TSTP Solution File: GEO192+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : GEO192+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:22:05 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 7.94s 1.78s
% Output : Proof 11.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : GEO192+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 22:07:46 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.50/0.61 ________ _____
% 0.50/0.61 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.50/0.61 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.50/0.61 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.50/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.50/0.61
% 0.50/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.50/0.61 (2023-06-19)
% 0.50/0.61
% 0.50/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.50/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.50/0.61 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.50/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.50/0.61
% 0.50/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.50/0.61
% 0.50/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.50/0.63 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.72/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.72/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.72/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.72/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.72/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.72/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.72/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.26/1.02 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.26/1.02 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.71/1.06 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.71/1.06 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.71/1.06 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.71/1.06 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.71/1.06 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 4.39/1.27 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 4.39/1.27 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.39/1.30 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.39/1.30 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 4.39/1.30 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.05/1.41 Prover 3: gave up
% 5.05/1.41 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 5.05/1.42 Prover 6: gave up
% 5.05/1.42 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 5.47/1.42 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.47/1.43 Prover 1: gave up
% 5.47/1.43 Prover 9: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1423531889
% 5.47/1.46 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 5.47/1.46 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 5.76/1.47 Prover 9: Preprocessing ...
% 5.76/1.47 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 5.76/1.51 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.76/1.52 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.30/1.55 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.30/1.56 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.59/1.61 Prover 8: gave up
% 6.59/1.63 Prover 9: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.59/1.63 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 7.13/1.67 Prover 7: gave up
% 7.31/1.68 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 7.31/1.70 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 7.31/1.71 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 7.76/1.74 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.76/1.75 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.94/1.78 Prover 0: proved (1152ms)
% 7.94/1.78
% 7.94/1.78 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.94/1.78
% 7.94/1.79 Prover 9: stopped
% 7.94/1.79 Prover 5: stopped
% 7.94/1.79 Prover 19: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 7.94/1.79 Prover 16: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 7.94/1.81 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 7.94/1.81 Prover 10: gave up
% 7.94/1.82 Prover 2: stopped
% 8.38/1.83 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 8.38/1.83 Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 8.38/1.84 Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 8.65/1.86 Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.65/1.87 Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.65/1.88 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.65/1.88 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.65/1.89 Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.65/1.89 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.65/1.89 Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.22/1.94 Prover 19: gave up
% 9.48/1.98 Prover 16: gave up
% 9.48/2.00 Prover 13: gave up
% 10.04/2.12 Prover 11: Found proof (size 89)
% 10.04/2.12 Prover 11: proved (439ms)
% 10.04/2.12 Prover 4: stopped
% 10.04/2.12
% 10.04/2.12 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.04/2.12
% 10.38/2.14 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 10.38/2.15 Assumptions after simplification:
% 10.38/2.15 ---------------------------------
% 10.38/2.15
% 10.38/2.15 (apart2)
% 10.60/2.17 ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0))
% 10.60/2.17
% 10.60/2.17 (apart5)
% 10.60/2.17 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: int] : ! [v4: int] : (v4 =
% 10.60/2.17 0 | v3 = 0 | ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) | ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) =
% 10.60/2.17 v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v5: int] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) &
% 10.60/2.18 distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 10.60/2.18 ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | ~
% 10.60/2.18 (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 10.60/2.18 distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : !
% 10.60/2.18 [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) | ~
% 10.60/2.18 (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 10.60/2.18 distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 10.60/2.18
% 10.60/2.18 (ceq2)
% 10.60/2.18 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: int] : ! [v4: int] : (v4 =
% 10.60/2.18 0 | v3 = 0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) | ~ (distinct_lines(v1,
% 10.60/2.18 v2) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v5: int] : ( ~ (v5 =
% 10.60/2.18 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] :
% 10.60/2.18 ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |
% 10.60/2.18 ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 10.60/2.18 distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : !
% 10.60/2.18 [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ~
% 10.60/2.18 (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 10.60/2.18 apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 10.60/2.18
% 10.60/2.18 (ci3)
% 10.60/2.18 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) =
% 10.60/2.18 v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v3: int] : ? [v4: int] : (( ~ (v4 = 0)
% 10.60/2.18 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 10.60/2.18 convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 10.60/2.18 (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: $i] : ?
