TSTP Solution File: GEO199+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO199+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 23.00s 6.42s
% Output   : Proof 32.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO199+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:31:57 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.67/0.67          ____       _                          
% 0.67/0.67    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.67/0.67   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.67/0.67  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.67/0.67  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.67/0.67  
% 0.67/0.67  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.67/0.67  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.67/0.67  
% 0.67/0.67  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.67/0.67  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.67/0.67  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.67/0.67  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.67/0.67  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.67/0.67  
% 0.67/0.67  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.67/0.67  
% 0.67/0.67  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.79/0.73  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.79/1.09  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.16/1.26  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.16/1.29  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.59/1.74  Prover 0: gave up
% 3.59/1.74  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.80/1.78  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.98/1.90  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.26/1.95  Prover 1: gave up
% 4.26/1.95  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 4.26/1.98  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 5.21/2.15  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.21/2.16  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.63/4.18  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 13.63/4.20  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 13.63/4.22  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.63/4.22  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.17/4.29  Prover 3: gave up
% 14.17/4.29  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 14.17/4.32  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 14.76/4.41  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 14.76/4.42  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.39/5.32  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 18.39/5.34  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 18.69/5.41  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 23.00/6.42  Prover 5: proved (1104ms)
% 23.00/6.42  Prover 4: stopped
% 23.00/6.42  Prover 2: stopped
% 23.00/6.42  
% 23.00/6.42  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 23.00/6.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 23.00/6.42  
% 23.00/6.42  Generating proof ... found it (size 558)
% 31.17/8.38  
% 31.17/8.38  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 31.17/8.38  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 31.17/8.38  | (0)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & intersection_point(v1, v0) = v5 & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v2) = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v4 & convergent_lines(v2, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 31.17/8.43  | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 31.17/8.43  | (1)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 31.17/8.43  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 31.17/8.43  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 31.17/8.43  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 31.17/8.43  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 31.17/8.43  | (6)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & intersection_point(v1, v0) = v5 & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v5, v2) = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v4 & convergent_lines(v2, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 31.17/8.43  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 31.17/8.43  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 31.17/8.43  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 31.17/8.43  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 31.17/8.43  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 31.17/8.43  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 31.17/8.43  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 31.17/8.43  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 31.17/8.43  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 31.17/8.43  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 31.17/8.44  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 31.17/8.44  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 31.17/8.44  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3))
% 31.17/8.44  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 31.17/8.44  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 31.17/8.44  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 31.17/8.44  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 31.17/8.44  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3))
% 31.17/8.44  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 31.17/8.44  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 31.17/8.44  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 31.17/8.44  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 31.17/8.44  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 31.17/8.44  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 31.17/8.44  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 31.17/8.44  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 31.17/8.44  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 31.17/8.44  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 31.17/8.44  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 31.17/8.44  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 31.17/8.44  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 31.17/8.44  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 31.17/8.45  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 31.17/8.45  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 31.17/8.45  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 31.17/8.45  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 31.17/8.45  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3))
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating (6) with all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (44)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_1_0_0 & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Applying alpha-rule on (44) yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (45) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 31.17/8.45  | (46) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 31.17/8.45  | (47) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 31.17/8.45  | (48)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 31.17/8.45  | (49) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1
% 31.17/8.45  | (50) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_1_0_0
% 31.17/8.45  | (51) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 31.17/8.45  | (52) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (7) with all_1_4_4 yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (53)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (7) with all_1_5_5 yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (54)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (55)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (2) with all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (56)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (11) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (57)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (2) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (58)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (40) with all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = 0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (59) all_1_1_1 = 0 | distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (60) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (43) with all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (61)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_4_4) = v1)
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (19) with all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (62)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_3_3) = v1)
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (43) with all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (63)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_3_3) = v1)
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (19) with all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (64)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_5_5) = v1)
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (43) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (65)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_4_4) = v1)
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating formula (19) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (66)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_5_5) = v1)
% 31.17/8.45  |
% 31.17/8.45  | Instantiating (66) with all_16_0_6, all_16_1_7 yields:
% 31.17/8.45  | (67)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_1_7 & apart_point_and_line(all_16_1_7, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 31.17/8.46  |
% 31.17/8.46  | Applying alpha-rule on (67) yields:
% 31.17/8.46  | (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 31.17/8.46  | (69) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_1_7
% 31.17/8.46  | (70) apart_point_and_line(all_16_1_7, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 31.17/8.46  |
% 31.17/8.46  | Instantiating (64) with all_18_0_8, all_18_1_9 yields:
% 31.17/8.46  | (71)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_18_1_9 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8
% 31.17/8.46  |
% 31.17/8.46  | Applying alpha-rule on (71) yields:
% 31.17/8.46  | (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 31.17/8.46  | (73) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_18_1_9
% 31.17/8.46  | (74) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8
% 31.17/8.46  |
% 31.17/8.46  | Instantiating (62) with all_20_0_10, all_20_1_11 yields:
% 31.17/8.46  | (75)  ~ (all_20_0_10 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_20_1_11 & apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10
% 31.17/8.46  |
% 31.17/8.46  | Applying alpha-rule on (75) yields:
% 31.17/8.46  | (76)  ~ (all_20_0_10 = 0)
% 31.17/8.46  | (77) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_20_1_11
% 31.17/8.46  | (78) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10
% 31.17/8.46  |
% 31.17/8.46  | Instantiating (61) with all_22_0_12, all_22_1_13 yields:
% 31.17/8.46  | (79)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_22_1_13 & apart_point_and_line(all_22_1_13, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Applying alpha-rule on (79) yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 31.64/8.46  | (81) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_22_1_13
% 31.64/8.46  | (82) apart_point_and_line(all_22_1_13, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Instantiating (63) with all_24_0_14, all_24_1_15 yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (83)  ~ (all_24_0_14 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_24_1_15 & apart_point_and_line(all_24_1_15, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Applying alpha-rule on (83) yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (84)  ~ (all_24_0_14 = 0)
% 31.64/8.46  | (85) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_24_1_15
% 31.64/8.46  | (86) apart_point_and_line(all_24_1_15, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Instantiating (65) with all_26_0_16, all_26_1_17 yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (87)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_26_1_17 & apart_point_and_line(all_26_1_17, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Applying alpha-rule on (87) yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 31.64/8.46  | (89) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_26_1_17
% 31.64/8.46  | (90) apart_point_and_line(all_26_1_17, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Instantiating (58) with all_28_0_18, all_28_1_19 yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (91) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_18 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_28_1_19 & ( ~ (all_28_0_18 = 0) |  ~ (all_28_1_19 = 0))
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Applying alpha-rule on (91) yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (92) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_18
% 31.64/8.46  | (93) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_28_1_19
% 31.64/8.46  | (94)  ~ (all_28_0_18 = 0) |  ~ (all_28_1_19 = 0)
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Instantiating (57) with all_30_0_20, all_30_1_21 yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (95) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_30_0_20 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_30_1_21 & ( ~ (all_30_0_20 = 0) |  ~ (all_30_1_21 = 0))
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Applying alpha-rule on (95) yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (96) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_30_0_20
% 31.64/8.46  | (97) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_30_1_21
% 31.64/8.46  | (98)  ~ (all_30_0_20 = 0) |  ~ (all_30_1_21 = 0)
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Instantiating (56) with all_32_0_22, all_32_1_23 yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (99) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22 & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_32_1_23 & ( ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0) |  ~ (all_32_1_23 = 0))
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Applying alpha-rule on (99) yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (100) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22
% 31.64/8.46  | (101) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_32_1_23
% 31.64/8.46  | (102)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0) |  ~ (all_32_1_23 = 0)
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Instantiating (55) with all_34_0_24, all_34_1_25 yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (103) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24 & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_34_1_25 & ( ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0) |  ~ (all_34_1_25 = 0))
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  | Applying alpha-rule on (103) yields:
% 31.64/8.46  | (104) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24
% 31.64/8.46  | (105) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_34_1_25
% 31.64/8.46  | (106)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0) |  ~ (all_34_1_25 = 0)
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (59), into two cases.
