TSTP Solution File: GEO191+3 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : GEO191+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:48:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 22.74s 6.73s
% Output   : Proof 71.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : GEO191+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 06:04:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.53/0.60          ____       _                          
% 0.53/0.60    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.53/0.60   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.53/0.60  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.53/0.60  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.53/0.60  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.53/0.60  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.53/0.60  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.53/0.60  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.53/0.60  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.53/0.60  
% 0.53/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.70/0.65  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.85/0.99  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.51/1.22  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.68/1.25  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.13/5.94  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 19.41/5.98  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 19.78/6.13  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 20.28/6.19  Prover 1: gave up
% 20.28/6.20  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 20.58/6.23  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 21.35/6.39  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 21.35/6.40  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.74/6.73  Prover 2: proved (533ms)
% 22.74/6.73  Prover 0: stopped
% 22.74/6.73  
% 22.74/6.73  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 22.74/6.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 22.74/6.73  
% 22.74/6.73  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 70.31/33.01  found it (size 962)
% 70.31/33.01  
% 70.31/33.01  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 70.31/33.01  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 70.31/33.01  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ( ~ (v9 = 0) &  ~ (v8 = 0) & intersection_point(v2, v3) = v7 & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v4 & apart_point_and_line(v7, v1) = v9 & apart_point_and_line(v7, v0) = v8 & convergent_lines(v2, v3) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v12, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v12, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v12, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v12, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v12, v13) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = v14) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v12, v13) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 | v14 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = v15) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ((v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v16 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v16 = 0) & distinct_lines(v12, v13) = v16))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : (v14 = 0 | v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ( ~ (v15 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v15)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] :  ! [v14] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v14) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v15 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v15) | ( ~ (v15 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v15))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_points(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) | apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) | apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) | convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_lines(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_points(v10, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) | distinct_points(v11, v12) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (parallel_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (equal_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (equal_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (equal_points(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (equal_points(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (intersection_point(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (intersection_point(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (line_connecting(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (line_connecting(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (distinct_points(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (distinct_points(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v12) = v13) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v15 = 0 & v14 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v11, v12) = 0 & convergent_lines(v11, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & v13 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v14 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v14))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v12, v13) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v14] : ((v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v13) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v13) = 0) | (v14 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = 0))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v12) | apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (equal_points(v10, v11) = v12) | distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | orthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v12) | incident_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | parallel_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v12) | equal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = v12) | equal_points(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (point(v12) = v11) |  ~ (point(v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (line(v12) = v11) |  ~ (line(v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v11, v10) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v12, v11) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v11, v10) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & line(v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & point(v11) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line(v10) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v11, v10) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v11, v10) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v12, v11) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & line(v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & point(v11) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line(v10) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & point(v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line(v11) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line(v10) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v12, v10) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & line(v12) = 0) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & point(v11) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & point(v10) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] : (( ~ (v13 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13) | ( ~ (v13 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v13))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (orthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (incident_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (parallel_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & convergent_lines(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (equal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & distinct_lines(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (equal_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & distinct_points(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & orthogonal_lines(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v12, v11) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v12, v10) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & point(v12) = 0 & intersection_point(v10, v11) = v12) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & line(v11) = v12) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & line(v10) = v12))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & parallel_lines(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) | convergent_lines(v10, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & equal_lines(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v11, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v13 = 0) & line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12 & apart_point_and_line(v10, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ((v13 = 0 & line(v12) = 0 & line_connecting(v10, v11) = v12) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & point(v11) = v12) | ( ~ (v12 = 0) & point(v10) = v12))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & equal_points(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v10, v10) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v10, v10) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ~ (distinct_points(v10, v10) = 0) &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : orthogonal_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : incident_point_and_line(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : parallel_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : equal_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : equal_points(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : orthogonal_through_point(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : unorthogonal_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : parallel_through_point(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : intersection_point(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : line_connecting(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : apart_point_and_line(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : convergent_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : distinct_lines(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : distinct_points(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : point(v10) = v11 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : line(v10) = v11 & ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v4, v3) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v4, v2) = 0)))
% 70.40/33.10  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 yields:
% 70.40/33.10  | (1)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2 & intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_5_5 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (equal_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (equal_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_points(v0, v1) = v2) | distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2) | incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | parallel_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | equal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = v2) | equal_points(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (point(v2) = v1) |  ~ (point(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line(v2) = v1) |  ~ (line(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & point(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (parallel_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (equal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (equal_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & point(v2) = 0 & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & line(v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & line(v0) = v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & parallel_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & equal_lines(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & point(v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & point(v0) = v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & equal_points(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : incident_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : equal_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : equal_points(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : unorthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : intersection_point(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : line_connecting(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : apart_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : convergent_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_lines(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_points(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : point(v0) = v1 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : line(v0) = v1 & ((all_0_3_3 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0))
% 70.88/33.14  |
% 70.88/33.14  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 70.88/33.14  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 70.88/33.15  | (3)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 70.88/33.15  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 70.88/33.15  | (5)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : convergent_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.15  | (6)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : incident_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.15  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 70.88/33.15  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (equal_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.15  | (9)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.15  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 70.88/33.15  | (11) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0
% 70.88/33.15  | (12)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 70.88/33.15  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.15  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 70.88/33.15  | (15)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.15  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3))
% 70.88/33.15  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.15  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)))
% 70.88/33.15  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (point(v2) = v1) |  ~ (point(v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.15  | (20)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.15  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.15  | (22)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : orthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.15  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v5))
% 70.88/33.15  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)))
% 70.88/33.15  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v3))
% 70.88/33.15  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.15  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 70.88/33.15  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0 & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & point(v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & point(v0) = v2)))
% 70.88/33.15  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 70.88/33.15  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 70.88/33.15  | (31)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : point(v0) = v1
% 70.88/33.15  | (32) intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2
% 70.88/33.15  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.16  | (34)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 70.88/33.16  | (35) (all_0_3_3 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (all_0_4_4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0)
% 70.88/33.16  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 70.88/33.16  | (37)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v5))
% 70.88/33.16  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] : ((v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)))
% 70.88/33.16  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.16  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 70.88/33.16  | (41)  ! [v0] :  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0)
% 70.88/33.16  | (42) convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 70.88/33.16  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6)))
% 70.88/33.16  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & point(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 70.88/33.16  | (45)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 70.88/33.16  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 70.88/33.16  | (47)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v6)))
% 70.88/33.16  | (48)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & parallel_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 70.88/33.16  | (49)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (parallel_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 70.88/33.16  | (50)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | equal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.16  | (51)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.16  | (52)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : line(v0) = v1
% 70.88/33.16  | (53)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_points(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.16  | (54) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1
% 70.88/33.16  | (55)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 70.88/33.16  | (56)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : distinct_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.16  | (57)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : equal_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.16  | (58)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line(v2) = v1) |  ~ (line(v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.16  | (59)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.16  | (60) intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_5_5
% 70.88/33.16  | (61)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6)))
% 70.88/33.17  | (62)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 70.88/33.17  | (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 70.88/33.17  | (64)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 70.88/33.17  | (65)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.17  | (66)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.17  | (67) convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 70.88/33.17  | (68)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.17  | (69)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.17  | (70)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3)))
% 70.88/33.17  | (71)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.17  | (72)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : apart_point_and_line(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.17  | (73)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.17  | (74)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 70.88/33.17  | (75)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.17  | (76)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.17  | (77)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v3))
% 70.88/33.17  | (78)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & equal_points(v0, v1) = v2))
% 70.88/33.17  | (79)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (equal_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v2))
% 70.88/33.17  | (80)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.17  | (81)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.17  | (82)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.17  | (83)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : line_connecting(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.17  | (84)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 70.88/33.17  | (85)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.17  | (86)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 70.88/33.17  | (87)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (orthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 70.88/33.17  | (88)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5))
% 70.88/33.17  | (89)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.17  | (90)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 70.88/33.18  | (91)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (92)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & convergent_lines(v2, v1) = v3))
% 70.88/33.18  | (93)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (94)  ! [v0] :  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v0) = 0)
% 70.88/33.18  | (95)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (96)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 70.88/33.18  | (97)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.18  | (98)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (99)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (100)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (101)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (102)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (103)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (104)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (105)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : parallel_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.18  | (106)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3))
% 70.88/33.18  | (107)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & equal_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 70.88/33.18  | (108)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (equal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & distinct_lines(v0, v1) = v2))
% 70.88/33.18  | (109)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (parallel_through_point(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & line(v0) = v3)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (110)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v0, v2) = 0)
% 70.88/33.18  | (111)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (112)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (113)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = v2) | equal_points(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.18  | (114)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (equal_points(v0, v1) = v2) | distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.18  | (115)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (116)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2) | incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.18  | (117)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.18  | (118)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v5)))
% 70.88/33.18  | (119)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0)
% 70.88/33.18  | (120)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.18  | (121)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.18  | (122)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v2, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.18  | (123)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0)
% 70.88/33.18  | (124)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : intersection_point(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.18  | (125)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_through_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  | (126)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  | (127)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  | (128)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (equal_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (equal_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  | (129)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2))
% 70.88/33.19  | (130)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (incident_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = v2))
% 70.88/33.19  | (131)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | parallel_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.19  | (132)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v0, v1) = v2) | convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0)
% 70.88/33.19  | (133)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : equal_points(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.19  | (134)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = v5) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v5)))
% 70.88/33.19  | (135)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (parallel_lines(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (parallel_lines(v3, v2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  | (136)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.19  | (137)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 | v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v1, v2) = v4) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ? [v5] : ( ~ (v5 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v5))
% 70.88/33.19  | (138)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & point(v2) = 0 & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & line(v1) = v2) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & line(v0) = v2)))
% 70.88/33.19  | (139)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5) |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v4) |  ? [v6] : ((v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = 0) | (v6 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_lines(v2, v3) = v6) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v6)))
% 70.88/33.19  | (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 70.88/33.19  | (141)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & intersection_point(v0, v1) = v2 & apart_point_and_line(v2, v0) = v3))
% 70.88/33.19  | (142)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.19  | (143)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (unorthogonal_lines(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 & unorthogonal_lines(v1, v2) = 0 & convergent_lines(v1, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & convergent_lines(v0, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & convergent_lines(v0, v1) = v4)))
% 70.88/33.19  | (144)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (orthogonal_through_point(v1, v0) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) & unorthogonal_lines(v2, v1) = v3))
% 70.88/33.19  | (145)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : unorthogonal_lines(v1, v0) = v2
% 70.88/33.19  | (146)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0)
% 70.88/33.19  | (147)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] : ((v3 = 0 & line(v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v1) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & point(v0) = v3) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & distinct_points(v0, v1) = v3)))
% 70.88/33.19  | (148)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | distinct_points(v1, v2) = 0)
% 70.88/33.19  |
% 70.88/33.19  | Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 70.88/33.19  | (149)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  |
% 70.88/33.19  | Instantiating formula (45) with all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 70.88/33.19  | (150)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  |
% 70.88/33.19  | Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 70.88/33.19  | (151)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  |
% 70.88/33.19  | Instantiating formula (45) with all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 70.88/33.19  | (152)  ? [v0] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  |
% 70.88/33.19  | Instantiating formula (101) with all_0_0_0, all_0_0_0, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 70.88/33.19  | (153) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  |
% 70.88/33.19  | Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_0_0, all_0_0_0, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 70.88/33.19  | (154) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  |
