TSTP Solution File: GEO190+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GEO190+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 03:44:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 9.38s 2.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  11 unt;  13 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   71 (   0 equ;  21 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dwkq5oau/input.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(i_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dwkq5oau/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | distinct_points(X3,X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dwkq5oau/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dwkq5oau/input.p',i_0_18) ).

cnf(i_0_19,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)
    | ~ distinct_points(X4,X1)
    | ~ distinct_lines(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dwkq5oau/input.p',i_0_19) ).

cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dwkq5oau/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dwkq5oau/input.p',i_0_15) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X2,X3)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dwkq5oau/input.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X3,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X3,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dwkq5oau/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X1) ),
    i_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0)),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | distinct_points(X3,X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X3,X1) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    i_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)
    | apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)
    | ~ distinct_points(X4,X1)
    | ~ distinct_lines(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0),X1)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk1_0,X1)
    | distinct_points(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,X3)
    | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    i_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X2,X3)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X3)) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ distinct_points(X3,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X3,X2)) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_32])]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_38])]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_45]),c_0_32])]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_46]),c_0_38])]),c_0_35]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.08  % Problem  : GEO190+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.09  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 06:53:19 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.13/0.38  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.38  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.13/0.38  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.13/0.38  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 9.38/2.76  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 9.38/2.76  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 9.38/2.76  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 9.38/2.76  
% 9.38/2.76  # Proof found!
% 9.38/2.76  # SZS status Theorem
% 9.38/2.76  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.38/2.76  # Proof object total steps             : 28
% 9.38/2.76  # Proof object clause steps            : 19
% 9.38/2.76  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 9.38/2.76  # Proof object conjectures             : 9
% 9.38/2.76  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 6
% 9.38/2.76  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 9.38/2.76  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 9.38/2.76  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 9.38/2.76  # Proof object generating inferences   : 10
% 9.38/2.76  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 12
% 9.38/2.76  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.38/2.76  # Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 9.38/2.76  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 9.38/2.76  # Initial clauses                      : 19
% 9.38/2.76  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 9.38/2.76  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 19
% 9.38/2.76  # Processed clauses                    : 166
% 9.38/2.76  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 9.38/2.76  # ...subsumed                          : 86
% 9.38/2.76  # ...remaining for further processing  : 78
% 9.38/2.76  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 9.38/2.76  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 9.38/2.76  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 9.38/2.76  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 9.38/2.76  # Generated clauses                    : 593
% 9.38/2.76  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 463
% 9.38/2.76  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 17
% 9.38/2.76  # Paramodulations                      : 377
% 9.38/2.76  # Factorizations                       : 216
% 9.38/2.76  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 9.38/2.76  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 9.38/2.76  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 9.38/2.76  # Current number of processed clauses  : 73
% 9.38/2.76  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 9.38/2.76  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.38/2.76  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 9.38/2.76  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 61
% 9.38/2.76  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 300
% 9.38/2.76  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1525
% 9.38/2.76  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 9.38/2.76  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 9.38/2.76  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1301
% 9.38/2.76  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 787
% 9.38/2.76  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 87
% 9.38/2.76  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 9.38/2.76  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 9.38/2.76  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 9.38/2.76  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 9.38/2.76  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 9.38/2.76  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 9.38/2.76  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6949
% 9.38/2.76  
% 9.38/2.76  # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.38/2.76  # User time                : 0.022 s
% 9.38/2.76  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 9.38/2.76  # Total time               : 0.027 s
% 9.38/2.76  # ...preprocessing         : 0.015 s
% 9.38/2.76  # ...main loop             : 0.013 s
% 9.38/2.76  # Maximum resident set size: 7140 pages
% 9.38/2.76  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------