% 10.60/2.19 [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 &
% 10.60/2.19 apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3 & $i(v2)))
% 10.60/2.19
% 10.60/2.19 (ci4)
% 10.60/2.19 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) =
% 10.60/2.19 v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v3: int] : ? [v4: int] : (( ~ (v4 = 0)
% 10.60/2.19 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 10.60/2.19 convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 10.60/2.19 (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: $i] : ?
% 10.60/2.19 [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 &
% 10.60/2.19 apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3 & $i(v2)))
% 10.60/2.19
% 10.60/2.19 (con)
% 10.60/2.19 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: int] : ? [v5:
% 10.60/2.19 int] : (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v3 & apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = 0 &
% 10.60/2.19 convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & (( ~ (v5
% 10.60/2.19 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) &
% 10.60/2.19 distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v4)))
% 10.60/2.19
% 10.60/2.19 (cu1)
% 10.60/2.21 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: int] : ! [v5:
% 10.60/2.21 int] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) | ~
% 10.60/2.21 (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) | ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | ~
% 10.60/2.21 $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] :
% 10.60/2.21 ? [v8: int] : ((v8 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v7 = 0 &
% 10.60/2.21 apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2,
% 10.60/2.21 v3) = v6))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] :
% 10.60/2.21 ! [v4: int] : ! [v5: int] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1,
% 10.60/2.21 v3) = v5) | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) | ~
% 10.60/2.21 (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0)
% 10.60/2.21 | ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ? [v8: int] : ((v8 = 0 &
% 10.60/2.21 apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v7 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0,
% 10.60/2.21 v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) & ! [v0:
% 10.60/2.21 $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: int] : ! [v5: int]
% 10.60/2.22 : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) | ~
% 10.60/2.22 (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~
% 10.60/2.22 $i(v0) | ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ? [v8: int] : ? [v9: int] : ((v9 =
% 10.60/2.22 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v8 = 0 &
% 10.60/2.22 apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2,
% 10.60/2.22 v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) & ! [v0:
% 10.60/2.22 $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: int] : ! [v5: int]
% 10.60/2.22 : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) | ~
% 10.60/2.22 (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~
% 10.60/2.22 $i(v0) | ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ? [v8: int] : ? [v9: int] : ((v9 =
% 10.60/2.22 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v8 = 0 &
% 10.60/2.22 apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2,
% 10.60/2.22 v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) & ! [v0:
% 10.60/2.22 $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: int] : ! [v5: int]
% 10.60/2.22 : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) | ~
% 10.60/2.22 (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) | ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | ~
% 10.60/2.22 $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] :
% 10.60/2.22 ? [v8: int] : ((v8 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v7 = 0 &
% 10.60/2.22 apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0,
% 10.60/2.22 v1) = v6))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] :
% 10.60/2.22 ! [v4: int] : ! [v5: int] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0,
% 10.60/2.22 v3) = v5) | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) | ~
% 10.60/2.22 (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~
% 10.60/2.22 $i(v0) | ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ? [v8: int] : ((v8 = 0 &
% 10.60/2.22 apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v7 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1,
% 10.60/2.22 v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) & ! [v0: $i]
% 10.60/2.22 : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |
% 10.60/2.22 ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~
% 10.60/2.22 $i(v0) | ? [v4: int] : ? [v5: int] : ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ((v7 =
% 10.60/2.22 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 &
% 10.60/2.22 apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0,
% 10.60/2.22 v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)))
% 10.60/2.22
% 10.60/2.22 (function-axioms)
% 10.60/2.22 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 10.60/2.22 (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &
% 10.60/2.22 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 10.60/2.22 (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) & !
% 10.60/2.22 [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3:
% 10.60/2.22 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 10.60/2.22 (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1:
% 10.60/2.22 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 10.60/2.22 (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) & !
