TSTP Solution File: GEO192+2 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO192+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 14.76s 4.11s
% Output   : Proof 28.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : GEO192+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 16:00:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.57          ____       _                          
% 0.18/0.58    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.18/0.58   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.18/0.58  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.18/0.58  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.18/0.58  
% 0.18/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.18/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.18/0.58  
% 0.18/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.18/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.18/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.18/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.18/0.58  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.18/0.58  
% 0.18/0.58  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.18/0.58  
% 0.18/0.58  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.68/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.67/0.89  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.98/1.02  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 1.98/1.05  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.78/1.25  Prover 0: gave up
% 2.78/1.25  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.78/1.30  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.28/1.41  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.46/1.49  Prover 1: gave up
% 3.46/1.49  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.58/1.52  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.78/1.64  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.26/1.65  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.80/1.80  Prover 2: gave up
% 4.80/1.80  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 5.03/1.81  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 5.03/1.83  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.03/1.83  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.19/1.88  Prover 3: gave up
% 5.19/1.89  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 5.19/1.90  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 5.59/1.97  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.59/1.98  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.25/3.09  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 10.25/3.11  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 10.65/3.17  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.76/4.11  Prover 5: proved (1015ms)
% 14.76/4.11  Prover 4: stopped
% 14.76/4.11  
% 14.76/4.11  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 14.76/4.11  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 14.76/4.11  
% 14.76/4.11  Generating proof ... found it (size 818)
% 27.20/7.14  
% 27.20/7.14  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 27.20/7.14  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 27.20/7.14  | (0)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v6) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0)) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v6) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5 & distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v4 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0)))
% 27.20/7.19  | Applying alpha-rule on (0) yields:
% 27.20/7.19  | (1)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 27.20/7.19  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 27.20/7.19  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)))
% 27.20/7.19  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0))))
% 27.20/7.19  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 27.20/7.19  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 27.20/7.19  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 27.20/7.19  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0))))
% 27.20/7.19  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 27.20/7.19  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0))))
% 27.20/7.19  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 27.20/7.19  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 27.20/7.19  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))
% 27.20/7.19  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0) | v9 = 0 | v8 = 0)))
% 27.20/7.19  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v4 = 0))))
% 27.20/7.19  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 27.20/7.19  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 27.20/7.19  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 27.20/7.19  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v4) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0 | ( ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 27.20/7.19  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 27.20/7.20  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 27.20/7.20  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v7 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0)))))
% 27.20/7.20  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 27.20/7.20  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v6) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5 & ( ~ (v7 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0))
% 27.20/7.20  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v6 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v6) = v7 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v7 = 0)) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))
% 27.20/7.20  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 27.20/7.20  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 27.20/7.20  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 27.20/7.20  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 27.20/7.20  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 27.20/7.20  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 27.20/7.20  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v4) = v5 & distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v3 = 0))))
% 27.20/7.20  | (33)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5 & distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v4 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0)))
% 27.20/7.20  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 27.20/7.20  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 27.20/7.20  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v7 & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 27.20/7.20  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 27.20/7.20  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v8 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v7 & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v8 = 0 | v7 = 0)))
% 27.20/7.20  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 27.20/7.20  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 27.20/7.20  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 27.20/7.20  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 27.20/7.20  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 27.20/7.21  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 27.20/7.21  | (45)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 27.20/7.21  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4 & distinct_points(v2, v5) = v6 & (v6 = 0 | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating (33) with all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (47) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1 & ( ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0))
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (47) yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (48)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 27.20/7.21  | (49) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2
% 27.20/7.21  | (50) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1
% 27.20/7.21  | (51) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 27.20/7.21  | (52) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 27.20/7.21  | (53) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (41) with all_1_5_5 yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (54)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_1_1, all_1_0_0 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (55) all_1_0_0 = all_1_1_1 |  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0)
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (25) with 0, 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (56)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (2) with all_1_2_2, 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (57)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (46) with 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (58)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = 0)
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (21) with 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (59)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = 0)
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (23) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (60) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_0_0, all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (61) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0)
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (13) with all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (62) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0)
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_1_1, all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (63) all_1_0_0 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_0_0, all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (64) all_1_0_0 = 0 | all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0)
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (9) with all_1_1_1, all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (65) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (13) with all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (66) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0)
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating (56) with all_17_0_6, all_17_1_7, all_17_2_8 yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (67) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_17_1_7 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_17_2_8 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_17_1_7) = all_17_0_6 & ( ~ (all_17_2_8 = 0) | all_17_0_6 = 0)
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Applying alpha-rule on (67) yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (68) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_17_1_7
% 27.20/7.21  | (69) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_17_2_8
% 27.20/7.21  | (70) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_17_1_7) = all_17_0_6
% 27.20/7.21  | (71)  ~ (all_17_2_8 = 0) | all_17_0_6 = 0
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.21  | Instantiating formula (41) with all_1_3_3 yields:
% 27.20/7.21  | (72)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 27.20/7.21  |
% 27.20/7.22  | Using (69) and (72) yields:
% 27.20/7.22  | (73)  ~ (all_17_2_8 = 0)
% 27.20/7.22  |
% 27.20/7.22  | Instantiating formula (12) with all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 27.20/7.22  | (74) all_1_0_0 = 0 | distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 27.20/7.22  |
% 27.20/7.22  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (55), into two cases.
% 27.20/7.22  |-Branch one:
% 27.20/7.22  | (75)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0)
% 27.20/7.22  |
% 27.20/7.22  	| Using (50) and (75) yields:
% 27.20/7.22  	| (76)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = all_1_1_1)
% 27.20/7.22  	|
% 27.20/7.22  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (48), into two cases.
% 27.20/7.22  	|-Branch one:
% 27.20/7.22  	| (77)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 27.20/7.22  	|
% 27.20/7.22  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (64), into two cases.
% 27.20/7.22  		|-Branch one:
% 27.20/7.22  		| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 27.20/7.22  		|
% 27.20/7.22  			| Equations (78) can reduce 77 to:
% 27.20/7.22  			| (79) $false
% 27.20/7.22  			|
% 27.20/7.22  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.20/7.22  		|-Branch two:
% 27.20/7.22  		| (77)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 27.20/7.22  		| (81) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0)
% 27.20/7.22  		|
% 27.20/7.22  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (62), into two cases.
% 27.20/7.22  			|-Branch one:
% 27.20/7.22  			| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 27.20/7.22  			|
% 27.20/7.22  				| Equations (78) can reduce 77 to:
% 27.20/7.22  				| (79) $false
% 27.20/7.22  				|
% 27.20/7.22  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.20/7.22  			|-Branch two:
% 27.20/7.22  			| (77)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 27.20/7.22  			| (85)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0)
% 27.20/7.22  			|
% 27.20/7.22  				| Instantiating (85) with all_52_0_9 yields:
% 27.20/7.22  				| (86)  ~ (all_52_0_9 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_52_0_9
% 27.20/7.22  				|
% 27.20/7.22  				| Applying alpha-rule on (86) yields:
% 27.20/7.22  				| (87)  ~ (all_52_0_9 = 0)
% 27.20/7.22  				| (88) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_52_0_9
% 27.20/7.22  				|
% 27.20/7.22  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (81), into two cases.
% 27.20/7.22  				|-Branch one:
% 27.20/7.22  				| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 27.20/7.22  				|
% 27.20/7.22  					| Equations (89) can reduce 76 to:
% 27.20/7.22  					| (77)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 27.20/7.22  					|
% 27.20/7.22  					| From (89) and (50) follows:
% 27.20/7.22  					| (91) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 27.20/7.22  					|
% 27.20/7.22  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (61), into two cases.
% 27.20/7.22  					|-Branch one:
% 27.20/7.22  					| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 27.20/7.22  					|
% 27.67/7.22  						| Equations (78) can reduce 77 to:
% 27.67/7.22  						| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.22  						|
% 27.67/7.22  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.22  					|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.22  					| (77)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 27.67/7.22  					| (95)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0)
% 27.67/7.22  					|
% 27.67/7.22  						| Instantiating formula (34) with all_52_0_9, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_52_0_9, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.22  						| (96) all_52_0_9 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 27.67/7.22  						|
% 27.67/7.22  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (59), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.22  						|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.22  						| (97)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 27.67/7.22  						|
% 27.67/7.22  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (96), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.22  							|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.22  							| (98) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 27.67/7.22  							|
% 27.67/7.22  								| Instantiating formula (46) with 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.22  								| (99)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = 0)
% 27.67/7.22  								|
% 27.67/7.22  								| Instantiating (99) with all_112_0_14, all_112_1_15 yields:
% 27.67/7.22  								| (100) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_112_0_14 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = 0
% 27.67/7.22  								|
% 27.67/7.22  								| Applying alpha-rule on (100) yields:
% 27.67/7.22  								| (101) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_112_0_14
% 27.67/7.22  								| (102) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.22  								| (103) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = 0
% 27.67/7.22  								|
% 27.67/7.22  								| Using (102) and (97) yields:
% 27.67/7.22  								| (104)  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)
% 27.67/7.22  								|
% 27.67/7.22  								| Instantiating formula (20) with all_1_2_2 yields:
% 27.67/7.22  								| (105)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 27.67/7.22  								|
% 27.67/7.22  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (57), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.22  								|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.22  								| (106)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 27.67/7.22  								|
% 27.67/7.22  									| Instantiating formula (39) with all_112_1_15, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.22  									| (107) all_112_1_15 = 0 | distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 27.67/7.22  									|
% 27.67/7.22  									| Instantiating formula (25) with all_112_1_15, 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.22  									| (108)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.22  									|
% 27.67/7.22  									| Instantiating formula (38) with all_112_1_15, all_112_1_15, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.22  									| (109) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.22  									|
% 27.67/7.22  									| Instantiating formula (14) with all_112_1_15, all_112_1_15, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (110) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Instantiating formula (19) with all_1_2_2, all_112_1_15, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (111)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0))))
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Instantiating formula (21) with all_112_1_15, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (112)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = v2 & (v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0))))
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Instantiating formula (10) with 0, all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (113)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Instantiating formula (3) with all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (114)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v0 & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Instantiating formula (3) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (115)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v0 & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Instantiating (115) with all_131_0_16, all_131_1_17, all_131_2_18, all_131_3_19 yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (116) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_131_0_16 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_131_1_17 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_131_3_19 & (all_131_0_16 = 0 | all_131_1_17 = 0 | all_131_2_18 = 0 | all_131_3_19 = 0)
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Applying alpha-rule on (116) yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (117) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_131_1_17
% 27.67/7.23  									| (118) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_131_0_16
% 27.67/7.23  									| (119) all_131_0_16 = 0 | all_131_1_17 = 0 | all_131_2_18 = 0 | all_131_3_19 = 0
% 27.67/7.23  									| (120) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18
% 27.67/7.23  									| (121) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_131_3_19
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Instantiating (114) with all_133_0_20, all_133_1_21, all_133_2_22, all_133_3_23 yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (122) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_133_0_20 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_133_1_21 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_133_2_22 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_133_3_23 & (all_133_0_20 = 0 | all_133_1_21 = 0 | all_133_2_22 = 0 | all_133_3_23 = 0)
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Applying alpha-rule on (122) yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (123) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_133_0_20
% 27.67/7.23  									| (124) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_133_3_23
% 27.67/7.23  									| (125) all_133_0_20 = 0 | all_133_1_21 = 0 | all_133_2_22 = 0 | all_133_3_23 = 0
% 27.67/7.23  									| (126) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_133_1_21
% 27.67/7.23  									| (127) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_133_2_22
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Instantiating (113) with all_135_0_24, all_135_1_25, all_135_2_26 yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (128) line_connecting(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = all_135_2_26 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_135_0_24 & ( ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0) | all_135_0_24 = 0)
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Applying alpha-rule on (128) yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (129) line_connecting(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = all_135_2_26
% 27.67/7.23  									| (130) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25
% 27.67/7.23  									| (131) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_135_0_24
% 27.67/7.23  									| (132)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0) | all_135_0_24 = 0
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Instantiating (112) with all_137_0_27, all_137_1_28, all_137_2_29 yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (133) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_137_1_28 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_137_2_29 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_137_1_28) = all_137_0_27 & (all_137_0_27 = 0 | ( ~ (all_137_2_29 = 0) &  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)))
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Applying alpha-rule on (133) yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (134) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_137_1_28
% 27.67/7.23  									| (135) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_137_2_29
% 27.67/7.23  									| (136) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_137_1_28) = all_137_0_27
% 27.67/7.23  									| (137) all_137_0_27 = 0 | ( ~ (all_137_2_29 = 0) &  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0))
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Instantiating (111) with all_139_0_30, all_139_1_31, all_139_2_32 yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (138) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_139_1_31 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_139_2_32 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_139_0_30 & ( ~ (all_139_2_32 = 0) | all_139_0_30 = 0 | ( ~ (all_139_1_31 = 0) &  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)))
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Applying alpha-rule on (138) yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (139) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_139_1_31
% 27.67/7.23  									| (140) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_139_2_32
% 27.67/7.23  									| (141) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_139_0_30
% 27.67/7.23  									| (142)  ~ (all_139_2_32 = 0) | all_139_0_30 = 0 | ( ~ (all_139_1_31 = 0) &  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0))
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Instantiating (108) with all_141_0_33, all_141_1_34, all_141_2_35 yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (143) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_141_1_34 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_141_2_35 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = all_141_0_33 & ( ~ (all_141_2_35 = 0) | all_141_0_33 = 0)
% 27.67/7.23  									|
% 27.67/7.23  									| Applying alpha-rule on (143) yields:
% 27.67/7.23  									| (144) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_141_1_34
% 27.67/7.23  									| (145) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_141_2_35
% 27.67/7.24  									| (146) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = all_141_0_33
% 27.67/7.24  									| (147)  ~ (all_141_2_35 = 0) | all_141_0_33 = 0
% 27.67/7.24  									|
% 27.67/7.24  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (110), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.24  									|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.24  									| (148) all_112_1_15 = 0
% 27.67/7.24  									|
% 27.67/7.24  										| Equations (148) can reduce 104 to:
% 27.67/7.24  										| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.24  										|
% 27.67/7.24  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.24  									|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.24  									| (104)  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)
% 27.67/7.24  									| (151)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.24  									|
% 27.67/7.24  										| Instantiating (151) with all_150_0_36, all_150_1_37, all_150_2_38, all_150_3_39 yields:
% 27.67/7.24  										| (152) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_150_0_36 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_150_1_37 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_150_2_38 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_150_3_39 & ( ~ (all_150_2_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_150_3_39 = 0) | all_150_0_36 = 0 | all_150_1_37 = 0)
% 27.67/7.24  										|
% 27.67/7.24  										| Applying alpha-rule on (152) yields:
% 27.67/7.24  										| (153) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_150_3_39
% 27.67/7.24  										| (154)  ~ (all_150_2_38 = 0) |  ~ (all_150_3_39 = 0) | all_150_0_36 = 0 | all_150_1_37 = 0
% 27.67/7.24  										| (155) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_150_1_37
% 27.67/7.24  										| (156) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_150_0_36
% 27.67/7.24  										| (157) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_150_2_38
% 27.67/7.24  										|
% 27.67/7.24  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (107), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.24  										|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.24  										| (158) distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 27.67/7.24  										|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (45) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_137_1_28, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_137_1_28, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (159) all_137_1_28 = all_1_2_2
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (26) with all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5, all_131_1_17, all_133_1_21 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_133_1_21, apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_131_1_17, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (160) all_133_1_21 = all_131_1_17
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_133_2_22, 0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_133_2_22, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (161) all_133_2_22 = 0
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_137_2_29, all_139_1_31 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_139_1_31, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_137_2_29, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (162) all_139_1_31 = all_137_2_29
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_131_2_18, all_139_1_31 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_139_1_31, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (163) all_139_1_31 = all_131_2_18
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_150_0_36, all_112_1_15 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_150_0_36, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (164) all_150_0_36 = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_133_3_23, all_150_0_36 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_150_0_36, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_133_3_23, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (165) all_150_0_36 = all_133_3_23
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_133_3_23, all_150_1_37 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_150_1_37, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_133_3_23, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (166) all_150_1_37 = all_133_3_23
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_131_3_19, all_150_1_37 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_150_1_37, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_131_3_19, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (167) all_150_1_37 = all_131_3_19