% 70.88/33.19  | Instantiating formula (101) with all_0_1_1, all_0_0_0, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 70.88/33.19  | (155) all_0_0_0 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  |
% 70.88/33.19  | Instantiating formula (101) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 70.88/33.19  | (156) all_0_0_0 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  |
% 70.88/33.19  | Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_1_1, all_0_0_0, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 70.88/33.19  | (157) all_0_0_0 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  |
% 70.88/33.19  | Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 70.88/33.19  | (158) all_0_0_0 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 70.88/33.19  |
% 70.88/33.19  | Instantiating formula (101) with all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.24/33.19  | (159) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_1_1, all_0_1_1, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (160) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating formula (25) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (161)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_0_6_6) = v1)
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating formula (141) with all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (162)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_0_7_7) = v1)
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating formula (25) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (163)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_0_8_8) = v1)
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating formula (141) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (164)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0 & apart_point_and_line(v0, all_0_9_9) = v1)
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating (164) with all_43_0_59, all_43_1_60 yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (165)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_43_1_60 & apart_point_and_line(all_43_1_60, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Applying alpha-rule on (165) yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  | (167) intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_43_1_60
% 71.24/33.20  | (168) apart_point_and_line(all_43_1_60, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating (152) with all_45_0_61 yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (169) ( ~ (all_45_0_61 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_45_0_61) | ( ~ (all_45_0_61 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_45_0_61)
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating (150) with all_46_0_62 yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (170) ( ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62) | ( ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_46_0_62)
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating (163) with all_50_0_67, all_50_1_68 yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (171)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_50_1_68 & apart_point_and_line(all_50_1_68, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Applying alpha-rule on (171) yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  | (173) intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_50_1_68
% 71.24/33.20  | (174) apart_point_and_line(all_50_1_68, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating (162) with all_54_0_72, all_54_1_73 yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (175)  ~ (all_54_0_72 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_54_1_73 & apart_point_and_line(all_54_1_73, all_0_7_7) = all_54_0_72
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Applying alpha-rule on (175) yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (176)  ~ (all_54_0_72 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  | (177) intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_54_1_73
% 71.24/33.20  | (178) apart_point_and_line(all_54_1_73, all_0_7_7) = all_54_0_72
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating (161) with all_56_0_74, all_56_1_75 yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (179)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0) & intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_56_1_75 & apart_point_and_line(all_56_1_75, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Applying alpha-rule on (179) yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  | (181) intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_56_1_75
% 71.24/33.20  | (182) apart_point_and_line(all_56_1_75, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating (149) with all_63_0_82 yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (183) ( ~ (all_63_0_82 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_63_0_82) | ( ~ (all_63_0_82 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_63_0_82)
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  | Instantiating (151) with all_64_0_83 yields:
% 71.24/33.20  | (184) ( ~ (all_64_0_83 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_64_0_83) | ( ~ (all_64_0_83 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_64_0_83)
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (170), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  |-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  | (185)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62
% 71.24/33.20  |
% 71.24/33.20  	| Applying alpha-rule on (185) yields:
% 71.24/33.20  	| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  	| (187) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62
% 71.24/33.20  	|
% 71.24/33.20  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (153), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  	|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  	| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.20  	|
% 71.24/33.20  		| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.20  		| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.20  		|
% 71.24/33.20  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.20  	|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.20  	| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  	| (191)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.20  	|
% 71.24/33.20  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (184), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  		|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  		| (192)  ~ (all_64_0_83 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_64_0_83
% 71.24/33.20  		|
% 71.24/33.20  			| Applying alpha-rule on (192) yields:
% 71.24/33.20  			| (193)  ~ (all_64_0_83 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  			| (194) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_64_0_83
% 71.24/33.20  			|
% 71.24/33.20  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (183), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  			|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  			| (195)  ~ (all_63_0_82 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_63_0_82
% 71.24/33.20  			|
% 71.24/33.20  				| Applying alpha-rule on (195) yields:
% 71.24/33.20  				| (196)  ~ (all_63_0_82 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  				| (197) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_63_0_82
% 71.24/33.20  				|
% 71.24/33.20  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (159), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  				|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  				| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.24/33.20  				|
% 71.24/33.20  					| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.24/33.20  					| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.20  					|
% 71.24/33.20  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.20  				|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.20  				| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  				| (201)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.20  				|
% 71.24/33.20  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (169), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  					|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  					| (202)  ~ (all_45_0_61 = 0) & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_45_0_61
% 71.24/33.20  					|
% 71.24/33.20  						| Applying alpha-rule on (202) yields:
% 71.24/33.20  						| (203)  ~ (all_45_0_61 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  						| (204) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_45_0_61
% 71.24/33.20  						|
% 71.24/33.20  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (160), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  						|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  						| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.24/33.20  						|
% 71.24/33.20  							| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.24/33.20  							| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.20  							|
% 71.24/33.20  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.20  						|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.20  						| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  						| (208)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.20  						|
% 71.24/33.20  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (154), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  							|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  							| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.20  							|
% 71.24/33.20  								| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.20  								| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.20  								|
% 71.24/33.20  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.20  							|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.20  							| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  							| (212)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.20  							|
% 71.24/33.20  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (155), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  								|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  								| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.20  								|
% 71.24/33.20  									| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.20  									| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.20  									|
% 71.24/33.20  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.20  								|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.20  								| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  								| (216) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.20  								|
% 71.24/33.20  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (156), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  									|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  									| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.20  									|
% 71.24/33.20  										| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.20  										| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.20  										|
% 71.24/33.20  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.20  									|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.20  									| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  									| (220) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.20  									|
% 71.24/33.20  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (157), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  										|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  										| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.20  										|
% 71.24/33.20  											| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.20  											| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.20  											|
% 71.24/33.20  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.20  										|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.20  										| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  										| (224) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.20  										|
% 71.24/33.20  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (158), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  											|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  											| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.20  											|
% 71.24/33.20  												| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.20  												| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.20  												|
% 71.24/33.20  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.20  											|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.20  											| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.20  											| (228) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.20  											|
% 71.24/33.20  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.20  												|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.20  												| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.24/33.20  												|
% 71.24/33.20  													| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.24/33.20  													| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.21  													|
% 71.24/33.21  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.21  												|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.21  												| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.24/33.21  												| (232)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  												|
% 71.24/33.21  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.21  													|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.21  													| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.24/33.21  													|
% 71.24/33.21  														| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.24/33.21  														| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.21  														|
% 71.24/33.21  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.21  													|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.21  													| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.24/33.21  													| (236)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  													|
% 71.24/33.21  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (224), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.21  														|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.21  														| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.24/33.21  														|
% 71.24/33.21  															| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.24/33.21  															| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.21  															|
% 71.24/33.21  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.21  														|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.21  														| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.24/33.21  														| (240)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  														|
% 71.24/33.21  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.21  															|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.21  															| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.24/33.21  															|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.21  															|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.21  															| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.24/33.21  															| (244)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  															|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (126) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_56_1_75, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_56_1_75, intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (245) all_56_1_75 = all_0_2_2
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (126) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_54_1_73, all_56_1_75 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_56_1_75, intersection_point(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_54_1_73, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (246) all_56_1_75 = all_54_1_73
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (126) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_50_1_68, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_50_1_68, intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (247) all_50_1_68 = all_0_5_5
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (126) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_43_1_60, all_50_1_68 and discharging atoms intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_50_1_68, intersection_point(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_43_1_60, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (248) all_50_1_68 = all_43_1_60
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Combining equations (245,246) yields a new equation:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (249) all_54_1_73 = all_0_2_2
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Combining equations (248,247) yields a new equation:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (250) all_43_1_60 = all_0_5_5
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Simplifying 250 yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (251) all_43_1_60 = all_0_5_5
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Combining equations (249,246) yields a new equation:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (245) all_56_1_75 = all_0_2_2
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| From (245) and (182) follows:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (253) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| From (249) and (178) follows:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (254) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_54_0_72
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| From (247) and (174) follows:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (255) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| From (251) and (168) follows:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (256) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_56_0_74, all_63_0_82 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_63_0_82, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (257) all_63_0_82 = all_56_0_74
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_54_0_72, all_46_0_62 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_54_0_72, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (258) all_54_0_72 = all_46_0_62
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, all_50_0_67, all_64_0_83 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_64_0_83, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (259) all_64_0_83 = all_50_0_67
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, all_43_0_59, all_45_0_61 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_45_0_61, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (260) all_45_0_61 = all_43_0_59
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Equations (259) can reduce 193 to:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Equations (257) can reduce 196 to:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Equations (258) can reduce 176 to:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Equations (260) can reduce 203 to:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| From (257) and (197) follows:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (253) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| From (258) and (254) follows:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (187) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| From (259) and (194) follows:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (255) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| From (260) and (204) follows:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (256) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_56_0_74, all_0_0_0, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (269) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_0_0_0, all_56_0_74, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (270) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_56_0_74, all_0_0_0, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (271) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_0_0, all_56_0_74, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (272) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_56_0_74, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (273) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_0_1_1, all_56_0_74, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (274) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_56_0_74, all_0_1_1, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (275) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_1_1, all_56_0_74, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (276) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_56_0_74, all_56_0_74, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (277) all_56_0_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.24/33.21  																|
% 71.24/33.21  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_56_0_74, all_56_0_74, all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, yields:
% 71.24/33.21  																| (278) all_56_0_74 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_46_0_62, all_0_0_0, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (279) all_46_0_62 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_0_0_0, all_46_0_62, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (280) all_46_0_62 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_46_0_62, all_0_0_0, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (281) all_46_0_62 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_0_0, all_46_0_62, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (282) all_46_0_62 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_46_0_62, all_0_1_1, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (283) all_46_0_62 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_0_1_1, all_46_0_62, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (284) all_46_0_62 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_46_0_62, all_0_1_1, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (285) all_46_0_62 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_1_1, all_46_0_62, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (286) all_46_0_62 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_46_0_62, all_56_0_74, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (287) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_56_0_74, all_46_0_62, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (288) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_46_0_62, all_56_0_74, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (289) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_56_0_74, all_46_0_62, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (290) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_46_0_62, all_46_0_62, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (291) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_46_0_62, all_46_0_62, all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (292) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_50_0_67, all_0_0_0, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (293) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_0_0, all_50_0_67, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (294) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_50_0_67, all_0_1_1, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (295) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_1_1, all_50_0_67, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (296) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (139) with all_50_0_67, all_0_1_1, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (297) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (139) with all_0_1_1, all_50_0_67, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (298) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_50_0_67, all_56_0_74, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (299) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_56_0_74, all_50_0_67, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (300) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (139) with all_50_0_67, all_56_0_74, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (301) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (139) with all_56_0_74, all_50_0_67, all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (302) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_50_0_67, all_46_0_62, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (303) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.22  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_46_0_62, all_50_0_67, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.22  																| (304) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.22  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (139) with all_50_0_67, all_46_0_62, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (305) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (139) with all_46_0_62, all_50_0_67, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (306) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_50_0_67, all_50_0_67, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (307) all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_50_0_67, all_50_0_67, all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (308) all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_43_0_59, all_0_0_0, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (309) all_43_0_59 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_0_0, all_43_0_59, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (310) all_43_0_59 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (139) with all_43_0_59, all_0_0_0, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (311) all_43_0_59 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (139) with all_0_0_0, all_43_0_59, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (312) all_43_0_59 = 0 | all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_43_0_59, all_0_1_1, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (313) all_43_0_59 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_1_1, all_43_0_59, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (314) all_43_0_59 = 0 | all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_43_0_59, all_56_0_74, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (315) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_56_0_74, all_43_0_59, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (316) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (139) with all_43_0_59, all_56_0_74, all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (317) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (139) with all_56_0_74, all_43_0_59, all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (318) all_56_0_74 = 0 | all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_43_0_59, all_46_0_62, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (319) all_46_0_62 = 0 | all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_46_0_62, all_43_0_59, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (320) all_46_0_62 = 0 | all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (139) with all_43_0_59, all_46_0_62, all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (321) all_46_0_62 = 0 | all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (139) with all_46_0_62, all_43_0_59, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (322) all_46_0_62 = 0 | all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_43_0_59, all_50_0_67, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (323) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_50_0_67, all_43_0_59, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (324) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_43_0_59, all_50_0_67, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (325) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_50_0_67, all_43_0_59, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (326) all_50_0_67 = 0 | all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (101) with all_43_0_59, all_43_0_59, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (327) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																| Instantiating formula (104) with all_43_0_59, all_43_0_59, all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9, all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (328) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (35), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.23  																|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.23  																| (329) all_0_3_3 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 71.24/33.23  																|
