TSTP Solution File: GEO192+2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO192+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : GEO192+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 16:21:20 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n016.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.37  Fri Jun 17 16:21:21 2022
% 0.21/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 28781.
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.21/0.37  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.21/0.37  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.44  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.44  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.44  number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.21/0.44  number of clauses initially in problem: 17
% 0.21/0.44  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 88
% 0.21/0.44  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.21/0.44  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.44  absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.21/0.44     distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.21/0.44     distinct function count: 2
% 0.21/0.44     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.44  
% 0.21/0.44  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.21/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  Model 3 [ 1 1 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.12 sec ----> 58 [binary,57.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 5.
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.21/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 0.21/0.54  2 [] {+} -distinct_lines(A,A).
% 0.21/0.54  3 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,A).
% 0.21/0.54  5 [] {+} -distinct_lines(A,B)|distinct_lines(A,C)|distinct_lines(B,C).
% 0.21/0.54  6 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)|convergent_lines(A,C)|convergent_lines(B,C).
% 0.21/0.54  9 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,A)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 0.21/0.54  10 [] {+} -convergent_lines(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(C,B)|distinct_points(C,intersection_point(A,B)).
% 0.21/0.54  13 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,C).
% 0.21/0.54  15 [] {+} -distinct_lines($c3,$c1)| -distinct_lines($c2,$c1).
% 0.21/0.54  16 [] {+} convergent_lines($c3,$c2).
% 0.21/0.54  17 [] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c1).
% 0.21/0.54  19 [hyper,16,6] {+} convergent_lines($c3,A)|convergent_lines($c2,A).
% 0.21/0.54  20 [hyper,17,13] {-} distinct_lines($c1,A)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),A).
% 0.21/0.54  22 [hyper,20,5] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),A)|distinct_lines($c1,B)|distinct_lines(A,B).
% 0.21/0.54  37 [hyper,22,15,22,unit_del,2,2] {-} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c2)|apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c3).
% 0.21/0.54  47 [hyper,37,10,19,unit_del,1,3] {+} apart_point_and_line(intersection_point($c3,$c2),$c3).
% 0.21/0.54  57 [hyper,47,9,16] {-} distinct_points(intersection_point($c3,$c2),intersection_point($c3,$c2)).
% 0.21/0.54  58 [binary,57.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.54  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  ============ end of search ============
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  true clauses given           4      (26.7%)
% 0.21/0.54  false clauses given         11
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.21/0.54     5  0         1
% 0.21/0.54     6  3         0
% 0.21/0.54     9  2         0
% 0.21/0.54    10  1         0
% 0.21/0.54    13  0         1
% 0.21/0.54    14  0         4
% 0.21/0.54    20  0         1
% 0.21/0.54    28  0         1
% 0.21/0.54  tot:  6         8      (57.1% true)
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  Model 3 [ 1 1 73 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  Process 28781 finished Fri Jun 17 16:21:21 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------