% 31.64/8.46  |-Branch one:
% 31.64/8.46  | (107) distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 31.64/8.46  |
% 31.64/8.46  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (60), into two cases.
% 31.64/8.46  	|-Branch one:
% 31.64/8.46  	| (108) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 31.64/8.46  	|
% 31.64/8.46  		| Equations (108) can reduce 48 to:
% 31.64/8.46  		| (109) $false
% 31.64/8.46  		|
% 31.64/8.46  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.64/8.46  	|-Branch two:
% 31.64/8.46  	| (48)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 31.64/8.46  	| (111)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.46  	|
% 31.64/8.46  		| Instantiating (111) with all_43_0_26, all_43_1_27, all_43_2_28, all_43_3_29 yields:
% 31.64/8.46  		| (112) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_43_0_26 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_43_1_27 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_43_2_28 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_43_3_29 & ( ~ (all_43_2_28 = 0) |  ~ (all_43_3_29 = 0) | all_43_0_26 = 0 | all_43_1_27 = 0)
% 31.64/8.46  		|
% 31.64/8.46  		| Applying alpha-rule on (112) yields:
% 31.64/8.46  		| (113) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_43_0_26
% 31.64/8.46  		| (114) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_43_3_29
% 31.64/8.46  		| (115) distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_43_2_28
% 31.64/8.47  		| (116)  ~ (all_43_2_28 = 0) |  ~ (all_43_3_29 = 0) | all_43_0_26 = 0 | all_43_1_27 = 0
% 31.64/8.47  		| (117) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_43_1_27
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Instantiating formula (34) with all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_20_1_11, all_22_1_13 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_22_1_13, intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_20_1_11, yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (118) all_22_1_13 = all_20_1_11
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Instantiating formula (34) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_18_1_9, all_24_1_15 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_24_1_15, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_18_1_9, yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (119) all_24_1_15 = all_18_1_9
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Instantiating formula (34) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_26_1_17, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_26_1_17, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (120) all_26_1_17 = all_1_2_2
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Instantiating formula (34) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_16_1_7, all_26_1_17 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_26_1_17, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_16_1_7, yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (121) all_26_1_17 = all_16_1_7
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_43_0_26, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_43_0_26, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (122) all_43_0_26 = all_1_1_1
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_43_1_27, all_43_0_26 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_43_0_26, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_43_1_27, yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (123) all_43_0_26 = all_43_1_27
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_30_0_20, all_26_0_16 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_30_0_20, yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (124) all_30_0_20 = all_26_0_16 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16)
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_28_0_18, all_16_0_6 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_28_0_18, yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (125) all_28_0_18 = all_16_0_6 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6)
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_32_1_23, all_34_1_25 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_34_1_25, convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_32_1_23, yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (126) all_34_1_25 = all_32_1_23
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_30_1_21, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_30_1_21, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (127) all_30_1_21 = 0
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Instantiating formula (15) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_28_1_19, all_30_1_21 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_30_1_21, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_28_1_19, yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (128) all_30_1_21 = all_28_1_19
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Combining equations (122,123) yields a new equation:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (129) all_43_1_27 = all_1_1_1
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Combining equations (128,127) yields a new equation:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (130) all_28_1_19 = 0
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Simplifying 130 yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (131) all_28_1_19 = 0
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Combining equations (121,120) yields a new equation:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (132) all_16_1_7 = all_1_2_2
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| Simplifying 132 yields:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (133) all_16_1_7 = all_1_2_2
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| From (120) and (90) follows:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (134) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| From (119) and (86) follows:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (135) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| From (118) and (82) follows:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (136) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| From (133) and (70) follows:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (137) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| From (129) and (117) follows:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (49) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| From (126) and (105) follows:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (101) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_32_1_23
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		| From (131) and (93) follows:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (46) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (98), into two cases.
% 31.64/8.47  		|-Branch one:
% 31.64/8.47  		| (141)  ~ (all_30_0_20 = 0)
% 31.64/8.47  		|
% 31.64/8.47  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (94), into two cases.
% 31.64/8.47  			|-Branch one:
% 31.64/8.47  			| (142)  ~ (all_28_0_18 = 0)
% 31.64/8.47  			|
% 31.64/8.47  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (125), into two cases.
% 31.64/8.47  				|-Branch one:
% 31.64/8.47  				| (143)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6)
% 31.64/8.47  				|
% 31.64/8.47  					| Using (137) and (143) yields:
% 31.64/8.47  					| (144) $false
% 31.64/8.47  					|
% 31.64/8.47  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.64/8.47  				|-Branch two:
% 31.64/8.47  				| (137) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 31.64/8.47  				| (146) all_28_0_18 = all_16_0_6
% 31.64/8.47  				|
% 31.64/8.47  					| Equations (146) can reduce 142 to:
% 31.64/8.47  					| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 31.64/8.47  					|
% 31.64/8.47  					| From (146) and (92) follows:
% 31.64/8.47  					| (137) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6
% 31.64/8.47  					|
% 31.64/8.47  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (124), into two cases.