% 71.24/33.23  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (329) yields:
% 71.24/33.23  																	| (330) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 71.24/33.23  																	| (331) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 71.24/33.23  																	|
% 71.24/33.23  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (291), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.23  																	|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.23  																	| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																	|
% 71.24/33.24  																		| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																		| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																		|
% 71.24/33.24  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																	|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																	| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																	| (335)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																	|
% 71.24/33.24  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (327), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																		|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																		| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																		|
% 71.24/33.24  																			| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																			| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																			|
% 71.24/33.24  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																		|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																		| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																		| (201)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																		|
% 71.24/33.24  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (307), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																			|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																			| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																			|
% 71.24/33.24  																				| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																				| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																				|
% 71.24/33.24  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																			|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																			| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																			| (191)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																			|
% 71.24/33.24  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (277), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																				|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																				| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																				|
% 71.24/33.24  																					| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																					| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																					|
% 71.24/33.24  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																				|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																				| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																				| (347)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																				|
% 71.24/33.24  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (278), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																					|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																					| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																					|
% 71.24/33.24  																						| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																						| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																						|
% 71.24/33.24  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																					|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																					| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																					| (351)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																					|
% 71.24/33.24  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (308), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																						|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																						| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																						|
% 71.24/33.24  																							| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																							| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																							|
% 71.24/33.24  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																						|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																						| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																						| (355)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																						|
% 71.24/33.24  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (328), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																							|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																							| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																							|
% 71.24/33.24  																								| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																								| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																								|
% 71.24/33.24  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																							|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																							| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																							| (359)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																							|
% 71.24/33.24  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (284), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																								|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																								| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																								|
% 71.24/33.24  																									| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																									| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																									|
% 71.24/33.24  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																								|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																								| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																								| (363) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																								|
% 71.24/33.24  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																									|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																									| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																									|
% 71.24/33.24  																										| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																										| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																										|
% 71.24/33.24  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																									|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																									| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																									| (367) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																									|
% 71.24/33.24  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (323), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																										|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																										| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																										|
% 71.24/33.24  																											| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																											| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																											|
% 71.24/33.24  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																										|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																										| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																										| (371) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																										|
% 71.24/33.24  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (324), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																											|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																											| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																											|
% 71.24/33.24  																												| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																												| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																												|
% 71.24/33.24  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																											|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																											| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																											| (375) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																											|
% 71.24/33.24  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (287), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																												|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																												| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																												|
% 71.24/33.24  																													| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																													| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																													|
% 71.24/33.24  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																												|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																												| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																												| (379) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																												|
% 71.24/33.24  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (280), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																													|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																													| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																													|
% 71.24/33.24  																														| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																														| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																														|
% 71.24/33.24  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																													|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																													| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																													| (383) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																													|
% 71.24/33.24  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (283), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																														|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																														| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																														|
% 71.24/33.24  																															| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																															| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																															|
% 71.24/33.24  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																														|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																														| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																														| (387) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																														|
% 71.24/33.24  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (281), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																															|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																															| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																															|
% 71.24/33.24  																																| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																																| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																																|
% 71.24/33.24  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																															|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																															| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																															| (391) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																															|
% 71.24/33.24  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																																|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																																| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																																|
% 71.24/33.24  																																	| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																																	| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																																	|
% 71.24/33.24  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																																|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																																| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																																| (395) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																																|
% 71.24/33.24  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (282), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																																	| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																																	|
% 71.24/33.24  																																		| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																																		| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																																		|
% 71.24/33.24  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																																	| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																																	| (399) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																																	|
% 71.24/33.24  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (290), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																																		| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																																		|
% 71.24/33.24  																																			| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																																			| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																																			|
% 71.24/33.24  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																																		| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																																		| (403) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																																		|
% 71.24/33.24  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																																			| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																																			|
% 71.24/33.24  																																				| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																																				| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																																				|
% 71.24/33.24  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																																			| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																																			| (407) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																																			|
% 71.24/33.24  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (299), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																																				| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																																				|
% 71.24/33.24  																																					| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																																					| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																																					|
% 71.24/33.24  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																																				| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																																				| (411) all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																																				|
% 71.24/33.24  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																																					| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																																					|
% 71.24/33.24  																																						| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																																						| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																																						|
% 71.24/33.24  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																																					| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																																					| (415) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																																					|
% 71.24/33.24  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (318), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.24  																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.24  																																						| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.24  																																						|
% 71.24/33.24  																																							| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.24  																																							| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.24  																																							|
% 71.24/33.24  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.24  																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.24  																																						| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.24  																																						| (419) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.24  																																						|
% 71.24/33.25  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (319), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																							| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																							|
% 71.24/33.25  																																								| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																								| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																								|
% 71.24/33.25  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																							| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																							| (423) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																							|
% 71.24/33.25  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (314), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																								| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																								|
% 71.24/33.25  																																									| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																									| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																									|
% 71.24/33.25  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																								| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																								| (427) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																								|
% 71.24/33.25  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (315), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																									|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																									| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																									|
% 71.24/33.25  																																										| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																										| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																										|
% 71.24/33.25  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																									|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																									| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																									| (431) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																									|
% 71.24/33.25  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (326), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																										|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																										| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																										|
% 71.24/33.25  																																											| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																											| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																											|
% 71.24/33.25  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																										|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																										| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																										| (435) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																										|
% 71.24/33.25  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (309), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																											| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																											|
% 71.24/33.25  																																												| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																												| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																												|
% 71.24/33.25  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																											| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																											| (439) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																											|
% 71.24/33.25  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (310), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																												|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																												| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																												|
% 71.24/33.25  																																													| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																													| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																													|
% 71.24/33.25  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																												|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																												| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																												| (443) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																												|
% 71.24/33.25  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (316), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																													| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																													|
% 71.24/33.25  																																														| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																														| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																														|
% 71.24/33.25  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																													| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																													| (447) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																													|
% 71.24/33.25  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (317), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																														| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																														|
% 71.24/33.25  																																															| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																															| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																															|
% 71.24/33.25  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																														| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																														| (451) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																														|
