TSTP Solution File: GEO192+2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : GEO192+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:32:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 73 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 69 ( 30 ~; 26 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 0 sgn; 30 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(apart1,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.APQUvbfTYw/E---3.1_26562.p',apart1) ).
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X3)
=> ( distinct_lines(X1,X3)
& distinct_lines(X2,X3) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.APQUvbfTYw/E---3.1_26562.p',con) ).
fof(con2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( ( apart_point_and_line(X3,X1)
| apart_point_and_line(X3,X2) )
=> distinct_points(X3,intersection_point(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.APQUvbfTYw/E---3.1_26562.p',con2) ).
fof(ceq2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.APQUvbfTYw/E---3.1_26562.p',ceq2) ).
fof(apart2,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.APQUvbfTYw/E---3.1_26562.p',apart2) ).
fof(apart5,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( distinct_lines(X1,X3)
| distinct_lines(X2,X3) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.APQUvbfTYw/E---3.1_26562.p',apart5) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart1]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X3)
=> ( distinct_lines(X1,X3)
& distinct_lines(X2,X3) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X32] : ~ distinct_points(X32,X32),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X25,X26,X27] :
( ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X27,X25)
| distinct_points(X27,intersection_point(X25,X26))
| ~ convergent_lines(X25,X26) )
& ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X27,X26)
| distinct_points(X27,intersection_point(X25,X26))
| ~ convergent_lines(X25,X26) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[con2])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X17,X18,X19] :
( ~ apart_point_and_line(X17,X18)
| distinct_lines(X18,X19)
| apart_point_and_line(X17,X19) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)
& ( ~ distinct_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ distinct_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( distinct_points(X1,intersection_point(X3,X2))
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart2]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X10,X11,X12] :
( ~ distinct_lines(X10,X11)
| distinct_lines(X10,X12)
| distinct_lines(X11,X12) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[apart5])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1)
| distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( distinct_points(X1,intersection_point(X2,X3))
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| ~ convergent_lines(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X9] : ~ distinct_lines(X9,X9),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( distinct_lines(X1,X3)
| distinct_lines(X2,X3)
| ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(esk3_0,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ convergent_lines(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
~ distinct_lines(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(esk2_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(esk3_0,esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ distinct_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ distinct_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1)
| distinct_lines(esk1_0,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_lines(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : GEO192+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 06:26:52 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.APQUvbfTYw/E---3.1_26562.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # new_bool_1 with pid 26643 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 26645 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 13
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses : 15
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 15
% 0.20/0.49 # Processed clauses : 53
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...subsumed : 6
% 0.20/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.20/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # Generated clauses : 67
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 50
% 0.20/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Paramodulations : 57
% 0.20/0.49 # Factorizations : 10
% 0.20/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 19
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 30
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27
% 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 93
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 17
% 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 73
% 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 51
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1558
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------