% 10.60/2.22 [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3:
% 10.60/2.22 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (distinct_lines(v3,
% 10.60/2.22 v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :
% 10.60/2.22 ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 10.60/2.22 (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 10.60/2.22
% 10.60/2.22 Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 10.60/2.22 --------------------------------------------
% 10.60/2.22 apart1, apart3, apart4, ax6, ceq1, ceq3, ci1, ci2
% 10.60/2.22
% 10.60/2.22 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 10.60/2.22 ---------------------------------
% 10.60/2.22
% 10.60/2.22 Begin of proof
% 10.60/2.23 |
% 10.60/2.23 | ALPHA: (apart5) implies:
% 10.60/2.23 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~
% 10.60/2.23 | (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ~
% 10.60/2.23 | $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 10.60/2.23 |
% 10.60/2.23 | ALPHA: (ci3) implies:
% 10.60/2.23 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ~
% 10.60/2.23 | $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 10.60/2.23 | intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3
% 10.60/2.23 | & $i(v2)))
% 10.60/2.23 | (3) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0,
% 10.60/2.23 | v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v3: int] : ? [v4: int] :
% 10.60/2.23 | (( ~ (v4 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v4) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 10.60/2.23 | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 10.60/2.23 |
% 10.60/2.23 | ALPHA: (ci4) implies:
% 10.60/2.23 | (4) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ~
% 10.60/2.23 | $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 10.60/2.23 | intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3
% 10.60/2.23 | & $i(v2)))
% 10.60/2.23 | (5) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0,
% 10.60/2.23 | v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v3: int] : ? [v4: int] :
% 10.60/2.23 | (( ~ (v4 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 10.60/2.23 | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 10.60/2.23 |
% 10.60/2.23 | ALPHA: (cu1) implies:
% 10.60/2.23 | (6) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: int] :
% 10.60/2.23 | ! [v5: int] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5)
% 10.60/2.23 | | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~
% 10.60/2.23 | $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ? [v8: int] : ?
% 10.60/2.23 | [v9: int] : ((v9 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v8 = 0 &
% 10.60/2.23 | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &
% 10.60/2.23 | distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0,
% 10.60/2.23 | v1) = v6)))
% 10.60/2.24 | (7) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: int] :
% 10.60/2.24 | ! [v5: int] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5)
% 10.60/2.24 | | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~
% 10.60/2.24 | $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v6: int] : ? [v7: int] : ? [v8: int] : ?
% 10.60/2.24 | [v9: int] : ((v9 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v8 = 0 &
% 10.60/2.24 | apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v7 = 0) &
% 10.60/2.24 | distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v7) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0,
% 10.60/2.24 | v1) = v6)))
% 10.60/2.24 |
% 10.60/2.24 | ALPHA: (ceq2) implies:
% 10.60/2.24 | (8) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~
% 10.60/2.24 | (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0,
% 10.60/2.24 | v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | distinct_lines(v1,
% 10.60/2.24 | v2) = 0)
% 10.60/2.24 |
% 10.60/2.24 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 10.60/2.24 | (9) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 10.60/2.24 | ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 10.60/2.24 | (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 10.60/2.24 | (10) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i]
