TSTP Solution File: GEO189+3 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : GEO189+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:23:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   9 unt;   7 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   32 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(5,axiom,
    ~ distinct_lines(u,u),
    file('GEO189+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ~ incident_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)),
    file('GEO189+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(u,v),u),
    file('GEO189+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(u,parallel_through_point(v,u)),
    file('GEO189+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(18,axiom,
    ( equal_lines(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(u,v) ),
    file('GEO189+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ( incident_point_and_line(u,v)
    | apart_point_and_line(u,v) ),
    file('GEO189+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | convergent_lines(u,v) ),
    file('GEO189+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(26,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | ~ equal_lines(u,v) ),
    file('GEO189+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(31,axiom,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(v,w)
    | distinct_lines(u,w) ),
    file('GEO189+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(38,axiom,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(v,w)
    | apart_point_and_line(u,w) ),
    file('GEO189+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(71,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(skc3,line_connecting(skc5,skc4)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[20,8]),
    [iquote('0:Res:20.1,8.0')] ).

cnf(98,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(parallel_through_point(u,v),u),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[22,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:22.1,9.0')] ).

cnf(149,plain,
    ( equal_lines(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(v,w)
    | distinct_lines(u,w) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[18,31]),
    [iquote('0:Res:18.1,31.0')] ).

cnf(246,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[71,38]),
    [iquote('0:Res:71.0,38.0')] ).

cnf(252,plain,
    ( ~ equal_lines(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),u)
    | apart_point_and_line(skc3,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[246,26]),
    [iquote('0:Res:246.0,26.0')] ).

cnf(454,plain,
    ( equal_lines(u,v)
    | distinct_lines(v,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[149,5]),
    [iquote('0:Res:149.2,5.0')] ).

cnf(467,plain,
    equal_lines(u,parallel_through_point(u,v)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[454,98]),
    [iquote('0:Res:454.1,98.0')] ).

cnf(468,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(skc3,parallel_through_point(line_connecting(skc5,skc4),u)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[467,252]),
    [iquote('0:Res:467.0,252.0')] ).

cnf(469,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[468,10]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:468.0,10.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : GEO189+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 03:50:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.48  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS derived 401 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 298 clauses.
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS allocated 97861 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.48  SPASS spent	0:00:00.12 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.48  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 19 :
% 0.20/0.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.48  Formulae used in the proof : apart2 con cp1 cp2 ax2 a4 p1 apart5 ceq2
% 0.20/0.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------