% 71.24/33.25  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (320), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																															| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																															|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																															| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																															| (455) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																															|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (311), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																	| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																	| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																	|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																| (459) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (312), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																	| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																	|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																		| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																		| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																		|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																	| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																	| (463) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																	|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (313), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																		| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																		|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																			| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																			| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																			|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																		| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																		| (467) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																		|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (300), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																			| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																			|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																				| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																				| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																				|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																			| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																			| (471) all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																			|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																				| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																				|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																					| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																					|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																				| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																				| (475) all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																				|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (322), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																					| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																					|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																						| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																						| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																						|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																					| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																					| (479) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																					|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (321), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																						| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																						|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																							| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																							| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																							|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																						| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																						| (483) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																						|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (293), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																							| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																							|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																								| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																								| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																								|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																							| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																							| (487) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																							|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (294), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																								| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																								|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																									| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																									|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																								| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																								| (491) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																								|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (302), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																									| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																									|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																										| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																										| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																										|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																									| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																									| (495) all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																									|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (325), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																										| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																										|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																											| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																											| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																											|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																										| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																										| (499) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																										|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (305), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																											| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																											|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																												| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																												| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																												|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																											| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																											| (503) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																											|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (303), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																												| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																												|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																													| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																													| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																													|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																												| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																												| (507) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.25  																																																												|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (304), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.25  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																													| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.25  																																																													|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																														| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																														| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.25  																																																														|
% 71.24/33.25  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.25  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.25  																																																													| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.25  																																																													| (511) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																													|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (306), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																														| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																														|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																															| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																															| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																															|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																														| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																														| (515) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																														|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (269), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																															| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																															|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																															| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																															| (519) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																															|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (270), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																	| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																	| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																	|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																| (523) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (273), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																	| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																	|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																		| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																		| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																		|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																	| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																	| (527) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																	|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (279), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																		| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																		|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																			| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																			| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																			|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																		| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																		| (531) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																		|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (274), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																			| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																			|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																				| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																				| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																				|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																			| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																			| (535) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																			|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (271), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																				| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																				|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																					| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																					|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																				| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																				| (539) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																				|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (275), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																					| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																					|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																						| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																						| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																						|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																					| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																					| (543) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																					|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (276), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																						| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																						|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																							| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																							| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																							|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																						| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																						| (547) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																						|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (272), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																							| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																							|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																								| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																								| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																								|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																							| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																							| (551) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																							|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (297), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																								| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																								|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																									| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																									|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																								| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																								| (555) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																								|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (295), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																									| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																									|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																										| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																										| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																										|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																									| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																									| (559) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																									|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (296), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																										| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																										|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																											| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																											| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																											|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																										| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																										| (563) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																										|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (298), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																											| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																											|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																												| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																												| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																												|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																											| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																											| (567) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																											|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (363), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																												| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																												|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																													| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																													| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																													|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																												| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																												| (571)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																												|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (371), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																													| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																													|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																														| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																														| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																														|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																													| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																													| (232)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																													|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (375), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																														| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																														|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																															| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																															| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																															|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																														| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																														| (236)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																														|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (383), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																															| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																															|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																															| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																															| (583)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																															|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (387), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																	| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																	| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																	|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																| (587)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (391), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																	| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																	|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																		| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																		| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																		|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																	| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																	| (591)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																	|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (395), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																		| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																		|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																			| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																			| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																			|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																		| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																		| (595)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																		|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (399), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																			| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																			|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																				| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																				| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																				|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																			| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																			| (599)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																			|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (407), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																				| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																				|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																					| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																					|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																				| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																				| (603)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																				|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (411), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																					| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																					|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																						| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																						| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																						|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																					| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																					| (607)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																					|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (419), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																						| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																						|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																							| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																							| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																							|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																						| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																						| (611)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																						|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (423), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																							| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																							|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																								| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																								| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																								|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																							| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																							| (615)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																							|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (427), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																								| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																								|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																									| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																									|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																								| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																								| (619)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																								|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (431), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																									| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																									|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																										| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																										| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																										|
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.26  																																																																																									| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																									| (623)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																									|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (435), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																										| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																										|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																											| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																											| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																											|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																										| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																										| (627)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																										|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (439), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																											| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																											|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																											| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																											| (631)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																											|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												| Instantiating (631) with all_437_0_123 yields:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												| (632) (all_437_0_123 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_437_0_123 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (all_437_0_123 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_123) | ( ~ (all_437_0_123 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_437_0_123)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (443), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																													| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																													| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																													|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												| (636)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																												|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (447), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																													| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																													|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																														| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																														| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																														|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																													| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																													| (640)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																													|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (451), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																														| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																														|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																															| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																															| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																															|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																														| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																														| (644)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																														|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (455), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																															| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																															|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																															| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																															| (648)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																															|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (459), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																	| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																	| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																	|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																| (652)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (463), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																	| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																	|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																	| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																	| (656)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																	|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		| Instantiating (656) with all_461_0_129 yields:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		| (657) (all_461_0_129 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_461_0_129 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (all_461_0_129 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_129) | ( ~ (all_461_0_129 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_461_0_129)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (467), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																			| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																			| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																			|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		| (661)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																		|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (471), into two cases.