% 31.64/8.47  					|-Branch one:
% 31.64/8.47  					| (149)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16)
% 31.64/8.47  					|
% 31.64/8.47  						| Using (134) and (149) yields:
% 31.64/8.47  						| (144) $false
% 31.64/8.47  						|
% 31.64/8.47  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.64/8.47  					|-Branch two:
% 31.64/8.47  					| (134) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16
% 31.64/8.47  					| (152) all_30_0_20 = all_26_0_16
% 31.64/8.47  					|
% 31.64/8.47  						| Equations (152) can reduce 141 to:
% 31.64/8.47  						| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 31.64/8.47  						|
% 31.64/8.47  						| From (152) and (96) follows:
% 31.64/8.47  						| (134) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16
% 31.64/8.47  						|
% 31.64/8.47  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_18_0_8, all_22_0_12, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, yields:
% 31.64/8.47  						| (155) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.47  						|
% 31.64/8.47  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_22_0_12, all_18_0_8, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (156) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.48  						|
% 31.64/8.48  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_18_0_8, all_22_0_12, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (157) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.48  						|
% 31.64/8.48  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_22_0_12, all_18_0_8, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (158) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.48  						|
% 31.64/8.48  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_18_0_8, all_18_0_8, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_18_1_9, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (159) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.48  						|
% 31.64/8.48  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_32_0_22, all_32_0_22, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (160) all_32_0_22 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.48  						|
% 31.64/8.48  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_34_0_24, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (161) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.48  						|
% 31.64/8.48  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_34_0_24, all_20_0_10, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (162) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.48  						|
% 31.64/8.48  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_20_0_10, all_34_0_24, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (163) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.48  						|
% 31.64/8.48  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_34_0_24, all_20_0_10, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (164) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.48  						|
% 31.64/8.48  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_20_0_10, all_34_0_24, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (165) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.48  						|
% 31.64/8.48  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_34_0_24, all_22_0_12, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (166) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.48  						|
% 31.64/8.48  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_22_0_12, all_34_0_24, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (167) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.48  						|
% 31.64/8.48  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_34_0_24, all_22_0_12, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.48  						| (168) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.49  						|
% 31.64/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_22_0_12, all_34_0_24, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.49  						| (169) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.49  						|
% 31.64/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_34_0_24, all_24_0_14, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_0_0, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.49  						| (170) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.49  						|
% 31.64/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_24_0_14, all_34_0_24, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_18_1_9, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.49  						| (171) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.49  						|
% 31.64/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_34_0_24, all_24_0_14, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.49  						| (172) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.49  						|
% 31.64/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_34_0_24, all_18_0_8, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.49  						| (173) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.49  						|
% 31.64/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_32_0_22, all_34_0_24, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.49  						| (174) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_32_0_22 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.49  						|
% 31.64/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_34_0_24, all_32_0_22, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.49  						| (175) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_32_0_22 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.49  						|
% 31.64/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_32_0_22, all_34_0_24, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.64/8.49  						| (176) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_32_0_22 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.64/8.49  						|
% 31.64/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_34_0_24, all_34_0_24, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 31.81/8.49  						| (177) all_34_0_24 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.49  						|
% 31.81/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_26_0_16, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.49  						| (178) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.49  						|
% 31.81/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_1_1, all_26_0_16, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.49  						| (179) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.49  						|
% 31.81/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_26_0_16, all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.49  						| (180) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.49  						|
% 31.81/8.49  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_1_1, all_26_0_16, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (181) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.50  						|
% 31.81/8.50  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_26_0_16, all_20_0_10, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (182) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.50  						|
% 31.81/8.50  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_20_0_10, all_26_0_16, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (183) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.50  						|
% 31.81/8.50  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_26_0_16, all_20_0_10, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (184) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.50  						|
% 31.81/8.50  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_20_0_10, all_26_0_16, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (185) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.50  						|
% 31.81/8.50  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_26_0_16, all_22_0_12, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (186) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.50  						|
% 31.81/8.50  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_22_0_12, all_26_0_16, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (187) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.50  						|
% 31.81/8.50  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_26_0_16, all_24_0_14, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (188) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.50  						|
% 31.81/8.50  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_24_0_14, all_26_0_16, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (189) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.50  						|
% 31.81/8.50  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_26_0_16, all_24_0_14, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (190) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.50  						|
% 31.81/8.50  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_24_0_14, all_26_0_16, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_3_3) = all_24_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (191) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.50  						|
% 31.81/8.50  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_26_0_16, all_18_0_8, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (192) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.50  						|
% 31.81/8.50  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_18_0_8, all_26_0_16, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.50  						| (193) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_26_0_16, all_18_0_8, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (194) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_18_0_8, all_26_0_16, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (195) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_32_0_22, all_26_0_16, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (196) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_26_0_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_26_0_16, all_34_0_24, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (197) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_26_0_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_34_0_24, all_26_0_16, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (198) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_26_0_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_34_0_24, all_26_0_16, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (199) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_26_0_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_16_0_6, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (200) all_16_0_6 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_1_1_1, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (201) all_16_0_6 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_16_0_6, all_20_0_10, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (202) all_20_0_10 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_20_0_10, all_16_0_6, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (203) all_20_0_10 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_16_0_6, all_20_0_10, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (204) all_20_0_10 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_20_0_10, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_3_3) = all_20_0_10, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (205) all_20_0_10 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_16_0_6, all_22_0_12, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.51  						| (206) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.51  						|
% 31.81/8.51  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_22_0_12, all_16_0_6, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (207) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_16_0_6, all_22_0_12, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (208) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_22_0_12, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = all_22_0_12, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (209) all_22_0_12 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_16_0_6, all_18_0_8, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (210) all_18_0_8 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_18_0_8, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = all_18_0_8, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (211) all_18_0_8 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_32_0_22, all_16_0_6, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (212) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_32_0_22, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (213) all_32_0_22 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_34_0_24, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (214) all_34_0_24 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (1) with all_26_0_16, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (215) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_16_0_6, all_16_0_6, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (216) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (37) with all_32_1_23, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_32_1_23, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0,  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = 0), yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (217) all_32_1_23 = 0
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (43) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (218)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_5_5) = v1)
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (19) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (219)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_4_4) = v1)
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (30) with all_1_1_1, all_26_0_16, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (220) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.81/8.52  						|
% 31.81/8.52  						| Instantiating formula (30) with all_1_1_1, all_16_0_6, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 31.81/8.52  						| (221) all_16_0_6 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.81/8.53  						|
% 31.81/8.53  						| Instantiating formula (30) with all_26_0_16, all_1_1_1, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 31.81/8.53  						| (222) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.81/8.53  						|
% 31.81/8.53  						| Instantiating formula (30) with all_26_0_16, all_26_0_16, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 31.81/8.53  						| (223) all_26_0_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.81/8.53  						|
% 31.81/8.53  						| Instantiating formula (30) with all_26_0_16, all_16_0_6, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_26_0_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 31.81/8.53  						| (224) all_26_0_16 = 0 | all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.81/8.53  						|
% 31.81/8.53  						| Instantiating formula (30) with all_16_0_6, all_1_1_1, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_16_0_6, distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 31.81/8.53  						| (225) all_16_0_6 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.81/8.53  						|
% 31.81/8.53  						| Combining equations (217,126) yields a new equation:
% 31.81/8.53  						| (226) all_34_1_25 = 0
% 31.81/8.53  						|
% 31.81/8.53  						| From (217) and (101) follows:
% 31.81/8.53  						| (227) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 31.81/8.53  						|
% 31.81/8.53  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (106), into two cases.
% 31.81/8.53  						|-Branch one:
% 31.81/8.53  						| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 31.81/8.53  						|
% 31.81/8.53  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 31.81/8.53  							|-Branch one:
% 31.81/8.53  							| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 31.81/8.53  							|
% 31.81/8.53  								| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 31.81/8.53  								| (109) $false
% 31.81/8.53  								|
% 31.81/8.53  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.81/8.53  							|-Branch two:
% 31.81/8.53  							| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 31.81/8.53  							| (232)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 31.81/8.53  							|
% 31.81/8.53  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (223), into two cases.