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Using (121) and (97) yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (168)  ~ (all_131_3_19 = 0)
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_139_2_32, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_139_2_32, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (169) all_139_2_32 = 0
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (16) with all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_150_3_39, all_137_0_27 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_150_3_39, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (170) all_150_3_39 = all_137_0_27 |  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_137_0_27)
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (16) with all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_139_0_30, all_150_3_39 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_150_3_39, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_139_0_30, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (171) all_150_3_39 = all_139_0_30
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Using (141) and (105) yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (172)  ~ (all_139_0_30 = 0)
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Instantiating formula (16) with all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_135_0_24, all_150_3_39 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_150_3_39, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_135_0_24, yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (173) all_150_3_39 = all_135_0_24
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Combining equations (165,164) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (174) all_133_3_23 = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Simplifying 174 yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (175) all_133_3_23 = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Combining equations (166,167) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (176) all_133_3_23 = all_131_3_19
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Simplifying 176 yields:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (177) all_133_3_23 = all_131_3_19
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Combining equations (173,171) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (178) all_139_0_30 = all_135_0_24
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Combining equations (163,162) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (179) all_137_2_29 = all_131_2_18
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Combining equations (175,177) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (180) all_131_3_19 = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Combining equations (178,171) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (173) all_150_3_39 = all_135_0_24
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Equations (178) can reduce 172 to:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (182)  ~ (all_135_0_24 = 0)
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| Equations (180) can reduce 168 to:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (104)  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| From (159) and (134) follows:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (49) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| From (160) and (126) follows:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (117) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_131_1_17
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| From (161) and (127) follows:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (51) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| From (179) and (135) follows:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (120) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| From (180) and (121) follows:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (102) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| From (169) and (140) follows:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (52) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											| From (159) and (136) follows:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (190) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_137_0_27
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (132), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.24  											|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.24  											| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.24  											|
% 27.67/7.24  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (109), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.24  												|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.24  												| (148) all_112_1_15 = 0
% 27.67/7.24  												|
% 27.67/7.24  													| Equations (148) can reduce 104 to:
% 27.67/7.24  													| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.24  													|
% 27.67/7.24  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.24  												|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.24  												| (104)  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)
% 27.67/7.24  												| (195)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  												|
% 27.67/7.25  													| Instantiating (195) with all_168_0_40, all_168_1_41, all_168_2_42 yields:
% 27.67/7.25  													| (196) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_168_0_40 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_168_1_41 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_168_2_42 & ( ~ (all_168_2_42 = 0) | all_168_0_40 = 0 | all_168_1_41 = 0)
% 27.67/7.25  													|
% 27.67/7.25  													| Applying alpha-rule on (196) yields:
% 27.67/7.25  													| (197) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_168_0_40
% 27.67/7.25  													| (198) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_168_1_41
% 27.67/7.25  													| (199) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_168_2_42
% 27.67/7.25  													| (200)  ~ (all_168_2_42 = 0) | all_168_0_40 = 0 | all_168_1_41 = 0
% 27.67/7.25  													|
% 27.67/7.25  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (170), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.25  													|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.25  													| (201)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_137_0_27)
% 27.67/7.25  													|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Using (190) and (201) yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.25  													|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.25  													| (190) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_137_0_27
% 27.67/7.25  													| (204) all_150_3_39 = all_137_0_27
% 27.67/7.25  													|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Combining equations (204,173) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (205) all_137_0_27 = all_135_0_24
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Simplifying 205 yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (206) all_137_0_27 = all_135_0_24
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| From (206) and (190) follows:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (131) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_135_0_24
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_168_0_40, all_131_2_18 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_168_0_40, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (208) all_168_0_40 = all_131_2_18
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_168_1_41, all_168_0_40 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_168_0_40, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_168_1_41, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (209) all_168_0_40 = all_168_1_41
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Using (198) and (106) yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (210)  ~ (all_168_1_41 = 0)
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (16) with all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_168_2_42, all_135_0_24 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_168_2_42, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_135_0_24, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (211) all_168_2_42 = all_135_0_24
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Combining equations (208,209) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (212) all_168_1_41 = all_131_2_18
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Equations (212) can reduce 210 to:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (213)  ~ (all_131_2_18 = 0)
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| From (212) and (198) follows:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (120) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| From (211) and (199) follows:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (131) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_135_0_24
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (19) with all_141_1_34, 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_141_1_34, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (216)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (14) with all_112_1_15, all_131_0_16, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_131_0_16, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (217) all_131_0_16 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_0_0, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_112_0_14 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (218) all_1_0_0 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = 0) | apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (19) with all_112_0_14, all_131_1_17, all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_112_0_14, apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_131_1_17, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (219)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_112_0_14) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0))))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (19) with all_1_2_2, all_131_1_17, all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_131_1_17, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (220)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0))))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (2) with all_141_1_34, all_131_1_17, all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_141_1_34, apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_131_1_17, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (221)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_141_1_34) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0))))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (21) with all_131_1_17, all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_131_1_17, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (222)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = v0 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, v1) = v2 & (v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0))))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (21) with all_131_1_17, all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_131_1_17, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (223)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, v1) = v2 & (v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0))))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (36) with all_135_1_25, all_112_1_15, all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5, all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (224) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (36) with all_112_1_15, all_135_1_25, all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26, all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (225) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_135_2_26) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (14) with all_135_1_25, all_112_1_15, all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (226) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (14) with all_112_1_15, all_135_1_25, all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (227) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (1) with all_135_1_25, all_112_1_15, all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (228) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (1) with all_112_1_15, all_135_1_25, all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (229) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (14) with all_131_1_17, all_131_2_18, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_131_1_17, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (230) all_131_1_17 = 0 | all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (36) with all_135_1_25, all_131_2_18, all_135_2_26, all_1_4_4, all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (231) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (14) with all_135_1_25, all_131_2_18, all_135_2_26, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (232) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (1) with all_131_2_18, all_135_1_25, all_135_2_26, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (233) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (1) with all_135_1_25, all_131_2_18, all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (234) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (34) with all_141_2_35, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_141_2_35, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0,  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = 0), yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (235) all_141_2_35 = 0
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (3) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (236)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.25  														| Instantiating formula (36) with all_112_1_15, all_112_1_15, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5, all_141_1_34, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.25  														| (237) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.25  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating formula (36) with all_112_1_15, all_135_1_25, all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26, all_141_1_34, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (238) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating formula (36) with all_112_1_15, all_131_2_18, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_141_1_34, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (239) all_131_2_18 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating formula (36) with all_135_1_25, all_112_1_15, all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5, all_141_1_34, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (240) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating formula (36) with all_135_1_25, all_135_1_25, all_135_2_26, all_135_2_26, all_141_1_34, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (241) all_135_1_25 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating formula (36) with all_135_1_25, all_131_2_18, all_135_2_26, all_1_4_4, all_141_1_34, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_135_1_25, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18, yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (242) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating formula (36) with all_131_2_18, all_131_2_18, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_141_1_34, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18, yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (243) all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating formula (31) with all_135_0_24, all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_135_0_24, yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (244) all_135_0_24 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0) | distinct_points(all_141_1_34, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating formula (32) with all_135_0_24, all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_135_0_24, yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (245)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_135_0_24 = 0)))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating (236) with all_204_0_55, all_204_1_56, all_204_2_57, all_204_3_58 yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (246) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_204_1_56 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_204_0_55 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_204_3_58 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_204_2_57 & (all_204_0_55 = 0 | all_204_1_56 = 0 | all_204_2_57 = 0 | all_204_3_58 = 0)
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Applying alpha-rule on (246) yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (247) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_204_2_57
% 27.67/7.26  														| (248) all_204_0_55 = 0 | all_204_1_56 = 0 | all_204_2_57 = 0 | all_204_3_58 = 0
% 27.67/7.26  														| (249) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_204_1_56
% 27.67/7.26  														| (250) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = all_204_0_55
% 27.67/7.26  														| (251) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_204_3_58
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating (223) with all_206_0_59, all_206_1_60, all_206_2_61 yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (252) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_206_1_60 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_206_2_61 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_206_1_60) = all_206_0_59 & (all_206_0_59 = 0 | ( ~ (all_206_2_61 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0)))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Applying alpha-rule on (252) yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (253) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_206_1_60
% 27.67/7.26  														| (254) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_206_2_61
% 27.67/7.26  														| (255) distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_206_1_60) = all_206_0_59
% 27.67/7.26  														| (256) all_206_0_59 = 0 | ( ~ (all_206_2_61 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating (222) with all_208_0_62, all_208_1_63, all_208_2_64 yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (257) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_208_1_63 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_208_2_64 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_208_1_63) = all_208_0_62 & (all_208_0_62 = 0 | ( ~ (all_208_2_64 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0)))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Applying alpha-rule on (257) yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (258) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_208_1_63
% 27.67/7.26  														| (259) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_208_2_64
% 27.67/7.26  														| (260) distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_208_1_63) = all_208_0_62
% 27.67/7.26  														| (261) all_208_0_62 = 0 | ( ~ (all_208_2_64 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating (219) with all_210_0_65, all_210_1_66, all_210_2_67 yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (262) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_210_1_66 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_210_2_67 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_112_0_14) = all_210_0_65 & ( ~ (all_210_2_67 = 0) | all_210_0_65 = 0 | ( ~ (all_210_1_66 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0)))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Applying alpha-rule on (262) yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (263) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_210_1_66
% 27.67/7.26  														| (264) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_210_2_67
% 27.67/7.26  														| (265) distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_112_0_14) = all_210_0_65
% 27.67/7.26  														| (266)  ~ (all_210_2_67 = 0) | all_210_0_65 = 0 | ( ~ (all_210_1_66 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating (221) with all_214_0_71, all_214_1_72, all_214_2_73 yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (267) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_214_1_72 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_214_2_73 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_141_1_34) = all_214_0_71 & ( ~ (all_214_2_73 = 0) | all_214_0_71 = 0 | ( ~ (all_214_1_72 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0)))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Applying alpha-rule on (267) yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (268) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_214_1_72
% 27.67/7.26  														| (269) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_214_2_73
% 27.67/7.26  														| (270) distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_141_1_34) = all_214_0_71
% 27.67/7.26  														| (271)  ~ (all_214_2_73 = 0) | all_214_0_71 = 0 | ( ~ (all_214_1_72 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating (220) with all_216_0_74, all_216_1_75, all_216_2_76 yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (272) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_216_1_75 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_216_2_76 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2) = all_216_0_74 & ( ~ (all_216_2_76 = 0) | all_216_0_74 = 0 | ( ~ (all_216_1_75 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0)))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Applying alpha-rule on (272) yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (273) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_216_1_75
% 27.67/7.26  														| (274) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_216_2_76
% 27.67/7.26  														| (275) distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2) = all_216_0_74
% 27.67/7.26  														| (276)  ~ (all_216_2_76 = 0) | all_216_0_74 = 0 | ( ~ (all_216_1_75 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Instantiating (216) with all_222_0_83, all_222_1_84, all_222_2_85 yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (277) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_222_1_84 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_222_2_85 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = all_222_0_83 & ( ~ (all_222_2_85 = 0) | all_222_0_83 = 0)
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														| Applying alpha-rule on (277) yields:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (278) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_222_1_84
% 27.67/7.26  														| (279) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_222_2_85
% 27.67/7.26  														| (280) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = all_222_0_83
% 27.67/7.26  														| (281)  ~ (all_222_2_85 = 0) | all_222_0_83 = 0
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.26  														|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (282)  ~ (all_141_2_35 = 0)
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  															| Equations (235) can reduce 282 to:
% 27.67/7.26  															| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.26  															|
% 27.67/7.26  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.26  														|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.26  														| (235) all_141_2_35 = 0
% 27.67/7.26  														| (285) all_141_0_33 = 0
% 27.67/7.26  														|
% 27.67/7.26  															| From (285) and (146) follows:
% 27.67/7.26  															| (286) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0
% 27.67/7.26  															|
% 27.67/7.26  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (234), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.26  															|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.26  															| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.26  															|
% 27.67/7.26  																| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.26  																| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.26  																|
% 27.67/7.26  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.26  															|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.26  															| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.26  															| (290) all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  															|
% 27.67/7.26  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.26  																|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.26  																| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.26  																|
% 27.67/7.26  																	| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.26  																	| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.26  																	|
% 27.67/7.26  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.26  																|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.26  																| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.26  																| (294) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  																|
% 27.67/7.26  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (244), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.26  																	|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.26  																	| (295)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0)
% 27.67/7.26  																	|
% 27.67/7.26  																		| Using (286) and (295) yields:
% 27.67/7.26  																		| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.26  																		|
% 27.67/7.26  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.26  																	|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.26  																	| (286) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0
% 27.67/7.26  																	| (298) all_135_0_24 = 0 | distinct_points(all_141_1_34, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 27.67/7.26  																	|
% 27.67/7.26  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (245), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.26  																		|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.26  																		| (295)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0)
% 27.67/7.26  																		|
% 27.67/7.26  																			| Using (286) and (295) yields:
% 27.67/7.26  																			| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.26  																			|
% 27.67/7.26  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.26  																		|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.26  																		| (286) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0
% 27.67/7.26  																		| (302)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v2 = 0 & all_135_0_24 = 0)))
% 27.67/7.26  																		|
% 27.67/7.26  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (225), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.26  																			|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.26  																			| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.26  																			|
% 27.67/7.26  																				| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.26  																				| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.26  																				|
% 27.67/7.26  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.26  																			|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.26  																			| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.26  																			| (306) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_135_2_26) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  																			|
% 27.67/7.26  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (226), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.26  																				|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.26  																				| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.26  																				|
% 27.67/7.26  																					| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.26  																					| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.26  																					|
% 27.67/7.26  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.26  																				|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.26  																				| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.26  																				| (310) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  																				|
% 27.67/7.26  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (290), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.26  																					|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.26  																					| (311) all_131_2_18 = 0
% 27.67/7.26  																					|
% 27.67/7.26  																						| Equations (311) can reduce 213 to:
% 27.67/7.26  																						| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.26  																						|
% 27.67/7.26  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.26  																					|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.26  																					| (213)  ~ (all_131_2_18 = 0)
% 27.67/7.26  																					| (314)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.26  																					|
% 27.67/7.26  																						| Instantiating (314) with all_269_0_95, all_269_1_96, all_269_2_97, all_269_3_98 yields:
% 27.67/7.26  																						| (315) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_269_1_96 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_269_0_95 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_4_4) = all_269_2_97 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_269_3_98 & ( ~ (all_269_2_97 = 0) |  ~ (all_269_3_98 = 0) | all_269_0_95 = 0 | all_269_1_96 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																						|
% 27.67/7.27  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (315) yields:
% 27.67/7.27  																						| (316) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_269_0_95
% 27.67/7.27  																						| (317) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_269_3_98
% 27.67/7.27  																						| (318) distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_4_4) = all_269_2_97
% 27.67/7.27  																						| (319)  ~ (all_269_2_97 = 0) |  ~ (all_269_3_98 = 0) | all_269_0_95 = 0 | all_269_1_96 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																						| (320) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_269_1_96
% 27.67/7.27  																						|
% 27.67/7.27  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (237), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																						|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																						| (295)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																						|
% 27.67/7.27  																							| Using (286) and (295) yields:
% 27.67/7.27  																							| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																							|
% 27.67/7.27  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																						|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																						| (286) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																						| (324) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																						|
% 27.67/7.27  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (241), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																							|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																							| (295)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																							|
% 27.67/7.27  																								| Using (286) and (295) yields:
% 27.67/7.27  																								| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																								|
% 27.67/7.27  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																							|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																							| (286) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																							| (328) all_135_1_25 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																							|
% 27.67/7.27  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (238), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																								|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																								| (295)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																								|
% 27.67/7.27  																									| Using (286) and (295) yields:
% 27.67/7.27  																									| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																									|
% 27.67/7.27  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																								|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																								| (286) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																								| (332) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																								|
% 27.67/7.27  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (242), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																									|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																									| (295)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																									|
% 27.67/7.27  																										| Using (286) and (295) yields:
% 27.67/7.27  																										| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																										|
% 27.67/7.27  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																									|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																									| (286) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																									| (336) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																									|
% 27.67/7.27  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (239), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																										|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																										| (295)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																										|
% 27.67/7.27  																											| Using (286) and (295) yields:
% 27.67/7.27  																											| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																											|
% 27.67/7.27  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																										|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																										| (286) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																										| (340) all_131_2_18 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																										|
% 27.67/7.27  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (240), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																											|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																											| (295)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																											|
% 27.67/7.27  																												| Using (286) and (295) yields:
% 27.67/7.27  																												| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																												|
% 27.67/7.27  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																											|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																											| (286) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																											| (344) all_135_1_25 = 0 | all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																											|
% 27.67/7.27  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (227), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																												|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																												| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																												|
% 27.67/7.27  																													| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.27  																													| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																													|
% 27.67/7.27  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																												|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																												| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																												| (348) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																												|
% 27.67/7.27  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																													|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																													| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																													|
% 27.67/7.27  																														| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.27  																														| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																														|
% 27.67/7.27  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																													|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																													| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																													| (352) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																													|
% 27.67/7.27  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																														|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																														| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																														|
% 27.67/7.27  																															| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.27  																															| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																															|
% 27.67/7.27  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																														|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																														| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																														| (356) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																														|
% 27.67/7.27  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (294), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																															|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																															| (148) all_112_1_15 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																															|
% 27.67/7.27  																																| Equations (148) can reduce 104 to:
% 27.67/7.27  																																| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																																|
% 27.67/7.27  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																															|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																															| (104)  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																															| (360)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																															|
% 27.67/7.27  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (306), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																																|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																																| (148) all_112_1_15 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																																|
% 27.67/7.27  																																	| Equations (148) can reduce 104 to:
% 27.67/7.27  																																	| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																																	|
% 27.67/7.27  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																																|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																																| (104)  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																																| (364)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_135_2_26) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																																|
% 27.67/7.27  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (324), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																																	|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																																	| (148) all_112_1_15 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																																	|
% 27.67/7.27  																																		| Equations (148) can reduce 104 to:
% 27.67/7.27  																																		| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																																		|
% 27.67/7.27  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																																	|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																																	| (104)  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																																	| (368)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																																	|
% 27.67/7.27  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (328), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																																		|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																																		| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																																		|
% 27.67/7.27  																																			| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.27  																																			| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																																			|
% 27.67/7.27  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																																		|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																																		| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																																		| (372)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																																		|
% 27.67/7.27  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (332), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																																			|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																																			| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																																			|
% 27.67/7.27  																																				| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.27  																																				| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																																				|
% 27.67/7.27  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																																			|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																																			| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																																			| (376) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																																			|
% 27.67/7.27  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (344), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																																				|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																																				| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																																				|
% 27.67/7.27  																																					| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.27  																																					| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																																					|
% 27.67/7.27  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																																				|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																																				| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																																				| (380) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																																				|
% 27.67/7.27  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (352), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																																					|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																																					| (148) all_112_1_15 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																																					|
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| Equations (148) can reduce 104 to:
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																																						|
% 27.67/7.27  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																																					|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																																					| (104)  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																																					| (384)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																																					|
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| Instantiating (384) with all_344_0_114, all_344_1_115, all_344_2_116, all_344_3_117 yields:
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| (385) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_344_1_115 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_344_0_114 & distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = all_344_2_116 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_344_3_117 & ( ~ (all_344_2_116 = 0) |  ~ (all_344_3_117 = 0) | all_344_0_114 = 0 | all_344_1_115 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																																						|
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (385) yields:
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| (386) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_344_3_117
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| (387) distinct_lines(all_135_2_26, all_1_5_5) = all_344_2_116
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| (388)  ~ (all_344_2_116 = 0) |  ~ (all_344_3_117 = 0) | all_344_0_114 = 0 | all_344_1_115 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| (389) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_344_0_114
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| (390) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_344_1_115
% 27.67/7.27  																																						|
% 27.67/7.27  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (356), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																																						|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| (148) all_112_1_15 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																																						|
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| Equations (148) can reduce 104 to:
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																																							|
% 27.67/7.27  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																																						|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| (104)  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																																						| (394)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																																						|
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| Instantiating (394) with all_349_0_118, all_349_1_119, all_349_2_120, all_349_3_121 yields:
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| (395) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_349_0_118 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_349_1_119 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = all_349_2_120 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_349_3_121 & ( ~ (all_349_2_120 = 0) |  ~ (all_349_3_121 = 0) | all_349_0_118 = 0 | all_349_1_119 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																																							|
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (395) yields:
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| (396) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_349_1_119
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| (397) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_135_2_26) = all_349_2_120
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| (398) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_349_3_121
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| (399) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_349_0_118
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| (400)  ~ (all_349_2_120 = 0) |  ~ (all_349_3_121 = 0) | all_349_0_118 = 0 | all_349_1_119 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																																							|
% 27.67/7.27  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (243), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																																							|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| (295)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																																							|
% 27.67/7.27  																																								| Using (286) and (295) yields:
% 27.67/7.27  																																								| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																																								|
% 27.67/7.27  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																																							|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| (286) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_141_1_34) = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																																							| (404) all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.27  																																							|
% 27.67/7.27  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.27  																																								|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.27  																																								| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.27  																																								|
% 27.67/7.27  																																									| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.27  																																									| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.27  																																									|
% 27.67/7.27  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.27  																																								|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.27  																																								| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.27  																																								| (408) all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.28  																																								|
% 27.67/7.28  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (231), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.28  																																									|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.28  																																									| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.28  																																									|
% 27.67/7.28  																																										| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.28  																																										| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.28  																																										|
% 27.67/7.28  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.28  																																									|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.28  																																									| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																									| (412) all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.28  																																									|
% 27.67/7.28  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (233), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.28  																																										|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.28  																																										| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.28  																																										|
% 27.67/7.28  																																											| Equations (287) can reduce 191 to:
% 27.67/7.28  																																											| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.28  																																											|
% 27.67/7.28  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.28  																																										|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.28  																																										| (191)  ~ (all_135_1_25 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																										| (416) all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.28  																																										|
% 27.67/7.28  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (340), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.28  																																											|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.28  																																											| (311) all_131_2_18 = 0
% 27.67/7.28  																																											|
% 27.67/7.28  																																												| Equations (311) can reduce 213 to:
% 27.67/7.28  																																												| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.28  																																												|
% 27.67/7.28  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.28  																																											|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.28  																																											| (213)  ~ (all_131_2_18 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																											| (420) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.28  																																											|
% 27.67/7.28  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (404), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.28  																																												|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.28  																																												| (311) all_131_2_18 = 0
% 27.67/7.28  																																												|
% 27.67/7.28  																																													| Equations (311) can reduce 213 to:
% 27.67/7.28  																																													| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.28  																																													|
% 27.67/7.28  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.28  																																												|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.28  																																												| (213)  ~ (all_131_2_18 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																												| (424)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_141_1_34, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.28  																																												|
% 27.67/7.28  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (408), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.28  																																													|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.28  																																													| (311) all_131_2_18 = 0
% 27.67/7.28  																																													|
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| Equations (311) can reduce 213 to:
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.28  																																														|
% 27.67/7.28  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.28  																																													|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.28  																																													| (213)  ~ (all_131_2_18 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																													| (428)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.28  																																													|
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| Instantiating (428) with all_405_0_129, all_405_1_130, all_405_2_131, all_405_3_132 yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| (429) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_405_1_130 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_405_0_129 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = all_405_2_131 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_405_3_132 & ( ~ (all_405_2_131 = 0) |  ~ (all_405_3_132 = 0) | all_405_0_129 = 0 | all_405_1_130 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																														|
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (429) yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| (430) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_405_0_129
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| (431) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_405_1_130
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| (432)  ~ (all_405_2_131 = 0) |  ~ (all_405_3_132 = 0) | all_405_0_129 = 0 | all_405_1_130 = 0
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| (433) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_405_3_132
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| (434) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = all_405_2_131
% 27.67/7.28  																																														|
% 27.67/7.28  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (412), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.28  																																														|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| (311) all_131_2_18 = 0
% 27.67/7.28  																																														|
% 27.67/7.28  																																															| Equations (311) can reduce 213 to:
% 27.67/7.28  																																															| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.28  																																															|
% 27.67/7.28  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.28  																																														|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| (213)  ~ (all_131_2_18 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																														| (438)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_135_2_26) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 27.67/7.28  																																														|