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																			| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																			|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																				| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																				| (189) $false
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																				|
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																			| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.24/33.27  																																																																																																			| (665)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																			|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (475), into two cases.
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																				| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																				|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																					| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																					|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																				| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																				| (669)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																				|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (479), into two cases.
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																					| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																					|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																						| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																						| (189) $false
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																						|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																					| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																					| (673)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																					|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (483), into two cases.
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																						| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																						|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																							| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																							| (189) $false
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																							|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																						| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																						| (677)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																						|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (487), into two cases.
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																							| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																							|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																								| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																								| (189) $false
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																								|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																							| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																							| (681)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																							|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (491), into two cases.
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																								| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																								|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																									| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																									|
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																								| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.57/33.27  																																																																																																								| (685)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																								|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (495), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																									| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																									|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																										| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																										| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																									| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																									| (689)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																									|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (499), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																										| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																											| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																											| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																										| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																										| (693)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (519), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																											| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																												| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																												| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																											| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																											| (697)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (523), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																												| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																													| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																													| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																												| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																												| (701)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (527), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																													| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																														| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																														| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																													| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																													| (705)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (531), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																														| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																															| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																															| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																														| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																														| (709)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																															| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																															| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																															| (713)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (539), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																	| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																	| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																| (717)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																	| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																		| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																		| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																		|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																	| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																	| (721)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																		| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																		|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																			| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																			| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																			|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																		| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																		| (725)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																		|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																			| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																			|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																				| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																				| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																				|
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																			| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.58/33.27  																																																																																																																			| (729)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																			|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (555), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																				| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																				|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																					| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																					|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																				| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																				| (733)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																				|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (559), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																					| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																					|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																						| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																						| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																						|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																					| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																					| (737)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																					|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (563), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																						| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																						|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																						| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																						| (741)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																						|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							| Instantiating (741) with all_562_0_154 yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							| (742) (all_562_0_154 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (all_562_0_154 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (all_562_0_154 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_562_0_154) | ( ~ (all_562_0_154 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_562_0_154)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (567), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																								| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																								| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																								|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							| (746)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																							|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (14) with all_56_0_74, all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = all_56_0_74, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																								| (747) all_56_0_74 = 0 | distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																								|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (747), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																								| (748) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																								|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (657), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																									| (749) (all_461_0_129 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_461_0_129 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (all_461_0_129 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_129)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																									|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (749), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																										| (750) (all_461_0_129 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_461_0_129 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (750), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											| (751) all_461_0_129 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (751) yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (752) all_461_0_129 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (753) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, 0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											| (756) all_461_0_129 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (756) yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (752) all_461_0_129 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (758) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, 0, all_50_0_67 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																										| (761)  ~ (all_461_0_129 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_129
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (761) yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											| (762)  ~ (all_461_0_129 = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											| (763) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_129
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (742), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											| (764) (all_562_0_154 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (all_562_0_154 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (all_562_0_154 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_562_0_154)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (764), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (765) (all_562_0_154 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (all_562_0_154 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (765), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| (766) all_562_0_154 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (766) yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (767) all_562_0_154 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (768) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| (771) all_562_0_154 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (771) yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (767) all_562_0_154 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (773) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, 0, all_43_0_59 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (776)  ~ (all_562_0_154 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_562_0_154
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (776) yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| (777)  ~ (all_562_0_154 = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| (778) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_562_0_154
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| Instantiating formula (9) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_461_0_129, all_562_0_154 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_562_0_154, distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_129, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| (779) all_562_0_154 = all_461_0_129
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| Equations (779) can reduce 777 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| (762)  ~ (all_461_0_129 = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| From (779) and (778) follows:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| (763) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_129
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (632), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| (782) (all_437_0_123 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_437_0_123 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (all_437_0_123 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_123)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (782), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (783) (all_437_0_123 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_437_0_123 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (783), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (784) all_437_0_123 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (784) yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| (785) all_437_0_123 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| (753) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, 0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (789) all_437_0_123 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (789) yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| (785) all_437_0_123 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| (758) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, 0, all_50_0_67 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (794)  ~ (all_437_0_123 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_123
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (794) yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (795)  ~ (all_437_0_123 = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (796) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_123
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (9) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_437_0_123, all_461_0_129 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_129, distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_123, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (797) all_461_0_129 = all_437_0_123
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| Equations (797) can reduce 762 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (795)  ~ (all_437_0_123 = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| From (797) and (763) follows:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (796) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_123
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (123) with all_437_0_123, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_123, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (800) all_437_0_123 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (800), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (801) convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| Instantiating formula (94) with all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| (802) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (803)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (785) all_437_0_123 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| Equations (785) can reduce 795 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													| (806)  ~ (all_437_0_123 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_437_0_123
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (806) yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (795)  ~ (all_437_0_123 = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (808) distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_437_0_123
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| Instantiating formula (110) with all_437_0_123, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_437_0_123, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (809) all_437_0_123 = 0 | distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (809), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (810) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| Instantiating formula (41) with all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (802) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (812)  ~ (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														| (785) all_437_0_123 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| Equations (785) can reduce 795 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											| (815)  ~ (all_562_0_154 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_562_0_154
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (815) yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (777)  ~ (all_562_0_154 = 0)
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (817) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_562_0_154
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| Instantiating formula (97) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_562_0_154 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_562_0_154, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (767) all_562_0_154 = 0
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| Equations (767) can reduce 777 to:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																									| (820)  ~ (all_461_0_129 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_461_0_129
% 71.58/33.28  																																																																																																																									|
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (820) yields:
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																										| (762)  ~ (all_461_0_129 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																										| (822) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_461_0_129
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																										| Instantiating formula (97) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_461_0_129 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_461_0_129, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																										| (752) all_461_0_129 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																										| Equations (752) can reduce 762 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																										| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																								| (825)  ~ (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																								| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																								|
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																									| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																									|
% 71.58/33.29  																																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																| (828) all_0_4_4 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																|
% 71.58/33.29  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (828) yields:
% 71.58/33.29  																	| (829) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																	| (830) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																	|
% 71.58/33.29  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (291), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																	|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																	| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																	|
% 71.58/33.29  																		| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																		| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																		|
% 71.58/33.29  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																	|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																	| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																	| (335)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																	|
% 71.58/33.29  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (327), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																		|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																		| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																		|
% 71.58/33.29  																			| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																			| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																			|
% 71.58/33.29  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																		|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																		| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																		| (201)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																		|
% 71.58/33.29  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (307), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																			|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																			| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																			|
% 71.58/33.29  																				| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																				| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																				|
% 71.58/33.29  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																			|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																			| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																			| (191)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																			|
% 71.58/33.29  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (277), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																				|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																				| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																				|
% 71.58/33.29  																					| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																					| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																					|
% 71.58/33.29  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																				|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																				| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																				| (347)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																				|
% 71.58/33.29  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (278), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																					|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																					| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																					|
% 71.58/33.29  																						| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																						| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																						|
% 71.58/33.29  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																					|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																					| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																					| (351)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																					|
% 71.58/33.29  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (308), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																						|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																						| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																						|
% 71.58/33.29  																							| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																							| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																							|