% 31.81/8.53  								|-Branch one:
% 31.81/8.53  								| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 31.81/8.53  								|
% 31.81/8.53  									| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 31.81/8.53  									| (109) $false
% 31.81/8.53  									|
% 31.81/8.53  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 31.81/8.53  								|-Branch two:
% 31.81/8.53  								| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 31.81/8.53  								| (236)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 31.81/8.53  								|
% 31.81/8.53  									| Instantiating (236) with all_91_0_38, all_91_1_39, all_91_2_40 yields:
% 31.81/8.53  									| (237) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_91_0_38 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_91_1_39 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_91_2_40 & ( ~ (all_91_2_40 = 0) | all_91_0_38 = 0 | all_91_1_39 = 0)
% 31.81/8.53  									|
% 31.81/8.53  									| Applying alpha-rule on (237) yields:
% 31.81/8.53  									| (238) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_91_0_38
% 31.81/8.53  									| (239) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_91_1_39
% 32.01/8.53  									| (240) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_91_2_40
% 32.01/8.53  									| (241)  ~ (all_91_2_40 = 0) | all_91_0_38 = 0 | all_91_1_39 = 0
% 32.01/8.53  									|
% 32.01/8.53  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 32.01/8.53  									|-Branch one:
% 32.01/8.53  									| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.01/8.53  									|
% 32.01/8.53  										| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.01/8.53  										| (109) $false
% 32.01/8.53  										|
% 32.01/8.53  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.01/8.53  									|-Branch two:
% 32.01/8.53  									| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.01/8.53  									| (245) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.01/8.53  									|
% 32.01/8.53  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 32.01/8.53  										|-Branch one:
% 32.01/8.53  										| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.01/8.53  										|
% 32.01/8.53  											| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 32.01/8.53  											| (109) $false
% 32.01/8.53  											|
% 32.01/8.53  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.01/8.53  										|-Branch two:
% 32.01/8.53  										| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.01/8.53  										| (249) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.01/8.53  										|
% 32.01/8.53  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 32.01/8.53  											|-Branch one:
% 32.01/8.53  											| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.01/8.53  											|
% 32.01/8.53  												| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.01/8.53  												| (109) $false
% 32.01/8.53  												|
% 32.01/8.53  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.01/8.53  											|-Branch two:
% 32.01/8.53  											| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.01/8.53  											| (253) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.01/8.53  											|
% 32.01/8.53  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (215), into two cases.
% 32.01/8.53  												|-Branch one:
% 32.01/8.53  												| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.01/8.53  												|
% 32.01/8.53  													| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.01/8.53  													| (109) $false
% 32.01/8.53  													|
% 32.01/8.53  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.01/8.53  												|-Branch two:
% 32.01/8.53  												| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.01/8.53  												| (257) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.01/8.53  												|
% 32.01/8.53  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (102), into two cases.
% 32.01/8.53  													|-Branch one:
% 32.01/8.53  													| (258)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 32.01/8.53  													|
% 32.01/8.53  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (249), into two cases.
% 32.01/8.53  														|-Branch one:
% 32.01/8.53  														| (108) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 32.01/8.53  														|
% 32.01/8.53  															| Equations (108) can reduce 48 to:
% 32.01/8.53  															| (109) $false
% 32.01/8.53  															|
% 32.01/8.53  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.01/8.53  														|-Branch two:
% 32.01/8.53  														| (48)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 32.01/8.53  														| (262)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.01/8.54  														|
% 32.01/8.54  															| Instantiating (262) with all_112_0_41, all_112_1_42, all_112_2_43 yields:
% 32.01/8.54  															| (263) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = all_112_0_41 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_42 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_112_2_43 & ( ~ (all_112_2_43 = 0) | all_112_0_41 = 0 | all_112_1_42 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  															|
% 32.03/8.54  															| Applying alpha-rule on (263) yields:
% 32.03/8.54  															| (264) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = all_112_0_41
% 32.03/8.54  															| (265) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_42
% 32.03/8.54  															| (266) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_112_2_43
% 32.03/8.54  															| (267)  ~ (all_112_2_43 = 0) | all_112_0_41 = 0 | all_112_1_42 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  															|
% 32.03/8.54  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (253), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  															|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  															| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  															|
% 32.03/8.54  																| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 32.03/8.54  																| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																|
% 32.03/8.54  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  															|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  															| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  															| (271)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.03/8.54  															|
% 32.03/8.54  																| Instantiating (271) with all_117_0_44, all_117_1_45, all_117_2_46 yields:
% 32.03/8.54  																| (272) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_117_0_44 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_117_1_45 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_117_2_46 & ( ~ (all_117_2_46 = 0) | all_117_0_44 = 0 | all_117_1_45 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																|
% 32.03/8.54  																| Applying alpha-rule on (272) yields:
% 32.03/8.54  																| (273) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_117_0_44
% 32.03/8.54  																| (274) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_117_1_45
% 32.03/8.54  																| (275) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_117_2_46
% 32.03/8.54  																| (276)  ~ (all_117_2_46 = 0) | all_117_0_44 = 0 | all_117_1_45 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																|
% 32.03/8.54  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (257), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  																|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  																| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																|
% 32.03/8.54  																	| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 32.03/8.54  																	| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																	|
% 32.03/8.54  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  																|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  																| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																| (280)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.54  																|
% 32.03/8.54  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (219), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  																	|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  																	| (281)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																	|
% 32.03/8.54  																		| Using (227) and (281) yields:
% 32.03/8.54  																		| (144) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																		|
% 32.03/8.54  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  																	|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  																	| (227) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																	| (284)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_4_4) = v1)
% 32.03/8.54  																	|
% 32.03/8.54  																		| Instantiating (284) with all_132_0_51, all_132_1_52 yields:
% 32.03/8.54  																		| (285)  ~ (all_132_0_51 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_132_1_52 & apart_point_and_line(all_132_1_52, all_1_4_4) = all_132_0_51
% 32.03/8.54  																		|
% 32.03/8.54  																		| Applying alpha-rule on (285) yields:
% 32.03/8.54  																		| (286)  ~ (all_132_0_51 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																		| (287) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_132_1_52
% 32.03/8.54  																		| (288) apart_point_and_line(all_132_1_52, all_1_4_4) = all_132_0_51
% 32.03/8.54  																		|
% 32.03/8.54  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  																		|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  																		| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																		|
% 32.03/8.54  																			| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 32.03/8.54  																			| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																			|
% 32.03/8.54  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  																		|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  																		| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																		| (292) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.03/8.54  																		|
% 32.03/8.54  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  																			|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  																			| (281)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																			|
% 32.03/8.54  																				| Using (227) and (281) yields:
% 32.03/8.54  																				| (144) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																				|
% 32.03/8.54  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  																			|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  																			| (227) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																			| (296)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_1_5_5) = v1)
% 32.03/8.54  																			|
% 32.03/8.54  																				| Instantiating (296) with all_144_0_53, all_144_1_54 yields:
% 32.03/8.54  																				| (297)  ~ (all_144_0_53 = 0) & intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_144_1_54 & apart_point_and_line(all_144_1_54, all_1_5_5) = all_144_0_53
% 32.03/8.54  																				|
% 32.03/8.54  																				| Applying alpha-rule on (297) yields:
% 32.03/8.54  																				| (298)  ~ (all_144_0_53 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																				| (299) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_144_1_54
% 32.03/8.54  																				| (300) apart_point_and_line(all_144_1_54, all_1_5_5) = all_144_0_53
% 32.03/8.54  																				|
% 32.03/8.54  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  																				|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  																				| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																				|
% 32.03/8.54  																					| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.54  																					| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																					|
% 32.03/8.54  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  																				|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  																				| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																				| (304) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.03/8.54  																				|
% 32.03/8.54  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  																					|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  																					| (305) all_20_0_10 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																					|
% 32.03/8.54  																						| Equations (305) can reduce 76 to:
% 32.03/8.54  																						| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																						|
% 32.03/8.54  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  																					|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  																					| (76)  ~ (all_20_0_10 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																					| (308) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.54  																					|
% 32.03/8.54  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  																						|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  																						| (309) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																						|
% 32.03/8.54  																							| Equations (309) can reduce 80 to:
% 32.03/8.54  																							| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																							|
% 32.03/8.54  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  																						|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  																						| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																						| (312) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.54  																						|
% 32.03/8.54  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  																							|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  																							| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																							|
% 32.03/8.54  																								| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 32.03/8.54  																								| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																								|
% 32.03/8.54  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  																							|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  																							| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																							| (316) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.54  																							|
% 32.03/8.54  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  																								|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  																								| (309) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																								|
% 32.03/8.54  																									| Equations (309) can reduce 80 to:
% 32.03/8.54  																									| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																									|
% 32.03/8.54  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  																								|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  																								| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																								| (320) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.54  																								|
% 32.03/8.54  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  																									|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  																									| (305) all_20_0_10 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																									|
% 32.03/8.54  																										| Equations (305) can reduce 76 to:
% 32.03/8.54  																										| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																										|
% 32.03/8.54  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  																									|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  																									| (76)  ~ (all_20_0_10 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																									| (324) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.54  																									|
% 32.03/8.54  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  																										|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  																										| (305) all_20_0_10 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																										|
% 32.03/8.54  																											| Equations (305) can reduce 76 to:
% 32.03/8.54  																											| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																											|
% 32.03/8.54  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  																										|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  																										| (76)  ~ (all_20_0_10 = 0)
% 32.03/8.54  																										| (328) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.54  																										|
% 32.03/8.54  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.54  																											|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.54  																											| (305) all_20_0_10 = 0
% 32.03/8.54  																											|
% 32.03/8.54  																												| Equations (305) can reduce 76 to:
% 32.03/8.54  																												| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.54  																												|
% 32.03/8.54  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.54  																											|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.54  																											| (76)  ~ (all_20_0_10 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																											| (332) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																											|
% 32.03/8.55  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																												|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																												| (309) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																												|
% 32.03/8.55  																													| Equations (309) can reduce 80 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																													| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																													|
% 32.03/8.55  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																												|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																												| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																												| (336) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																												|
% 32.03/8.55  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																													|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																													| (309) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																													|
% 32.03/8.55  																														| Equations (309) can reduce 80 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																														| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																														|
% 32.03/8.55  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																													|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																													| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																													| (340) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																													|
% 32.03/8.55  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (211), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																														|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																														| (341) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																														|
% 32.03/8.55  																															| Equations (341) can reduce 72 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																															| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																															|
% 32.03/8.55  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																														|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																														| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																														| (344) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																														|
% 32.03/8.55  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																															|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																															| (341) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																															|
% 32.03/8.55  																																| Equations (341) can reduce 72 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																|
% 32.03/8.55  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																															|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																															| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																															| (348) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																															|
% 32.03/8.55  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (182), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																|
% 32.03/8.55  																																	| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																	| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																	|
% 32.03/8.55  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																| (352) all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																|
% 32.03/8.55  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (183), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																	|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																	| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																	|