% 27.67/7.28  																																															| Instantiating (438) with all_410_0_133, all_410_1_134, all_410_2_135 yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																															| (439) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_135_2_26) = all_410_0_133 & apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_410_1_134 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = all_410_2_135 & ( ~ (all_410_2_135 = 0) | all_410_0_133 = 0 | all_410_1_134 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																															|
% 27.67/7.28  																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (439) yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																															| (440) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_135_2_26) = all_410_0_133
% 27.67/7.28  																																															| (441) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_410_1_134
% 27.67/7.28  																																															| (442) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = all_410_2_135
% 27.67/7.28  																																															| (443)  ~ (all_410_2_135 = 0) | all_410_0_133 = 0 | all_410_1_134 = 0
% 27.67/7.28  																																															|
% 27.67/7.28  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (416), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.28  																																															|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.28  																																															| (311) all_131_2_18 = 0
% 27.67/7.28  																																															|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Equations (311) can reduce 213 to:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.28  																																															|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.28  																																															| (213)  ~ (all_131_2_18 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																															| (447)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.28  																																															|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating (447) with all_415_0_136, all_415_1_137, all_415_2_138, all_415_3_139 yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (448) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_415_0_136 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_415_1_137 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = all_415_2_138 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_415_3_139 & ( ~ (all_415_2_138 = 0) |  ~ (all_415_3_139 = 0) | all_415_0_136 = 0 | all_415_1_137 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (448) yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (449) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_135_2_26) = all_415_0_136
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (450) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_135_2_26) = all_415_2_138
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (451)  ~ (all_415_2_138 = 0) |  ~ (all_415_3_139 = 0) | all_415_0_136 = 0 | all_415_1_137 = 0
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (452) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_415_3_139
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (453) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_415_1_137
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (45) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_208_1_63, all_112_0_14 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_208_1_63, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_112_0_14, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (454) all_208_1_63 = all_112_0_14
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3, all_210_1_66, all_214_1_72 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_214_1_72, apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_210_1_66, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (455) all_214_1_72 = all_210_1_66
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3, all_208_2_64, all_210_1_66 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_210_1_66, apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_208_2_64, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (456) all_210_1_66 = all_208_2_64
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3, all_204_1_56, all_214_1_72 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_214_1_72, apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_204_1_56, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (457) all_214_1_72 = all_204_1_56
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4, all_410_1_134, all_131_0_16 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_410_1_134, apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_131_0_16, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (458) all_410_1_134 = all_131_0_16
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4, all_216_1_75, all_410_1_134 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_410_1_134, apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_216_1_75, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (459) all_410_1_134 = all_216_1_75
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4, all_206_2_61, all_216_1_75 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_216_1_75, apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_206_2_61, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (460) all_216_1_75 = all_206_2_61
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_405_0_129, all_131_2_18 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_405_0_129, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_131_2_18, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (461) all_405_0_129 = all_131_2_18
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_405_0_129, all_415_1_137 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_415_1_137, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_405_0_129, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (462) all_415_1_137 = all_405_0_129
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_269_0_95, all_415_1_137 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_415_1_137, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_269_0_95, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (463) all_415_1_137 = all_269_0_95
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Using (316) and (106) yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (464)  ~ (all_269_0_95 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_349_1_119, all_112_1_15 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_349_1_119, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_112_1_15, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (465) all_349_1_119 = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_344_0_114, all_349_1_119 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_349_1_119, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_344_0_114, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (466) all_349_1_119 = all_344_0_114
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_222_1_84, all_344_0_114 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_344_0_114, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_222_1_84, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (467) all_344_0_114 = all_222_1_84
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_204_2_57, all_222_1_84 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_222_1_84, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_204_2_57, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (468) all_222_1_84 = all_204_2_57
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Using (247) and (97) yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (469)  ~ (all_204_2_57 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (16) with all_112_0_14, all_112_0_14, all_210_0_65, all_208_0_62 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_112_0_14) = all_210_0_65, yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (470) all_210_0_65 = all_208_0_62 |  ~ (distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_112_0_14) = all_208_0_62)
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Instantiating formula (20) with all_112_0_14 yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (471)  ~ (distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_112_0_14) = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Combining equations (462,463) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (472) all_405_0_129 = all_269_0_95
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Simplifying 472 yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (473) all_405_0_129 = all_269_0_95
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Combining equations (459,458) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (474) all_216_1_75 = all_131_0_16
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Simplifying 474 yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (475) all_216_1_75 = all_131_0_16
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Combining equations (461,473) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (476) all_269_0_95 = all_131_2_18
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Combining equations (466,465) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (477) all_344_0_114 = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Simplifying 477 yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (478) all_344_0_114 = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Combining equations (467,478) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (479) all_222_1_84 = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Simplifying 479 yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (480) all_222_1_84 = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Combining equations (468,480) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (481) all_204_2_57 = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Simplifying 481 yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (482) all_204_2_57 = all_112_1_15
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Combining equations (475,460) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (483) all_206_2_61 = all_131_0_16
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Combining equations (455,457) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (484) all_210_1_66 = all_204_1_56
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Simplifying 484 yields:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (485) all_210_1_66 = all_204_1_56
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Combining equations (485,456) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (486) all_208_2_64 = all_204_1_56
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Equations (476) can reduce 464 to:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (213)  ~ (all_131_2_18 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| Equations (482) can reduce 469 to:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (104)  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)
% 27.67/7.28  																																																|
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| From (486) and (259) follows:
% 27.67/7.28  																																																| (249) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_204_1_56
% 27.67/7.29  																																																|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																| From (483) and (254) follows:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																| (118) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = all_131_0_16
% 27.67/7.29  																																																|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																| From (454) and (260) follows:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																| (491) distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_112_0_14) = all_208_0_62
% 27.67/7.29  																																																|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (470), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.29  																																																|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																| (492)  ~ (distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_112_0_14) = all_208_0_62)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	| Using (491) and (492) yields:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  																																																|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																| (491) distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_112_0_14) = all_208_0_62
% 27.67/7.29  																																																| (495) all_210_0_65 = all_208_0_62
% 27.67/7.29  																																																|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	| From (495) and (265) follows:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	| (491) distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_112_0_14) = all_208_0_62
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	| Using (491) and (471) yields:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	| (497)  ~ (all_208_0_62 = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (261), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	| (498) all_208_0_62 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		| Equations (498) can reduce 497 to:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	| (497)  ~ (all_208_0_62 = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	| (501)  ~ (all_208_2_64 = 0) &  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																	|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (501) yields:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		| (502)  ~ (all_208_2_64 = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		| (503)  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		| Equations (486) can reduce 502 to:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		| (504)  ~ (all_204_1_56 = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (119), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		| (505) all_131_0_16 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			| From (505) and (118) follows:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			| (506) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			| (507)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				| Using (506) and (507) yields:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			| (506) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			| (510) all_1_0_0 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				| (511) apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					| Instantiating formula (26) with all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3, 0, all_204_1_56 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = all_204_1_56, apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					| (512) all_204_1_56 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					| Equations (512) can reduce 504 to:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				| (514)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					| Equations (78) can reduce 77 to:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		| (517)  ~ (all_131_0_16 = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		| (518) all_131_1_17 = 0 | all_131_2_18 = 0 | all_131_3_19 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																		|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			| (519) all_131_1_17 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				| Equations (519) can reduce 503 to:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			| (503)  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			| (522) all_131_2_18 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_112_0_14) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.29  																																																			|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (518), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				| (519) all_131_1_17 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					| Equations (519) can reduce 503 to:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				| (503)  ~ (all_131_1_17 = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				| (526) all_131_2_18 = 0 | all_131_3_19 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																				|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					| (505) all_131_0_16 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																						| Equations (505) can reduce 517 to:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																						| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.29  																																																						|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					| (517)  ~ (all_131_0_16 = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					| (530) all_112_1_15 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.29  																																																					|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (530), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.29  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																						| (148) all_112_1_15 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																						|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																							| Equations (148) can reduce 104 to:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																							| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.29  																																																							|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																						| (104)  ~ (all_112_1_15 = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																						| (534)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_112_0_14, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_112_0_14, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.29  																																																						|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (526), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.29  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																							| (311) all_131_2_18 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																							|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																								| Equations (311) can reduce 213 to:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																								| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.29  																																																								|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																							| (213)  ~ (all_131_2_18 = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  																																																							| (538) all_131_3_19 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																							|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																								| Combining equations (538,180) yields a new equation:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																								| (148) all_112_1_15 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  																																																								|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																								| Equations (148) can reduce 104 to:
% 27.67/7.29  																																																								| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.29  																																																								|
% 27.67/7.29  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  											|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  											| (287) all_135_1_25 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  											| (542) all_135_0_24 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  											|
% 27.67/7.29  												| Equations (542) can reduce 182 to:
% 27.67/7.29  												| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.29  												|
% 27.67/7.29  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  										|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  										| (544)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  										| (148) all_112_1_15 = 0
% 27.67/7.29  										|
% 27.67/7.29  											| Equations (148) can reduce 104 to:
% 27.67/7.29  											| (79) $false
% 27.67/7.29  											|
% 27.67/7.29  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  								|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  								| (547) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 27.67/7.29  								| (548)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 27.67/7.29  								|
% 27.67/7.29  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (58), into two cases.
% 27.67/7.29  									|-Branch one:
% 27.67/7.29  									| (106)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  									|
% 27.67/7.29  										| Using (547) and (106) yields:
% 27.67/7.29  										| (202) $false
% 27.67/7.29  										|
% 27.67/7.29  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 27.67/7.29  									|-Branch two:
% 27.67/7.29  									| (547) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 27.67/7.29  									| (552)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = 0)
% 27.67/7.29  									|
% 27.67/7.29  										| Instantiating (552) with all_128_0_147, all_128_1_148 yields:
% 27.67/7.29  										| (553) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_128_0_147 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_128_1_148 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_128_0_147) = 0
% 27.67/7.29  										|
% 27.67/7.29  										| Applying alpha-rule on (553) yields:
% 27.67/7.29  										| (554) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_128_0_147
% 27.67/7.29  										| (555) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_128_1_148
% 27.67/7.29  										| (556) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_128_0_147) = 0
% 27.67/7.29  										|
% 27.67/7.29  										| Instantiating formula (45) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_128_0_147, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_128_0_147, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 27.67/7.29  										| (557) all_128_0_147 = all_1_2_2
% 27.67/7.29  										|
% 27.67/7.29  										| Using (556) and (105) yields:
% 27.67/7.30  										| (558)  ~ (all_128_0_147 = all_1_2_2)
% 27.67/7.30  										|
% 28.03/7.30  										| Equations (557) can reduce 558 to:
% 28.03/7.30  										| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  										|
% 28.03/7.30  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  							|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  							| (560)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  							| (561) all_52_0_9 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  							|
% 28.03/7.30  								| Equations (561) can reduce 87 to:
% 28.03/7.30  								| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  								|
% 28.03/7.30  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  						|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  						| (563) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 28.03/7.30  						| (564)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  						|
% 28.03/7.30  							| Instantiating (564) with all_79_0_149, all_79_1_150 yields:
% 28.03/7.30  							| (565) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_79_0_149 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_79_1_150 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_79_0_149) = 0
% 28.03/7.30  							|
% 28.03/7.30  							| Applying alpha-rule on (565) yields:
% 28.03/7.30  							| (566) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_79_0_149
% 28.03/7.30  							| (567) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_79_1_150
% 28.03/7.30  							| (568) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_79_0_149) = 0
% 28.03/7.30  							|
% 28.03/7.30  							| Instantiating formula (45) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_79_0_149, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_79_0_149, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 28.03/7.30  							| (569) all_79_0_149 = all_1_2_2
% 28.03/7.30  							|
% 28.03/7.30  							| Instantiating formula (20) with all_1_2_2 yields:
% 28.03/7.30  							| (105)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  							|
% 28.03/7.30  							| From (569) and (568) follows:
% 28.03/7.30  							| (571) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 28.03/7.30  							|
% 28.03/7.30  							| Using (571) and (105) yields:
% 28.03/7.30  							| (202) $false
% 28.03/7.30  							|
% 28.03/7.30  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  				|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  				| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  				| (574)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  				|
% 28.03/7.30  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (65), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  					|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  					| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  					|
% 28.03/7.30  						| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.03/7.30  						| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  						|
% 28.03/7.30  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  					|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  					| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  					| (578)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  					|
% 28.03/7.30  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (61), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  						|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  						| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  						|
% 28.03/7.30  							| Equations (78) can reduce 77 to:
% 28.03/7.30  							| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  							|
% 28.03/7.30  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  						|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  						| (77)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  						| (95)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  						|
% 28.03/7.30  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (63), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  							|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  							| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  							|
% 28.03/7.30  								| Equations (78) can reduce 77 to:
% 28.03/7.30  								| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  								|
% 28.03/7.30  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  							|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  							| (77)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  							| (586) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  							|
% 28.03/7.30  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (74), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  								|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  								| (91) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 28.03/7.30  								|
% 28.03/7.30  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (66), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  									|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  									| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  									|
% 28.03/7.30  										| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.03/7.30  										| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  										|
% 28.03/7.30  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  									|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  									| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  									| (591)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  									|
% 28.03/7.30  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (586), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  										|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  										| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  										|
% 28.03/7.30  											| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.03/7.30  											| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  											|
% 28.03/7.30  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  										|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  										| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  										| (595)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  										|
% 28.03/7.30  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, 0, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.30  											| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  											|
% 28.03/7.30  											| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.03/7.30  											| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  											|
% 28.03/7.30  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  								|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  								| (598)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  								| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  								|
% 28.03/7.30  									| Equations (78) can reduce 77 to:
% 28.03/7.30  									| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  									|
% 28.03/7.30  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  	|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  	| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  	| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  	|
% 28.03/7.30  		| Equations (78) can reduce 76 to:
% 28.03/7.30  		| (603)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  		|
% 28.03/7.30  		| Simplifying 603 yields:
% 28.03/7.30  		| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  		|
% 28.03/7.30  		| From (78) and (53) follows:
% 28.03/7.30  		| (605) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 28.03/7.30  		|
% 28.03/7.30  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (66), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  		|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  		| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  		|
% 28.03/7.30  			| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.03/7.30  			| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  			|
% 28.03/7.30  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  		|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  		| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  		| (591)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  		|
% 28.03/7.30  			| Instantiating (591) with all_49_0_162 yields:
% 28.03/7.30  			| (610)  ~ (all_49_0_162 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_49_0_162
% 28.03/7.30  			|
% 28.03/7.30  			| Applying alpha-rule on (610) yields:
% 28.03/7.30  			| (611)  ~ (all_49_0_162 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  			| (612) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_49_0_162
% 28.03/7.30  			|
% 28.03/7.30  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (65), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  			|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  			| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  			|
% 28.03/7.30  				| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.03/7.30  				| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  				|
% 28.03/7.30  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  			|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  			| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  			| (578)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  			|
% 28.03/7.30  				| Instantiating (578) with all_54_0_163 yields:
% 28.03/7.30  				| (617)  ~ (all_54_0_163 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_54_0_163
% 28.03/7.30  				|
% 28.03/7.30  				| Applying alpha-rule on (617) yields:
% 28.03/7.30  				| (618)  ~ (all_54_0_163 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  				| (619) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_54_0_163
% 28.03/7.30  				|
% 28.03/7.30  				| Instantiating formula (28) with all_49_0_162, all_17_2_8, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_3_3) = all_17_2_8, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_49_0_162, yields:
% 28.03/7.30  				| (620) all_49_0_162 = 0 | all_17_2_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  				|
% 28.03/7.30  				| Instantiating formula (43) with all_49_0_162, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_49_0_162, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.30  				| (621) all_49_0_162 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 28.03/7.30  				|
% 28.03/7.30  				| Instantiating formula (28) with all_49_0_162, all_49_0_162, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_49_0_162, yields:
% 28.03/7.30  				| (622) all_49_0_162 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  				|
% 28.03/7.30  				| Instantiating formula (44) with all_54_0_163, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = all_54_0_163, yields:
% 28.03/7.30  				| (623) all_54_0_163 = 0 | distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 28.03/7.30  				|
% 28.03/7.30  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (59), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  				|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  				| (97)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  				|
% 28.03/7.30  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (623), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  					|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  					| (625) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 28.03/7.30  					|
% 28.03/7.30  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (621), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  						|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  						| (626) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 28.03/7.30  						|
% 28.03/7.30  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (622), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  							|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  							| (627) all_49_0_162 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  							|
% 28.03/7.30  								| Equations (627) can reduce 611 to:
% 28.03/7.30  								| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  								|
% 28.03/7.30  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  							|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  							| (611)  ~ (all_49_0_162 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  							| (630)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  							|
% 28.03/7.30  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (620), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  								|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  								| (627) all_49_0_162 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  								|
% 28.03/7.30  									| Equations (627) can reduce 611 to:
% 28.03/7.30  									| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  									|
% 28.03/7.30  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  								|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  								| (611)  ~ (all_49_0_162 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  								| (634) all_17_2_8 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  								|
% 28.03/7.30  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (634), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.30  									|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.30  									| (635) all_17_2_8 = 0
% 28.03/7.30  									|
% 28.03/7.30  										| Equations (635) can reduce 73 to:
% 28.03/7.30  										| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.30  										|
% 28.03/7.30  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.30  									|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.30  									| (73)  ~ (all_17_2_8 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  									| (638)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 28.03/7.30  									|
% 28.03/7.30  										| Instantiating (638) with all_93_0_166 yields:
% 28.03/7.30  										| (639)  ~ (all_93_0_166 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_93_0_166
% 28.03/7.30  										|
% 28.03/7.30  										| Applying alpha-rule on (639) yields:
% 28.03/7.30  										| (640)  ~ (all_93_0_166 = 0)
% 28.03/7.30  										| (641) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_93_0_166
% 28.03/7.30  										|
% 28.03/7.30  										| Instantiating formula (34) with all_93_0_166, all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5) = all_93_0_166, convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.30  										| (642) all_93_0_166 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 28.03/7.30  										|
% 28.03/7.30  										| Instantiating formula (46) with 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.31  										| (643)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = 0)
% 28.03/7.31  										|
% 28.03/7.31  										| Instantiating (643) with all_104_0_167, all_104_1_168 yields:
% 28.03/7.31  										| (644) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_104_0_167 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = 0
% 28.03/7.31  										|
% 28.03/7.31  										| Applying alpha-rule on (644) yields:
% 28.03/7.31  										| (645) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_104_0_167
% 28.03/7.31  										| (646) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.31  										| (647) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = 0
% 28.03/7.31  										|
% 28.03/7.31  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (642), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.31  										|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.31  										| (648) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 28.03/7.31  										|
% 28.03/7.31  											| Instantiating formula (20) with all_1_2_2 yields:
% 28.03/7.31  											| (105)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 28.03/7.31  											|
% 28.03/7.31  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (58), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.31  											|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.31  											| (106)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 28.03/7.31  											|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Using (646) and (106) yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (651)  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0)
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating formula (39) with all_104_1_168, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (652) all_104_1_168 = 0 | distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating formula (25) with all_104_1_168, 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (653)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating formula (14) with all_104_1_168, all_104_1_168, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (654) all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating formula (2) with all_1_2_2, all_104_1_168, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (655)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0))))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating formula (46) with all_104_1_168, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (656)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = v2 & (v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0))))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating formula (21) with all_104_1_168, all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (657)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = v2 & (v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0))))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating formula (10) with 0, all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (658)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (line_connecting(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, v0) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating formula (36) with all_104_1_168, all_104_1_168, all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4, all_104_0_167, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (659) all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating formula (3) with all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4, all_104_0_167, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (660)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v0 & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating formula (3) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_104_0_167, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (661)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v1 & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating formula (3) with all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5, all_104_0_167, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (662)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v0 & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating (662) with all_127_0_169, all_127_1_170, all_127_2_171, all_127_3_172 yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (663) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_127_0_169 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_127_1_170 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_127_2_171 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_127_3_172 & (all_127_0_169 = 0 | all_127_1_170 = 0 | all_127_2_171 = 0 | all_127_3_172 = 0)
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Applying alpha-rule on (663) yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (664) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_127_1_170
% 28.03/7.31  												| (665) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_127_2_171
% 28.03/7.31  												| (666) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_127_0_169
% 28.03/7.31  												| (667) all_127_0_169 = 0 | all_127_1_170 = 0 | all_127_2_171 = 0 | all_127_3_172 = 0
% 28.03/7.31  												| (668) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_127_3_172
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating (661) with all_129_0_173, all_129_1_174, all_129_2_175, all_129_3_176 yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (669) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_129_1_174 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_129_0_173 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_129_3_176 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_129_2_175 & (all_129_0_173 = 0 | all_129_1_174 = 0 | all_129_2_175 = 0 | all_129_3_176 = 0)
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Applying alpha-rule on (669) yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (670) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_129_3_176
% 28.03/7.31  												| (671) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_129_2_175
% 28.03/7.31  												| (672) all_129_0_173 = 0 | all_129_1_174 = 0 | all_129_2_175 = 0 | all_129_3_176 = 0
% 28.03/7.31  												| (673) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_129_1_174
% 28.03/7.31  												| (674) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_129_0_173
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating (658) with all_131_0_177, all_131_1_178, all_131_2_179 yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (675) line_connecting(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = all_131_2_179 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_131_0_177 & ( ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0) | all_131_0_177 = 0)
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Applying alpha-rule on (675) yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (676) line_connecting(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = all_131_2_179
% 28.03/7.31  												| (677) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178
% 28.03/7.31  												| (678) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_131_0_177
% 28.03/7.31  												| (679)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0) | all_131_0_177 = 0
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating (660) with all_133_0_180, all_133_1_181, all_133_2_182, all_133_3_183 yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (680) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_133_0_180 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_133_1_181 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_133_2_182 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_133_3_183 & (all_133_0_180 = 0 | all_133_1_181 = 0 | all_133_2_182 = 0 | all_133_3_183 = 0)
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Applying alpha-rule on (680) yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (681) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_133_2_182
% 28.03/7.31  												| (682) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_133_3_183
% 28.03/7.31  												| (683) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_133_0_180
% 28.03/7.31  												| (684) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_133_1_181
% 28.03/7.31  												| (685) all_133_0_180 = 0 | all_133_1_181 = 0 | all_133_2_182 = 0 | all_133_3_183 = 0
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating (657) with all_135_0_184, all_135_1_185, all_135_2_186 yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (686) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_135_1_185 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_135_2_186 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_135_1_185) = all_135_0_184 & (all_135_0_184 = 0 | ( ~ (all_135_2_186 = 0) &  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0)))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Applying alpha-rule on (686) yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (687) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_135_1_185
% 28.03/7.31  												| (688) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_135_2_186
% 28.03/7.31  												| (689) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_135_1_185) = all_135_0_184
% 28.03/7.31  												| (690) all_135_0_184 = 0 | ( ~ (all_135_2_186 = 0) &  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating (656) with all_137_0_187, all_137_1_188, all_137_2_189 yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (691) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_137_1_188 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_137_2_189 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_137_1_188) = all_137_0_187 & (all_137_0_187 = 0 | ( ~ (all_137_2_189 = 0) &  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0)))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Applying alpha-rule on (691) yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (692) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_137_1_188
% 28.03/7.31  												| (693) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_137_2_189
% 28.03/7.31  												| (694) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_137_1_188) = all_137_0_187
% 28.03/7.31  												| (695) all_137_0_187 = 0 | ( ~ (all_137_2_189 = 0) &  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating (653) with all_139_0_190, all_139_1_191, all_139_2_192 yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (696) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_139_1_191 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_139_2_192 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_139_1_191) = all_139_0_190 & ( ~ (all_139_2_192 = 0) | all_139_0_190 = 0)
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Applying alpha-rule on (696) yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (697) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_139_1_191
% 28.03/7.31  												| (698) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_139_2_192
% 28.03/7.31  												| (699) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_139_1_191) = all_139_0_190
% 28.03/7.31  												| (700)  ~ (all_139_2_192 = 0) | all_139_0_190 = 0
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Instantiating (655) with all_141_0_193, all_141_1_194, all_141_2_195 yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (701) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_141_1_194 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_141_2_195 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_141_0_193 & ( ~ (all_141_2_195 = 0) | all_141_0_193 = 0 | ( ~ (all_141_1_194 = 0) &  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0)))
% 28.03/7.31  												|
% 28.03/7.31  												| Applying alpha-rule on (701) yields:
% 28.03/7.31  												| (702) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_141_1_194
% 28.03/7.31  												| (703) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_141_2_195
% 28.03/7.31  												| (704) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_141_0_193
% 28.03/7.31  												| (705)  ~ (all_141_2_195 = 0) | all_141_0_193 = 0 | ( ~ (all_141_1_194 = 0) &  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0))
% 28.03/7.32  												|
% 28.03/7.32  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (652), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.32  												|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.32  												| (706) distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 28.03/7.32  												|
% 28.03/7.32  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (654), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.32  													|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.32  													| (707) all_104_1_168 = 0
% 28.03/7.32  													|
% 28.03/7.32  														| Equations (707) can reduce 651 to:
% 28.03/7.32  														| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.32  														|
% 28.03/7.32  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.32  													|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.32  													| (651)  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0)
% 28.03/7.32  													| (710)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.32  													|
% 28.03/7.32  														| Instantiating (710) with all_154_0_196, all_154_1_197, all_154_2_198, all_154_3_199 yields:
% 28.03/7.32  														| (711) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_154_0_196 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_154_1_197 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_154_2_198 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_154_3_199 & ( ~ (all_154_2_198 = 0) |  ~ (all_154_3_199 = 0) | all_154_0_196 = 0 | all_154_1_197 = 0)
% 28.03/7.32  														|
% 28.03/7.32  														| Applying alpha-rule on (711) yields:
% 28.03/7.32  														| (712) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_154_0_196
% 28.03/7.32  														| (713) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_154_1_197
% 28.03/7.32  														| (714) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_154_3_199
% 28.03/7.32  														| (715) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_154_2_198
% 28.03/7.32  														| (716)  ~ (all_154_2_198 = 0) |  ~ (all_154_3_199 = 0) | all_154_0_196 = 0 | all_154_1_197 = 0
% 28.03/7.32  														|
% 28.03/7.32  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (659), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.32  														|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.32  														| (707) all_104_1_168 = 0
% 28.03/7.32  														|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Equations (707) can reduce 651 to:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.32  														|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.32  														| (651)  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0)
% 28.03/7.32  														| (720)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 28.03/7.32  														|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating (720) with all_159_0_200, all_159_1_201, all_159_2_202 yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (721) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_159_0_200 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_159_1_201 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_159_2_202 & ( ~ (all_159_2_202 = 0) | all_159_0_200 = 0 | all_159_1_201 = 0)
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Applying alpha-rule on (721) yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (722) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_159_0_200
% 28.03/7.32  															| (723) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_159_1_201
% 28.03/7.32  															| (724) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = all_159_2_202
% 28.03/7.32  															| (725)  ~ (all_159_2_202 = 0) | all_159_0_200 = 0 | all_159_1_201 = 0
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (45) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_137_1_188, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_137_1_188, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (726) all_137_1_188 = all_1_2_2
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4, all_159_1_201, all_159_0_200 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_159_0_200, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_159_1_201, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (727) all_159_0_200 = all_159_1_201
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4, all_133_1_181, all_159_1_201 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_159_1_201, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_133_1_181, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (728) all_159_1_201 = all_133_1_181
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4, all_129_1_174, all_133_1_181 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_133_1_181, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_129_1_174, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (729) all_133_1_181 = all_129_1_174
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4, all_127_0_169, all_159_0_200 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_159_0_200, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_127_0_169, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (730) all_159_0_200 = all_127_0_169
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5, all_127_1_170, all_129_0_173 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_129_0_173, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_127_1_170, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (731) all_129_0_173 = all_127_1_170
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3, all_133_2_182, 0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_133_2_182, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (732) all_133_2_182 = 0
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_154_0_196, all_104_1_168 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_154_0_196, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (733) all_154_0_196 = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_154_1_197, all_154_0_196 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_154_0_196, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_154_1_197, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (734) all_154_0_196 = all_154_1_197
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_133_3_183, all_154_1_197 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_154_1_197, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_133_3_183, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (735) all_154_1_197 = all_133_3_183
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_129_3_176, all_154_1_197 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_154_1_197, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_129_3_176, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (736) all_154_1_197 = all_129_3_176
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_127_2_171, all_133_3_183 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_133_3_183, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_127_2_171, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (737) all_133_3_183 = all_127_2_171
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Using (665) and (106) yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (738)  ~ (all_127_2_171 = 0)
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_137_2_189, all_141_1_194 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_141_1_194, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_137_2_189, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (739) all_141_1_194 = all_137_2_189
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_135_2_186, all_137_2_189 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_137_2_189, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_135_2_186, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (740) all_137_2_189 = all_135_2_186
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_129_2_175, all_141_1_194 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_141_1_194, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_129_2_175, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (741) all_141_1_194 = all_129_2_175
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Using (671) and (97) yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (742)  ~ (all_129_2_175 = 0)
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_127_3_172, all_135_2_186 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_135_2_186, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_127_3_172, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (743) all_135_2_186 = all_127_3_172
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_141_2_195, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_141_2_195, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (744) all_141_2_195 = 0
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (16) with all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_141_0_193, all_154_3_199 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_154_3_199, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_141_0_193, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (745) all_154_3_199 = all_141_0_193
