TSTP Solution File: GEO196+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : GEO196+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 05:54:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.77s 1.06s
% Output   : Refutation 0.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : GEO196+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 18:10:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.77/1.06  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.77/1.06  Process 28742 was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.77/1.06  Fri Jun 17 18:10:43 2022
% 0.77/1.06  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_28589_n025.cluster.edu".
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_28589_n025.cluster.edu
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.77/1.06  set(auto2).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.77/1.06      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.77/1.06      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.77/1.06      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.77/1.06  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.77/1.06  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.77/1.06  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.77/1.06  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.77/1.06  clear(print_given).
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (15 formulas)
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.77/1.06  1 (all X -distinct_points(X,X)) # label(apart1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  2 (all X -distinct_lines(X,X)) # label(apart2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  3 (all X -convergent_lines(X,X)) # label(apart3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  4 (all X all Y all Z (distinct_points(X,Y) -> distinct_points(X,Z) | distinct_points(Y,Z))) # label(apart4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  5 (all X all Y all Z (distinct_lines(X,Y) -> distinct_lines(X,Z) | distinct_lines(Y,Z))) # label(apart5) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  6 (all X all Y all Z (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> convergent_lines(X,Z) | convergent_lines(Y,Z))) # label(ax6) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  7 (all X all Y (distinct_points(X,Y) -> -apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)))) # label(ci1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  8 (all X all Y (distinct_points(X,Y) -> -apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)))) # label(ci2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  9 (all X all Y (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),X))) # label(ci3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  10 (all X all Y (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Y))) # label(ci4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  11 (all X all Y all U all V (distinct_points(X,Y) & distinct_lines(U,V) -> apart_point_and_line(X,U) | apart_point_and_line(X,V) | apart_point_and_line(Y,U) | apart_point_and_line(Y,V))) # label(cu1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  12 (all X all Y all Z (apart_point_and_line(X,Y) -> distinct_points(X,Z) | apart_point_and_line(Z,Y))) # label(ceq1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  13 (all X all Y all Z (apart_point_and_line(X,Y) -> distinct_lines(Y,Z) | apart_point_and_line(X,Z))) # label(ceq2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  14 (all X all Y all Z (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> distinct_lines(Y,Z) | convergent_lines(X,Z))) # label(ceq3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  15 -(all X all Y all U all V (convergent_lines(X,Y) & convergent_lines(U,V) & -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),U) & -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),V) -> -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(U,V),X) & -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(U,V),Y))) # label(con) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.77/1.06  Function symbol KB weights:  c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. intersection_point=1. line_connecting=1.
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.77/1.06  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.77/1.06  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.77/1.06  % Length of proof is 39.
% 0.77/1.06  % Level of proof is 10.
% 0.77/1.06  % Maximum clause weight is 18.000.
% 0.77/1.06  % Given clauses 57.
% 0.77/1.06  
% 0.77/1.06  3 (all X -convergent_lines(X,X)) # label(apart3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  6 (all X all Y all Z (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> convergent_lines(X,Z) | convergent_lines(Y,Z))) # label(ax6) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  9 (all X all Y (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),X))) # label(ci3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.06  10 (all X all Y (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Y))) # label(ci4) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.07  11 (all X all Y all U all V (distinct_points(X,Y) & distinct_lines(U,V) -> apart_point_and_line(X,U) | apart_point_and_line(X,V) | apart_point_and_line(Y,U) | apart_point_and_line(Y,V))) # label(cu1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.07  12 (all X all Y all Z (apart_point_and_line(X,Y) -> distinct_points(X,Z) | apart_point_and_line(Z,Y))) # label(ceq1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.07  14 (all X all Y all Z (convergent_lines(X,Y) -> distinct_lines(Y,Z) | convergent_lines(X,Z))) # label(ceq3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.07  15 -(all X all Y all U all V (convergent_lines(X,Y) & convergent_lines(U,V) & -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),U) & -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),V) -> -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(U,V),X) & -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(U,V),Y))) # label(con) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.77/1.07  16 convergent_lines(c1,c2) # label(con) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(15)].
% 0.77/1.07  17 convergent_lines(c3,c4) # label(con) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(15)].
% 0.77/1.07  18 apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c3,c4),c1) | apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c3,c4),c2) # label(con) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(15)].