% 32.03/8.55  																																		| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																		| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																		|
% 32.03/8.55  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																	|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																	| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																	| (356) all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																	|
% 32.03/8.55  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (184), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																		|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																		| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																		|
% 32.03/8.55  																																			| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																			| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																			|
% 32.03/8.55  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																		|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																		| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																		| (360) all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																		|
% 32.03/8.55  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (185), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																			|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																			| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																			|
% 32.03/8.55  																																				| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																				| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																				|
% 32.03/8.55  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																			|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																			| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																			| (364) all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																			|
% 32.03/8.55  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (214), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																				| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																				|
% 32.03/8.55  																																					| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																					| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																					|
% 32.03/8.55  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																				| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																				| (368) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																				|
% 32.03/8.55  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (212), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																					|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																					| (369) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																					|
% 32.03/8.55  																																						| Equations (369) can reduce 258 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																						| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																						|
% 32.03/8.55  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																					|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																					| (258)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																					| (372) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																					|
% 32.03/8.55  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (188), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																						|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																						| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																						|
% 32.03/8.55  																																							| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																							| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																							|
% 32.03/8.55  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																						|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																						| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																						| (376) all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																						|
% 32.03/8.55  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (186), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																							|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																							| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																							|
% 32.03/8.55  																																								| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																								| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																								|
% 32.03/8.55  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																							|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																							| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																							| (380) all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																							|
% 32.03/8.55  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (187), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																								|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																								| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																								|
% 32.03/8.55  																																									| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																									| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																									|
% 32.03/8.55  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																								|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																								| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																								| (384) all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																								|
% 32.03/8.55  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (189), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																									|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																									| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																									|
% 32.03/8.55  																																										| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																										| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																										|
% 32.03/8.55  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																									|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																									| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																									| (388) all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																									|
% 32.03/8.55  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (213), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																										|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																										| (369) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																										|
% 32.03/8.55  																																											| Equations (369) can reduce 258 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																											| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																											|
% 32.03/8.55  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																										|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																										| (258)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																										| (392) all_16_0_6 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																										|
% 32.03/8.55  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																											|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																											| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																											|
% 32.03/8.55  																																												| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																												| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																												|
% 32.03/8.55  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																											|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																											| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																											| (396) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																											|
% 32.03/8.55  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (195), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																												|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																												| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																												|
% 32.03/8.55  																																													| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																													| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																													|
% 32.03/8.55  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																												|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																												| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																												| (400) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.55  																																												|
% 32.03/8.55  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (190), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.55  																																													|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.55  																																													| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.55  																																													|
% 32.03/8.55  																																														| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.55  																																														| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.55  																																														|
% 32.03/8.55  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.55  																																													|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.55  																																													| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.55  																																													| (404) all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																													|
% 32.03/8.56  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																														|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																														| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																														|
% 32.03/8.56  																																															| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																															| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																															|
% 32.03/8.56  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																														|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																														| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																														| (408) all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																														|
% 32.03/8.56  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (192), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																															|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																															| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																															|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																															|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																															| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																															| (412) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																															|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (193), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																	| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																	| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																	|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																| (416) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (196), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																	| (369) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																	|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																		| Equations (369) can reduce 258 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																		| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																		|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																	| (258)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																	| (420) all_26_0_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																	|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																		| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																		|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																			| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																			| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																			|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																		| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																		| (424) all_26_0_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																		|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																			| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																			|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																				| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																				| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																				|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																			| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																			| (428) all_26_0_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																			|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																				| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																				|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																					| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																					| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																					|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																				| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																				| (432) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																				|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (292), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																					| (108) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																					|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						| Equations (108) can reduce 48 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																					| (48)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																					| (436)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																					|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						| Instantiating (436) with all_260_0_55, all_260_1_56, all_260_2_57 yields:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						| (437) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = all_260_1_56 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_260_0_55 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_260_2_57 & ( ~ (all_260_2_57 = 0) | all_260_0_55 = 0 | all_260_1_56 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (437) yields:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						| (438) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = all_260_1_56
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						| (439) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_260_0_55
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						| (440) distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_260_2_57
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						| (441)  ~ (all_260_2_57 = 0) | all_260_0_55 = 0 | all_260_1_56 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (161), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																							| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																							| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																							|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						| (445) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																						|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (168), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																							| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																							|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																								| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																								| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																								|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																							| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																							| (449) all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																							|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (169), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																								| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																								|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																									| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																									| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																									|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																								| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																								| (453) all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																								|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (164), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																									| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																									|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																										| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																										| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																										|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																									| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																									| (457) all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																									|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (165), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																										| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																										|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																											| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																											| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																											|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																										| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																										| (461) all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																										|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (166), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																											| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																											|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																												| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																												| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																												|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																											| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																											| (465) all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																											|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (167), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																												| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																												|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																													| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																													| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																													|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																												| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																												| (469) all_22_0_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																												|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (170), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																													| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																													|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																														| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																														| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.56  																																																														|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.56  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																													| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.56  																																																													| (473) all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.56  																																																													|