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Using (704) and (105) yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (746)  ~ (all_141_0_193 = 0)
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Instantiating formula (16) with all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2, all_131_0_177, all_154_3_199 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_154_3_199, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_131_0_177, yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (747) all_154_3_199 = all_131_0_177
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Combining equations (727,730) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (748) all_159_1_201 = all_127_0_169
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Simplifying 748 yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (749) all_159_1_201 = all_127_0_169
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Combining equations (728,749) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (750) all_133_1_181 = all_127_0_169
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Simplifying 750 yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (751) all_133_1_181 = all_127_0_169
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Combining equations (734,733) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (752) all_154_1_197 = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Simplifying 752 yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (753) all_154_1_197 = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Combining equations (753,736) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (754) all_129_3_176 = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Combining equations (735,736) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (755) all_133_3_183 = all_129_3_176
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Simplifying 755 yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (756) all_133_3_183 = all_129_3_176
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Combining equations (745,747) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (757) all_141_0_193 = all_131_0_177
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Simplifying 757 yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (758) all_141_0_193 = all_131_0_177
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Combining equations (739,741) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (759) all_137_2_189 = all_129_2_175
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Simplifying 759 yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (760) all_137_2_189 = all_129_2_175
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Combining equations (740,760) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (761) all_135_2_186 = all_129_2_175
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Simplifying 761 yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (762) all_135_2_186 = all_129_2_175
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Combining equations (743,762) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (763) all_129_2_175 = all_127_3_172
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Combining equations (751,729) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (764) all_129_1_174 = all_127_0_169
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Combining equations (756,737) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (765) all_129_3_176 = all_127_2_171
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Simplifying 765 yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (766) all_129_3_176 = all_127_2_171
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Combining equations (766,754) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (767) all_127_2_171 = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Simplifying 767 yields:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (768) all_127_2_171 = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.32  															|
% 28.03/7.32  															| Equations (758) can reduce 746 to:
% 28.03/7.32  															| (769)  ~ (all_131_0_177 = 0)
% 28.03/7.33  															|
% 28.03/7.33  															| Equations (763) can reduce 742 to:
% 28.03/7.33  															| (770)  ~ (all_127_3_172 = 0)
% 28.03/7.33  															|
% 28.03/7.33  															| Equations (768) can reduce 738 to:
% 28.03/7.33  															| (651)  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0)
% 28.03/7.33  															|
% 28.03/7.33  															| From (726) and (692) follows:
% 28.03/7.33  															| (49) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2
% 28.03/7.33  															|
% 28.03/7.33  															| From (764) and (673) follows:
% 28.03/7.33  															| (666) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_127_0_169
% 28.03/7.33  															|
% 28.03/7.33  															| From (731) and (674) follows:
% 28.03/7.33  															| (664) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_127_1_170
% 28.03/7.33  															|
% 28.03/7.33  															| From (732) and (681) follows:
% 28.03/7.33  															| (51) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 28.03/7.33  															|
% 28.03/7.33  															| From (768) and (665) follows:
% 28.03/7.33  															| (646) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.33  															|
% 28.03/7.33  															| From (763) and (671) follows:
% 28.03/7.33  															| (668) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_127_3_172
% 28.03/7.33  															|
% 28.03/7.33  															| From (744) and (703) follows:
% 28.03/7.33  															| (52) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 28.03/7.33  															|
% 28.03/7.33  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (679), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.33  															|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.33  															| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.33  															|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (19) with all_139_1_191, 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_139_1_191, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (780)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_139_1_191) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (19) with all_104_0_167, all_127_0_169, all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_104_0_167, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_127_0_169, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (781)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_104_0_167) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (2) with all_1_2_2, all_127_0_169, all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_127_0_169, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (782)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_1_2_2) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (2) with all_139_1_191, all_127_0_169, all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_139_1_191, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_127_0_169, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (783)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_139_1_191) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (19) with all_135_1_185, all_127_0_169, all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_135_1_185, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_127_0_169, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (784)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = v1 & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_135_1_185) = v2 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (21) with all_127_0_169, all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_127_0_169, convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (785)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = v0 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, v1) = v2 & (v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (21) with all_127_0_169, all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_127_0_169, convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (786)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = v0 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, v1) = v2 & (v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (46) with all_127_0_169, all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_127_0_169, convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (787)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = v0 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, v1) = v2 & (v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (37) with all_1_1_1, all_1_3_3, all_1_5_5, all_104_0_167 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (788) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = 0) | apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (36) with all_131_1_178, all_104_1_168, all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4, all_104_0_167, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (789) all_131_1_178 = 0 | all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (36) with all_104_1_168, all_131_1_178, all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179, all_104_0_167, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (790) all_131_1_178 = 0 | all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_131_2_179) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (14) with all_131_1_178, all_104_1_168, all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (791) all_131_1_178 = 0 | all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (14) with all_104_1_168, all_131_1_178, all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (792) all_131_1_178 = 0 | all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (1) with all_131_1_178, all_104_1_168, all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (793) all_131_1_178 = 0 | all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (1) with all_104_1_168, all_131_1_178, all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (794) all_131_1_178 = 0 | all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (36) with all_131_1_178, all_131_1_178, all_131_2_179, all_131_2_179, all_104_0_167, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (795) all_131_1_178 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_131_2_179) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (14) with all_131_1_178, all_131_1_178, all_131_2_179, all_131_2_179, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (796) all_131_1_178 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (14) with all_127_3_172, all_131_1_178, all_1_5_5, all_131_2_179, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_127_3_172, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (797) all_131_1_178 = 0 | all_127_3_172 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (14) with all_131_1_178, all_127_3_172, all_131_2_179, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_127_3_172, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (798) all_131_1_178 = 0 | all_127_3_172 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (1) with all_127_3_172, all_131_1_178, all_131_2_179, all_1_5_5, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_127_3_172, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (799) all_131_1_178 = 0 | all_127_3_172 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (1) with all_131_1_178, all_127_3_172, all_1_5_5, all_131_2_179, all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_131_1_178, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_127_3_172, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (800) all_131_1_178 = 0 | all_127_3_172 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (34) with all_139_2_192, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_139_2_192, convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (801) all_139_2_192 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (21) with 0, all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (802)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = 0)
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (46) with all_127_0_169, all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_127_0_169, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (803)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = v0 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, v1) = v2 & (v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating formula (3) with all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_104_0_167, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0, distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_104_0_167) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (804)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v1 & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0 | v0 = 0))
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Instantiating (804) with all_184_0_203, all_184_1_204, all_184_2_205, all_184_3_206 yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (805) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_184_1_204 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_184_0_203 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_184_3_206 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_184_2_205 & (all_184_0_203 = 0 | all_184_1_204 = 0 | all_184_2_205 = 0 | all_184_3_206 = 0)
% 28.03/7.33  																|
% 28.03/7.33  																| Applying alpha-rule on (805) yields:
% 28.03/7.33  																| (806) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_184_2_205
% 28.03/7.33  																| (807) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_184_1_204
% 28.03/7.33  																| (808) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_3_3) = all_184_3_206
% 28.03/7.34  																| (809) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = all_184_0_203
% 28.03/7.34  																| (810) all_184_0_203 = 0 | all_184_1_204 = 0 | all_184_2_205 = 0 | all_184_3_206 = 0
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Instantiating (785) with all_202_0_231, all_202_1_232, all_202_2_233 yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (811) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_202_1_232 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_202_2_233 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_202_1_232) = all_202_0_231 & (all_202_0_231 = 0 | ( ~ (all_202_2_233 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0)))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Applying alpha-rule on (811) yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (812) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_202_1_232
% 28.03/7.34  																| (813) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_202_2_233
% 28.03/7.34  																| (814) distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_202_1_232) = all_202_0_231
% 28.03/7.34  																| (815) all_202_0_231 = 0 | ( ~ (all_202_2_233 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Instantiating (784) with all_204_0_234, all_204_1_235, all_204_2_236 yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (816) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_204_1_235 & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_204_2_236 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_135_1_185) = all_204_0_234 & ( ~ (all_204_2_236 = 0) | all_204_0_234 = 0 | ( ~ (all_204_1_235 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0)))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Applying alpha-rule on (816) yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (817) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_204_1_235
% 28.03/7.34  																| (818) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_204_2_236
% 28.03/7.34  																| (819) distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_135_1_185) = all_204_0_234
% 28.03/7.34  																| (820)  ~ (all_204_2_236 = 0) | all_204_0_234 = 0 | ( ~ (all_204_1_235 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Instantiating (781) with all_206_0_237, all_206_1_238, all_206_2_239 yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (821) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_206_1_238 & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_206_2_239 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_104_0_167) = all_206_0_237 & ( ~ (all_206_2_239 = 0) | all_206_0_237 = 0 | ( ~ (all_206_1_238 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0)))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Applying alpha-rule on (821) yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (822) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_206_1_238
% 28.03/7.34  																| (823) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_206_2_239
% 28.03/7.34  																| (824) distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_104_0_167) = all_206_0_237
% 28.03/7.34  																| (825)  ~ (all_206_2_239 = 0) | all_206_0_237 = 0 | ( ~ (all_206_1_238 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Instantiating (783) with all_208_0_240, all_208_1_241, all_208_2_242 yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (826) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_208_1_241 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_208_2_242 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_139_1_191) = all_208_0_240 & ( ~ (all_208_2_242 = 0) | all_208_0_240 = 0 | ( ~ (all_208_1_241 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0)))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Applying alpha-rule on (826) yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (827) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_208_1_241
% 28.03/7.34  																| (828) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_208_2_242
% 28.03/7.34  																| (829) distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_139_1_191) = all_208_0_240
% 28.03/7.34  																| (830)  ~ (all_208_2_242 = 0) | all_208_0_240 = 0 | ( ~ (all_208_1_241 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Instantiating (787) with all_212_0_246, all_212_1_247, all_212_2_248 yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (831) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_212_1_247 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_212_2_248 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_212_1_247) = all_212_0_246 & (all_212_0_246 = 0 | ( ~ (all_212_2_248 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0)))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Applying alpha-rule on (831) yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (832) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_212_1_247
% 28.03/7.34  																| (833) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_212_2_248
% 28.03/7.34  																| (834) distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_212_1_247) = all_212_0_246
% 28.03/7.34  																| (835) all_212_0_246 = 0 | ( ~ (all_212_2_248 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Instantiating (786) with all_214_0_249, all_214_1_250, all_214_2_251 yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (836) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_214_1_250 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_214_2_251 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_214_1_250) = all_214_0_249 & (all_214_0_249 = 0 | ( ~ (all_214_2_251 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0)))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Applying alpha-rule on (836) yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (837) intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = all_214_1_250
% 28.03/7.34  																| (838) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_214_2_251
% 28.03/7.34  																| (839) distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_214_1_250) = all_214_0_249
% 28.03/7.34  																| (840) all_214_0_249 = 0 | ( ~ (all_214_2_251 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Instantiating (780) with all_216_0_252, all_216_1_253, all_216_2_254 yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (841) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_216_1_253 & convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_216_2_254 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_139_1_191) = all_216_0_252 & ( ~ (all_216_2_254 = 0) | all_216_0_252 = 0)
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Applying alpha-rule on (841) yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (842) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_216_1_253
% 28.03/7.34  																| (843) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_216_2_254
% 28.03/7.34  																| (844) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_139_1_191) = all_216_0_252
% 28.03/7.34  																| (845)  ~ (all_216_2_254 = 0) | all_216_0_252 = 0
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Instantiating (782) with all_218_0_255, all_218_1_256, all_218_2_257 yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (846) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_218_1_256 & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_218_2_257 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_1_2_2) = all_218_0_255 & ( ~ (all_218_2_257 = 0) | all_218_0_255 = 0 | ( ~ (all_218_1_256 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0)))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																| Applying alpha-rule on (846) yields:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (847) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_218_1_256
% 28.03/7.34  																| (848) convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_218_2_257
% 28.03/7.34  																| (849) distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_1_2_2) = all_218_0_255
% 28.03/7.34  																| (850)  ~ (all_218_2_257 = 0) | all_218_0_255 = 0 | ( ~ (all_218_1_256 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (795), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.34  																|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																	| Equations (851) can reduce 779 to:
% 28.03/7.34  																	| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.34  																	|
% 28.03/7.34  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.34  																|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.34  																| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.34  																| (854)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_131_2_179) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																|
% 28.03/7.34  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (796), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.34  																	|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.34  																	| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.03/7.34  																	|
% 28.03/7.34  																		| Equations (851) can reduce 779 to:
% 28.03/7.34  																		| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.34  																		|
% 28.03/7.34  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.34  																	|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.34  																	| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.34  																	| (858)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																	|
% 28.03/7.34  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (789), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.34  																		|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.34  																		| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.03/7.34  																		|
% 28.03/7.34  																			| Equations (851) can reduce 779 to:
% 28.03/7.34  																			| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.34  																			|
% 28.03/7.34  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.34  																		|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.34  																		| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.34  																		| (862) all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																		|
% 28.03/7.34  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (790), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.34  																			|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.34  																			| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.03/7.34  																			|
% 28.03/7.34  																				| Equations (851) can reduce 779 to:
% 28.03/7.34  																				| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.34  																				|
% 28.03/7.34  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.34  																			|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.34  																			| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.34  																			| (866) all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_131_2_179) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																			|
% 28.03/7.34  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (791), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.34  																				|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.34  																				| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.03/7.34  																				|
% 28.03/7.34  																					| Equations (851) can reduce 779 to:
% 28.03/7.34  																					| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.34  																					|
% 28.03/7.34  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.34  																				|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.34  																				| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.34  																				| (870) all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																				|
% 28.03/7.34  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (792), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.34  																					|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.34  																					| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.03/7.34  																					|
% 28.03/7.34  																						| Equations (851) can reduce 779 to:
% 28.03/7.34  																						| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.34  																						|
% 28.03/7.34  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.34  																					|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.34  																					| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.34  																					| (874) all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																					|
% 28.03/7.34  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (793), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.34  																						|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.34  																						| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.03/7.34  																						|
% 28.03/7.34  																							| Equations (851) can reduce 779 to:
% 28.03/7.34  																							| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.34  																							|
% 28.03/7.34  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.34  																						|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.34  																						| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.34  																						| (878) all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.34  																						|
% 28.03/7.35  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (794), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.35  																							|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.35  																							| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																							|
% 28.03/7.35  																								| Equations (851) can reduce 779 to:
% 28.03/7.35  																								| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.35  																								|
% 28.03/7.35  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.35  																							|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.35  																							| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																							| (882) all_104_1_168 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.35  																							|
% 28.03/7.35  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (797), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.35  																								|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.35  																								| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																								|
% 28.03/7.35  																									| Equations (851) can reduce 779 to:
% 28.03/7.35  																									| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.35  																									|
% 28.03/7.35  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.35  																								|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.35  																								| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																								| (886) all_127_3_172 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.35  																								|
