TSTP Solution File: GEO190+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO190+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.36s 5.60s
% Output   : Refutation 5.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : GEO190+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 03:42:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.34  The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.34  Sat Jun 18 03:42:24 2022
% 0.12/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 7490.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.34  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.12/0.34  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.34  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.34     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.34  
% 0.12/0.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.37  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.37  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.37  number of clauses in intial UL: 15
% 0.12/0.37  number of clauses initially in problem: 19
% 0.12/0.37  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 0.12/0.37  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.37  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.37  absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.12/0.37     distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.12/0.37     distinct function count: 2
% 0.12/0.37     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  =========== start of search ===========
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 5.36/5.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 5.36/5.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 4 [ 1 1 64 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 5 [ 1 1 67 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 6 [ 1 0 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 7 [ 2 0 119 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 8 [ 2 0 74 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 9 [ 2 0 82 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 10 [ 3 1 74 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 11 [ 3 0 111 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 12 [ 4 0 78 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 13 [ 4 1 226 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 14 [ 5 1 63 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 15 [ 5 0 76 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   5.23 sec ----> 1169 [binary,1168.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Length of proof is 20.  Level of proof is 10.
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 5.36/5.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 5.36/5.60  % SZS output start Refutation
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  1 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,A).
% 5.36/5.60  4 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 5.36/5.60  7 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(A,line_connecting(A,B)).
% 5.36/5.60  8 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -apart_point_and_line(B,line_connecting(A,B)).
% 5.36/5.60  11 [] {+} -distinct_points(A,B)| -distinct_lines(C,D)|apart_point_and_line(A,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,D)|apart_point_and_line(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(B,D).
% 5.36/5.60  13 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line(A,B)|distinct_lines(B,C)|apart_point_and_line(A,C).
% 5.36/5.60  15 [] {+} -apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c3,$c2)).
% 5.36/5.60  16 [] {+} distinct_points($c3,$c2).
% 5.36/5.60  19 [] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,line_connecting($c2,$c3)).
% 5.36/5.60  20 [hyper,16,4] {+} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points($c2,A).
% 5.36/5.60  23 [hyper,19,13] {-} distinct_lines(line_connecting($c2,$c3),A)|apart_point_and_line($c1,A).
% 5.36/5.60  25 [hyper,20,4] {-} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points($c3,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 5.36/5.60  26 [hyper,20,1] {+} distinct_points($c2,$c3).
% 5.36/5.60  34 [hyper,23,11,26] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,A)|apart_point_and_line($c2,line_connecting($c2,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c2,A)|apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c2,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c3,A).
% 5.36/5.60  50 [hyper,25,1] {-} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points(A,$c3).
% 5.36/5.60  52 [hyper,25,4] {-} distinct_points($c2,A)|distinct_points($c3,B)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 5.36/5.60  53 [factor,52.1.3,unit_del,1] {-} distinct_points($c3,A)|distinct_points(A,$c2).
% 5.36/5.60  58 [hyper,50,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points($c2,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 5.36/5.60  60 [hyper,53,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c2)|distinct_points($c3,B)|distinct_points(A,B).
% 5.36/5.60  62 [hyper,58,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points($c2,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 5.36/5.60  63 [hyper,58,1] {+} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,$c2).
% 5.36/5.60  83 [hyper,60,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c2)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points($c3,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 5.36/5.60  155 [hyper,34,7,63,unit_del,1] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,A)|apart_point_and_line($c2,A)|apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c2,$c3))|apart_point_and_line($c3,A).
% 5.36/5.60  289 [hyper,62,1] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(B,$c2).
% 5.36/5.60  297 [hyper,289,4] {-} distinct_points(A,$c3)|distinct_points(B,$c2)|distinct_points(A,C)|distinct_points(B,C).
% 5.36/5.60  319 [hyper,83,1] {-} distinct_points(A,$c2)|distinct_points(A,B)|distinct_points(B,$c3).
% 5.36/5.60  965 [hyper,155,8,319,unit_del,1,1] {-} apart_point_and_line($c1,A)|apart_point_and_line($c2,A)|apart_point_and_line($c3,A).
% 5.36/5.60  1085 [hyper,965,8,53,unit_del,15,1] {+} apart_point_and_line($c3,line_connecting($c3,$c2)).
% 5.36/5.60  1168 [hyper,1085,7,297,unit_del,1,factor_simp] {-} distinct_points(A,$c2).
% 5.36/5.60  1169 [binary,1168.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  % SZS output end Refutation
% 5.36/5.60  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  ============ end of search ============
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  true clauses given          13      (18.8%)
% 5.36/5.60  false clauses given         56
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60        FALSE     TRUE
% 5.36/5.60     5  0         1
% 5.36/5.60    10  8         0
% 5.36/5.60    12  6         15
% 5.36/5.60    13  16        8
% 5.36/5.60    14  4         0
% 5.36/5.60    15  22        9
% 5.36/5.60    16  20        16
% 5.36/5.60    17  4         0
% 5.36/5.60    18  0         1
% 5.36/5.60    19  6         22
% 5.36/5.60    22  0         3
% 5.36/5.60    23  0         13
% 5.36/5.60    25  0         28
% 5.36/5.60    26  0         70
% 5.36/5.60    28  2         74
% 5.36/5.60    29  0         148
% 5.36/5.60    31  3         96
% 5.36/5.60    32  0         107
% 5.36/5.60    33  0         3
% 5.36/5.60    34  0         62
% 5.36/5.60    36  0         11
% 5.36/5.60    39  0         12
% 5.36/5.60    41  0         2
% 5.36/5.60    42  0         13
% 5.36/5.60    44  0         4
% 5.36/5.60    45  0         6
% 5.36/5.60    47  0         2
% 5.36/5.60  tot:  91        726      (88.9% true)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Model 15 [ 5 0 76 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 5.36/5.60  
% 5.36/5.60  Process 7490 finished Sat Jun 18 03:42:29 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------