% 32.03/8.56  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (171), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.56  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.56  																																																														| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.56  																																																														|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																															| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																															| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																															|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																														| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																														| (477) all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																														|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (180), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																															| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																															|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																															| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																															| (481) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																															|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (178), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																	| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																	| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																	|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																| (485) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (179), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																	| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																	|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																		| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																		| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																		|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																	| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																	| (489) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																	|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (181), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																		| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																		|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																			| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																			| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																			|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																		| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																		| (493) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																		|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (308), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																			| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																			|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																				| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																				| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																				|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																			| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																			| (497)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																			|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (312), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																				| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																				|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																					| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																					| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																					|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																				| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																				| (501)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																				|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (320), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																					| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																					|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																						| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																						| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																						|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																					| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																					| (505)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																					|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (332), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																						| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																						|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																							| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																							| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																							|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																						| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																						| (509)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																						|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (344), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																							| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																							|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																								| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																								| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																								|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																							| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																							| (513)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																							|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (372), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																								| (229) all_16_0_6 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																								|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| Equations (229) can reduce 68 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																								| (68)  ~ (all_16_0_6 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																								| (517)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																								|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| Instantiating (517) with all_343_0_86, all_343_1_87, all_343_2_88, all_343_3_89 yields:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| (518) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_343_0_86 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_343_1_87 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_343_2_88 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = all_343_3_89 & ( ~ (all_343_2_88 = 0) |  ~ (all_343_3_89 = 0) | all_343_0_86 = 0 | all_343_1_87 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (518) yields:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| (519) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_343_1_87
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| (520) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_343_0_86
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| (521)  ~ (all_343_2_88 = 0) |  ~ (all_343_3_89 = 0) | all_343_0_86 = 0 | all_343_1_87 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| (522) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = all_343_3_89
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| (523) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_343_2_88
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (396), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| (341) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																										| Equations (341) can reduce 72 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																										| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																										|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									| (527)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																									|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (420), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																										| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																										|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																										| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																										| (531)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																										|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| Instantiating (531) with all_363_0_102, all_363_1_103, all_363_2_104, all_363_3_105 yields:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| (532) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_363_0_102 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_363_1_103 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_363_2_104 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = all_363_3_105 & ( ~ (all_363_2_104 = 0) |  ~ (all_363_3_105 = 0) | all_363_0_102 = 0 | all_363_1_103 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (532) yields:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| (533) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_363_2_104
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| (534) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_363_1_103
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| (535)  ~ (all_363_2_104 = 0) |  ~ (all_363_3_105 = 0) | all_363_0_102 = 0 | all_363_1_103 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| (536) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_363_0_102
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| (537) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_0_0) = all_363_3_105
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (159), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| (341) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																												| Equations (341) can reduce 72 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																												| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																												|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											| (541)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																											|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (160), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																												| (369) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																												|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																													| Equations (369) can reduce 258 to:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																													| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																													|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																												| (258)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																												| (545)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																												|
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																													| Instantiating (545) with all_377_0_110, all_377_1_111, all_377_2_112, all_377_3_113 yields:
% 32.03/8.57  																																																																													| (546) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_377_0_110 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_377_1_111 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_377_2_112 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = all_377_3_113 & ( ~ (all_377_2_112 = 0) |  ~ (all_377_3_113 = 0) | all_377_0_110 = 0 | all_377_1_111 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (546) yields:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													| (547) distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = all_377_3_113
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													| (548) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_377_1_111
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													| (549)  ~ (all_377_2_112 = 0) |  ~ (all_377_3_113 = 0) | all_377_0_110 = 0 | all_377_1_111 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													| (550) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_377_2_112
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													| (551) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_377_0_110
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (177), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													| (555)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																													|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| Instantiating (555) with all_382_0_114, all_382_1_115, all_382_2_116, all_382_3_117 yields:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| (556) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_382_0_114 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_382_1_115 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_382_2_116 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = all_382_3_117 & ( ~ (all_382_2_116 = 0) |  ~ (all_382_3_117 = 0) | all_382_0_114 = 0 | all_382_1_115 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (556) yields:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| (557) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_382_2_116
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| (558) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_382_1_115
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| (559) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_382_0_114
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| (560)  ~ (all_382_2_116 = 0) |  ~ (all_382_3_117 = 0) | all_382_0_114 = 0 | all_382_1_115 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| (561) distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = all_382_3_117
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (162), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																															| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																															| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																															|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														| (565) all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																														|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (163), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																															| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																															|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																															| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																															| (569) all_20_0_10 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																															|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (174), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																	| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																	| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																	|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																| (573) all_32_0_22 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (155), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																	| (309) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																	|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																		| Equations (309) can reduce 80 to:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																		| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																		|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																	| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																	| (577) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																	|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (158), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																		| (309) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																		|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																			| Equations (309) can reduce 80 to:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																			| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																			|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																		| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																		| (581) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																		|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (156), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																			| (309) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																			|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																				| Equations (309) can reduce 80 to:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																				| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																				|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																			| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																			| (585) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																			|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (157), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																				| (309) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																				|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																					| Equations (309) can reduce 80 to:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																					| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																					|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																				| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																				| (589) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																				|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (175), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																					| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																					|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																						| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																						| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																						|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																					| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																					| (593) all_32_0_22 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																					|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (176), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																						| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																						|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																							| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																							| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																							|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																						| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																						| (597) all_32_0_22 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																						|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (449), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																							| (309) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																							|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| Equations (309) can reduce 80 to:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																							| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																							| (601)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																							|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| Instantiating (601) with all_432_0_118, all_432_1_119, all_432_2_120, all_432_3_121 yields:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| (602) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_432_1_119 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_432_0_118 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_432_2_120 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0) = all_432_3_121 & ( ~ (all_432_2_120 = 0) |  ~ (all_432_3_121 = 0) | all_432_0_118 = 0 | all_432_1_119 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (602) yields:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| (603) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_432_0_118
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| (604)  ~ (all_432_2_120 = 0) |  ~ (all_432_3_121 = 0) | all_432_0_118 = 0 | all_432_1_119 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| (605) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_432_2_120
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| (606) distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_1_0_0) = all_432_3_121
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| (607) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_432_1_119
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (453), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| (309) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									| Equations (309) can reduce 80 to:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								| (611)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																								|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									| Instantiating (611) with all_437_0_122, all_437_1_123, all_437_2_124, all_437_3_125 yields:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									| (612) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_437_0_122 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_437_1_123 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_437_2_124 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = all_437_3_125 & ( ~ (all_437_2_124 = 0) |  ~ (all_437_3_125 = 0) | all_437_0_122 = 0 | all_437_1_123 = 0)
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (612) yields:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									| (613)  ~ (all_437_2_124 = 0) |  ~ (all_437_3_125 = 0) | all_437_0_122 = 0 | all_437_1_123 = 0
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									| (614) distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = all_437_3_125
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									| (615) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_437_2_124
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									| (616) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_437_0_122