% 10.60/2.24 | : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) | ~
% 10.60/2.24 | (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 10.60/2.24 | (11) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~
% 10.60/2.24 | (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) =
% 10.60/2.24 | v0))
% 10.60/2.24 |
% 10.60/2.24 | DELTA: instantiating (con) with fresh symbols all_17_0, all_17_1, all_17_2,
% 10.60/2.24 | all_17_3, all_17_4, all_17_5 gives:
% 10.60/2.24 | (12) intersection_point(all_17_5, all_17_4) = all_17_2 &
% 10.60/2.24 | apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_3) = 0 &
% 10.60/2.24 | convergent_lines(all_17_5, all_17_4) = 0 & $i(all_17_2) & $i(all_17_3)
% 10.60/2.24 | & $i(all_17_4) & $i(all_17_5) & (( ~ (all_17_0 = 0) &
% 10.60/2.24 | distinct_lines(all_17_4, all_17_3) = all_17_0) | ( ~ (all_17_1 =
% 10.60/2.24 | 0) & distinct_lines(all_17_5, all_17_3) = all_17_1))
% 10.60/2.24 |
% 10.60/2.24 | ALPHA: (12) implies:
% 10.60/2.24 | (13) $i(all_17_5)
% 10.60/2.24 | (14) $i(all_17_4)
% 10.60/2.24 | (15) $i(all_17_3)
% 10.60/2.24 | (16) convergent_lines(all_17_5, all_17_4) = 0
% 10.60/2.24 | (17) apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_3) = 0
% 10.60/2.24 | (18) intersection_point(all_17_5, all_17_4) = all_17_2
% 10.60/2.24 | (19) ( ~ (all_17_0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_17_4, all_17_3) = all_17_0) |
% 10.60/2.24 | ( ~ (all_17_1 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_17_5, all_17_3) = all_17_1)
% 10.60/2.24 |
% 10.97/2.24 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_17_5, all_17_4, simplifying with (13),
% 10.97/2.24 | (14), (16) gives:
% 10.97/2.24 | (20) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 10.97/2.24 | intersection_point(all_17_5, all_17_4) = v0 &
% 10.97/2.24 | apart_point_and_line(v0, all_17_4) = v1 & $i(v0))
% 10.97/2.24 |
% 10.97/2.24 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_17_5, all_17_4, simplifying with (13),
% 10.97/2.24 | (14), (16) gives:
% 10.97/2.24 | (21) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 10.97/2.24 | intersection_point(all_17_5, all_17_4) = v0 &
% 10.97/2.24 | apart_point_and_line(v0, all_17_5) = v1 & $i(v0))
% 10.97/2.24 |
% 10.97/2.25 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_17_5, all_17_4, all_17_2, simplifying
% 10.97/2.25 | with (13), (14), (18) gives:
% 10.97/2.25 | (22) ? [v0: int] : ? [v1: int] : (( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 10.97/2.25 | apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_4) = v1) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 10.97/2.25 | convergent_lines(all_17_5, all_17_4) = v0))
% 10.97/2.25 |
% 10.97/2.25 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_17_5, all_17_4, all_17_2, simplifying
% 10.97/2.25 | with (13), (14), (18) gives:
% 10.97/2.25 | (23) ? [v0: int] : ? [v1: int] : (( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 10.97/2.25 | apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_5) = v1) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 10.97/2.25 | convergent_lines(all_17_5, all_17_4) = v0))
% 10.97/2.25 |
% 10.97/2.25 | DELTA: instantiating (23) with fresh symbols all_24_0, all_24_1 gives:
% 10.97/2.25 | (24) ( ~ (all_24_0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_5) =
% 10.97/2.25 | all_24_0) | ( ~ (all_24_1 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_17_5,
% 10.97/2.25 | all_17_4) = all_24_1)
% 10.97/2.25 |
% 10.97/2.25 | DELTA: instantiating (22) with fresh symbols all_25_0, all_25_1 gives:
% 10.97/2.25 | (25) ( ~ (all_25_0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_4) =
% 10.97/2.25 | all_25_0) | ( ~ (all_25_1 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_17_5,
% 10.97/2.25 | all_17_4) = all_25_1)
% 10.97/2.25 |
% 10.97/2.25 | DELTA: instantiating (21) with fresh symbols all_26_0, all_26_1 gives:
% 10.97/2.25 | (26) ~ (all_26_0 = 0) & intersection_point(all_17_5, all_17_4) = all_26_1
% 10.97/2.25 | & apart_point_and_line(all_26_1, all_17_5) = all_26_0 & $i(all_26_1)
