TSTP Solution File: GEO197+2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO197+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:19:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 9.62s 9.85s
% Output   : Refutation 9.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : GEO197+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:01:48 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.37  Sat Jun 18 10:01:49 2022
% 0.20/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 16529.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.20/0.37  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.20/0.37  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.41  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.41  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.41  number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.20/0.41  number of clauses initially in problem: 19
% 0.20/0.41  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 0.20/0.41  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.20/0.41  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.41  absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.20/0.41     distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.20/0.41     distinct function count: 2
% 0.20/0.41     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  =========== start of search ===========
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 9.62/9.85  % SZS status Theorem
% 9.62/9.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 4 [ 1 0 89 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 5 [ 1 0 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 6 [ 3 1 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 7 [ 1 0 119 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 8 [ 2 0 114 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 9 [ 3 1 119 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 10 [ 3 0 121 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 11 [ 3 1 71 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 12 [ 15 1 126 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 13 [ 4 0 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 14 [ 4 0 76 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 15 [ 5 1 128 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 16 [ 5 0 68 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 17 [ 5 0 84 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 18 [ 4 0 65 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 19 [ 6 0 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 20 [ 4 0 67 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 21 [ 7 1 121 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 22 [ 7 0 68 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 23 [ 7 0 117 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 24 [ 8 1 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 25 [ 7 1 80 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 26 [ 8 0 123 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 27 [ 9 0 117 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 28 [ 9 1 68 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 29 [ 9 0 121 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 30 [ 10 0 74 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 31 [ 10 0 155 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 32 [ 10 1 454 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 33 [ 11 0 160 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 34 [ 11 0 152 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 35 [ 11 0 117 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 36 [ 12 0 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 37 [ 13 0 88 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 38 [ 13 0 116 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 39 [ 13 0 70 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 40 [ 13 0 130 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 41 [ 14 0 127 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 42 [ 14 1 130 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 43 [ 15 0 115 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 44 [ 68 0 76 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 45 [ 15 1 71 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 46 [ 16 1 113 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 47 [ 16 0 118 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   9.44 sec ----> 1075 [binary,1074.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Length of proof is 19.  Level of proof is 7.
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 9.62/9.85  % SZS status Theorem
% 9.62/9.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 9.62/9.85  3 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,A).
% 9.62/9.85  6 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 9.62/9.85  9 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,A)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 9.62/9.85  10 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,B)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 9.62/9.85  11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 9.62/9.85  14 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,B).
% 9.62/9.85  15 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c1).
% 9.62/9.85  16 [] {+} convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 9.62/9.85  17 [] {+} convergent_lines($c1,$c2).
% 9.62/9.85  19 [] {+} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c1,$c2),$c3).
% 9.62/9.85  21 [hyper,16,6] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c2,A).
% 9.62/9.85  25 [hyper,17,6] {+} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines($c2,A).
% 9.62/9.85  31 [hyper,19,9,16] {-} distinct_points(intersection_point($c1,$c2),intersection_point($c3,$c2)).
% 9.62/9.85  36 [hyper,21,6] {-} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 9.62/9.85  43 [hyper,25,6] {-} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c1,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 9.62/9.85  44 [hyper,25,3] {+} convergent_lines($c2,$c1).
% 9.62/9.85  55 [hyper,44,14] {+} distinct_lines($c2,$c1).
% 9.62/9.85  70 [hyper,31,11,55,unit_del,15] {+} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c1,$c2),$c2)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c1,$c2),$c1)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c2).
% 9.62/9.85  142 [hyper,36,6] {+} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 9.62/9.85  143 [factor,142.1.3,unit_del,3] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c2).
% 9.62/9.85  156 [hyper,43,3] {+} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c1).
% 9.62/9.85  158 [hyper,43,6] {+} convergent_lines($c2,A)|convergent_lines($c1,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 9.62/9.85  159 [factor,158.1.3,unit_del,3] {+} convergent_lines($c1,A)|convergent_lines(A,$c2).
% 9.62/9.85  161 [hyper,156,6] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c1)|convergent_lines($c2,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 9.62/9.85  176 [hyper,143,6] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c2)|convergent_lines($c3,B)|convergent_lines(A,B).
% 9.62/9.85  442 [hyper,161,3] {+} convergent_lines(A,$c1)|convergent_lines(A,$c2).
% 9.62/9.85  500 [hyper,70,10,159,unit_del,1,3] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c1,$c2),$c1)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c2).
% 9.62/9.85  1060 [hyper,500,9,442,unit_del,1,3] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c2).
% 9.62/9.85  1074 [hyper,1060,10,176,unit_del,1,factor_simp] {-} convergent_lines(A,$c2).
% 9.62/9.85  1075 [binary,1074.1,3.1] {-} $F.
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  % SZS output end Refutation
% 9.62/9.85  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  ============ end of search ============
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  true clauses given          21      (14.7%)
% 9.62/9.85  false clauses given        122
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85        FALSE     TRUE
% 9.62/9.85     5  1         0
% 9.62/9.85     9  0         14
% 9.62/9.85    10  0         5
% 9.62/9.85    11  1         0
% 9.62/9.85    12  33        47
% 9.62/9.85    13  12        5
% 9.62/9.85    14  2         0
% 9.62/9.85    19  8         0
% 9.62/9.85    21  1         0
% 9.62/9.85    22  19        0
% 9.62/9.85    23  3         13
% 9.62/9.85    24  28        0
% 9.62/9.85    25  24        0
% 9.62/9.85    26  81        48
% 9.62/9.85    27  118       0
% 9.62/9.85    29  103       19
% 9.62/9.85    36  2         0
% 9.62/9.85  tot:  436       151      (25.7% true)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Model 47 [ 16 -137 118 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 9.62/9.85  
% 9.62/9.85  Process 16529 finished Sat Jun 18 10:01:58 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------