% 28.03/7.35  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (798), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.35  																									|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.35  																									| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																									|
% 28.03/7.35  																										| Equations (851) can reduce 779 to:
% 28.03/7.35  																										| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.35  																										|
% 28.03/7.35  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.35  																									|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.35  																									| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																									| (890) all_127_3_172 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.35  																									|
% 28.03/7.35  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (799), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.35  																										|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.35  																										| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																										|
% 28.03/7.35  																											| Equations (851) can reduce 779 to:
% 28.03/7.35  																											| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.35  																											|
% 28.03/7.35  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.35  																										|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.35  																										| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																										| (894) all_127_3_172 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.35  																										|
% 28.03/7.35  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (800), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.35  																											|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.35  																											| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																											|
% 28.03/7.35  																												| Equations (851) can reduce 779 to:
% 28.03/7.35  																												| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.35  																												|
% 28.03/7.35  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.35  																											|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.35  																											| (779)  ~ (all_131_1_178 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																											| (898) all_127_3_172 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.35  																											|
% 28.03/7.35  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (801), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.35  																												|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.35  																												| (899) convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																												|
% 28.03/7.35  																													| Instantiating formula (41) with all_1_4_4 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.35  																													| (202) $false
% 28.03/7.35  																													|
% 28.03/7.35  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.35  																												|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.35  																												| (901)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																												| (902) all_139_2_192 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																												|
% 28.03/7.35  																													| From (902) and (698) follows:
% 28.03/7.35  																													| (903) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																													|
% 28.03/7.35  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (862), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.35  																													|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.35  																													| (707) all_104_1_168 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																													|
% 28.03/7.35  																														| Equations (707) can reduce 651 to:
% 28.03/7.35  																														| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.35  																														|
% 28.03/7.35  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.35  																													|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.35  																													| (651)  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																													| (907)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 28.03/7.35  																													|
% 28.03/7.35  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (866), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.35  																														|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.35  																														| (707) all_104_1_168 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																														|
% 28.03/7.35  																															| Equations (707) can reduce 651 to:
% 28.03/7.35  																															| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.35  																															|
% 28.03/7.35  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.35  																														|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.35  																														| (651)  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																														| (911)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_131_2_179) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0 | v1 = 0))
% 28.03/7.35  																														|
% 28.03/7.35  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (870), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.35  																															|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.35  																															| (707) all_104_1_168 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																															|
% 28.03/7.35  																																| Equations (707) can reduce 651 to:
% 28.03/7.35  																																| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.35  																																|
% 28.03/7.35  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.35  																															|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.35  																															| (651)  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																															| (915)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.35  																															|
% 28.03/7.35  																																| Instantiating (915) with all_334_0_319, all_334_1_320, all_334_2_321, all_334_3_322 yields:
% 28.03/7.35  																																| (916) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_334_1_320 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_334_0_319 & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179) = all_334_2_321 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_334_3_322 & ( ~ (all_334_2_321 = 0) |  ~ (all_334_3_322 = 0) | all_334_0_319 = 0 | all_334_1_320 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																																|
% 28.03/7.35  																																| Applying alpha-rule on (916) yields:
% 28.03/7.35  																																| (917) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_334_1_320
% 28.03/7.35  																																| (918) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_334_3_322
% 28.03/7.35  																																| (919)  ~ (all_334_2_321 = 0) |  ~ (all_334_3_322 = 0) | all_334_0_319 = 0 | all_334_1_320 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																																| (920) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_334_0_319
% 28.03/7.35  																																| (921) distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_131_2_179) = all_334_2_321
% 28.03/7.35  																																|
% 28.03/7.35  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (874), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.35  																																|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.35  																																| (707) all_104_1_168 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																																|
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| Equations (707) can reduce 651 to:
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.35  																																	|
% 28.03/7.35  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.35  																																|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.35  																																| (651)  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																																| (925)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.35  																																|
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| Instantiating (925) with all_339_0_323, all_339_1_324, all_339_2_325, all_339_3_326 yields:
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| (926) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_339_0_323 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_339_1_324 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4) = all_339_2_325 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_339_3_326 & ( ~ (all_339_2_325 = 0) |  ~ (all_339_3_326 = 0) | all_339_0_323 = 0 | all_339_1_324 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																																	|
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (926) yields:
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| (927) distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_4_4) = all_339_2_325
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| (928) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_339_0_323
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| (929) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_339_1_324
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| (930) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_339_3_326
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| (931)  ~ (all_339_2_325 = 0) |  ~ (all_339_3_326 = 0) | all_339_0_323 = 0 | all_339_1_324 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																																	|
% 28.03/7.35  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (890), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.35  																																	|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| (932) all_127_3_172 = 0
% 28.03/7.35  																																	|
% 28.03/7.35  																																		| Equations (932) can reduce 770 to:
% 28.03/7.35  																																		| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.35  																																		|
% 28.03/7.35  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.35  																																	|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| (770)  ~ (all_127_3_172 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																																	| (935)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.35  																																	|
% 28.03/7.35  																																		| Instantiating (935) with all_344_0_327, all_344_1_328, all_344_2_329, all_344_3_330 yields:
% 28.03/7.35  																																		| (936) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_344_1_328 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_344_0_327 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_131_2_179) = all_344_2_329 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_344_3_330 & ( ~ (all_344_2_329 = 0) |  ~ (all_344_3_330 = 0) | all_344_0_327 = 0 | all_344_1_328 = 0)
% 28.03/7.35  																																		|
% 28.03/7.35  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (936) yields:
% 28.03/7.35  																																		| (937) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_131_2_179) = all_344_2_329
% 28.03/7.36  																																		| (938) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_344_3_330
% 28.03/7.36  																																		| (939) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_344_0_327
% 28.03/7.36  																																		| (940)  ~ (all_344_2_329 = 0) |  ~ (all_344_3_330 = 0) | all_344_0_327 = 0 | all_344_1_328 = 0
% 28.03/7.36  																																		| (941) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_344_1_328
% 28.03/7.36  																																		|
% 28.03/7.36  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (894), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.36  																																		|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.36  																																		| (932) all_127_3_172 = 0
% 28.03/7.36  																																		|
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| Equations (932) can reduce 770 to:
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.36  																																			|
% 28.03/7.36  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.36  																																		|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.36  																																		| (770)  ~ (all_127_3_172 = 0)
% 28.03/7.36  																																		| (945)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v2 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_131_2_179) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.36  																																		|
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| Instantiating (945) with all_349_0_331, all_349_1_332, all_349_2_333, all_349_3_334 yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| (946) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_349_0_331 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_349_1_332 & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_131_2_179) = all_349_2_333 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_349_3_334 & ( ~ (all_349_2_333 = 0) |  ~ (all_349_3_334 = 0) | all_349_0_331 = 0 | all_349_1_332 = 0)
% 28.03/7.36  																																			|
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (946) yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| (947) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_131_2_179) = all_349_2_333
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| (948) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_349_0_331
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| (949)  ~ (all_349_2_333 = 0) |  ~ (all_349_3_334 = 0) | all_349_0_331 = 0 | all_349_1_332 = 0
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| (950) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_349_3_334
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| (951) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_349_1_332
% 28.03/7.36  																																			|
% 28.03/7.36  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (898), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.36  																																			|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| (932) all_127_3_172 = 0
% 28.03/7.36  																																			|
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| Equations (932) can reduce 770 to:
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| (79) $false
% 28.03/7.36  																																				|
% 28.03/7.36  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.36  																																			|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| (770)  ~ (all_127_3_172 = 0)
% 28.03/7.36  																																			| (955)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v3 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_5_5) = v1 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0) | v3 = 0 | v2 = 0))
% 28.03/7.36  																																			|
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| Instantiating (955) with all_354_0_335, all_354_1_336, all_354_2_337, all_354_3_338 yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| (956) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_354_1_336 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_354_0_335 & distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_5_5) = all_354_2_337 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_354_3_338 & ( ~ (all_354_2_337 = 0) |  ~ (all_354_3_338 = 0) | all_354_0_335 = 0 | all_354_1_336 = 0)
% 28.03/7.36  																																				|
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (956) yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| (957) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_131_2_179) = all_354_1_336
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| (958)  ~ (all_354_2_337 = 0) |  ~ (all_354_3_338 = 0) | all_354_0_335 = 0 | all_354_1_336 = 0
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| (959) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_354_0_335
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| (960) distinct_lines(all_131_2_179, all_1_5_5) = all_354_2_337
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| (961) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = all_354_3_338
% 28.03/7.36  																																				|
% 28.03/7.36  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (802), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.36  																																				|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| (962)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 28.03/7.36  																																				|
% 28.03/7.36  																																					| Using (903) and (962) yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																					| (202) $false
% 28.03/7.36  																																					|
% 28.03/7.36  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.36  																																				|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| (903) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 28.03/7.36  																																				| (965)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = 0)
% 28.03/7.36  																																				|
% 28.03/7.36  																																					| Instantiating (965) with all_360_0_339, all_360_1_340 yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																					| (966) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_360_0_339 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_360_1_340 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_360_0_339) = 0
% 28.03/7.36  																																					|
% 28.03/7.36  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (966) yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																					| (967) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_360_0_339
% 28.03/7.36  																																					| (968) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_360_1_340
% 28.03/7.36  																																					| (969) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_360_0_339) = 0
% 28.03/7.36  																																					|
% 28.03/7.36  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (803), into two cases.
% 28.03/7.36  																																					|-Branch one:
% 28.03/7.36  																																					| (962)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 28.03/7.36  																																					|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Using (903) and (962) yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (202) $false
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.03/7.36  																																					|-Branch two:
% 28.03/7.36  																																					| (903) convergent_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 28.03/7.36  																																					| (973)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = v0 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, v1) = v2 & (v2 = 0 | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))))
% 28.03/7.36  																																					|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating (973) with all_369_0_341, all_369_1_342, all_369_2_343 yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (974) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_369_1_342 & apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_369_2_343 & distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_369_1_342) = all_369_0_341 & (all_369_0_341 = 0 | ( ~ (all_369_2_343 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0)))
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (974) yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (975) intersection_point(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = all_369_1_342
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (976) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_369_2_343
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (977) distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_369_1_342) = all_369_0_341
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (978) all_369_0_341 = 0 | ( ~ (all_369_2_343 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (45) with all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_202_1_232, all_104_0_167 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_202_1_232, intersection_point(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_104_0_167, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (979) all_202_1_232 = all_104_0_167
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3, all_206_1_238, all_369_2_343 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_369_2_343, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_206_1_238, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (980) all_369_2_343 = all_206_1_238
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3, all_206_1_238, all_208_1_241 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_208_1_241, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_206_1_238, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (981) all_208_1_241 = all_206_1_238
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3, all_202_2_233, all_369_2_343 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_369_2_343, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_202_2_233, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (982) all_369_2_343 = all_202_2_233
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3, all_184_1_204, all_208_1_241 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_208_1_241, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_184_1_204, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (983) all_208_1_241 = all_184_1_204
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5, all_218_1_256, all_127_1_170 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_218_1_256, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_127_1_170, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (984) all_218_1_256 = all_127_1_170
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5, all_214_2_251, all_218_1_256 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_218_1_256, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_214_2_251, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (985) all_218_1_256 = all_214_2_251
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5, all_212_2_248, all_214_2_251 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_214_2_251, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_212_2_248, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (986) all_214_2_251 = all_212_2_248
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5, all_204_1_235, all_214_2_251 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_214_2_251, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_204_1_235, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (987) all_214_2_251 = all_204_1_235
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_339_1_324, all_360_1_340 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_360_1_340, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_339_1_324, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (988) all_360_1_340 = all_339_1_324
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_334_0_319, all_104_1_168 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_334_0_319, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_104_1_168, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (989) all_334_0_319 = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_334_0_319, all_339_1_324 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_339_1_324, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_334_0_319, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (990) all_339_1_324 = all_334_0_319
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_216_1_253, all_360_1_340 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_360_1_340, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_216_1_253, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (991) all_360_1_340 = all_216_1_253
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4, all_184_2_205, all_339_1_324 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_339_1_324, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_184_2_205, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (992) all_339_1_324 = all_184_2_205
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Using (806) and (106) yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (993)  ~ (all_184_2_205 = 0)
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_349_1_332, all_127_3_172 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_349_1_332, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_127_3_172, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (994) all_349_1_332 = all_127_3_172
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_349_1_332, all_354_0_335 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_354_0_335, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_349_1_332, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (995) all_354_0_335 = all_349_1_332
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Instantiating formula (26) with all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5, all_344_0_327, all_354_0_335 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_354_0_335, apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_344_0_327, yields:
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| (996) all_354_0_335 = all_344_0_327
% 28.03/7.36  																																						|
% 28.03/7.36  																																						| Using (939) and (97) yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (997)  ~ (all_344_0_327 = 0)
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Instantiating formula (27) with all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3, all_206_2_239, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = all_206_2_239, convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (998) all_206_2_239 = 0
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Instantiating formula (16) with all_104_0_167, all_104_0_167, all_206_0_237, all_202_0_231 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_104_0_167) = all_206_0_237, yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (999) all_206_0_237 = all_202_0_231 |  ~ (distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_104_0_167) = all_202_0_231)
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Instantiating formula (20) with all_104_0_167 yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1000)  ~ (distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_104_0_167) = 0)
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (980,982) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1001) all_206_1_238 = all_202_2_233
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Simplifying 1001 yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1002) all_206_1_238 = all_202_2_233
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (988,991) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1003) all_339_1_324 = all_216_1_253
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Simplifying 1003 yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1004) all_339_1_324 = all_216_1_253
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (995,996) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1005) all_349_1_332 = all_344_0_327
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Simplifying 1005 yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1006) all_349_1_332 = all_344_0_327
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (994,1006) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1007) all_344_0_327 = all_127_3_172
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (990,1004) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1008) all_334_0_319 = all_216_1_253
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Simplifying 1008 yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1009) all_334_0_319 = all_216_1_253
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (992,1004) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1010) all_216_1_253 = all_184_2_205