% 10.97/2.25 |
% 10.97/2.25 | ALPHA: (26) implies:
% 10.97/2.25 | (27) ~ (all_26_0 = 0)
% 10.97/2.25 | (28) $i(all_26_1)
% 10.97/2.25 | (29) apart_point_and_line(all_26_1, all_17_5) = all_26_0
% 10.97/2.25 | (30) intersection_point(all_17_5, all_17_4) = all_26_1
% 10.97/2.25 |
% 10.97/2.25 | DELTA: instantiating (20) with fresh symbols all_28_0, all_28_1 gives:
% 10.97/2.25 | (31) ~ (all_28_0 = 0) & intersection_point(all_17_5, all_17_4) = all_28_1
% 10.97/2.25 | & apart_point_and_line(all_28_1, all_17_4) = all_28_0 & $i(all_28_1)
% 10.97/2.25 |
% 10.97/2.25 | ALPHA: (31) implies:
% 10.97/2.25 | (32) ~ (all_28_0 = 0)
% 10.97/2.25 | (33) apart_point_and_line(all_28_1, all_17_4) = all_28_0
% 10.97/2.25 | (34) intersection_point(all_17_5, all_17_4) = all_28_1
% 10.97/2.25 |
% 10.97/2.25 | BETA: splitting (24) gives:
% 10.97/2.25 |
% 10.97/2.25 | Case 1:
% 10.97/2.25 | |
% 10.97/2.25 | | (35) ~ (all_24_0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_5) =
% 10.97/2.25 | | all_24_0
% 10.97/2.25 | |
% 10.97/2.25 | | ALPHA: (35) implies:
% 10.97/2.25 | | (36) apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_5) = all_24_0
% 10.97/2.25 | |
% 10.97/2.25 | | BETA: splitting (25) gives:
% 10.97/2.25 | |
% 10.97/2.25 | | Case 1:
% 10.97/2.25 | | |
% 10.97/2.25 | | | (37) ~ (all_25_0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_4) =
% 10.97/2.25 | | | all_25_0
% 10.97/2.25 | | |
% 10.97/2.25 | | | ALPHA: (37) implies:
% 10.97/2.25 | | | (38) apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_4) = all_25_0
% 10.97/2.25 | | |
% 10.97/2.25 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_17_2, all_28_1, all_17_4,
% 10.97/2.25 | | | all_17_5, simplifying with (18), (34) gives:
% 10.97/2.25 | | | (39) all_28_1 = all_17_2
% 10.97/2.25 | | |
% 10.97/2.25 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (11) with all_26_1, all_28_1, all_17_4,
% 10.97/2.25 | | | all_17_5, simplifying with (30), (34) gives:
% 10.97/2.25 | | | (40) all_28_1 = all_26_1
% 10.97/2.25 | | |
% 10.97/2.25 | | | COMBINE_EQS: (39), (40) imply:
% 10.97/2.25 | | | (41) all_26_1 = all_17_2
% 10.97/2.25 | | |
% 10.97/2.25 | | | REDUCE: (33), (39) imply:
% 10.97/2.25 | | | (42) apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_4) = all_28_0
% 10.97/2.25 | | |
% 10.97/2.25 | | | REDUCE: (29), (41) imply:
% 10.97/2.25 | | | (43) apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_5) = all_26_0
% 10.97/2.26 | | |
% 10.97/2.26 | | | REDUCE: (28), (41) imply:
% 10.97/2.26 | | | (44) $i(all_17_2)
% 10.97/2.26 | | |
% 10.97/2.26 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_24_0, all_26_0, all_17_5,
% 10.97/2.26 | | | all_17_2, simplifying with (36), (43) gives:
% 10.97/2.26 | | | (45) all_26_0 = all_24_0
% 10.97/2.26 | | |
% 10.97/2.26 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with all_25_0, all_28_0, all_17_4,
% 10.97/2.26 | | | all_17_2, simplifying with (38), (42) gives:
% 10.97/2.26 | | | (46) all_28_0 = all_25_0
% 10.97/2.26 | | |
% 10.97/2.26 | | | REDUCE: (32), (46) imply:
% 10.97/2.26 | | | (47) ~ (all_25_0 = 0)
% 10.97/2.26 | | |
% 10.97/2.26 | | | REDUCE: (27), (45) imply:
% 10.97/2.26 | | | (48) ~ (all_24_0 = 0)
% 10.97/2.26 | | |
% 10.97/2.26 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_17_2, all_17_3, all_17_5,
% 10.97/2.26 | | | all_24_0, simplifying with (13), (15), (17), (36), (44)
% 10.97/2.26 | | | gives:
% 10.97/2.26 | | | (49) all_24_0 = 0 | distinct_lines(all_17_3, all_17_5) = 0
% 10.97/2.26 | | |
% 10.97/2.26 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_17_2, all_17_3, all_17_4,
% 10.97/2.26 | | | all_25_0, simplifying with (14), (15), (17), (38), (44)
% 10.97/2.26 | | | gives:
% 10.97/2.26 | | | (50) all_25_0 = 0 | distinct_lines(all_17_3, all_17_4) = 0
% 10.97/2.26 | | |
% 10.97/2.26 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_17_2, all_17_2, all_17_4,
% 10.97/2.26 | | | all_17_5, all_25_0, all_24_0, simplifying with (13), (14),
% 10.97/2.26 | | | (36), (38), (44) gives:
% 10.97/2.26 | | | (51) all_25_0 = 0 | all_24_0 = 0 | ? [v0: int] : ? [v1: int] : ?
