TSTP Solution File: GEO192+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : GEO192+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:43:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.52s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO192+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 21:52:41 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.65  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.52/0.65  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.65  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.52/0.65  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.52/0.65  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.52/0.65  
% 0.52/0.65  % Result      :Theorem 0.030000s
% 0.52/0.65  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.030000s
% 0.52/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.65  % File     : GEO192+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.52/0.65  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.52/0.65  % Problem  : Lemma on symmetry and apartness
% 0.52/0.65  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 0.52/0.65  % English  : If the lines X and Y are convergent, and the intersection
% 0.52/0.65  %            point of X and Y is apart from a line Z, then Z is distinct
% 0.52/0.65  %            from X and Y.
% 0.52/0.65  
% 0.52/0.65  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.52/0.65  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.52/0.65  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 0.52/0.65  % Names    : Lemma 4.9 [vPl95]
% 0.52/0.65  
% 0.52/0.65  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.52/0.65  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.13 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.11 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.52/0.65  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Number of connectives :   31 (   7   ~;   9   |;   2   &)
% 0.52/0.65  %                                         (   0 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.65  %            Number of variables   :   36 (  36   !;   0   ?)
% 0.52/0.65  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.52/0.65  
% 0.52/0.65  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.52/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.65  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.52/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.65  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.52/0.65      ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.52/0.65        ( convergent_lines(X,Y)
% 0.52/0.65       => ( apart_point_and_line(intersection_point(X,Y),Z)
% 0.52/0.65         => ( distinct_lines(X,Z)
% 0.52/0.65            & distinct_lines(Y,Z) ) ) ) ).
% 0.52/0.65  
% 0.52/0.65  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.65  % Proof found
% 0.52/0.65  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.65  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.52/0.65  %ClaNum:17(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.52/0.65  %VarNum:74(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 0.52/0.65  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.52/0.65  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.52/0.65  %SharedTerms:8
% 0.52/0.65  %goalClause: 1 2 6
% 0.52/0.65  %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 0.52/0.65  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.52/0.65  [2]P2(f3(a1,a2),a4)
% 0.52/0.65  [3]~P3(x31,x31)
% 0.52/0.65  [4]~P4(x41,x41)
% 0.52/0.65  [5]~P1(x51,x51)
% 0.52/0.65  [6]~P4(a1,a4)+~P4(a2,a4)
% 0.52/0.65  [13]~P3(x131,x132)+~P2(x132,f5(x131,x132))
% 0.52/0.65  [14]~P3(x141,x142)+~P2(x141,f5(x141,x142))
% 0.52/0.65  [15]~P1(x151,x152)+~P2(f3(x151,x152),x152)
% 0.52/0.65  [16]~P1(x161,x162)+~P2(f3(x161,x162),x161)
% 0.52/0.65  [7]~P3(x73,x71)+P3(x71,x72)+P3(x73,x72)
% 0.52/0.65  [8]~P2(x81,x83)+P3(x81,x82)+P2(x82,x83)
% 0.52/0.65  [9]~P4(x93,x91)+P4(x91,x92)+P4(x93,x92)
% 0.52/0.65  [10]~P1(x103,x101)+P4(x101,x102)+P1(x103,x102)
% 0.52/0.65  [11]~P2(x113,x111)+P4(x111,x112)+P2(x113,x112)
% 0.52/0.65  [12]~P1(x123,x121)+P1(x121,x122)+P1(x123,x122)
% 0.52/0.65  [17]P2(x174,x173)+~P3(x174,x171)+~P4(x173,x172)+P2(x171,x172)+P2(x171,x173)+P2(x174,x172)
% 0.52/0.65  %EqnAxiom
% 0.52/0.65  
% 0.52/0.65  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.66  cnf(19,plain,
% 0.52/0.66     (~P1(x191,x191)),
% 0.52/0.66     inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 0.52/0.66  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.52/0.66     (~P2(f3(a1,a2),a1)),
% 0.52/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,5,19,12,10,9,16])).
% 0.52/0.66  cnf(28,plain,
% 0.52/0.66     (~P2(f3(a1,a2),a2)),
% 0.52/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,5,19,12,10,9,16,15])).
% 0.52/0.66  cnf(30,plain,
% 0.52/0.66     (P4(a4,a1)),
% 0.52/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,26,11])).
% 0.52/0.66  cnf(41,plain,
% 0.52/0.66     (P4(a4,a2)),
% 0.52/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,2,11])).
% 0.52/0.66  cnf(52,plain,
% 0.52/0.66     (P4(a1,a4)),
% 0.52/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[30,4,9])).
% 0.52/0.66  cnf(55,plain,
% 0.52/0.66     (~P4(a2,a4)),
% 0.52/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[52,6])).
% 0.52/0.66  cnf(60,plain,
% 0.52/0.66     ($false),
% 0.52/0.66     inference(scs_inference,[],[41,55,4,1,10,9]),
% 0.52/0.66     ['proof']).
% 0.52/0.66  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.52/0.66  % Total time :0.030000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------