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									| (617) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_437_1_123
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									|
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (469), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.58  																																																																																									| (309) all_22_0_12 = 0
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																									|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| Equations (309) can reduce 80 to:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																									| (80)  ~ (all_22_0_12 = 0)
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																									| (621)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																									|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| Instantiating (621) with all_447_0_130, all_447_1_131, all_447_2_132, all_447_3_133 yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| (622) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_447_0_130 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_447_1_131 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_447_2_132 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = all_447_3_133 & ( ~ (all_447_2_132 = 0) |  ~ (all_447_3_133 = 0) | all_447_0_130 = 0 | all_447_1_131 = 0)
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (622) yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| (623) distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_20_1_11) = all_447_3_133
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| (624) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_447_0_130
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| (625)  ~ (all_447_2_132 = 0) |  ~ (all_447_3_133 = 0) | all_447_0_130 = 0 | all_447_1_131 = 0
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| (626) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_447_2_132
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| (627) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_447_1_131
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (173), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																											| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																											| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																											|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										| (631) all_18_0_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																										|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (172), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																											| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																											|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																												| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																												| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																												|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																											| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																											| (635) all_24_0_14 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_1_0_0) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																											|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (577), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																												| (341) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																												|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																													| Equations (341) can reduce 72 to:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																													| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																													|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																												| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																												| (639)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																												|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (581), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																													| (341) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																													|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																														| Equations (341) can reduce 72 to:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																														| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																														|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																													| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																													| (643)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																													|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (585), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																														| (341) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																														|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| Equations (341) can reduce 72 to:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																														| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																														| (647)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																														|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| Instantiating (647) with all_493_0_154, all_493_1_155, all_493_2_156, all_493_3_157 yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| (648) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_493_0_154 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = all_493_1_155 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_493_2_156 & distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = all_493_3_157 & ( ~ (all_493_2_156 = 0) |  ~ (all_493_3_157 = 0) | all_493_0_154 = 0 | all_493_1_155 = 0)
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (648) yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| (649) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = all_493_1_155
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| (650) distinct_points(all_18_1_9, all_20_1_11) = all_493_3_157
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| (651) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_493_2_156
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| (652)  ~ (all_493_2_156 = 0) |  ~ (all_493_3_157 = 0) | all_493_0_154 = 0 | all_493_1_155 = 0
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| (653) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_493_0_154
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (589), into two cases.
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| (341) all_18_0_8 = 0
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Equations (341) can reduce 72 to:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (109) $false
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| (72)  ~ (all_18_0_8 = 0)
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															| (657)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																															|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating (657) with all_498_0_158, all_498_1_159, all_498_2_160, all_498_3_161 yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (658) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_498_1_159 & apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = all_498_0_158 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_498_2_160 & distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = all_498_3_161 & ( ~ (all_498_2_160 = 0) |  ~ (all_498_3_161 = 0) | all_498_0_158 = 0 | all_498_1_159 = 0)
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (658) yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (659) apart_point_and_line(all_20_1_11, all_1_5_5) = all_498_1_159
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (660) distinct_points(all_20_1_11, all_18_1_9) = all_498_3_161
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (661) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_498_2_160
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (662)  ~ (all_498_2_160 = 0) |  ~ (all_498_3_161 = 0) | all_498_0_158 = 0 | all_498_1_159 = 0
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (663) apart_point_and_line(all_18_1_9, all_1_4_4) = all_498_0_158
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (34) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_144_1_54, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_144_1_54, intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (664) all_144_1_54 = all_1_0_0
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (34) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_132_1_52, all_144_1_54 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_144_1_54, intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_132_1_52, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (665) all_144_1_54 = all_132_1_52
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_437_1_123, all_447_1_131 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_447_1_131, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_437_1_123, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (666) all_447_1_131 = all_437_1_123
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_432_0_118, all_437_1_123 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_437_1_123, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_432_0_118, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (667) all_437_1_123 = all_432_0_118
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_377_0_110, all_432_0_118 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_432_0_118, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_377_0_110, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (668) all_432_0_118 = all_377_0_110
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_377_1_111, all_377_0_110 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_377_0_110, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_377_1_111, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (669) all_377_0_110 = all_377_1_111
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_363_0_102, all_132_0_51 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_363_0_102, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (670) all_363_0_102 = all_132_0_51 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_132_0_51)
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_363_0_102, all_377_1_111 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_377_1_111, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_363_0_102, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (671) all_377_1_111 = all_363_0_102
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_117_0_44, all_363_0_102 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_363_0_102, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_117_0_44, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (672) all_363_0_102 = all_117_0_44
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_91_0_38, all_32_0_22 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_91_0_38, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_32_0_22, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (673) all_91_0_38 = all_32_0_22
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_91_0_38, all_117_0_44 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_117_0_44, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_91_0_38, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (674) all_117_0_44 = all_91_0_38
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4, all_91_1_39, all_447_1_131 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_447_1_131, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_91_1_39, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (675) all_447_1_131 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_382_0_114, all_144_0_53 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_382_0_114, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (676) all_382_0_114 = all_144_0_53 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_144_0_53)
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_382_1_115, all_382_0_114 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_382_0_114, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_382_1_115, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (677) all_382_0_114 = all_382_1_115
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_343_0_86, all_34_0_24 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_343_0_86, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_34_0_24, yields:
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| (678) all_343_0_86 = all_34_0_24
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.59  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_343_0_86, all_382_1_115 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_382_1_115, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_343_0_86, yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (679) all_382_1_115 = all_343_0_86
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_260_0_55, all_343_0_86 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_343_0_86, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_260_0_55, yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (680) all_343_0_86 = all_260_0_55
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_117_1_45, all_382_0_114 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_382_0_114, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_117_1_45, yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (681) all_382_0_114 = all_117_1_45
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (35) with all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5, all_112_1_42, all_343_0_86 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_343_0_86, apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_42, yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (682) all_343_0_86 = all_112_1_42
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (42) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_493_2_156, all_498_2_160 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_498_2_160, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_493_2_156, yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (683) all_498_2_160 = all_493_2_156
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (42) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_447_2_132, all_493_2_156 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_493_2_156, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_447_2_132, yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (684) all_493_2_156 = all_447_2_132
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (42) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_432_2_120, all_447_2_132 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_447_2_132, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_432_2_120, yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (685) all_447_2_132 = all_432_2_120
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (42) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_343_2_88, all_432_2_120 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_432_2_120, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_343_2_88, yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (686) all_432_2_120 = all_343_2_88
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (42) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_117_2_46, all_498_2_160 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_498_2_160, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_117_2_46, yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (687) all_498_2_160 = all_117_2_46
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (683,687) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (688) all_493_2_156 = all_117_2_46
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 688 yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (689) all_493_2_156 = all_117_2_46
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (684,689) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (690) all_447_2_132 = all_117_2_46
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 690 yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (691) all_447_2_132 = all_117_2_46
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (666,675) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (692) all_437_1_123 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 692 yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (693) all_437_1_123 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (685,691) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (694) all_432_2_120 = all_117_2_46
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 694 yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (695) all_432_2_120 = all_117_2_46
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (667,693) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (696) all_432_0_118 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 696 yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (697) all_432_0_118 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (668,697) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (698) all_377_0_110 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 698 yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (699) all_377_0_110 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (695,686) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (700) all_343_2_88 = all_117_2_46
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (677,681) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (701) all_382_1_115 = all_117_1_45
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 701 yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (702) all_382_1_115 = all_117_1_45
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (679,702) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (703) all_343_0_86 = all_117_1_45
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 703 yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (704) all_343_0_86 = all_117_1_45
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (669,699) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (705) all_377_1_111 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 705 yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (706) all_377_1_111 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (671,706) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (707) all_363_0_102 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 707 yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (708) all_363_0_102 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (672,708) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (709) all_117_0_44 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 709 yields:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (710) all_117_0_44 = all_91_1_39
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (682,680) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (711) all_260_0_55 = all_112_1_42
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (704,680) yields a new equation:
% 32.03/8.60  																																																																																																| (712) all_260_0_55 = all_117_1_45
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (678,680) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (713) all_260_0_55 = all_34_0_24
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (713,712) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (714) all_117_1_45 = all_34_0_24
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (711,712) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (715) all_117_1_45 = all_112_1_42
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (665,664) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (716) all_132_1_52 = all_1_0_0
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 716 yields:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (717) all_132_1_52 = all_1_0_0
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (674,710) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (718) all_91_0_38 = all_91_1_39
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 718 yields:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (719) all_91_0_38 = all_91_1_39
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (714,715) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (720) all_112_1_42 = all_34_0_24
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (719,673) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (721) all_91_1_39 = all_32_0_22
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Simplifying 721 yields:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (722) all_91_1_39 = all_32_0_22
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (720,715) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (714) all_117_1_45 = all_34_0_24
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (722,710) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (724) all_117_0_44 = all_32_0_22
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (722,708) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (725) all_363_0_102 = all_32_0_22
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| Combining equations (714,681) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (726) all_382_0_114 = all_34_0_24
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| From (664) and (300) follows:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (727) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_144_0_53
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| From (717) and (288) follows:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (728) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_132_0_51
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| From (700) and (523) follows:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (275) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_117_2_46
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																	| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																	| (109) $false
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																	|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																| (733) all_26_0_16 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																|
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (733), into two cases.