% 71.58/33.29  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																						|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																						| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																						| (355)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																						|
% 71.58/33.29  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (328), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																							|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																							| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																							|
% 71.58/33.29  																								| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																								| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																								|
% 71.58/33.29  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																							|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																							| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																							| (359)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																							|
% 71.58/33.29  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (284), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																								|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																								| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																								|
% 71.58/33.29  																									| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																									| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																									|
% 71.58/33.29  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																								|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																								| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																								| (363) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																								|
% 71.58/33.29  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (288), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																									|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																									| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																									|
% 71.58/33.29  																										| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																										| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																										|
% 71.58/33.29  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																									|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																									| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																									| (367) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																									|
% 71.58/33.29  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (323), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																										|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																										| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																										|
% 71.58/33.29  																											| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																											| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																											|
% 71.58/33.29  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																										|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																										| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																										| (371) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																										|
% 71.58/33.29  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (324), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																											|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																											| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																											|
% 71.58/33.29  																												| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																												| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																												|
% 71.58/33.29  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																											|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																											| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																											| (375) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																											|
% 71.58/33.29  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (287), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																												|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																												| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																												|
% 71.58/33.29  																													| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																													| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																													|
% 71.58/33.29  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																												|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																												| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																												| (379) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																												|
% 71.58/33.29  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (280), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																													|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																													| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																													|
% 71.58/33.29  																														| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																														| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																														|
% 71.58/33.29  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																													|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																													| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																													| (383) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																													|
% 71.58/33.29  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (283), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																														|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																														| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																														|
% 71.58/33.29  																															| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																															| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																															|
% 71.58/33.29  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																														|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																														| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																														| (387) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																														|
% 71.58/33.29  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (281), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																															|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																															| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																															|
% 71.58/33.29  																																| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																																| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																																|
% 71.58/33.29  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																															|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																															| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																															| (391) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																															|
% 71.58/33.29  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																																|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																																| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																																|
% 71.58/33.29  																																	| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																																	| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																																	|
% 71.58/33.29  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																																|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																																| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																																| (395) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																																|
% 71.58/33.29  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (282), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																																	| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																																	|
% 71.58/33.29  																																		| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																																		| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																																		|
% 71.58/33.29  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																																	| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																																	| (399) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																																	|
% 71.58/33.29  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (290), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																																		| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																																		|
% 71.58/33.29  																																			| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																																			| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																																			|
% 71.58/33.29  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																																		| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																																		| (403) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																																		|
% 71.58/33.29  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																																			| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																																			|
% 71.58/33.29  																																				| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																																				| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																																				|
% 71.58/33.29  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																																			| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																																			| (407) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																																			|
% 71.58/33.29  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (299), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																																				| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																																				|
% 71.58/33.29  																																					| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																																					| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																																					|
% 71.58/33.29  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																																				| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																																				| (411) all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																																				|
% 71.58/33.29  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (289), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																																					| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																																					|
% 71.58/33.29  																																						| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																																						| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																																						|
% 71.58/33.29  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																																					| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																																					| (415) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																																					|
% 71.58/33.29  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (318), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																																						| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																																						|
% 71.58/33.29  																																							| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																																							| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																																							|
% 71.58/33.29  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																																						| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																																						| (419) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																																						|
% 71.58/33.29  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (319), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																																							| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																																							|
% 71.58/33.29  																																								| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																																								| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																																								|
% 71.58/33.29  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																																							| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																																							| (423) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.29  																																							|
% 71.58/33.29  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (314), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.29  																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.29  																																								| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.29  																																								|
% 71.58/33.29  																																									| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.29  																																									| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.29  																																									|
% 71.58/33.29  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.29  																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.29  																																								| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.29  																																								| (427) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																								|
% 71.58/33.30  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (315), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																									|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																									| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																									|
% 71.58/33.30  																																										| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																										| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																										|
% 71.58/33.30  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																									|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																									| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																									| (431) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																									|
% 71.58/33.30  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (326), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																										|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																										| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																										|
% 71.58/33.30  																																											| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																											| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																											|
% 71.58/33.30  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																										|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																										| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																										| (435) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																										|
% 71.58/33.30  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (309), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																											| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																											|
% 71.58/33.30  																																												| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																												| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																												|
% 71.58/33.30  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																											| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																											| (439) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																											|
% 71.58/33.30  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (310), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																												|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																												| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																												|
% 71.58/33.30  																																													| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																													| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																													|
% 71.58/33.30  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																												|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																												| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																												| (443) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																												|
% 71.58/33.30  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (316), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																													| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																													|
% 71.58/33.30  																																														| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																														| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																														|
% 71.58/33.30  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																													| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																													| (447) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																													|
% 71.58/33.30  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (317), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																														| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																														|
% 71.58/33.30  																																															| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																															| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																															|
% 71.58/33.30  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																														| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																														| (451) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																														|
% 71.58/33.30  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (320), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																															| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																															|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																															| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																															| (455) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																															|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (311), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																	| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																	| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																	|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																| (459) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (312), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																	| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																	|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																		| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																		| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																		|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																	| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																	| (463) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																	|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (313), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																		| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																		|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																			| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																			| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																			|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																		| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																		| (467) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																		|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (300), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																			| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																			|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																				| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																				| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																				|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																			| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																			| (471) all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																			|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (301), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																				| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																				|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																					| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																					|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																				| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																				| (475) all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																				|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (322), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																					| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																					|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																						| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																						| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																						|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																					| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																					| (479) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																					|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (321), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																						| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																						|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																							| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																							| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																							|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																						| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																						| (483) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																						|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (293), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																							| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																							|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																								| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																								| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																								|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																							| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																							| (487) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																							|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (294), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																								| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																								|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																									| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																									|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																								| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																								| (491) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																								|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (302), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																									| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																									|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																										| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																										| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																										|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																									| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																									| (495) all_50_0_67 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																									|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (325), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																										| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																										|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																											| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																											| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																											|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																										| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																										| (499) all_43_0_59 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																										|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (305), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																											| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																											|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																												| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																												| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																												|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																											| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																											| (503) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																											|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (303), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																												| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																												|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																													| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																													| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																													|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																												| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																												