% 10.97/2.26 | | | [v2: int] : ? [v3: int] : ((v3 = 0 &
% 10.97/2.26 | | | apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_4) = 0) | (v2 = 0 &
% 10.97/2.26 | | | apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 10.97/2.26 | | | distinct_lines(all_17_4, all_17_5) = v1) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 10.97/2.26 | | | distinct_points(all_17_2, all_17_2) = v0))
% 10.97/2.26 | | |
% 10.97/2.26 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_17_2, all_17_2, all_17_4,
% 10.97/2.26 | | | all_17_5, all_24_0, all_25_0, simplifying with (13), (14),
% 10.97/2.26 | | | (36), (38), (44) gives:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | (52) all_25_0 = 0 | all_24_0 = 0 | ? [v0: int] : ? [v1: int] : ?
% 10.97/2.27 | | | [v2: int] : ? [v3: int] : ((v3 = 0 &
% 10.97/2.27 | | | apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_5) = 0) | (v2 = 0 &
% 10.97/2.27 | | | apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_4) = 0) | ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 10.97/2.27 | | | distinct_lines(all_17_4, all_17_5) = v1) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 10.97/2.27 | | | distinct_points(all_17_2, all_17_2) = v0))
% 10.97/2.27 | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | BETA: splitting (19) gives:
% 10.97/2.27 | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | Case 1:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | (53) ~ (all_17_0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_17_4, all_17_3) =
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | all_17_0
% 10.97/2.27 | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | ALPHA: (53) implies:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | (54) ~ (all_17_0 = 0)
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | (55) distinct_lines(all_17_4, all_17_3) = all_17_0
% 10.97/2.27 | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | BETA: splitting (50) gives:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | Case 1:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | (56) distinct_lines(all_17_3, all_17_4) = 0
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | BETA: splitting (52) gives:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | Case 1:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | (57) all_25_0 = 0
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | REDUCE: (47), (57) imply:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | (58) $false
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | CLOSE: (58) is inconsistent.
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | Case 2:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | (59) all_24_0 = 0 | ? [v0: int] : ? [v1: int] : ? [v2: int] :
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | ? [v3: int] : ((v3 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_17_2,
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | all_17_5) = 0) | (v2 = 0 &
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_4) = 0) | ( ~ (v1
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | = 0) & distinct_lines(all_17_4, all_17_5) = v1) | ( ~
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_17_2, all_17_2) = v0))
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | BETA: splitting (59) gives:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | Case 1:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | (60) all_24_0 = 0
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | REDUCE: (48), (60) imply:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | (61) $false
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | CLOSE: (61) is inconsistent.
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | Case 2:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_17_3, all_17_4, all_17_3,
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | all_17_0, simplifying with (14), (15), (55), (56)
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | gives:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | (62) all_17_0 = 0 | distinct_lines(all_17_3, all_17_3) = 0
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (62) gives:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | | (63) distinct_lines(all_17_3, all_17_3) = 0
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (apart2) with all_17_3, simplifying
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | | with (15), (63) gives:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | | (64) $false
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (64) is inconsistent.
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | | (65) all_17_0 = 0
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (54), (65) imply:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | | (66) $false
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (66) is inconsistent.
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | | End of split
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | | End of split
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | End of split
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | Case 2:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | (67) all_25_0 = 0
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | REDUCE: (47), (67) imply:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | (68) $false
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | | CLOSE: (68) is inconsistent.
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | End of split
% 10.97/2.27 | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | Case 2:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | (69) ~ (all_17_1 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_17_5, all_17_3) =
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | all_17_1
% 10.97/2.27 | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | ALPHA: (69) implies:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | (70) ~ (all_17_1 = 0)
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | (71) distinct_lines(all_17_5, all_17_3) = all_17_1
% 10.97/2.27 | | | |
% 10.97/2.27 | | | | BETA: splitting (49) gives:
% 10.97/2.27 | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | Case 1:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | (72) distinct_lines(all_17_3, all_17_5) = 0
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | BETA: splitting (51) gives:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | Case 1:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | (73) all_25_0 = 0
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | REDUCE: (47), (73) imply:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | (74) $false
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | CLOSE: (74) is inconsistent.