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (1009,989) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1011) all_216_1_253 = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Simplifying 1011 yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1012) all_216_1_253 = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (985,984) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1013) all_214_2_251 = all_127_1_170
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Simplifying 1013 yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1014) all_214_2_251 = all_127_1_170
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (1010,1012) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1015) all_184_2_205 = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Simplifying 1015 yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1016) all_184_2_205 = all_104_1_168
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (1014,986) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1017) all_212_2_248 = all_127_1_170
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (987,986) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1018) all_212_2_248 = all_204_1_235
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (1017,1018) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1019) all_204_1_235 = all_127_1_170
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (981,983) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1020) all_206_1_238 = all_184_1_204
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Simplifying 1020 yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1021) all_206_1_238 = all_184_1_204
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Combining equations (1002,1021) yields a new equation:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1022) all_202_2_233 = all_184_1_204
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Simplifying 1022 yields:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (1023) all_202_2_233 = all_184_1_204
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Equations (1007) can reduce 997 to:
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| (770)  ~ (all_127_3_172 = 0)
% 28.03/7.37  																																						|
% 28.03/7.37  																																						| Equations (1016) can reduce 993 to:
% 28.34/7.37  																																						| (651)  ~ (all_104_1_168 = 0)
% 28.34/7.37  																																						|
% 28.34/7.37  																																						| From (1023) and (813) follows:
% 28.34/7.37  																																						| (807) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_184_1_204
% 28.34/7.37  																																						|
% 28.34/7.37  																																						| From (1019) and (817) follows:
% 28.34/7.37  																																						| (664) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = all_127_1_170
% 28.34/7.37  																																						|
% 28.34/7.37  																																						| From (979) and (814) follows:
% 28.34/7.37  																																						| (1028) distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_104_0_167) = all_202_0_231
% 28.34/7.37  																																						|
% 28.34/7.37  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (999), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.37  																																						|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.37  																																						| (1029)  ~ (distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_104_0_167) = all_202_0_231)
% 28.34/7.37  																																						|
% 28.34/7.37  																																							| Using (1028) and (1029) yields:
% 28.34/7.37  																																							| (202) $false
% 28.34/7.37  																																							|
% 28.34/7.37  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.37  																																						|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.37  																																						| (1028) distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_104_0_167) = all_202_0_231
% 28.34/7.37  																																						| (1032) all_206_0_237 = all_202_0_231
% 28.34/7.37  																																						|
% 28.34/7.37  																																							| From (1032) and (824) follows:
% 28.34/7.37  																																							| (1028) distinct_points(all_104_0_167, all_104_0_167) = all_202_0_231
% 28.34/7.37  																																							|
% 28.34/7.37  																																							| Using (1028) and (1000) yields:
% 28.34/7.37  																																							| (1034)  ~ (all_202_0_231 = 0)
% 28.34/7.37  																																							|
% 28.34/7.37  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (825), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.37  																																							|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.37  																																							| (1035)  ~ (all_206_2_239 = 0)
% 28.34/7.37  																																							|
% 28.34/7.37  																																								| Equations (998) can reduce 1035 to:
% 28.34/7.37  																																								| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.37  																																								|
% 28.34/7.37  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.37  																																							|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.37  																																							| (998) all_206_2_239 = 0
% 28.34/7.37  																																							| (1038) all_206_0_237 = 0 | ( ~ (all_206_1_238 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0))
% 28.34/7.37  																																							|
% 28.34/7.37  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1038), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.37  																																								|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.37  																																								| (1039) all_206_0_237 = 0
% 28.34/7.37  																																								|
% 28.34/7.37  																																									| Combining equations (1032,1039) yields a new equation:
% 28.34/7.37  																																									| (1040) all_202_0_231 = 0
% 28.34/7.37  																																									|
% 28.34/7.37  																																									| Simplifying 1040 yields:
% 28.34/7.37  																																									| (1041) all_202_0_231 = 0
% 28.34/7.37  																																									|
% 28.34/7.37  																																									| Equations (1041) can reduce 1034 to:
% 28.34/7.37  																																									| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.37  																																									|
% 28.34/7.37  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.37  																																								|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.37  																																								| (1043)  ~ (all_206_0_237 = 0)
% 28.34/7.37  																																								| (1044)  ~ (all_206_1_238 = 0) &  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0)
% 28.34/7.37  																																								|
% 28.34/7.38  																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (1044) yields:
% 28.34/7.38  																																									| (1045)  ~ (all_206_1_238 = 0)
% 28.34/7.38  																																									| (1046)  ~ (all_127_0_169 = 0)
% 28.34/7.38  																																									|
% 28.34/7.38  																																									| Equations (1021) can reduce 1045 to:
% 28.34/7.38  																																									| (1047)  ~ (all_184_1_204 = 0)
% 28.34/7.38  																																									|
% 28.34/7.38  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (672), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.38  																																									|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.38  																																									| (1048) all_129_0_173 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																									|
% 28.34/7.38  																																										| Combining equations (731,1048) yields a new equation:
% 28.34/7.38  																																										| (1049) all_127_1_170 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																										|
% 28.34/7.38  																																										| Simplifying 1049 yields:
% 28.34/7.38  																																										| (1050) all_127_1_170 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																										|
% 28.34/7.38  																																										| From (1050) and (664) follows:
% 28.34/7.38  																																										| (1051) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																										|
% 28.34/7.38  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (788), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.38  																																										|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.38  																																										| (1052)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 28.34/7.38  																																										|
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| Using (1051) and (1052) yields:
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| (202) $false
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.38  																																										|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.38  																																										| (1051) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																										| (1055) all_1_1_1 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																										|
% 28.34/7.38  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1055), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| (1056) apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| Instantiating formula (26) with all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3, 0, all_184_1_204 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = all_184_1_204, apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| (1057) all_184_1_204 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																												|
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| Equations (1057) can reduce 1047 to:
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.38  																																												|
% 28.34/7.38  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| (1059)  ~ (apart_point_and_line(all_104_0_167, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.38  																																												|
% 28.34/7.38  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.38  																																									|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.38  																																									| (1062)  ~ (all_129_0_173 = 0)
% 28.34/7.38  																																									| (1063) all_129_1_174 = 0 | all_129_2_175 = 0 | all_129_3_176 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																									|
% 28.34/7.38  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1063), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.38  																																										|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.38  																																										| (1064) all_129_1_174 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																										|
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| Combining equations (764,1064) yields a new equation:
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| (1065) all_127_0_169 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| Simplifying 1065 yields:
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| (1066) all_127_0_169 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| Equations (1066) can reduce 1046 to:
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.38  																																										|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.38  																																										| (1068)  ~ (all_129_1_174 = 0)
% 28.34/7.38  																																										| (1069) all_129_2_175 = 0 | all_129_3_176 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																										|
% 28.34/7.38  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1069), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| (1070) all_129_2_175 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| Combining equations (1070,763) yields a new equation:
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| (932) all_127_3_172 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																												|
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| Equations (932) can reduce 770 to:
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.38  																																												|
% 28.34/7.38  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| (742)  ~ (all_129_2_175 = 0)
% 28.34/7.38  																																											| (1074) all_129_3_176 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																											|
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| Combining equations (1074,754) yields a new equation:
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| (707) all_104_1_168 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  																																												|
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| Equations (707) can reduce 651 to:
% 28.34/7.38  																																												| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.38  																																												|
% 28.34/7.38  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.38  															|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.38  															| (851) all_131_1_178 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  															| (1078) all_131_0_177 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  															|
% 28.34/7.38  																| Equations (1078) can reduce 769 to:
% 28.34/7.38  																| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.38  																|
% 28.34/7.38  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.38  												|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.38  												| (1080)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_3_3, all_1_4_4) = 0)
% 28.34/7.38  												| (707) all_104_1_168 = 0
% 28.34/7.38  												|
% 28.34/7.38  													| Equations (707) can reduce 651 to:
% 28.34/7.38  													| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.38  													|
% 28.34/7.38  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.38  											|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.38  											| (547) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = 0
% 28.34/7.38  											| (552)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  											|
% 28.34/7.39  												| Instantiating (552) with all_118_0_356, all_118_1_357 yields:
% 28.34/7.39  												| (1085) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_118_0_356 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_118_1_357 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_118_0_356) = 0
% 28.34/7.39  												|
% 28.34/7.39  												| Applying alpha-rule on (1085) yields:
% 28.34/7.39  												| (1086) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_118_0_356
% 28.34/7.39  												| (1087) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = all_118_1_357
% 28.34/7.39  												| (1088) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_118_0_356) = 0
% 28.34/7.39  												|
% 28.34/7.39  												| Instantiating formula (45) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_118_0_356, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_118_0_356, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 28.34/7.39  												| (1089) all_118_0_356 = all_1_2_2
% 28.34/7.39  												|
% 28.34/7.39  												| Using (1088) and (105) yields:
% 28.34/7.39  												| (1090)  ~ (all_118_0_356 = all_1_2_2)
% 28.34/7.39  												|
% 28.34/7.39  												| Equations (1089) can reduce 1090 to:
% 28.34/7.39  												| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  												|
% 28.34/7.39  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  										|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  										| (1092)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  										| (1093) all_93_0_166 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  										|
% 28.34/7.39  											| Equations (1093) can reduce 640 to:
% 28.34/7.39  											| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  											|
% 28.34/7.39  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  						|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  						| (1095)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  						| (627) all_49_0_162 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  						|
% 28.34/7.39  							| Equations (627) can reduce 611 to:
% 28.34/7.39  							| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  							|
% 28.34/7.39  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  					|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  					| (1098)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  					| (1099) all_54_0_163 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  					|
% 28.34/7.39  						| Equations (1099) can reduce 618 to:
% 28.34/7.39  						| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  						|
% 28.34/7.39  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  				|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  				| (563) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_5_5) = 0
% 28.34/7.39  				| (564)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v1 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = v0 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, v1) = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  				|
% 28.34/7.39  					| Instantiating (564) with all_67_0_361, all_67_1_362 yields:
% 28.34/7.39  					| (1103) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_67_0_361 & apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_67_1_362 & distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_67_0_361) = 0
% 28.34/7.39  					|
% 28.34/7.39  					| Applying alpha-rule on (1103) yields:
% 28.34/7.39  					| (1104) intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_67_0_361
% 28.34/7.39  					| (1105) apart_point_and_line(all_1_2_2, all_1_4_4) = all_67_1_362
% 28.34/7.39  					| (1106) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_67_0_361) = 0
% 28.34/7.39  					|
% 28.34/7.39  					| Instantiating formula (45) with all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4, all_67_0_361, all_1_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_67_0_361, intersection_point(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = all_1_2_2, yields:
% 28.34/7.39  					| (1107) all_67_0_361 = all_1_2_2
% 28.34/7.39  					|
% 28.34/7.39  					| Instantiating formula (20) with all_1_2_2 yields:
% 28.34/7.39  					| (105)  ~ (distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  					|
% 28.34/7.39  					| From (1107) and (1106) follows:
% 28.34/7.39  					| (571) distinct_points(all_1_2_2, all_1_2_2) = 0
% 28.34/7.39  					|
% 28.34/7.39  					| Using (571) and (105) yields:
% 28.34/7.39  					| (202) $false
% 28.34/7.39  					|
% 28.34/7.39  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  |-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  | (1111) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_0_0
% 28.34/7.39  | (1112) all_1_0_0 = all_1_1_1
% 28.34/7.39  |
% 28.34/7.39  	| From (1112) and (1111) follows:
% 28.34/7.39  	| (50) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1
% 28.34/7.39  	|
% 28.34/7.39  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (48), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.39  	|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.39  	| (77)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  	|
% 28.34/7.39  		| Equations (1112) can reduce 77 to:
% 28.34/7.39  		| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  		|
% 28.34/7.39  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (64), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.39  		|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.39  		| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  		|
% 28.34/7.39  			| Combining equations (78,1112) yields a new equation:
% 28.34/7.39  			| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  			|
% 28.34/7.39  			| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.34/7.39  			| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  			|
% 28.34/7.39  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  		|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  		| (77)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  		| (81) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0)
% 28.34/7.39  		|
% 28.34/7.39  			| Equations (1112) can reduce 77 to:
% 28.34/7.39  			| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  			|
% 28.34/7.39  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (65), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.39  			|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.39  			| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  			|
% 28.34/7.39  				| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.34/7.39  				| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  				|
% 28.34/7.39  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  			|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  			| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  			| (578)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 28.34/7.39  			|
% 28.34/7.39  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (61), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.39  				|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.39  				| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  				|
% 28.34/7.39  					| Combining equations (78,1112) yields a new equation:
% 28.34/7.39  					| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  					|
% 28.34/7.39  					| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.34/7.39  					| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  					|
% 28.34/7.39  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  				|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  				| (77)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  				| (95)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_4_4) = v0)
% 28.34/7.39  				|
% 28.34/7.39  					| Equations (1112) can reduce 77 to:
% 28.34/7.39  					| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  					|
% 28.34/7.39  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (74), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.39  					|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.39  					| (91) distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0
% 28.34/7.39  					|
% 28.34/7.39  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (62), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.39  						|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.39  						| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  						|
% 28.34/7.39  							| Combining equations (78,1112) yields a new equation:
% 28.34/7.39  							| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  							|
% 28.34/7.39  							| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.34/7.39  							| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  							|
% 28.34/7.39  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  						|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  						| (77)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  						| (85)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_3_3) = v0)
% 28.34/7.39  						|
% 28.34/7.39  							| Equations (1112) can reduce 77 to:
% 28.34/7.39  							| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  							|
% 28.34/7.39  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (66), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.39  							|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.39  							| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  							|
% 28.34/7.39  								| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.34/7.39  								| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  								|
% 28.34/7.39  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  							|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  							| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  							| (591)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = v0)
% 28.34/7.39  							|
% 28.34/7.39  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (63), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.39  								|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.39  								| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  								|
% 28.34/7.39  									| Combining equations (78,1112) yields a new equation:
% 28.34/7.39  									| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  									|
% 28.34/7.39  									| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.34/7.39  									| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  									|
% 28.34/7.39  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  								|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  								| (77)  ~ (all_1_0_0 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  								| (586) all_1_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 28.34/7.39  								|
% 28.34/7.39  									| Equations (1112) can reduce 77 to:
% 28.34/7.39  									| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  									|
% 28.34/7.39  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (81), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.39  									|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.39  									| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  									|
% 28.34/7.39  										| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.34/7.39  										| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  										|
% 28.34/7.39  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  									|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  									| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  									| (574)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_4_4) = v0)
% 28.34/7.39  									|
% 28.34/7.39  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (586), into two cases.
% 28.34/7.39  										|-Branch one:
% 28.34/7.39  										| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  										|
% 28.34/7.39  											| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.34/7.39  											| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  											|
% 28.34/7.39  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  										|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  										| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  										| (595)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_1_4_4, all_1_5_5) = v0)
% 28.34/7.39  										|
% 28.34/7.39  											| Instantiating formula (5) with all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3, 0, all_1_1_1 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = all_1_1_1, distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0, yields:
% 28.34/7.39  											| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  											|
% 28.34/7.39  											| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.34/7.39  											| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  											|
% 28.34/7.39  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  					|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  					| (598)  ~ (distinct_lines(all_1_5_5, all_1_3_3) = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  					| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  					|
% 28.34/7.39  						| Combining equations (78,1112) yields a new equation:
% 28.34/7.39  						| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  						|
% 28.34/7.39  						| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.34/7.39  						| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  						|
% 28.34/7.39  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  	|-Branch two:
% 28.34/7.39  	| (78) all_1_0_0 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  	| (573)  ~ (all_1_1_1 = 0)
% 28.34/7.39  	|
% 28.34/7.39  		| Combining equations (78,1112) yields a new equation:
% 28.34/7.39  		| (89) all_1_1_1 = 0
% 28.34/7.39  		|
% 28.34/7.39  		| Equations (89) can reduce 573 to:
% 28.34/7.39  		| (79) $false
% 28.34/7.39  		|
% 28.34/7.39  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 28.34/7.39  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 28.34/7.40  
% 28.34/7.40  6807ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------