% 0.77/1.07  21 -convergent_lines(A,A) # label(apart3) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.77/1.07  22 -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c1,c2),c3) # label(con) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(15)].
% 0.77/1.07  23 -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c1,c2),c4) # label(con) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(15)].
% 0.77/1.07  26 -convergent_lines(A,B) | -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(A,B),A) # label(ci3) # label(axiom).  [clausify(9)].
% 0.77/1.07  27 -convergent_lines(A,B) | -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(A,B),B) # label(ci4) # label(axiom).  [clausify(10)].
% 0.77/1.07  30 -convergent_lines(A,B) | convergent_lines(A,C) | convergent_lines(B,C) # label(ax6) # label(axiom).  [clausify(6)].
% 0.77/1.07  31 -apart_point_and_line(A,B) | distinct_points(A,C) | apart_point_and_line(C,B) # label(ceq1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(12)].
% 0.77/1.07  33 -convergent_lines(A,B) | distinct_lines(B,C) | convergent_lines(A,C) # label(ceq3) # label(axiom).  [clausify(14)].
% 0.77/1.07  34 -distinct_points(A,B) | -distinct_lines(C,D) | apart_point_and_line(A,C) | apart_point_and_line(A,D) | apart_point_and_line(B,C) | apart_point_and_line(B,D) # label(cu1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(11)].
% 0.77/1.07  35 -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c3,c4),c3).  [resolve(26,a,17,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  36 -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c1,c2),c1).  [resolve(26,a,16,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  37 -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c3,c4),c4).  [resolve(27,a,17,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  38 -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c1,c2),c2).  [resolve(27,a,16,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  39 convergent_lines(c3,A) | convergent_lines(c4,A).  [resolve(30,a,17,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  41 distinct_points(intersection_point(c3,c4),A) | apart_point_and_line(A,c2) | apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c3,c4),c1).  [resolve(31,a,18,b)].
% 0.77/1.07  47 convergent_lines(c3,A) | convergent_lines(c4,B) | convergent_lines(A,B).  [resolve(39,b,30,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  50 convergent_lines(c4,c3).  [factor(47,a,c),unit_del(a,21)].
% 0.77/1.07  52 -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c4,c3),c3).  [resolve(50,a,27,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  53 -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c4,c3),c4).  [resolve(50,a,26,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  83 convergent_lines(c3,A) | convergent_lines(A,c4).  [resolve(47,b,21,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  94 convergent_lines(c3,A) | distinct_lines(c4,B) | convergent_lines(A,B).  [resolve(83,b,33,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  97 distinct_lines(c4,c3).  [factor(94,a,c),unit_del(a,21)].
% 0.77/1.07  100 -distinct_points(intersection_point(c4,c3),intersection_point(c1,c2)).  [ur(34,b,97,a,c,53,a,d,52,a,e,23,a,f,22,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  101 -distinct_points(intersection_point(c3,c4),intersection_point(c4,c3)).  [ur(34,b,97,a,c,37,a,d,35,a,e,53,a,f,52,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  106 -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c4,c3),c2).  [ur(31,b,100,a,c,38,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  107 -apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c4,c3),c1).  [ur(31,b,100,a,c,36,a)].
% 0.77/1.07  133 apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(c3,c4),c1).  [resolve(101,a,41,a),unit_del(a,106)].
% 0.77/1.07  134 $F.  [ur(31,b,101,a,c,107,a),unit_del(a,133)].
% 0.77/1.07  
% 0.77/1.07  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.77/1.07  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.77/1.07  
% 0.77/1.07  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.77/1.07  
% 0.77/1.07  Given=57. Generated=314. Kept=118. proofs=1.
% 0.77/1.07  Usable=57. Sos=60. Demods=0. Limbo=1, Disabled=19. Hints=0.
% 0.77/1.07  Megabytes=0.13.
% 0.77/1.07  User_CPU=0.02, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.77/1.07  
% 0.77/1.07  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.77/1.07  
% 0.77/1.07  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.77/1.07  
% 0.77/1.07  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.77/1.07  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.77/1.07  
% 0.77/1.07  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.77/1.07  
% 0.77/1.07  Process 28742 exit (max_proofs) Fri Jun 17 18:10:43 2022
% 0.77/1.07  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------