TSTP Solution File: GEO190+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : GEO190+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 05:04:52 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.98s
% Output   : Solution 0.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31559/GEO190+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31559/GEO190+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31559/GEO190+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 31655
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.012 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:~(distinct_points(X1,X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', apart1)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>(distinct_points(X1,X3)|distinct_points(X2,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', apart4)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ci1)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ci2)).
% fof(6, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X4]:![X5]:((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_lines(X4,X5))=>(((apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X5))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X4))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X5))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', cu1)).
% fof(9, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)=>(distinct_lines(X2,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', ceq2)).
% fof(15, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_points(X1,X3))&distinct_points(X2,X3))&~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))))=>~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X2,X1)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', con)).
% fof(16, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_points(X1,X3))&distinct_points(X2,X3))&~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))))=>~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X2,X1))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[15])).
% fof(17, plain,![X1]:~(distinct_points(X1,X1)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[1,theory(equality)])).
% fof(18, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[3,theory(equality)])).
% fof(19, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(distinct_points(X1,X2)=>~(apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[4,theory(equality)])).
% fof(24, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:((((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_points(X1,X3))&distinct_points(X2,X3))&~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))))=>~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X2,X1))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[16,theory(equality)])).
% fof(25, plain,![X2]:~(distinct_points(X2,X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[17])).
% cnf(26,plain,(~distinct_points(X1,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[25])).
% fof(27, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|(distinct_points(X1,X3)|distinct_points(X2,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(28, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(distinct_points(X4,X5))|(distinct_points(X4,X6)|distinct_points(X5,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[27])).
% cnf(29,plain,(distinct_points(X1,X2)|distinct_points(X3,X2)|~distinct_points(X3,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[28])).
% fof(30, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|~(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[18])).
% fof(31, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(distinct_points(X3,X4))|~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X3,X4)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[30])).
% cnf(32,plain,(~apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2))|~distinct_points(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[31])).
% fof(33, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|~(apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[19])).
% fof(34, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(distinct_points(X3,X4))|~(apart_point_and_line(X4,line_connecting(X3,X4)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[33])).
% cnf(35,plain,(~apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X1))|~distinct_points(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[34])).
% fof(39, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X4]:![X5]:((~(distinct_points(X1,X2))|~(distinct_lines(X4,X5)))|(((apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X5))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X4))|apart_point_and_line(X2,X5))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[6])).
% fof(40, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:((~(distinct_points(X6,X7))|~(distinct_lines(X8,X9)))|(((apart_point_and_line(X6,X8)|apart_point_and_line(X6,X9))|apart_point_and_line(X7,X8))|apart_point_and_line(X7,X9))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[39])).
% cnf(41,plain,(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)|~distinct_lines(X3,X2)|~distinct_points(X4,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[40])).
% fof(47, plain,![X1]:![X2]:![X3]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2))|(distinct_lines(X2,X3)|apart_point_and_line(X1,X3))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[9])).
% fof(48, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(~(apart_point_and_line(X4,X5))|(distinct_lines(X5,X6)|apart_point_and_line(X4,X6))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[47])).
% cnf(49,plain,(apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|distinct_lines(X3,X2)|~apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[48])).
% fof(64, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:?[X3]:((((distinct_points(X1,X2)&distinct_points(X1,X3))&distinct_points(X2,X3))&~(apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))))&apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X2,X1))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[24])).
% fof(65, negated_conjecture,?[X4]:?[X5]:?[X6]:((((distinct_points(X4,X5)&distinct_points(X4,X6))&distinct_points(X5,X6))&~(apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))))&apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X5,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[64])).
% fof(66, negated_conjecture,((((distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)&distinct_points(esk1_0,esk3_0))&distinct_points(esk2_0,esk3_0))&~(apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))))&apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[65])).
% cnf(67,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[66])).
% cnf(68,negated_conjecture,(~apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[66])).
% cnf(71,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[66])).
% cnf(74,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk1_0,X1)|distinct_points(esk2_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[29,71,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(76,negated_conjecture,(distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0),X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[49,67,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(83,negated_conjecture,(distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[26,74,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(98,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)|apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X2)|~distinct_points(X1,X3)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[41,76,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(384,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[98,83,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1349,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|~distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[35,384,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1350,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1349,83,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1351,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk2_0,esk1_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1350,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1359,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|~distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[32,1351,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1360,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1359,83,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1361,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)|apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1360,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1366,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[68,1361,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1369,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|~distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[32,1366,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1370,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1369,71,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1371,negated_conjecture,(apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1370,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1405,negated_conjecture,(~distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[35,1371,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1407,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1405,71,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1408,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1407,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1409,negated_conjecture,($false),1408,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 388
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 268
% # ...remaining for further processing: 120
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 2
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 1
% # Generated clauses                  : 948
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 719
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 78
% # Paramodulations                    : 644
% # Factorizations                     : 304
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 98
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 8
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 4
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 86
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 353
% # ...number of literals in the above : 1992
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3982
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2392
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 1
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index:    45 leaves,   1.87+/-1.628 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:           27 leaves,   1.44+/-1.030 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:           40 leaves,   1.60+/-1.114 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.097 s
% # System time            : 0.003 s
% # Total time             : 0.100 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.19 CPU 0.28 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.19 CPU 0.28 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31559/GEO190+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------