| (507) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																												|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (304), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																													| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																													|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																														| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																														| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																														|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																													| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																													| (511) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																													|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (306), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																														| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																														|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																															| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																															| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																															|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																														| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																														| (515) all_46_0_62 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																														|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (269), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																															| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																															|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																															| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																															| (519) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																															|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (270), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																	| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																	| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																| (523) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (273), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																	| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																		| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																		| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																		|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																	| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																	| (527) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (279), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																		| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																		|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																			| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																			| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																			|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																		| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																		| (531) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																		|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (274), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																			| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																			|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																				| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																				| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																				|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																			| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																			| (535) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																			|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (292), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																				| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																				|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																					| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																					|
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																				| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.30  																																																																				| (1038)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																				|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (271), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																					| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																					|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																						| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																						| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																						|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																					| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																					| (539) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																					|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (275), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																						| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																						|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																							| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																							| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																							|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																						| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																						| (543) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																						|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (276), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																							| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																							|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																								| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																								| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																								|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																							| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																							| (547) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																							|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (272), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																								| (344) all_56_0_74 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																								|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																									| Equations (344) can reduce 180 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																									|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																								| (180)  ~ (all_56_0_74 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																								| (551) all_0_0_0 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																								|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (297), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																									| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																									|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																										| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																										| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																									| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																									| (555) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																									|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (295), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																										| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																											| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																											| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																										| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																										| (559) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (296), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																											| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																												| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																												| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																											| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																											| (563) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (298), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																												| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																													| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																													| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																												| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																												| (567) all_0_1_1 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (363), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																													| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																														| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																														| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																													| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																													| (571)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (367), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																														| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																															| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																															| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																														| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																														| (1078)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (371), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																															| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																															| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																															| (232)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (375), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																	| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																	| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																| (236)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (379), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																	| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																		| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																		| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																		|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																	| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																	| (1090)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (383), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																		| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																		|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																			| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																			| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																			|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																		| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																		| (583)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																		|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (387), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																			| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																			|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																				| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																				| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																				|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																			| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																			| (587)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																			|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (391), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																				| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																				|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																					| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																					|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																				| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																				| (591)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																				|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (395), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																					| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																					|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																						| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																						| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																						|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																					| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																					| (595)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																					|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (399), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																						| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																						|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																							| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																							| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																							|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																						| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																						| (599)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																						|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (403), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																							| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																							|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																								| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																								| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																								|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																							| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																							| (1114)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																							|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (407), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																								| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																								|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																									| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																									|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																								| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																								| (603)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																								|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (411), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																									| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																									|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																										| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																										| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																									| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																									| (607)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																									|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (415), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																										| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																											| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																											| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																										| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																										| (1126)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																										|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (419), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																											| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																												| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																												| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																											| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																											| (611)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																											|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (423), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																												| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																													| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																													| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																												| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																												| (615)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																												|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (427), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																													| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																														| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																														| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																													| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																													| (619)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																													|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (431), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																														| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																															| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																															| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																														| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																														| (623)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																														|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (435), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																															| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																															| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																															| (627)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																															|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (439), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																	| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																	| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.58/33.31  																																																																																																| (631)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																	| Instantiating (631) with all_437_0_7900 yields:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																	| (1151) (all_437_0_7900 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_437_0_7900 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (all_437_0_7900 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_7900) | ( ~ (all_437_0_7900 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_437_0_7900)
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (443), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																	| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																		| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																		| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																		|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																	| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																	| (636)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																	|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (447), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																		| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																		|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																			| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																			| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																			|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																		| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																		| (640)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																		|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (451), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																			| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																			|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																				| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																				| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																				|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																			| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																			| (644)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																			|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (455), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																				| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																				|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																					| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																					|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																				| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																				| (648)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																				|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (459), into two cases.
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																					| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																					|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																						| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																						| (189) $false
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																						|
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																					| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.58/33.32  																																																																																																					| (652)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (463), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																						| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																						| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																						| (656)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							| Instantiating (656) with all_461_0_7906 yields:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							| (1176) (all_461_0_7906 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_461_0_7906 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (all_461_0_7906 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_7906) | ( ~ (all_461_0_7906 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_461_0_7906)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (467), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																								| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																								| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							| (661)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (471), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																								| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																									| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																								| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																								| (665)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (475), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																									| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																										| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																										| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																										|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																									| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																									| (669)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (479), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																										| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																										|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																											| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																											| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																											|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																										| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																										| (673)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																										|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (483), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																											| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																											|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																												| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																												| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																												|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																											| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																											| (677)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																											|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (487), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																												| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																												|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																													| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																													| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																													|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																												| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																												| (681)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																												|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (491), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																													| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																													|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																														| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																														| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																														|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																													| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																													| (685)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																													|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (495), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																														| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																														|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																															| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																															| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																															|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																														| (172)  ~ (all_50_0_67 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																														| (689)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																														|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (499), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																															| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																															|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																															| (166)  ~ (all_43_0_59 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																															| (693)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																															|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (503), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																	| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																	| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																	|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																| (1216)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (507), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																	| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																	|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																		| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																		| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																		|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																	| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																	| (1220)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																	|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																		| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																		|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																			| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																			| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																			|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																		| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																		| (1224)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																		|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (515), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																			| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																			|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																				| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																				| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																				|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																			| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																			| (1228)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																			|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (519), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																				| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																				|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																					| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																				| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																				| (697)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																				|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (523), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																					| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																						| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																						| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																					| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																					| (701)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (527), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																						| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																							| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																							| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																						| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																						| (705)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (531), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																							| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																								| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																								| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																							| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																							| (709)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																								| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																									| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																								| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																								| (713)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & convergent_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (539), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																									| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																										| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																										| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																										|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																									| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																									| (717)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																										| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																										|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																											| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																											| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																											|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																										| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																										| (721)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																										|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																											| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																											|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																												| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																												| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																											| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.77/33.32  																																																																																																																											| (725)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																											|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																												| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																													| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																													| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																													|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																												| (140)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																												| (729)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_6_6) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																												|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (555), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																													| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																													|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																														| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																														| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																													| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																													| (733)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																													|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (559), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																														| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																															| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																															| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																														| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																														| (737)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = v0))
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																														|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (563), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																															|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																															| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																															|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																															| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																															| (741)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																															|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																| Instantiating (741) with all_562_0_7931 yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																| (1277) (all_562_0_7931 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (all_562_0_7931 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (all_562_0_7931 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_562_0_7931) | ( ~ (all_562_0_7931 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_562_0_7931)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (567), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																	| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																	| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																	|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																| (63)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																| (746)  ? [v0] : ((v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (v0 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = v0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = v0))
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																	| Instantiating formula (14) with all_46_0_62, all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_7_7) = all_46_0_62, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																	| (1282) all_46_0_62 = 0 | distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																	|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1282), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																	| (748) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																	|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1176), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																		| (1284) (all_461_0_7906 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_461_0_7906 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (all_461_0_7906 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_7906)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																		|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1284), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																			| (1285) (all_461_0_7906 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_461_0_7906 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																			|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1285), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				| (1286) all_461_0_7906 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (1286) yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| (1287) all_461_0_7906 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| (753) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, 0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				| (1291) all_461_0_7906 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (1291) yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| (1287) all_461_0_7906 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| (758) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, 0, all_50_0_67 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																			| (1296)  ~ (all_461_0_7906 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_7906
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																			|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (1296) yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				| (1297)  ~ (all_461_0_7906 = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				| (1298) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_7906
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1277), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				| (1299) (all_562_0_7931 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (all_562_0_7931 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0) | ( ~ (all_562_0_7931 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_562_0_7931)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																				|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1299), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| (1300) (all_562_0_7931 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0) | (all_562_0_7931 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| (1301) all_562_0_7931 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1301) yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (1302) all_562_0_7931 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (768) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8, 0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = all_0_0_0, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (188) all_0_0_0 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| Equations (188) can reduce 140 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| (1306) all_562_0_7931 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1306) yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (1302) all_562_0_7931 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (773) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9, 0, all_43_0_59 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = all_43_0_59, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (336) all_43_0_59 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| Equations (336) can reduce 166 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					| (1311)  ~ (all_562_0_7931 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_562_0_7931
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (1311) yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| (1312)  ~ (all_562_0_7931 = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| (1313) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_562_0_7931
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| Instantiating formula (9) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_461_0_7906, all_562_0_7931 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_562_0_7931, distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_7906, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| (1314) all_562_0_7931 = all_461_0_7906
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| Equations (1314) can reduce 1312 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| (1297)  ~ (all_461_0_7906 = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| From (1314) and (1313) follows:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| (1298) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_7906
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1151), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| (1317) (all_437_0_7900 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_437_0_7900 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0) | ( ~ (all_437_0_7900 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_7900)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1317), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (1318) (all_437_0_7900 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0) | (all_437_0_7900 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1318), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (1319) all_437_0_7900 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (1319) yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| (1320) all_437_0_7900 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| (753) apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9, 0, all_0_1_1 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = all_0_1_1, apart_point_and_line(all_0_2_2, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| (198) all_0_1_1 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| Equations (198) can reduce 63 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (1324) all_437_0_7900 = 0 & apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (1324) yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| (1320) all_437_0_7900 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| (758) apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (121) with all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8, 0, all_50_0_67 and discharging atoms apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = all_50_0_67, apart_point_and_line(all_0_5_5, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| (340) all_50_0_67 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| Equations (340) can reduce 172 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (1329)  ~ (all_437_0_7900 = 0) & distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_7900
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (1329) yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (1330)  ~ (all_437_0_7900 = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (1331) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_7900
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (9) with all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_437_0_7900, all_461_0_7906 and discharging atoms distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_461_0_7906, distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_7900, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (1332) all_461_0_7906 = all_437_0_7900
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| Equations (1332) can reduce 1297 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (1330)  ~ (all_437_0_7900 = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| From (1332) and (1298) follows:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (1331) distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_7900
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (123) with all_437_0_7900, all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, distinct_lines(all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9) = all_437_0_7900, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (1335) all_437_0_7900 = 0 | convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1335), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (801) convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| Instantiating formula (94) with all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| (802) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (803)  ~ (convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_9_9) = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (1320) all_437_0_7900 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| Equations (1320) can reduce 1330 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						| (1341)  ~ (all_437_0_7900 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_437_0_7900
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																						|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1341) yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (1330)  ~ (all_437_0_7900 = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (1343) distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_437_0_7900
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| Instantiating formula (110) with all_437_0_7900, all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_2_2, all_0_5_5) = all_437_0_7900, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (1344) all_437_0_7900 = 0 | distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1344), into two cases.
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (810) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| Instantiating formula (41) with all_0_5_5 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (802) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (812)  ~ (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_5_5) = 0)
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							| (1320) all_437_0_7900 = 0
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																							|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| Equations (1320) can reduce 1330 to:
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|
% 71.77/33.33  																																																																																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																				| (1350)  ~ (all_562_0_7931 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_562_0_7931
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																				|
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (1350) yields:
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																					| (1312)  ~ (all_562_0_7931 = 0)
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																					| (1352) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_562_0_7931
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																					| Instantiating formula (97) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_562_0_7931 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_562_0_7931, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																					| (1302) all_562_0_7931 = 0
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																					| Equations (1302) can reduce 1312 to:
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																					| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																					|
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																		| (1355)  ~ (all_461_0_7906 = 0) & distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_461_0_7906
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																		|
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (1355) yields:
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																			| (1297)  ~ (all_461_0_7906 = 0)
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																			| (1357) distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_461_0_7906
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																			|
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																			| Instantiating formula (97) with all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2, 0, all_461_0_7906 and discharging atoms distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = all_461_0_7906, distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																			| (1287) all_461_0_7906 = 0
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																			|
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																			| Equations (1287) can reduce 1297 to:
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																			| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																			|
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																	| (825)  ~ (distinct_points(all_0_5_5, all_0_2_2) = 0)
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																	| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																	|
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																		| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																		| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																		|
% 71.77/33.34  																																																																																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.34  					|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.34  					| (1363)  ~ (all_45_0_61 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_45_0_61
% 71.77/33.34  					|
% 71.77/33.34  						| Applying alpha-rule on (1363) yields:
% 71.77/33.34  						| (203)  ~ (all_45_0_61 = 0)
% 71.77/33.34  						| (1365) convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_45_0_61
% 71.77/33.34  						|
% 71.77/33.34  						| Instantiating formula (120) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_45_0_61, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_45_0_61, convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.34  						| (1366) all_45_0_61 = 0
% 71.77/33.34  						|
% 71.77/33.34  						| Equations (1366) can reduce 203 to:
% 71.77/33.34  						| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.34  						|
% 71.77/33.34  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.34  			|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.34  			| (1368)  ~ (all_63_0_82 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_63_0_82
% 71.77/33.34  			|
% 71.77/33.34  				| Applying alpha-rule on (1368) yields:
% 71.77/33.34  				| (196)  ~ (all_63_0_82 = 0)
% 71.77/33.34  				| (1370) convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_63_0_82
% 71.77/33.34  				|
% 71.77/33.34  				| Instantiating formula (120) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_63_0_82, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_63_0_82, convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.34  				| (1371) all_63_0_82 = 0
% 71.77/33.34  				|
% 71.77/33.34  				| Equations (1371) can reduce 196 to:
% 71.77/33.34  				| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.34  				|
% 71.77/33.34  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.34  		|-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.34  		| (1373)  ~ (all_64_0_83 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_64_0_83
% 71.77/33.34  		|
% 71.77/33.34  			| Applying alpha-rule on (1373) yields:
% 71.77/33.34  			| (193)  ~ (all_64_0_83 = 0)
% 71.77/33.34  			| (1375) convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_64_0_83
% 71.77/33.34  			|
% 71.77/33.34  			| Instantiating formula (120) with all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8, all_64_0_83, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_64_0_83, convergent_lines(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.34  			| (1376) all_64_0_83 = 0
% 71.77/33.34  			|
% 71.77/33.34  			| Equations (1376) can reduce 193 to:
% 71.77/33.34  			| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.34  			|
% 71.77/33.34  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.34  |-Branch two:
% 71.77/33.34  | (1378)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0) & convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_46_0_62
% 71.77/33.34  |
% 71.77/33.34  	| Applying alpha-rule on (1378) yields:
% 71.77/33.34  	| (186)  ~ (all_46_0_62 = 0)
% 71.77/33.34  	| (1380) convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_46_0_62
% 71.77/33.34  	|
% 71.77/33.34  	| Instantiating formula (120) with all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6, all_46_0_62, 0 and discharging atoms convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = all_46_0_62, convergent_lines(all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 71.77/33.34  	| (332) all_46_0_62 = 0
% 71.77/33.34  	|
% 71.77/33.34  	| Equations (332) can reduce 186 to:
% 71.77/33.34  	| (189) $false
% 71.77/33.34  	|
% 71.77/33.34  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 71.77/33.34  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 71.77/33.34  
% 71.77/33.34  32726ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------