TSTP Solution File: GEO195+3 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : GEO195+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:04:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   58 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  17   ~;  15   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   5 sgn  32   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
        & convergent_lines(X3,X2)
        & convergent_lines(X1,X3) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X3)
       => apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X2,X1),X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',con) ).

fof(ceq2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
     => ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
        | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).

fof(p1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
     => convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+1.ax',p1) ).

fof(cp2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp2) ).

fof(ax6,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
     => ( convergent_lines(X1,X3)
        | convergent_lines(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ax6) ).

fof(cp1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+2.ax',cp1) ).

fof(apart3,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart3) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
          & convergent_lines(X3,X2)
          & convergent_lines(X1,X3) )
       => ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X3)
         => apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X2,X1),X3) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)
      | distinct_lines(X5,X6)
      | apart_point_and_line(X4,X6) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk2_0)
    & convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    & apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
    & ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk2_0,esk1_0),esk3_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ distinct_lines(X3,X4)
      | convergent_lines(X3,X4) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | distinct_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,parallel_through_point(X4,X3)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cp2])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1)
    | distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ convergent_lines(X4,X5)
      | convergent_lines(X4,X6)
      | convergent_lines(X5,X6) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax6])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1)
    | convergent_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X4,X3),X4),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cp1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | convergent_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(esk3_0,parallel_through_point(X1,intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X2] : ~ convergent_lines(X2,X2),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart3])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0)),X2)
    | convergent_lines(esk3_0,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(esk3_0,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : GEO195+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 04:51:48 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.43  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 0.24/1.43  
% 0.24/1.43  # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.43  # Proof object total steps             : 28
% 0.24/1.43  # Proof object clause steps            : 13
% 0.24/1.43  # Proof object formula steps           : 15
% 0.24/1.43  # Proof object conjectures             : 10
% 0.24/1.43  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 7
% 0.24/1.43  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.24/1.43  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.24/1.43  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 0.24/1.43  # Proof object generating inferences   : 6
% 0.24/1.43  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 0
% 0.24/1.43  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 36
% 0.24/1.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5
% 0.24/1.43  # Initial clauses                      : 41
% 0.24/1.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/1.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 41
% 0.24/1.43  # Processed clauses                    : 387
% 0.24/1.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.24/1.43  # ...subsumed                          : 135
% 0.24/1.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 249
% 0.24/1.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/1.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 17
% 0.24/1.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 39
% 0.24/1.43  # Generated clauses                    : 2728
% 0.24/1.43  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 2210
% 0.24/1.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 61
% 0.24/1.43  # Paramodulations                      : 2632
% 0.24/1.43  # Factorizations                       : 96
% 0.24/1.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/1.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 193
% 0.24/1.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 26
% 0.24/1.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 0.24/1.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 159
% 0.24/1.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1282
% 0.24/1.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 5697
% 0.24/1.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 56
% 0.24/1.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10060
% 0.24/1.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3849
% 0.24/1.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 187
% 0.24/1.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 581
% 0.24/1.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 15
% 0.24/1.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 14
% 0.24/1.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 36081
% 0.24/1.43  
% 0.24/1.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.43  # User time                : 0.083 s
% 0.24/1.43  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.24/1.43  # Total time               : 0.087 s
% 0.24/1.43  # Maximum resident set size: 4628 pages
% 0.24/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------