202
% 0.21/1.40 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6035
% 0.21/1.40 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 138
% 0.21/1.40 # Paramodulations : 6964
% 0.21/1.40 # Factorizations : 238
% 0.21/1.40 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of processed clauses : 314
% 0.21/1.40 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 28
% 0.21/1.40 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.21/1.40 # Non-unit-clauses : 277
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3539
% 0.21/1.40 # ...number of literals in the above : 17542
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Current number of archived clauses : 93
% 0.21/1.40 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 31050
% 0.21/1.40 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8799
% 0.21/1.40 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 392
% 0.21/1.40 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 964
% 0.21/1.40 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # BW rewrite match attempts : 18
% 0.21/1.40 # BW rewrite match successes : 17
% 0.21/1.40 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/1.40 # Termbank termtop insertions : 97469
% 0.21/1.40
% 0.21/1.40 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/1.40 # User time : 0.160 s
% 0.21/1.40 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/1.40 # Total time : 0.169 s
% 0.21/1.40 # Maximum resident set size: 7544 pages
% 0.21/23.39 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.21/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.21/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.21/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.21/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.21/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.21/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.21/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.21/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.21/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.21/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.21/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.21/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.21/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------