TSTP Solution File: GEO197+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : GEO197+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:04:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 32 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 67 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 56 ( 21 ~; 18 |; 11 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 59 ( 7 sgn 38 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X3,X2)
& convergent_lines(X1,X3)
& incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X3) )
=> incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(X3,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',con) ).
fof(a4,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
<=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).
fof(ceq2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).
fof(p1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
=> convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+1.ax',p1) ).
fof(cp2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp2) ).
fof(ax6,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( convergent_lines(X1,X3)
| convergent_lines(X2,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ax6) ).
fof(cp1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp1) ).
fof(apart3,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart3) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X3,X2)
& convergent_lines(X1,X3)
& incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X3) )
=> incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(X3,X2),X1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk2_0)
& convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
& ~ incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk3_0,esk2_0),esk1_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X3,X4)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X4) )
& ( apart_point_and_line(X3,X4)
| incident_point_and_line(X3,X4) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a4])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)
| distinct_lines(X5,X6)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X6) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ incident_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk3_0,esk2_0),esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X3,X4)
| convergent_lines(X3,X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| distinct_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk3_0,esk2_0),esk1_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X3,X4] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,parallel_through_point(X4,X3)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cp2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk3_0,esk2_0),X1)
| distinct_lines(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ convergent_lines(X4,X5)
| convergent_lines(X4,X6)
| convergent_lines(X5,X6) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax6])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk3_0,esk2_0),X1)
| convergent_lines(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X3,X4] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X4,X3),X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cp1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
| convergent_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk1_0,parallel_through_point(X1,intersection_point(esk3_0,esk2_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X2] : ~ convergent_lines(X2,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart3])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X2),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,intersection_point(esk3_0,esk2_0)),X2)
| convergent_lines(esk1_0,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk1_0,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO197+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 17:16:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 32
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 11
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 8
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 7
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 36
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 43
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 43
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 657
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 246
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 410
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 57
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 60
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 6752
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 5482
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 124
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 6534
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 218
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 293
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 35
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 249
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3523
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 17494
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 117
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 27989
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8429
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 369
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1690
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 23
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 22
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 91396
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.147 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.152 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 6752 pages
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------