TSTP Solution File: GEO190+2 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : GEO190+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 05:04:58 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 1.16s
% Output : Solution 1.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3975/GEO190+2.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3975/GEO190+2.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3975/GEO190+2.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 4071
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:~(distinct_points(X1,X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', apart1)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>(distinct_points(X1,X3)|distinct_points(X2,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', apart4)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))=>(distinct_points(X3,X1)&distinct_points(X3,X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', con1)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X4]:![X5]:((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_lines(X4,X5))=>(((apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X5))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X4))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X5))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', cu1)).
% fof(10, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)=>(distinct_lines(X2,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ceq2)).
% fof(13, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_points(X1,X3))&distinct_points(X2,X3))&~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))))=>~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X2,X1)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', con)).
% fof(14, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_points(X1,X3))&distinct_points(X2,X3))&~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))))=>~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X2,X1))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[13])).
% fof(15, plain,![X1]:~(distinct_points(X1,X1)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[1,theory(equality)])).
% fof(18, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_points(X1,X3))&distinct_points(X2,X3))&~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))))=>~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X2,X1))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[14,theory(equality)])).
% fof(19, plain,![X2]:~(distinct_points(X2,X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[15])).
% cnf(20,plain,(~distinct_points(X1,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[19])).
% fof(21, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|(distinct_points(X1,X3)|distinct_points(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(22, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(distinct_points(X4,X5))|(distinct_points(X4,X6)|distinct_points(X5,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[21])).
% cnf(23,plain,(distinct_points(X1,X2)|distinct_points(X3,X2)|~distinct_points(X3,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[22])).
% fof(24, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|(~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)))|(distinct_points(X3,X1)&distinct_points(X3,X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(25, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(distinct_points(X4,X5))|(~(apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5)))|(distinct_points(X6,X4)&distinct_points(X6,X5)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[24])).
% fof(26, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((distinct_points(X6,X4)|~(apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))))|~(distinct_points(X4,X5)))&((distinct_points(X6,X5)|~(apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))))|~(distinct_points(X4,X5)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[25])).
% cnf(27,plain,(distinct_points(X3,X2)|~distinct_points(X1,X2)|~apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26])).
% cnf(28,plain,(distinct_points(X3,X1)|~distinct_points(X1,X2)|~apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[26])).
% fof(32, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X4]:![X5]:((~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|~(distinct_lines(X4,X5)))|(((apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X5))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X4))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X5))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5])).
% fof(33, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:((~(distinct_points(X6,X7))|~(distinct_lines(X8,X9)))|(((apart_point_and_line(X6,X8)|apart_point_and_line(X6,X9))|apart_point_and_line(X7,X8))|apart_point_and_line(X7,X9))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[32])).
% cnf(34,plain,(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)|~distinct_lines(X3,X2)|~distinct_points(X4,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[33])).
% fof(45, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2))|(distinct_lines(X2,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10])).
% fof(46, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X4,X5))|(distinct_lines(X5,X6)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[45])).
% cnf(47,plain,(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|distinct_lines(X3,X2)|~apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[46])).
% fof(56, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:((((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_points(X1,X3))&distinct_points(X2,X3))&~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))))&apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X2,X1))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(57, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:?[X6]:((((distinct_points(X4,X5)&distinct_points(X4,X6))&distinct_points(X5,X6))&~(apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))))&apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X5,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[56])).
% fof(58, negated_conjecture,((((distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)&distinct_points(esk1_0,esk3_0))&distinct_points(esk2_0,esk3_0))&~(apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))))&apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[57])).
% cnf(59,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58])).
% cnf(60,negated_conjecture,(~apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58])).
% cnf(63,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58])).
% cnf(66,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,X1)|distinct_points(esk2_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[23,63,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(70,negated_conjecture,(distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0),X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[47,59,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(83,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[20,66,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(108,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X2)|~distinct_points(X1,X3)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[34,70,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(432,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[108,83,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1419,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk1_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|~distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[27,432,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1421,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk1_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1419,83,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1422,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk1_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1421,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1423,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1422,20,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1443,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|~distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[28,1423,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1447,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1443,83,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1448,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1447,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1449,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1448,20,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1456,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[60,1449,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1462,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk1_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|~distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[28,1456,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1466,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk1_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1462,63,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1467,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk1_0)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1466,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1468,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1467,20,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1473,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)|~distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[27,1468,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1476,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1473,63,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1477,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1476,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1478,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1477,20,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1479,negated_conjecture,($false),1478,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 427
% # ...of these trivial : 0
% # ...subsumed : 300
% # ...remaining for further processing: 127
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 2
% # Backward-rewritten : 3
% # Generated clauses : 995
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 760
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 90
% # Paramodulations : 671
% # Factorizations : 324
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 103
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 8
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 4
% # Non-unit-clauses : 91
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 343
% # ...number of literals in the above : 2002
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4668
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2742
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 2
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 2
% # Backwards rewriting index: 46 leaves, 1.89+/-1.821 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 27 leaves, 1.41+/-0.991 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 42 leaves, 1.62+/-1.194 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.101 s
% # System time : 0.005 s
% # Total time : 0.106 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.23 CPU 0.31 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.23 CPU 0.31 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3975/GEO190+2.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------