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																	| (233) all_26_0_16 = 0
% 32.33/8.60  																																																																																																	|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| Equations (233) can reduce 88 to:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| (109) $false
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																	| (88)  ~ (all_26_0_16 = 0)
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																	| (737)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																	|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| Instantiating (737) with all_526_0_166, all_526_1_167, all_526_2_168, all_526_3_169 yields:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| (738) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_526_1_167 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_526_0_166 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_526_2_168 & distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = all_526_3_169 & ( ~ (all_526_2_168 = 0) |  ~ (all_526_3_169 = 0) | all_526_0_166 = 0 | all_526_1_167 = 0)
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (738) yields:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| (739)  ~ (all_526_2_168 = 0) |  ~ (all_526_3_169 = 0) | all_526_0_166 = 0 | all_526_1_167 = 0
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| (740) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_526_0_166
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| (741) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_526_2_168
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| (742) distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = all_526_3_169
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| (743) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_526_1_167
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (670), into two cases.
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| (744)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_132_0_51)
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			| Using (728) and (744) yields:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			| (144) $false
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| (728) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_4_4) = all_132_0_51
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		| (747) all_363_0_102 = all_132_0_51
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																		|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			| Combining equations (747,725) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			| (748) all_132_0_51 = all_32_0_22
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			| Simplifying 748 yields:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			| (749) all_132_0_51 = all_32_0_22
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			| Equations (749) can reduce 286 to:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			| (258)  ~ (all_32_0_22 = 0)
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (676), into two cases.
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			| (751)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_144_0_53)
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				| Using (727) and (751) yields:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				| (144) $false
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			| (727) apart_point_and_line(all_1_0_0, all_1_5_5) = all_144_0_53
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			| (754) all_382_0_114 = all_144_0_53
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																			|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				| Combining equations (754,726) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				| (755) all_144_0_53 = all_34_0_24
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				| Simplifying 755 yields:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				| (756) all_144_0_53 = all_34_0_24
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				| Equations (756) can reduce 298 to:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				| (228)  ~ (all_34_0_24 = 0)
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (276), into two cases.
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				| (758)  ~ (all_117_2_46 = 0)
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (42) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_526_2_168, all_117_2_46 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_526_2_168, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_117_2_46, yields:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					| (759) all_526_2_168 = all_117_2_46
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					| From (759) and (741) follows:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					| (275) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_117_2_46
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (20) with all_117_2_46, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_117_2_46,  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = 0), yields:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					| (761) all_117_2_46 = 0
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					| Equations (761) can reduce 758 to:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					| (109) $false
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				| (761) all_117_2_46 = 0
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				| (764) all_117_0_44 = 0 | all_117_1_45 = 0
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																				|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (764), into two cases.
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					| (765) all_117_0_44 = 0
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						| Combining equations (724,765) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						| (766) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						| Simplifying 766 yields:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						| (369) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						| Equations (369) can reduce 258 to:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						| (109) $false
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					| (769)  ~ (all_117_0_44 = 0)
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					| (770) all_117_1_45 = 0
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																					|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						| Combining equations (714,770) yields a new equation:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						| (771) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						| Simplifying 771 yields:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						| Equations (365) can reduce 228 to:
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						| (109) $false
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						|
% 32.33/8.61  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.33/8.62  													|-Branch two:
% 32.33/8.62  													| (369) all_32_0_22 = 0
% 32.33/8.62  													| (775)  ~ (all_32_1_23 = 0)
% 32.33/8.62  													|
% 32.33/8.62  														| Equations (217) can reduce 775 to:
% 32.33/8.62  														| (109) $false
% 32.33/8.62  														|
% 32.33/8.62  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.33/8.62  						|-Branch two:
% 32.33/8.62  						| (365) all_34_0_24 = 0
% 32.33/8.62  						| (778)  ~ (all_34_1_25 = 0)
% 32.33/8.62  						|
% 32.33/8.62  							| Equations (226) can reduce 778 to:
% 32.33/8.62  							| (109) $false
% 32.33/8.62  							|
% 32.33/8.62  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.33/8.62  			|-Branch two:
% 32.33/8.62  			| (780) all_28_0_18 = 0
% 32.33/8.62  			| (781)  ~ (all_28_1_19 = 0)
% 32.33/8.62  			|
% 32.33/8.62  				| Equations (131) can reduce 781 to:
% 32.33/8.62  				| (109) $false
% 32.33/8.62  				|
% 32.33/8.62  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.33/8.62  		|-Branch two:
% 32.33/8.62  		| (783) all_30_0_20 = 0
% 32.33/8.62  		| (784)  ~ (all_30_1_21 = 0)
% 32.33/8.62  		|
% 32.33/8.62  			| Equations (127) can reduce 784 to:
% 32.33/8.62  			| (109) $false
% 32.33/8.62  			|
% 32.33/8.62  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.33/8.62  |-Branch two:
% 32.33/8.62  | (786)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_0_0, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 32.33/8.62  | (108) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 32.33/8.62  |
% 32.33/8.62  	| Equations (108) can reduce 48 to:
% 32.33/8.62  	| (109) $false
% 32.33/8.62  	|
% 32.33/8.62  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 32.33/8.62  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 32.33/8.62  
% 32.33/8.62  7935ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------