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | Case 2:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | (75) all_24_0 = 0 | ? [v0: int] : ? [v1: int] : ? [v2: int] :
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | ? [v3: int] : ((v3 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_17_2,
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | all_17_4) = 0) | (v2 = 0 &
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | apart_point_and_line(all_17_2, all_17_5) = 0) | ( ~ (v1
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | = 0) & distinct_lines(all_17_4, all_17_5) = v1) | ( ~
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_17_2, all_17_2) = v0))
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | BETA: splitting (75) gives:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | Case 1:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | (76) all_24_0 = 0
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | REDUCE: (48), (76) imply:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | (77) $false
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | CLOSE: (77) is inconsistent.
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | Case 2:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_17_3, all_17_5, all_17_3,
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | all_17_1, simplifying with (13), (15), (71), (72)
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | gives:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | (78) all_17_1 = 0 | distinct_lines(all_17_3, all_17_3) = 0
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (78) gives:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | | (79) distinct_lines(all_17_3, all_17_3) = 0
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (apart2) with all_17_3, simplifying
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | | with (15), (79) gives:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | | (80) $false
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (80) is inconsistent.
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | | (81) all_17_1 = 0
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (70), (81) imply:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | | (82) $false
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (82) is inconsistent.
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | | End of split
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | | End of split
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | End of split
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | Case 2:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | (83) all_24_0 = 0
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | REDUCE: (48), (83) imply:
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | (84) $false
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | | CLOSE: (84) is inconsistent.
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | | End of split
% 10.97/2.28 | | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | | End of split
% 10.97/2.28 | | |
% 10.97/2.28 | | Case 2:
% 10.97/2.28 | | |
% 11.15/2.28 | | | (85) ~ (all_25_1 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_17_5, all_17_4) =
% 11.15/2.28 | | | all_25_1
% 11.15/2.28 | | |
% 11.15/2.28 | | | ALPHA: (85) implies:
% 11.15/2.28 | | | (86) ~ (all_25_1 = 0)
% 11.15/2.28 | | | (87) convergent_lines(all_17_5, all_17_4) = all_25_1
% 11.15/2.28 | | |
% 11.15/2.28 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with 0, all_25_1, all_17_4, all_17_5,
% 11.15/2.28 | | | simplifying with (16), (87) gives:
% 11.15/2.28 | | | (88) all_25_1 = 0
% 11.15/2.28 | | |
% 11.15/2.28 | | | REDUCE: (86), (88) imply:
% 11.15/2.28 | | | (89) $false
% 11.15/2.28 | | |
% 11.15/2.28 | | | CLOSE: (89) is inconsistent.
% 11.15/2.28 | | |
% 11.15/2.28 | | End of split
% 11.15/2.28 | |
% 11.15/2.28 | Case 2:
% 11.15/2.28 | |
% 11.15/2.28 | | (90) ~ (all_24_1 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_17_5, all_17_4) = all_24_1
% 11.15/2.28 | |
% 11.15/2.28 | | ALPHA: (90) implies:
% 11.15/2.28 | | (91) ~ (all_24_1 = 0)
% 11.15/2.28 | | (92) convergent_lines(all_17_5, all_17_4) = all_24_1
% 11.15/2.28 | |
% 11.15/2.28 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with 0, all_24_1, all_17_4, all_17_5,
% 11.15/2.28 | | simplifying with (16), (92) gives:
% 11.15/2.28 | | (93) all_24_1 = 0
% 11.15/2.28 | |
% 11.15/2.28 | | REDUCE: (91), (93) imply:
% 11.15/2.28 | | (94) $false
% 11.15/2.28 | |
% 11.15/2.28 | | CLOSE: (94) is inconsistent.
% 11.15/2.28 | |
% 11.15/2.28 | End of split
% 11.15/2.28 |
% 11.15/2.28 End of proof
% 11.15/2.28 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 11.15/2.28
% 11.15/2.28 1670ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------