TSTP Solution File: GEO195+3 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : GEO195+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:32:01 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  20   ~;  14   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   6 sgn;  37   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
        & convergent_lines(X3,X2)
        & convergent_lines(X1,X3) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X3)
       => apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X2,X1),X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt7EGuIMex/E---3.1_22108.p',con) ).

fof(cp2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt7EGuIMex/E---3.1_22108.p',cp2) ).

fof(ceq2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
     => ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
        | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt7EGuIMex/E---3.1_22108.p',ceq2) ).

fof(p1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
     => convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt7EGuIMex/E---3.1_22108.p',p1) ).

fof(cp1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt7EGuIMex/E---3.1_22108.p',cp1) ).

fof(ax6,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
     => ( convergent_lines(X1,X3)
        | convergent_lines(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt7EGuIMex/E---3.1_22108.p',ax6) ).

fof(apart3,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt7EGuIMex/E---3.1_22108.p',apart3) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
          & convergent_lines(X3,X2)
          & convergent_lines(X1,X3) )
       => ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X3)
         => apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X2,X1),X3) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cp2]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X14,X15,X16] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X14,X15)
      | distinct_lines(X15,X16)
      | apart_point_and_line(X14,X16) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk2_0)
    & convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    & apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
    & ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk2_0,esk1_0),esk3_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X79,X80] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X79,parallel_through_point(X80,X79)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X41,X42] :
      ( ~ distinct_lines(X41,X42)
      | convergent_lines(X41,X42) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[p1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,parallel_through_point(X2,X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1)
    | distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X2,X1),X2),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cp1]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X27,X28,X29] :
      ( ~ convergent_lines(X27,X28)
      | convergent_lines(X27,X29)
      | convergent_lines(X28,X29) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax6])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
    | ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_lines(esk3_0,parallel_through_point(X1,intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart3]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X77,X78] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X78,X77),X78),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(X1,X3)
    | convergent_lines(X2,X3)
    | ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(esk3_0,parallel_through_point(X1,intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X26] : ~ convergent_lines(X26,X26),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(X1,intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0)),X2)
    | convergent_lines(esk3_0,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    convergent_lines(esk3_0,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : GEO195+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 06:31:55 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Jt7EGuIMex/E---3.1_22108.p
% 0.19/0.49  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # new_bool_3 with pid 22188 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.19/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.49  # Search class: FGHNF-FFMS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 22192 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.19/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.19/0.49  # Search class: FGHNF-FFMS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 36
% 0.19/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5
% 0.19/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 41
% 0.19/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 41
% 0.19/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 137
% 0.19/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 24
% 0.19/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 113
% 0.19/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.19/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 0.19/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 157
% 0.19/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 130
% 0.19/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 157
% 0.19/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 31
% 0.19/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 66
% 0.19/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 19
% 0.19/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 0.19/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 39
% 0.19/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 71
% 0.19/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 231
% 0.19/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 47
% 0.19/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 256
% 0.19/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 168
% 0.19/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 24
% 0.19/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 68
% 0.19/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.19/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.19/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4332
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  # User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.19/0.49  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1892 pages
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.19/0.49  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.19/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.19/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------